PP Report.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Management Program Support Services
- Solicitation number
- N0018926QW068
About this file
This is a Past Performance Report Form to be submitted by vendors' customers to support evaluation of contractor performance for solicitation N0018926QW068. The form is structured as a template for customer references to complete and return directly to the Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Groton Office Contracting Department, specifically to Larissa Benoit at larissa.v.benoit.civ@us.navy.mil, no later than the solicitation closing date. The form requests information about the contractor's previous contract performance, including contract details (number, amount, type, period of performance, and business address) and the customer's organizational information.
The Past Performance Quality Rating Table evaluates contractors across five primary categories: Quality and Meeting Contract Requirements (addressing customer satisfaction, rework/deficiency reports, and innovative work applications); Timeliness (measuring schedule compliance and submission responsiveness); Contractor Responsiveness (assessing problem identification and resolution effectiveness); Cost Control (determining compliance with agreed pricing and explaining cost variances); and Additional Observations/Information (soliciting overall strengths and weaknesses, future work willingness, knowledge of similar contracted efforts, and referrals to other relevant points of contact). This form is used by the Naval Supply System to assess the probability of successful contract accomplishment for the Advanced Management Program Support Services contract, a Firm-Fixed-Price single-award IDIQ contract for instructor-based training services supporting the Navy Supply Corps School in Newport, Rhode Island, issued under FAR Part 12 with a Woman-Owned Small Business set-aside.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT FORM
(To be filled by the vendor’s customers and sent directly to the Contract Specialist) Solicitation N00189-26-Q-W068
Complete and return NLT the solicitation closing date to:
Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Groton Office Contracting Department, Attn: Larissa Benoit, Code 245.2 Email larissa.v.benoit.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of :
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the U.S. Naval Supply System (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
0. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
0. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
0. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
1. Quality/Timeliness.
1. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
1. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
1. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
1. respond to customer concerns
1. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
1. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
1. Additional Observations/Information
1. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
1. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
1. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
1. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
N0018926QW068
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .