Att_J.8.pdf

Solicitation NO. R14PS01024

Blue Mesa, Morrow Point, and Crystal Powerplants Generator Rewinds and Excitation System

Replacements

Attachment J-8

Past Performance Questionnaire Glen Canyon Power Plant

Middle River Division – Glen Canyon Unit – Arizona – Utah Colorado River Storage Project

Attachment J-8 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SOLICITATION NUMBER (R14PS01024)

A firm has submitted a proposal in response to the Bureau of Reclamation solicitation cited above, which included your firm’s/agency name as a reference for Past Performance evaluation purposes.

Past performance is an important evaluation criterion for this acquisition; therefore, your input on this firm is very important to us.

We would greatly appreciate your time in providing us with an objective assessment of this firm by completing this electronic Past Performance Questionnaire. Please include comments to explain each rating given. You may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings.

When responding to the questionnaire, please refer to the rating criteria shown below and select the rating that best fits the firm’s performance on your contract/project.

QUESTIONNAIRE RETURN INSTRUCTIONS:

Please save this file using “Save as,” and use your company/agency name to create the filename. Questionnaire respondents are requested to either fax or e-mail the completed questionnaire to Washington Bennett, Contract Specialist, at (801-524-3857) wbennett@usbr.gov. In either case, the questionnaire needs to be submitted no later than the solicitation closing date.

If you have questions, please contact Mr. Bennett via email at wbennett@usbr.gov or by phone at 801-524-3853.

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS:

OUTSTANDING

No risk anticipated with delivery or installation of quality product, on time, or of any degradation of performance or lack of customer satisfaction (or cost growth if applicable) based upon offeror’s past performance.

BETTER

Very little risk anticipated with delivery or installation of quality product, on time, or of degradation of performance of lack of customer satisfaction (or cost growth if applicable) based upon the offeror’s past performance.

SATISFACTORY

Some potential risk anticipated with delivery or installation of quality product, on time, and of degradation or lack of customer satisfaction (or cost growth if applicable) based upon the offeror’s past performance.

MARGINAL

Significant potential risk anticipated with delivery or installation of quality product, on time, and of degradation of performance based upon the offeror’s past performance.

UNACCEPTABLE

Delivery or installation of product or service did not meet the minimum standards set forth in the contract.

NEUTRAL No relevant past performance available for evaluation

Attachment J-8 2

A. Evaluator, please provide your Company/Agency and PoC Information:

Information On Company Providing Evaluation:

Company Name:

Company Address:

Point of Contact:

Name:

Phone Number:

B. Information on Company and Work Being Evaluated:

1. Company Providing Services:

2. Contract Number(s):

3. Company Address:

4. Contract Type:

Firm-Fixed Price Cost-Reimbursement Other (Specify Type):

5. Period of Performance:

6. Contract Value:

a. Original Contract Value:

b. Final Contract Value:

7. Title(s) of Contract(s):

8. Description of Contract Work:

9. Complexity of Work: Difficult Routine Other (specify):

10. Percentage of work subcontracted: No-Subcontracting

C. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE:

1. Quality Control and Technical Past Performance:

a. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures which resulted in a quality finished project.

Outstanding Better Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable Neutral

Comments:

b. Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedule(s).

c. Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

Attachment J-8 3

d. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punch-list items.

e. As-built drawings were accurate, to include all change order corrections, and submitted when required.

f. Identification/correction of deficient work accomplished in a timely manner.

2. Timely Performance:

a. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time, as scheduled.

b. [Government Agencies Only] Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if Liquidated Damages were assessed).

c. Contractor submitted progress schedule and interim progress reports as required.

Attachment J-8 4

d. Contractor provided on-time submittals as required.

Comments:

e. Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items.

3. General Business Practices:

a. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed and maintained communication with the Government to keep the project on schedule or minimize potential delays.

b. Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested realistic approaches to problems; displayed initiative to solve problems; and performed as a “Team Member”.

c. Contractor realigned performance schedules to meet your firm’s needs when changes were required.

d. Contractor responded to warranty issues within the timeframes specified in the contract.

e. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Attachment J-8 5

f. Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

Comments:

g. Contractor hired quality Subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

4. Pricing:

a. Contractor provided complete, supportable, timely, accurate, and reasonable cost proposals that met the requirements of the project or modification. They were not over-inflated nor were they underestimated.

b. Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or design projects or modifications within the scope specified.

c. Contractor submitted proposals that accurately represented the work required/requested.

5. Site Management/Superintendent:

a. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations.

b. Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.

Attachment J-8 6

6. Compliance with Labor Standards:

a. Contractor submitted payrolls in a timely manner.

b. Contractor compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Davis-Bacon Act.

7. Compliance with Safety Standards:

a. Implementation of Safety Plan.

b. Adequacy of Safety Plan.

8. Subcontractor Management:

a. How would you rate the Contractor’s management of subcontracts considering promptness in resolving problems and ensuring compliance with contract requirements?

9. Customer Satisfaction:

Attachment J-8 7

a. Your firm would have no reservation in awarding another contract to the Contractor.

Signature____________________________________________________ Date________________________