Q and A 8995 Economic Impact Study eff.12.06.2021-2 docx.pdf
PDF 109 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Economic Impact Study
- Solicitation number
- S-63400-00001264
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to Amendment 3 of Oregon Parks and Recreation Department's (OPRD) Solicitation No. 8995 for an Economic Impact Study. The study aims to assess the impact of Oregon's heritage sites, properties, organizations, events, and other heritage-related interests on the state's economy. The study will include a report and a messaging tool based on the results. The document provides clarification on the survey methodology, the scope of heritage sites and organizations, and the page limit for proposal submissions. The contract opportunity is open to qualified contractors to provide professional consulting services for the study.
The contract opportunity involves Marion County and the city of Salem as the jurisdictions. Pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, and other salient information are not explicitly stated in the provided documents.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum 2~2.pdf | ||
| Attach B - Disclosure Exemption.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach A - Sample Contract.pdf | ||
| Q and A 8995 Economic Impact Study eff.12.06.2021.pdf | ||
| 8995 RFP Economic Impact Study.pdf | ||
| Attach C - Proposer Information and Certification.docx | DOCX document | |
| Workmanship Standards~4.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q and A 8995 Economic Impact Study eff.12.06.2021(2)docx.docx Page 1 of 1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS POSTED 12/06/2021(2)
AMENDMENT 3 TO OREGONBUYS BID S-63400-00001264
OPRD SOLICITATION NO. 8995
ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
The following information is being provided to potential Proposers for clarification purposes in accordance with Section 3.3.2 Questions / Requests for Clarification of the Solicitation Document.
CLARIFICATIONS:
1) QUESTION: Page 12, Section 3.5.2.3, second bullet mentions “survey methodology” as part of the evaluation criteria. Can you please provide more information on the survey that the Commission is seeking as part of this study?
ANSWER: The intention was for this to say “study methodology”. A survey is not required unless it is a part of the Proposer’s study methodology.
2) QUESTION: Page 5, Section 2.4, third paragraph describes the types of organizations included as “heritage.” Is there an existing inventory of heritage sites that would be included in this study that OPRD can provide, or is there any further detail on the scope of sites and organizations that would be included in this study?
ANSWER: We have included a definition on page 4 as “For the purpose of this study, organizations, places, and activities to consider as heritage include, but are not limited to, museums, historical societies, historic cemeteries, historic downtowns, historic properties, historic districts, heritage preservation organizations, and designated heritage traditions.”
OPRD’s Heritage Division does have databases related to various heritage organizations, interests, and designations that have participated in our programs that we would be able to use to generate lists of contacts related to this study.
3) Page 12, Section 3.2.2 references the page limit and provides examples of exempted items. Can you please confirm whether or not section dividers and intentionally blank pages will be counted towards the pages limit, or will they be exempted?
ANSWER: Intentionally blank pages will not be counted towards the page limit. Section dividers containing ONLY the title or number of the section in the proposal will not be counted towards the page limit.
END OF Q&A
| AMENDMENT 3 TO OREGONBUYS BID S-63400-00001264 |
| OPRD SOLICITATION NO. 8995 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .