Question_and_Response_(Addendum_1).pdf
PDF 349 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 0000032369
- Issued by
- Alameda County, Alpine County, Amador County, Butte County, Calaveras County, Colusa County, Contra Costa County, Del Norte County, El Dorado County, Fresno County, Glenn County, Humboldt County, Imperial County, Inyo County, Kern County, Kings County, Lake County, Lassen County, Los Angeles County, Madera County, Marin County, Mariposa County, Mendocino County, Merced County, Modoc County, Mono County, Monterey County, Napa County, Nevada County, Orange County, Placer County, Plumas County, Riverside County, Sacramento County, San Benito County, San Bernardino County, San Diego County, San Francisco County, San Joaquin County, San Luis Obispo County, San Mateo County, Santa Barbara County, Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County, Shasta County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, Solano County, Sonoma County, Stanislaus County, Sutter County, Tehama County, Trinity County, Tulare County, Tuolumne County, Ventura County, Yolo County, Yuba County, Alameda City, Alpine Village CDP, Amador City, Amador Pines CDP, Sutter Creek City, Butte Creek Canyon CDP, Butte Meadows CDP, Butte Valley CDP, Rancho Calaveras CDP, Colusa City, Contra Costa Centre CDP, Auburn Lake Trails CDP, El Dorado Hills CDP, Placerville City, South Lake Tahoe City, Fresno City, Kingsburg City, Orange Cove City, San Joaquin City, Shaver Lake CDP, Blue Lake City, Humboldt Hill CDP, Imperial City, Alta Sierra CDP, China Lake Acres CDP, Glennville CDP, Inyokern CDP, Kernville CDP, Lake Isabella CDP, Lake of the Woods CDP, Lakeside CDP, Hidden Valley Lake CDP, Lakeport City, Lower Lake CDP, North Lakeport CDP, Upper Lake CDP, East Los Angeles CDP, Elizabeth Lake CDP, Lake Hughes CDP, Lake Los Angeles CDP, Lakewood City, Los Angeles City, Marina Del Rey CDP, Monterey Park City, San Marino City, Sierra Madre City, Bass Lake CDP, Madera City, Madera Acres CDP, Madera Ranchos CDP, Yosemite Lakes CDP, Corte Madera Town, Lucas Valley-Marinwood CDP, Marin City CDP, Lake Don Pedro CDP, Mariposa CDP, Mendocino CDP, Merced City, University of California-Merced CDP, Lake City CDP, Crowley Lake CDP, June Lake CDP, Mammoth Lakes Town, Mono City CDP, Twin Lakes CDP, Virginia Lakes CDP, Marina City, Monterey City, Napa City, Lake of the Pines CDP, Lake Wildwood CDP, Nevada City, Lake Forest City, Orange City, Kings Beach CDP, Bucks Lake CDP, Lake Almanor Country Club CDP, Lake Almanor Peninsula CDP, Lake Almanor West CDP, Lake Davis CDP, Plumas Eureka CDP, Canyon Lake City, Lake Elsinore City, Lakeland Village CDP, Lake Mathews CDP, Lake Riverside CDP, Lakeview CDP, Riverside City, Orangevale CDP, Sacramento City, Big Bear Lake City, Lake Arrowhead CDP, San Bernardino City, Silver Lakes CDP, Spring Valley Lake CDP, Alpine CDP, Imperial Beach City, Lake San Marcos CDP, Rancho San Diego CDP, San Diego City, San Diego Country Estates CDP, San Francisco City, Lake Nacimiento CDP, San Luis Obispo City, Emerald Lake Hills CDP, San Mateo City, South San Francisco City, Santa Barbara City, University of California-Santa Barbara CDP, Santa Clara City, Santa Cruz City, Lakehead CDP, Shasta CDP, Shasta Lake City, Sierra Brooks CDP, Sierra City CDP, Sierraville CDP, Lake Shastina CDP, Mount Shasta City, Sonoma City, Sonoma State University CDP, Monterey Park Tract CDP, Orange Blossom CDP, Sutter CDP, Yuba City, Lake California CDP, Rancho Tehama Reserve CDP, Tehama City, Trinity Center CDP, Trinity Village CDP, East Tulare Villa CDP, Tulare City, Mono Vista CDP, Phoenix Lake CDP, Pine Mountain Lake CDP, Sierra Village CDP, Tuolumne City CDP, Lake Sherwood CDP, West Sacramento City, Yolo CDP, Plumas Lake CDP, California
About this file
This document is an Addendum to an Invitation for Bid (IFB) issued by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) for Pre-Employment Psychological Screening services. The IFB requires the selected contractor to provide psychological screening of all applicants for the Department's peace officer positions. The contract will have an initial term of up to 7 years, with a minimum appointment requirement of 52 appointments per month, per site, averaged over any 24 distinct billing months within the contract period. The IFB indicates the contract award will be made to the responsive, responsible bidder whose bid is the lowest in price.
The addendum clarifies the appointment requirement, stating that the 52 appointments per month, per site, can be averaged over any 24 distinct billing months within the 7-year contract period, and do not need to be consecutive. The addendum also notes there is no requirement for a specific number of appointments per month, as long as the 24-month average equals 52 per month, per site.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum_1_Memo.pdf | ||
| IFB_Number_C5612474-D_Pre-Employment_Psychological_Screening.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_B-1.1_through_B-1.3_Rate_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation IFB Number C5612474-D Question and Response Addendum 1
Pre-Employment Psychological Screening IFB Number C5612474-D Question and Response
Question 1: Could you please clarify regarding the language on the minimum appointment per month, per site. Does the average need to be 52 appointments over a 2-year period, or does every month have to be 52 appointments or more. Do they have to be in consecutive 2 years or just any 24 months.
Response 1: The totals must average out to 52 per month, per site for any 24 distinct billing months. These months need not be consecutive. For example, if the bidder can produce 24 separate monthly invoices from a specific site, that fall within the allotted 7-year window (2017- 2024) and that site averages out to 52, then it is sufficient. Whichever 24 invoices the bidder chooses to submit for each region (provided all invoices bear the bidding agency’s name) average out to be 52 per month in that site. It does not matter that some months have fewer than 52 interviews and others had more than 52. What matters is the average equals 52 per month, per site.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .