PPQ Form GSA1142-15c .docx
DOCX document 750 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Moakley Elevators Modernization Project Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 47PB0022R0012
About this file
This past performance questionnaire is used by the General Services Administration to evaluate contractors' performance on prior federal contracts. It requests ratings on quality, schedule, customer satisfaction, management, cost, safety, and general performance. Responses are due by a specified month and year. The questionnaire must be completed by a government contracting officer or corporate official and relates to Solicitation Number TBD for an unspecified project.
The solicitation is for the Moakley Elevators Modernization Project under Solicitation Number 47PB0022R0012. The General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 1 is seeking modernization of elevators at the Moakley Federal Building through the attached solicitation and agreement documents. Requested specifications are available upon request.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation Name Solicitation No.: TBD Section X.X-X Page 1 Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Past Performance - Questionnaire
Thank you in advance for filling out this questionnaire for the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). We understand that your time is very valuable and we appreciate your input. Your rating is essential in successfully evaluating your contractors past performance.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:
1. This form should be completed by the Government Contracting Officer (or Corporate Official for Commercial Experience).
2. GSA Requests the Government Contracting Officer (or Corporate Official for Commercial Experience) completes this questionnaire and submits directly to GSA by XX Month, Time.
3. Provide an adjectival rating for the following questions (the adjectival rating is defined on page 2).
4. Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
5. E-mail questionnaires to: aasd.sed@gsa.gov
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
DRAFT
Solicitation
Name
Solicitation
No.:
TBD
Section
X.X-X Page
Source
Selection
Information
See
FAR
2.101 and
3.104
DRAFT
Solicitation
Name
Solicitation
No.:
TBD
Section
X.X-X Page
Source
Selection
Information
See
FAR
2.101 and
3.104
1. QUALITY:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
b) Rate the Contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
d) Overall customer satisfaction
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
c) Government Property Control
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
I) Effectively transition personnel and operations when taking over from the incumbent contractor?
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
DRAFT
Solicitation
Name
Solicitation
No.:
TBD
Section
X.X-X Page
Source
Selection
Information
See
FAR
2.101 and
3.104 4.
MANAGEMENT/
PERSONNEL/LABOR:
DRAFT
Solicitation
Name
Solicitation
No.:
TBD
Section
X.X-X Page
Source
Selection
Information
See
FAR
2.101 and
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
d) Is the Contractor's accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
6. SAFETY/SECURITY:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
DRAFT
Solicitation
Name
Solicitation
No.:
TBD
Section
X.X-X Page
Source
Selection
Information
See
FAR
2.101 and
3.104
DRAFT
Solicitation
Name
Solicitation
No.:
TBD
Section
X.X-X Page
Source
Selection
Information
See
FAR
2.101 and
7. GENERAL:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
b) Compliance with contractual terms/ provisions (explain if specific issues)
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U) or Not Applicable (N).
Brief Narrative
Please provide additional remarks (if applicable). Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.png image20.png image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image25.png image26.png image27.png image28.png image29.png image30.png image31.png image32.png image33.png image34.png image35.png image36.png image37.png image38.png image39.png image40.png image41.png image42.png image43.png image44.png image45.png image46.png image47.png image48.png image49.png image50.png image51.png image52.png image53.png image54.png image55.png image56.png image57.png image58.png image59.png image60.png image61.png image62.png image63.png image64.png image65.png image66.png image67.png image68.png image1.jpeg image69.png image70.png image71.png image72.png image73.png image74.png image75.png image76.png image77.png image78.png image2.png image79.png image80.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .