The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
| Performance Objective |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Surveillance Method |
| Rating |
| Delivery Timeliness |
| Orders must be delivered within 4 days of order placement. |
| 98% of deliveries per month must arrive on schedule. |
| 100% Inspection of supplies received against order placed by Technical Point of Contact (TPOC). |
| Cold-Chain Intergrity |
| Temperature-sensitive supplies must be transported and delivered at required temperatures set in Section 2.2 of SOW. |
| 100% compliance. Zero compromised shipments allowed. |
| Visual verification of active continuous temperature data loggers upon receipt. |
| Lot Expirations Dates |
| Supplies must have a minimum shelf life of 6 months remaining upon delivery. |
| 98% of delivered items per shipment must meet the threshold. |
| Random sampling of 10% of packages per delivery batch. |
| Lot Numbers |
| Lot numbers shall be identical for each batch of reagents; lot sequestration is required. |
| 98% of delivered items per shipment must meet the threshold. |
| Random sampling of 10% of packages per delivery batch. |
| Order Accuracy & Completeness |
| Delivered shipments must match the packing slip item numbers, quantities, and lot numbers. |
| 99% accuracy rate per monthly evaluation period. |
| 100% Inspection against the original Purchase Order. |
| Product Condition |
| All shipments must arrive free of punctures, leaks, broken seals, or crushed packaging. |
| 100% Complaince |
| Visual inspection of external packaging and individual kits at the loading dock. |
Performance Ratings The performance ratings below reflect definitions at FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1. The COR will use these rating to evaluate the quality of contractor’s performance.
Performance Rating Definition
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |