QASP PB and COR Quarterly Report 47QFSA21K0148 Nov 2 2021.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
COVID Response - Import Permit Program - DSAT
Solicitation number
47QFSA22R0001
Issued by

About this file

This document outlines a quality assurance surveillance plan and contracting officer's representative quarterly report for a federal contract providing COVID response import permit program services. Key details include:

  • The contractor must adhere to a detailed performance work statement and quality control plan. Performance is evaluated across metrics such as on-time deliverable submission and report accuracy. Surveillance includes monthly inspections with incentives for compliance and penalties for deficiencies.

  • Deliverables encompass monthly technical and financial reports, draft and final comprehensive project summaries, property management, and service contract reporting. Performance standards specify timeliness, accuracy and completeness thresholds.

  • The contracting officer's representative will submit quarterly performance reviews assessing quality, schedule, cost control, business relations, management, and small business considerations. An annual contractor performance assessment report will incorporate these evaluations.

  • The General Services Administration Federal Acquisition Service will award a firm-fixed-price contract for these COVID response import permit program support services through full and open competition solicitation 47QFSA22R0001. Evaluation prioritizes technical capability, staffing approach and past performance over price.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE BASED

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN AND CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE QUARTERLY REPORT

FOR: COVID RESPONSE - IMPORT PERMIT PROGRAM - DSAT

Acquisition ID #: 47QFSA21K0148

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed to evaluate contractor actions while implementing this Performance Work Statement (PWS). It is designed to provide an effective surveillance method of monitoring contractor performance for each listed objective on the Performance Requirements Matrix in the task order. The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the services the contractor is required to furnish.

The contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the task order. The role of the Government is quality assurance to ensure task order standards are achieved.

In this task order the quality control program is the driver for product quality. The contractor is required to develop a comprehensive program of inspections and monitoring actions. The first major step to ensuring a “self-correcting” task order is to ensure that the quality control program approved at the beginning of the task order provides the measures needed to lead the contractor to success.

Once the quality control program is approved, careful application of the process and standards presented in the remainder of this document will ensure a robust quality assurance program.

PWS Ref
Deliverable or Performance Requirement
Performance Standards
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
Method of Surveillance
Incentive
4.1
Schedule Inspections
Inspections are scheduled in adherence to requested schedule
100% completeness
100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting/Withhold Payment
4.5
Prepare inspection report
Inspection reports are written with minimum mistakes observed as outlined in defined performance standard
accuracy, no substantive errors, and clarity;

100% of compliance with timeliness

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting/Withhold Payment
7(a)(1)
Monthly Technical Report
Comprehensive and accurate report provided by10th calendar day of each month
accuracy, no substantive errors, and clarity;

100% of compliance with timeliness

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting
7(a)(2)
Monthly Financial Letter Report
Comprehensive and accurate report provided by10th calendar day of each month
accuracy, no substantive errors, and clarity;

100% of compliance with timeliness

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting
7(a)(3)
Draft Final Report
Comprehensive and accurate report provided by 120 days before end of contract
accuracy, no substantive errors, and clarity;

100% of compliance with timeliness;

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting
7(a)(4)
Final Report
Comprehensive and accurate report provided within 30 days of notification
accuracy, no substantive errors, and clarity;

100% of compliance with timeliness;

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting
7(c)
Project Management Plan
Comprehensive and accurate; report provided as required by COR
accuracy, no substantive errors, and clarity;

100% of compliance with timeliness;

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting
12.0
Return Government Furnished Property
As Required and/or Request by the Government
Timeliness
100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting/Withhold Payment/Price Reduction
18.1
Essential Personnel
Government notification.

Number of days without staff coverage and/or not meeting requirement 100% Compliance

99% of days per month have full staff coverage 100% Inspection

Periodic Inspection CPAR Reporting

CPAR Reporting/Price Reduction

33.0
FAR 52.204-14 Service Contract Reporting Requirements
As Required
100% Compliance,

Timeliness

100% Inspection
CPAR Reporting

SURVEILLANCE

The Government will evaluate the performance objectives through surveillance as reflected above by reviews and acceptance of work products and services.

STANDARD

The Contractor shall perform all work required in a satisfactory manner in accordance with the appropriate PWS paragraph. The QA shall not consider the services complete until all deficiencies have been corrected. The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) shall notify the Contracting Officer for appropriate action if any of the above performance objectives are not in accordance with acceptable AQL.

PROCEDURES

The COR will inspect all tasks required by the task order to ensure Contractor compliance with the task order requirements. Inspection results will be recorded in a Surveillance Log noting the date, time and result of inspection or verification.

The COR will document all defects using a “Task Discrepancy Report (TDR)”. The COR will verbally notify the GSA Project Manager (PM) or Contracting Officer (CO) of the defect and will submit a copy of the TDR as an Action Memo in ITSS to the GSA PM/CO. The COR will ensure the TDR is completed in its entirety and coordinated through the Contracting Officer. The Contractor will also be furnished a copy of the TDR. The Contractor shall furnish their response to the TDR. The Contractor’s response will address the accuracy and validity of the defect, planned corrective action and actions to prevent recurrence. The TDR information will be included when assessing the Contractor’s overall performance (i.e., past performance assessments, exercise of options, etc.).

If any of the services do not conform to the task order requirements, the Government may require the Contractor to perform the services again in conformity with task order requirements. The Contractor must correct the defect(s) within the timeframes established in the PWS. The COR shall not certify satisfactory performance for the task order until all defects have been corrected.

When the defects in services cannot be corrected by re-performance, the Government may:

1) Require the Contractor to take necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to task order requirements; and,

2) Reduce the task order price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed.

The COR shall, in addition to providing documentation to the GSA PM/CO, maintain a complete quality assurance file. The file will contain copies of all reports, evaluations, recommendations, and any actions relating to the Government’s performance of the quality assurance function, including originals of all surveillance activity checklists. All such records will be retained for the life of the task order. The COR shall forward these records to the GSA PM/CO at completion or termination of the task order.

The COR shall upload a copy of the Surveillance Log in ASSIST, Collaboration Tool addressed to the GSA CO at least once every three months.

10 Jan – 09 Apr (due to GSA CS/CO NLT 19 Apr) 10 Apr – 09 Jul (due to GSA CS/CO NLT 19 Jul) 10 Jul – 09 Oct (due to GSA CS/CO NLT 19 Oct) 10 Oct – 09 Jan (due to GSA CS/CO NLT 19 Jan)

ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICES

Acceptance of services shall be based upon compliance with performance standards described in the PWS and surveillance procedures described in this QASP. Prior to approving/certifying any Contractor invoices, the COR will verify that all invoiced services have been performed in compliance with task order requirements. The COR shall not certify satisfactory performance for the task order until all defects have been corrected.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

The purpose of a COR Quarterly Report is to document the performance of the contractor every three months, with the intent to aid in a successful annual CPARS submission. To capture contractor performance, select the most appropriate rating definition that corresponds with each rating category. Rating definitions are provided below. The Quarterly COR Report should be completed and submitted by the COR, along with Surveillance Logs.

The COR shall upload a copy of the Quarterly COR Report in the ASSIST, Collaboration Tool addressed to the GSA CO.

Surveillance Log Task Order Title: COVID Response - Import Permit Program – DSAT Acquisition ID #: 47QFSA21K0148

AWARD ID: TBD

Task Order Period of Performance: ________________

Surveillance Period: _______________________

Task Requirement

PWS

Ref.

Method of Surveillance Date Accomplished

Compliance Results

Shaw Gargis: __________________________________________ Date:____________________________

Task Discrepancy Report Acquisition ID #: 47QFSA21K0148

AWARD ID: TBD

1. Task Order Number:
2. Report Number

3. To: (Contractor and Manager’s Name)

4. From: (Name of Client Representative)

5. Dates

Prepared:
Returned by Contractor
Action Completed

6. Discrepancy or Problem: (Describe in detail; include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

Contractor Response

7. To: (Contracting Officer)

8. From: (Contractor)

9. Contractor Response as to Cause, Corrective Action and Actions to Prevent Recurrence; Attach continuation sheet if necessary. (Cite applicable Q.C. program procedures or new Q.C. procedures)

10. Government Evaluations (Acceptance, partial acceptance, rejection: attach continuation sheet if necessary)

11. Government Actions (Reduced payment, cure notice, show cause, other)

Closeout

Name-Title
Signature
Date

Contractor Notified

Client Rep

CO/PM

Quarterly COR Report Acquisition ID #: 47QFSA21K0148

AWARD ID: TBD

Quarterly COR Report

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Contract Name:

Contract POP:

Location of Service:

Contracting Officer:

COR:

Date
Quality
Schedule
Cost Control
Business Relations
Management
Small Business
Overall Performance
Significant issues for SCO attention. (If rating for any category is unsatisfactory then a rationale must be provided)
(a) Exceptional
(b) Very Good
(c) Satisfactory
(d) Marginal
(e) Unsatisfactory

CPARS Evaluation Rating Definitions (see FAR 42.1503(h)(4))

(a) Exceptional
(b) Very Good
(c) Satisfactory
(d) Marginal
(e) Unsatisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Note: To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order.
Note: To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).
Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .