QASP Elevator Inspection.pdf
PDF 349 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25026Q0363
About this file
This is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for elevator inspection and certification services at the Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). The contract covers annual and semi-annual inspection and certification services for 32 elevator vertical transportation systems, plus 5-year full load testing and 30-day follow-up inspections for failed items. The contract period runs from May 1, 2026 through April 30, 2031, comprising a base year and four option years. The Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COR) is Robert Davis, who serves as the Electric Shop Supervisor. The facility elevators are located across multiple buildings on the Cleveland VA campus and are separated into three groups for quarterly inspection purposes.
The QASP establishes five performance standards, all with 100% acceptable quality levels: Accessibility (periodic inspection capability), Professional Oversight (adherence to state and federal safety and privacy regulations), Implementation of VA Medical Waste Removal Policies, Costs (correct billing per contract terms), and HIPAA Compliance (protection of private health information). Surveillance methods include direct observation via daily web-based temperature monitoring system checks, periodic monthly inspection with flash reports and meetings, validated user/customer complaints through the Maximo work order system, periodic sampling for suspected deficiencies, 24/7 monitoring software alerts, and progress standard meetings at the Contracting Officer's discretion. The contractor must return completed inspection checklists to the COR no later than seven days before month-end. Performance is rated as Excellent (exceeds standards), Satisfactory (meets standards), or Unsatisfactory (fails to meet standards), with exercise of option periods used as the primary incentive. The COR conducts quarterly performance assessment meetings with written evaluations, and unacceptable performance triggers a Contract Discrepancy Report requiring corrective action plans.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 36C25026Q0363.pdf | ||
| SOW Elevator Inspections.pdf | ||
| WD.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
For: Louis Stokes VAMC Elevator Inspection
Contract Number: Elevator Inspection with 30-day follow-up inspections
Time period:
Base Year: 5-1-2026 – 4-30-2027 Option Year One: 5-1-2027 – 4-30-2028 Option Year Two: 5-1-2028 – 4-30-2029 Option Year Three: 5-1-2029 – 4-30-2030 Option Year Four: 5-1-2030 – 4-30-2031
Contract Description: Provide elevator inspection and annual certification services for 32 elevator vertical transportation systems.
Contractor’s name:
1. Purpose:
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
What will be monitored.
o Annual elevator inspection o Semi-Annual elevator inspection o 30-day follow-up inspection o Schedule coordination
How monitoring will take place.
o Facility elevators are located at multiple areas within several buildings of the Cleveland VA campus. separated into 3 groups for quarterly inspection purposes.
COR will provide COR with inspection checklists during each visit Contractor will coordinate inspection with elevator maintenance contractor The contractor will complete inspection and checklist.
The contractor will return the checklist to COR no later than 7 days before the end of month is issued.
The contractor will complete 30-day follow-up inspections for failed items identified during the inspection.
The contractor will schedule with elevator maintenance contractor and complete 5-year full load testing.
o Inventory Parts on Hand Inspection
N/A o Preventative Maintenance
Contractor will complete annual and semiannual certification inspections.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: ______________________ Organization or Agency: _______________________________________________________
b. Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall ensure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: ___Robert Davis__________
c. Other Key Government Personnel – N/A
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
Name/Title: Robert Davis, Electric Shop Supervisor, COR___________________
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
Task ID Indicator Standard Acceptable
Quality Level
Method of Surveillance
Incentive
VAMC needs Annual and Semi-Annual, inspection and 5-year full load testing of passenger and freight elevators
1 Accessibility
Periodic Inspection- (Evaluates outcomes on a periodic basis.
Inspections may be scheduled [Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, or annually] or unscheduled, as required.)
100%
Can be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance
Exercise of Option Period
Professional Oversight
Contracted vendors will adhere to all State and Federal regulations for safety and patient privacy
100%
Review of State and corporate privacy policies
Exercise of Option Period
Implement VA policies on Medical Waste Removal Services
Contractor will implement and manage policies established by the VA, 100%
Review of reports and destruction records
Exercise of Option Period
4 Costs
The contractor will bill the VA correctly based on the terms of the contact
100% Review of billing statements
Exercise of Option Period
HIPPA
Compliance
Adherence to
HIPPA
The contractor must adhere to the provisions of HIPPA and the National Standards to Protect the Privacy and Security of Protected Health Information
(PHI)
100%
Direct Observation and Validated User/Customer Complaints
Exercise of Option Period
Comments:
5. INCENTIVES
The Government shall use Exercise of Options (if any) and Past Performance as incentives.
Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. The end user will sign into the web and perform a daily check on the temperature monitoring system.
b. PERIODIC MONTHLY INSPECTION. Monthly flash reports will be produced, and a meeting will be conducted to discuss ongoing issues.
c. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. The Maximo work order system will be improvised. Written complaints from Staff and Patients will be documented and passed on to the Contracting Officer.
d. PERIODIC SAMPLING. To be used if there is a problem/deficiency that is suspected.
e. 100% INSPECTION. Monitoring software provides 24/7 365 days a year system status and alerts.
f. PROGRESS STANDARD MEETINGS. To be used based on the Contracting Officers Discretion.
7. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
Excellent = Exceeds Standards Satisfactory = Meets Standards Unsatisfactory = Fails to Meet Standards
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor should correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COTR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR shall meet with the contractor quarterly to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
Signature – Contractor Program Manager
Signature – Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .