PKG00294042.pdf

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of International Labor Affairs

Program Office:

Office of Trade and Labor Affairs

Notice of Availability of Funds and Funding Opportunity Announcement for:

Ensuring “Pro-American Worker” Critical Minerals Supply Chains in the Western Hemisphere

Announcement Type: Discretionary Cooperative Agreement

Funding Opportunity Number: FOA-ILAB-26-30

Assistance Listing Number: 17.401

Key Dates: The closing date for receipt of applications under this announcement is September 21, 2026. Applications must be received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.

All technical questions related to the content of this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) must be submitted no later than 10 business days prior to the close date of the FOA.

Award decisions are expected to be made between September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2026.

The Department will make its best efforts to make award decisions within this timeframe, but please be aware that there are a variety of circumstances that may result in a later or earlier than expected award decision.

To apply: Submit applications via https://www.grants.gov/ in response to this funding opportunity number.

Please refer to Section IV for application submission instructions.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB), U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL, or the Department), announces the availability of approximately $5 million total costs (subject to the availability of Federal funds) for one (1) cooperative agreement to fund a project to strengthen labor standards compliance and transparency in Western Hemisphere critical mineral supply chains to advance U.S. manufacturing competitiveness.

https://www.grants.gov/

The duration of the project will be 36 months from the award date. Applicants may propose a shorter period of performance in line with their proposed strategy. The project will focus on strengthening American manufacturing by advancing labor standards compliance and transparency in critical mineral supply chains in Chile and/or Argentina. Applicants may choose to work in one or both countries. Applicants must choose one or more of the following critical minerals: copper, lithium, and/or silver. Applicants who choose to work in both countries must select at least one (1) critical mineral per country. Applicants can select the same mineral for both countries or choose different minerals for each country.

Applicants must propose context-responsive strategies in Argentina and/or Chile to address unfair labor practices that disadvantage U.S. workers in critical mineral supply chains.

Strategies should aim to reduce labor-related supply chain risks in target countries for essential critical minerals supplies that support advanced manufacturing jobs in the United States. Applicants are encouraged to develop innovative strategies. Some illustrative examples of activities could include providing technical support to governments, sharing technical guidance with employers, and developing policy or enforcement standards.

Applicants must ensure that their proposed activities and geographic focus align with all requirements of the FOA (e.g., country limitations, sectors, thematic areas, etc.) and respond directly to the programmatic intent described in Section I. Successful awardees must ensure that their activities align and comply with all relevant policies, Executive Orders, and strategies of the federal government for the life of the project regarding objectives, outcomes, monitoring and evaluation, fiscal transparency, and operational governance. Failure to align and comply risks termination of the project.

Eligible applicants include any commercial, international, educational, or non-profit organizations, including any faith-based organizations, community-based organizations, or public international organizations. Please see section III of this funding opportunity announcement for complete eligibility requirements.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Table of Contents

I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

A. PROGRAM PURPOSE

B. PROGRAM AUTHORITY

C. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

II. AWARD INFORMATION

A. AWARD TYPE AND AMOUNT

B. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

A. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

B. COST SHARING OR MATCHING

C. OTHER INFORMATION

1. Application Screening Criteria

2. Number of Applications to be Submitted

IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

A. HOW TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION PACKAGE

B. CONTENT AND FORM OF APPLICATION SUBMISSION

1. Technical Proposal

2. Cost Proposal

3. Submission Date, Times, and Process

C. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW

D. FUNDING RESTRICTIONS

E. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

F. OTHER SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

V. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION

A. CRITERIA

B. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS

1. Merit Review and Selection Process

2. Risk Review Process

VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION

A. AWARD NOTICES

B. ADMINISTRATIVE AND NATIONAL POLICY REQUIREMENTS

1. General Requirements

2. Audits and Attestation Engagements

3. Administrative Standards

4. Other Legal Requirements

5. Other Administrative Standards

6. Special Program Requirements

C. REPORTING

1. Quarterly Federal Financial Report (SF 425, FFR)

2. Semi-Annual Technical Progress Reports

3. Final Technical Report

4. Indirect Cost Rates

5. Closeout Reports

VII. AGENCY CONTACTS

VIII. OTHER INFORMATION

A. OMB INFORMATION COLLECTION

IX. APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: Acronyms APPENDIX B: Definitions

I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

A. PROGRAM PURPOSE

The Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) increases American job and wage growth by combatting foreign labor abuses and unfair trade practices in global supply chains that undermine U.S. prosperity and security. ILAB works to ensure that U.S. workers and businesses benefit from the Administration’s trade and labor policies by countering overseas labor practices that impede fair competition, including through the robust enforcement of labor provisions in trade agreements.

See ILAB’s webpage for additional information: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab.

ILAB will incorporate Transparency Tiers and Financial Health Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to identify implementing partners that demonstrate strong fiscal stewardship, operational efficiency, and low administrative burden. These requirements support the initiatives established under Administration policy guidance and 2 CFR part 200.

This FOA solicits applications to implement one project with the objective to strengthen labor standards compliance and transparency in Western Hemisphere critical minerals supply chains to advance U.S. manufacturing competitiveness.

B. PROGRAM AUTHORITY

ILAB is authorized to award and administer grants and cooperative agreements by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, Pub. L. 119-75 (February 3, 2026).

C. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This project will focus on strengthening labor standards compliance and transparency in Western Hemisphere critical mineral supply chains to advance U.S. manufacturing competitiveness.

Critical minerals such as copper, lithium, and silver are crucial to U.S. national and economic security as necessary inputs for manufacturing, automotive and electronics industries, energy infrastructure, telecom networks, and artificial intelligence.0F

1 The Presidential Proclamation on “Adjusting Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and their Derivative Products into the United States” and Executive Order 14241 “Immediate Measures To Increase American Mineral Production” instruct the United States to improve domestic mining and processing capacity of critical minerals, while simultaneously securing reliable supply chains of critical minerals while domestic production ramps up.1F

1 U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026. February, 2026. See also U.S. Department of Interior. Interior Department Release Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals. November 14, 2025.

2 U.S. Government. “Adjusting Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and Their Derivative Products into the United States” Proclamation. January 14, 2026. See also U.S. Government. Executive Order (E.O. 14241) “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production.”

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026.pdf https://www.usgs.gov/news/science-snippet/interior-department-releases-final-2025-list-critical-minerals https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/01/adjusting-imports-of-processed-critical-minerals-and-their-derivative-products-into-the-united-states/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/01/adjusting-imports-of-processed-critical-minerals-and-their-derivative-products-into-the-united-states/

Chile and Argentina are important critical minerals supply chain partners for the United States.

The United States has signed a critical minerals agreement with Argentina and a joint declaration with Chile to guard against unfair trade practices within the Western Hemisphere, to create secure and reliable supply chains of critical minerals, and to facilitate the opening of new projects with U.S. investment. While the United States has reserves and mining projects for many critical minerals—including copper, lithium, and silver—that employ thousands of American workers it imports the remaining needed supply for U.S. manufacturers from countries like Chile and Argentina.2F

3 Chile is the United States’s primary supplier of refined copper, representing 68 percent of total refined copper imports in 2025. Similarly, Argentina and Chile are the United States’s nearly sole sources of lithium, representing a combined 97 percent lithium imports. Over 50 percent of U.S. lithium consumption is from imported lithium, 57 percent of U.S. copper consumption is from imported copper, and 77 percent of U.S. silver consumption is from imported silver.3F

Chinese investment in the mining operations in Argentina and Chile leaves American manufacturers and their supply chains vulnerable to Chinese control or influence. Chinese State- Owned Enterprises are increasing investment and ownership of copper and lithium mines and processing facilities in both Chile and Argentina, allowing China to be the largest importer of lithium and copper from both countries.4F

5 Despite Chile having the world’s largest reserves of copper, China’s copper refining represented 50 percent of the world total in 2025. Similarly, over 60 percent of the world’s lithium processing capacity is based in China.5F

6 Globally, evidence suggests that Chinese firms and operations commit widespread human rights violations in all stages of the critical minerals supply chain, including denial of fundamental labor rights like workplace safety and health.6F

7 Significant Chinese investment in critical minerals extraction and refining assets in the Western Hemisphere undercuts American workers by dominating the supply of these minerals.

As new mining projects begin construction and production, the mining workforce in Argentina and Chile continues to face labor challenges driven by price shocks, labor disputes, occupational safety and health concerns, and negotiation of collective bargaining agreements. For example, in Chile, labor tensions remain elevated in the mining sector, where unions continue pressing for higher wages and benefits amid strong global copper demand.7F

8 Mining operations that do not respect workers’ fundamental rights at work—including freedom of association, collective bargaining, and occupational safety and health—risk compromising industrial relations and creating supply chain challenges for American companies, hurting U.S. manufacturing workers.

3 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. 2025 Annual Report to Congress. November 2025 4 U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026. February, 2026 5 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. 2025 Annual Report to Congress. November 2025.

6 U.S. Energy Information Administration. China dominates global trade of battery minerals. May 21, 2025. See also Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026. Urban, M. Status of Chinese Investments in Argentinian Lithium Mines.

Tearline, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, March 5, 2024.

7 Business and Human Rights. Unpacking clean energy: Human rights impacts of Chinese overseas investment in transition minerals - Business and Human Rights Centre, July 6, 2023.

8 Ibid. Salta News. Hundreds of Workers Reportedly Laid Off in Just Two Weeks by Lithium Company in Salta. July 28, 2025. See also Madhiraju, Pallavi. Why Capstone Copper’s latest mine dispute could ripple through Chile’s.

Business News Today. January 3, 2026.

https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2025-11/2025_Annual_Report_to_Congress.pdf https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026.pdf https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2025-11/2025_Annual_Report_to_Congress.pdf https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026.pdf https://www.tearline.mil/public_page/china-investment-in-argentinian-lithium https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/briefings/unpacking-clean-energy-human-rights-impacts-of-chinese-overseas-investment-in-transition-minerals/ https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/briefings/unpacking-clean-energy-human-rights-impacts-of-chinese-overseas-investment-in-transition-minerals/ https://saltanews.com/saltanews/economy/mining/23-hundreds-of-workers-reportedly-laid-off-in-just-two-weeks-by-lithium-company-in-salta.html https://business-news-today.com/why-capstone-coppers-latest-mine-dispute-could-ripple-through-chiles-copper-sector/

Securing sources of critical minerals produced under fair working conditions that reflect the cost of production by workers who are afforded their rights is crucial to prevent unfair competition with the U.S. critical minerals sector, while simultaneously ensuring that American manufacturers have the inputs they need.8F

By advancing and supporting labor standards compliance in these supply chains, the United States can source critical minerals free from disruption due to unfair labor practices to support domestic high-value manufacturing jobs, while protecting the domestic mining and mineral processing and industry as new domestic projects come online. By focusing on fair labor standards in Argentine and/or Chilean mines, the project will support labor standards compliance in mining operations that the U.S. government has identified as strategic priorities to support American manufacturers that create American jobs.9F

10 The project will create sources of supply that help American manufacturers meet their responsible sourcing goals, reduce compliance risks under U.S. laws prohibiting the importation of goods made with forced labor, and meet labor requirements under U.S. international financing programs. A high-standard supply chain within the Western Hemisphere will help provide U.S. manufacturers and businesses a competitive advantage in countering China and providing a reliable, high value alternative to Chinese mineral processing for both domestic use and potential export.

Applicants must propose context-responsive strategies in Argentina and/or Chile to address unfair labor practices that disadvantage U.S. workers in critical mineral supply chains.

Strategies should aim to reduce labor-related supply chain risks in target countries for essential critical minerals supplies that support advanced manufacturing jobs in the United States. Activities should demonstrate meaningful multi-stakeholder engagement with relevant government agencies, workers and worker organizations, and employers. For example, input from key stakeholders should be incorporated into the project throughout the design and implementation phases. All strategies will be finalized in consultation with the grantee and ILAB and are subject to the 6-month validation process to refine strategies post-award.

Applicants are encouraged to develop innovative approaches as project strategies. For the purpose of the technical proposal, illustrative examples of activities include but are not limited to:

• Providing technical guidance by identifying needs and gaps for governments to improve and uphold transparency and enforcement integrity within the labor inspectorate

• Providing technical guidance for employers to uphold labor standards in new and established mining or mineral refining or processing projects

• Strengthening industrial relations in the mining or mineral refining/processing sector and upcoming mining or mineral refining/processing projects that align with U.S.

critical mineral initiatives

• Providing technical guidance or support for implementation of multi-stakeholder assurance systems for mineral mining, processing, or supply chain tracing to ensure

9 International Labor Organizations (ILO). How labour governance is key to securing critical mineral supply chains | International Labour Organization. March 23, 2026.

10 Ibid. U.S. Department of State. 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial. February 4, 2026.

https://www.ilo.org/resource/article/how-labour-governance-key-securing-critical-mineral-supply-chains https://www.ilo.org/resource/article/how-labour-governance-key-securing-critical-mineral-supply-chains https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/02/2026-critical-minerals-ministerial/ alignment with international standards and create reliable sources of supply for U.S. manufacturers

• Developing policy or enforcement measures to ensure labor standards compliance across all employment providers, including subcontractors and service providers, to strengthen minimum wages, occupational safety and health standards, and freedom of association

When developing proposals, applicants should use ILAB’s evidence resources available online, including Meta-Evaluation Options Paper April 2023.

II. AWARD INFORMATION

A. AWARD TYPE AND AMOUNT

Funding will be provided in the form of a cooperative agreement. Approximately $5 million total costs is expected to be available to fund approximately one award. Applicants may apply for a ceiling amount of up to $5 million total costs. Awards made under this announcement are subject to the availability of federal funds. In the event that additional funds become available, USDOL reserves the right to increase the amount of an award or to use such funds to select additional recipients from applications submitted in response to this announcement.

In addition to its normal consultative role as grantor, ILAB’s substantial involvement in program activities may focus on elements that are essential to meet program requirements and ensure achievement of program objectives and outcomes. ILAB’s involvement may include, but not be limited to:

• Liaising with in-country USG officials and host country governments on matters related to the project.

• Collaborating substantially on the project strategy and implementation, as well as the development of the project document package.

• Collaborating substantially on project monitoring activities, including but not limited to, work plans, progress reports, evaluations, attestation engagements, site visits, conference calls.

• Collaborating substantially on the development and implementation of the monitoring and evaluation plan and all of its components consistent with applicable federal law, regulations, and policies.

• Providing highly specialized input on the design and implementation of activities related to strengthening international labor standards, labor justice institutions, and legal and policy frameworks, among others.

• Being substantially and actively involved in designing research, service provision, and/or capacity building activities jointly with the recipient.

• Reviewing and providing input on project’s planning and collaborating to promote the continuation of project outcomes and benefits, including through replication of good practices.

https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/Meta-Evaluation-Options-Paper-April-2023-508.pdf

• Providing guidance to ensure alignment with all relevant U.S. Presidential Executive Orders, policy memoranda, and other applicable government directives throughout the project’s lifecycle.

B. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

The required period of performance is 36 months from the award date. This performance period includes all necessary implementation and start-up activities. Only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance may be charged to the federal award (2 CFR 200.1 Period of performance). Applicants may propose a shorter period of performance in line with their proposed strategy.

III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

A. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

The following organizations are eligible to apply:

• U.S. organizations:

o Nonprofits, including any faith-based organizations or community-based organizations o Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education o Private Institutions of Higher Education o Native American tribal organizations (Federally recognized) o For-Profit organizations

• Non-U.S. organizations:

o Non-U.S. Entities, including PIOs, as described in 2 CFR 200.1.

Applicants selected for award, including PIOs, must abide by DOL's requirements in the term and conditions of the award, in alignment with U.S. appropriation laws and applicable U.S.

regulations.

Applicants do not need previous experience managing federal awards, but they must speak persuasively about their ability to leverage other previous experience and bring it to scale in support of a large federal investment.

Faith-based organizations are encouraged to apply, as are all organizations. Those that meet the eligibility requirements may receive awards under this funding opportunity. USDOL will not, in the selection of recipients and administration of the grant, discriminate on the basis of an organization’s religious character, affiliation, exercise, or lack thereof, or on the basis of conduct that would not be considered grounds to favor or disfavor a similarly situated secular organization.

The following types of organizations are not eligible to apply nor to participate as subrecipients/contractors:

• Organizations designated by the U.S. Government to be associated with terrorism.

• Organizations designated by the U.S. Government to have been debarred or suspended.

• Organizations planning to charge a fee (profit) associated with a project funded by a USDOL award.

• Foreign governments and entities that are agencies of, or operated by or for, a foreign state or government are not eligible to apply. However, they may be eligible to participate as a subrecipient in certain instances, subject to USDOL approval. NOTE: If an exception to this subrecipient eligibility criterion might be appropriate, the application must include a detailed justification for the possible exception. USDOL funds are not intended to duplicate existing foreign government efforts or substitute for activities for which such governments have already assumed responsibility. USDOL will make eligibility decisions on a case-by-case basis after receiving the application.

B. COST SHARING OR MATCHING

This program does not require cost sharing or matching funds. Including such funds is not one of the application screening criteria, unless otherwise specified in the proposal requirements.

Absent such a requirement, applications that include any form of cost sharing or match will not receive additional consideration during the review process. Instead, the agency considers any resources contributed to the project beyond the funds provided by the agency as leveraged resources. Section IV.B.2 provides more information on leveraged resources.

C. OTHER INFORMATION

1. Application Screening Criteria

Use the following checklist as a guide when preparing the application package to ensure that the application has met all of the screening criteria. Note that this checklist is only an aid for applicants and should not be included in the application package. It is recommended to use this checklist to ensure that the application contains all required items. If the application does not substantially meet all of the screening criteria, the application will not move forward to the merit review process.

2. Number of Applications to be Submitted

Multiple applications from an organization are not allowed. If multiple applications are received, the most recent application submitted by the deadline will be accepted. If the most recent application is disqualified for any reason, USDOL will not replace it with an earlier application.

Applicant entities are not precluded from participating as partners on another entity’s application.

IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION

INFORMATION

A. HOW TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION PACKAGE

This FOA, found at www.grants.gov, contains all of the information needed to apply for funding.

Applicants should note that it includes hyperlinks to external forms and resources. Applicants are required to comply with all parts of the FOA, including those parts found at the hyperlinks.

Application Requirement Instructions Complete?

The deadline submission requirements are met Section IV.B.3.a Eligibility requirements are met Section III.A The components of the application are saved in any of the specified formats and are not corrupt. (USDOL will attempt to open documents but will not troubleshoot any problems related to opening files.)

Section IV.B.3.b

Applicant has registered with the System for Award Management (SAM) and maintains an active account Section IV.B.2.a

Completed and signed SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance, including a Unique Entity Identifier Number Section IV.B.2.c

Funding request on SF-424 does not exceed the ceiling amount of $5 million total costs. Section II.A

SF-424A, Budget Information Form Section IV.B.2.d Technical Proposal Section IV.B.1 Attachments to Technical Proposal

• Abstract

• Work Plan

• Relevant Sector Experience

• Evidence of Country Presence

• Project Management Organizational Chart

Section IV.B.1

Cost Proposal

• SF-424A Budget Narrative

• Country-Specific Budget Narratives, as applicable

(Chile and/or Argentina).

Section IV.B.2 http://www.grants.gov/

B. CONTENT AND FORM OF APPLICATION

SUBMISSION

Applications submitted in response to this FOA must consist of two separate and distinct parts:

(1) a Technical Proposal, including attachments; and (2) a Cost Proposal, including the SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance and related forms identified as follows. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that the funding amount requested is consistent across all parts of the application. If the funding amount is not consistent, the amount requested on the SF-424 will be considered for the purpose of the award. Applicants who use or plan to use AI platforms (e.g., Copilot, ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.) to develop their applications and/or implement project activities may do so, and are required to provide information about this in their proposals.

1. Technical Proposal

The project will focus on strengthening American manufacturing by supporting labor standards compliance and transparency in critical mineral supply chains in Chile and/or Argentina.

Applicants may choose to work in one or both countries. Applicants must choose one or more of the following critical minerals: copper, lithium, and/or silver. Applicants who choose to work in both countries must select at least one (1) critical mineral per country. Applicants can select the same mineral for both countries or choose different minerals for each country.

Applicants are required to complete all elements of the application package, including the various components of the technical narrative, budget documentation and justification, other narrative materials, and all forms, certifications, and attachments stated as necessary for submission. Applicants must ensure that every element is included according to FOA specifications to avoid disqualification. This includes every section within the categories of the project design, milestones and targets, monitoring and evaluation (M&E), work plan, organizational capacity, key personnel, management plan, budget narrative and budget line-itemization. Failure to include all these elements will render an application package incomplete.

Applicants should use their technical expertise to propose how to meet the requirements of the FOA and must provide justification for their choices based on evidence (see definition in Appendix B), analysis of contextual opportunities and constraints, and available resources within the requirements of the FOA. Applicants must include specific citations to the evidence used to support their proposed project strategy. If there is limited evidence to support the proposed intervention(s), applicants may propose to pilot an innovative approach but must include and describe a plan for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the intervention(s).

All pages of the application must be numbered. All required documents (including attachments) must be submitted in English. Any additional documentation submitted that is not required or specifically requested under this announcement will not be considered during the merit review process.

Technical Proposals must be no more than 50 single-sided, double-spaced pages (8.5 x 11 inches with 1-inch margins). If any page limits required by this FOA for any part of the application are exceeded, the content that exceeds the page limit will not be considered during the merit review process. Font style must be Times New Roman and font size must be 12-point. The Cover Page, Acronyms List, Table of Contents, required attachments to the Technical Proposal, and the Cost Proposal do not count toward the page limit and do not have any spacing restrictions. Different fonts and font sizes may be used for tables, text boxes, and graphics. However, it is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that they are legible and meet electronic submission requirements. Documents which cannot be read or accessed by the Department will not be considered during the merit review process. Please see section IV.B.3. for the file format requirements for electronic submissions.

The following instructions provide all the information needed to complete the Technical Proposal. Applicants should carefully read and consider each section and include all required information. The Technical Proposal will be evaluated using the evaluation criteria identified in Section V, Application Review Information. Applicants must use the same section headers identified in this FOA for each section of the Technical Proposal:

a. Abstract (Executive Summary)

Applicants must submit as an attachment an abstract summarizing the proposed project including, but not limited to, the project objective, proposed outcomes, sub-outcomes (if included in this FOA), outputs, and activities. The abstract should describe the proposed project in plain language and include the following sections:

1) Applicant’s Name and Title for the Project. The applicant’s name and title for the proposed project.

2) Purpose. A brief description of the purpose for the award, including a description of the geographic area to be served (if applicable), population(s) to be served (if applicable), number and description of individuals, groups and institutions5 to be served (if applicable), and the funding level requested.

3) Activities to be Performed. A brief description of award specific activities and other deliverables.

4) Expected Outcomes. The project objective, proposed outcomes, and outputs.

5) Intended Beneficiaries. Intended beneficiary(ies) or recipient(s) of the project activities.

6) Subrecipient Activities. If sub-awards are proposed, then specify the activities to be provided and the name of each proposed sub-awardee, if known.

The abstract is limited to two double-spaced single sided 8.5 x 11-inch pages with 12-point text font, Times New Roman font style, and 1-inch margins. When submitting in Grants.gov, this document must be uploaded as an attachment to the application package and specifically labeled "Abstract." The information provided in the abstract may be published to a public facing website as a summary of the project, should it be selected for award.

b. Table of Contents The table of contents must list all required documents and include their corresponding page numbers.

c. Project Design Narrative The Project Narrative must describe in detail the applicant's response to the FOA. Project

Design must present a coherent, evidence-based narrative that links the identified problem to the proposed intervention strategy, expected outcomes, monitoring and evaluation processes, performance measurement approach, and alignment with Administration priorities.

Applicants must demonstrate how their design reflects logical progression from problem analysis to activities, outputs, outcomes, and long-term impact that is maintained and continued after the conclusion of the ILAB-funded technical assistance. Specifically, the Project Design must include a theory of change demonstrating how proposed activities will lead to an increase in American jobs and wage growth. The Project Design must also include how the applicant plans to monitor results from the project’s full theory of change through to increasing American job and wage growth

The Project Design Narrative must contain the following sections and fully address all associated criteria within each. The Project Design narrative is collectively worth a total of 80 points.

Point Scoring will be allocated for this section as follows:

(1) Literature Review

2 points – Applicants must include a Literature Review describing the data relied upon to design the project and identify the outcomes sought. All assertions of fact, methodologies employed, and monitoring and evaluation analytics should be referenced to materials in the Literature Review.

(2) Project Strategy and Approach

8 points – Activity Execution. Provide a step-by-step description of the strategic approach to deliver the outcomes necessary for achieving project objectives, including a description of all major areas of proposed interventions, demonstration of the long-term sustainability of all efforts, and attainment of outcomes.

5 points – Analytics: Describe the analytical underpinning for project design, monitoring, evaluation, efficacy, and risk assessment. Included in this section must be a detailed description of current and prior programs that address the same problem, within this sector, and within this country by the U.S. government or other entities. In addition, the Analytics must discuss how the activity will compliment, rather than conflict, with current related activities. This includes a list of potential risks along with approaches to mitigate these risks.

5 points – Adaptive Management: Explain key points within the project where tactical changes in project activities are anticipated and how course correction will be implemented and justified to meet project objectives and outcomes.

5 points – Innovation: Identify novel approaches and new technologies, such as the use of digital financial tools, block chain, digital models, and targeted use of artificial intelligence within the project. This involves an expanded comparative analysis to explain how the project approach is different in both kind and degree from past programs addressing the problem.

5 points – U.S. Benefit: Provide a detailed analysis of how this activity in a foreign country (such as, but not limited to: [i] worker’s rights & fair-trade investigation and enforcement, [ii] combating forced labor, trafficked labor, and child labor, and [iii] advocating for multilateral and bilateral terms improving labor standards, etc.) contributes to increased American job and wage growth consistent with Administration objectives using quantitative data and analyses to the appropriate extent practicable.

(3) Project Milestones and Targets

5 points – Provide a table of milestones and expected completion dates. The applicant's Project Milestones and Targets section will be evaluated based on how well it supports the overall project strategy, as well as for how reasonable project targets are with consideration to the allocation of project resources (e.g., budget, staffing) to support the meeting of those targets.

(4) Monitoring and Evaluation

5 points – Outcomes. List the concrete outcomes by which the activity will be assessed.

Adequate M&E staffing capacity and resources must be made clear to support monitoring, evaluation and learning activities throughout the project’s period of performance. The project must align and comply with applicable federal law, regulations, standards and policies, to include the following:

2016 Foreign Aid Transparency and Accountability Act (FATAA) of 2016 (22 USC 2151)

- Requires Federal agencies that administer foreign assistance to “apply rigorous monitoring and evaluation methodologies to such programs that clearly define program logic, inputs, outputs, intermediate outcomes, and end outcomes.”

o OMB M-18-04 Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines for Federal Departments and Agencies that Administer United States Foreign Assistance (January 2018)

2018 Foundations of Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (Evidence Act) of 2018 - Augments GPRMA to promote better use and management of data and evidence, such as through agency learning agendas, evaluation plans, data-driven performance and strategic reviews. A series of Memoranda from OMB provide more detailed guidance to agencies in fulfilling the obligations under this Act:

o Memorandum on Restoring Trust in the Government Through Scientific Integrity and Evidence-Based Policy Making (January 27, 2021) o OMB M-21-27 Evidence-Based Policymaking: Learning Agendas and Annual Evaluation Plans (June 2021) o OMB M-20-12 Program Evaluation Standards and Practices (March 2020) o OMB M-19-23 Learning Agendas, Personnel and Planning Guidance (July 2019)

5 points – Success Criteria: Explain what criteria and measurements will be used to ascertain whether the activity has been successful in delivering the outcomes necessary to achieve the project objectives, consistent with alignment and compliance with Administration policies.

Implementation of the M&E plan includes collection, disaggregation, quality assessment, analysis, and reporting of milestones and indicator data throughout the period of performance as required by USDOL.

(5) Work Plan

5 points – Timeline. Provide a narrative timeline for operations from start up, execution, and closeout or termination. The timeline must identify major project activities and milestones, deadlines for completing these activities, and person(s) or institution(s) responsible for completing these activities for the entire life of the project, as well as a sustainability plan. The timeline must correspond to activities identified in the Project Design, Budget and Budget Narrative.

5 points – Map and/or Flowchart. Provide a map or flow chart to portray the project architecture, mapping project phases into small, management work packages, and breaking major deliverables into logical hierarchical components. This visualization should demonstrate the path needed to ensure which critical tasks must be completed before the next phase can begin.

(6) Capacity and Partner Statement

4 points – List and describe the applicant’s past and current operations in the target country(ies) and the performance outcomes.

3 points – List and describe past and current operations in the target sector(s) by the applicant.

4 points – Description of applicant partners’ and/or sub-awardees’ (foreign government entities, civil society organizations, private sector industries, unions, faith groups, U.S.

agencies, etc.) used in past projects, as well as partnerships used current activities in the target country(ies) and sector(s) designated in the funding opportunity announcement and targeted by the applicant’s proposal.

(7) Key Personnel

5 points – Staffing Matrix: The applicant must provide a list and description of the positions and duties for all senior or key personnel the applicant identifies as required to accomplish the goals and objectives listed in the FOA as proposed by the applicant. Key personnel positions are deemed essential to the successful operation of the project and completion of all proposed deliverables. Names and resumes for proposed key personnel positions identified by the proposal must be included for each key personnel position described by the applicant.

Should the applicant be accepted for award, the applicant must fill each of the key personnel positions within 30 days of award. ILAB, the Federal awarding agency, retains the authority to approve all key personnel changes throughout the life of the award as stated in 2 CFR 200.308(f). Approved key personnel must be available to staff the project no later than 14 calendar days after receiving ILAB permission to hire. Based upon experience and prior ILAB evaluations, ILAB recommends that the Project Director and Monitoring and Evaluation Officer should be designated as key personnel, devoting at least 90 percent of their time to the project. Applicants may propose alternate solutions that depart from this recommendation to meet the experience and level of effort required to achieve the concrete outcomes of the proposal with appropriate justification.

(8) Management Plan

4 points – The Project Management Organizational Chart will be evaluated based on how well it demonstrates an ability to support proper oversight, reporting, implementation of the project activities, monitoring and assessment, and delivery of project outcomes necessary to achieve its objectives.

5 points – The Project Management Narrative must discuss their project’s Management Plan, including a description of the structure of the project’s proposed management team, key personnel roles and responsibilities, and the lines of authority between key personnel and other project staff responsible for providing services related to the project intervention. The Narrative description must address project Start-Up and Close-Out procedures, as well as for potential Termination of the program.

2. Cost Proposal

Applicants must prepare a cost proposal as part of the application. The cost proposal must reflect consistency between the proposed costs and the work to be performed as outlined in the Project Narrative of the applicant’s technical proposal.

If an applicant proposes cost sharing, cost sharing information must be included as part of the cost proposal. Cost sharing is not required for this program. Applications that include any form of cost sharing will not receive additional consideration during the review process. Any approved cost sharing will be subject to the same compliance and reporting requirements as any awarded federal funds.

To promote transparency and full accountability consistent with Administration policy guidance, the Cost Proposal Budget Narrative must present a complete and traceable map of the project’s financial structure, clearly showing how funds move through all direct and indirect cost components.

• Detailed Line-Item Budget: Applicants must fully itemize all proposed costs—including personnel, fringe, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual services, and indirect charges—to demonstrate that requested funds support necessary and nonduplicative programmatic functions.

• Subrecipient and Vendor Disclosure: Applicants must list all proposed subrecipients and vendors, including legal names, EINs, and entity classifications, to ensure full transparency in financial and organizational relationships to the extent allowed by law.

• Merit-Based Compensation: Consistent with Administration policy guidance, applicants must disclose the compensation levels of all Key Personnel and justify them based on merit, responsibilities, and required technical expertise.

• Historical Financial Documentation: Applicants must provide three years of organizational financial statements to demonstrate solvency, fiscal reliability, and responsible historical expenditure patterns.

As part of the process of developing a cost proposal, the applicant must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number and be registered in System for Award Management (SAM). In addition, the cost proposal must contain the following:

• SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance;

• SF-424A Budget Information;

• SF-424A Budget Narrative;

• Country-Specific Budget Narratives (Chile and/or Argentina, as applicable); and

• Indirect cost supporting documentation.

a. Requirement for SAM Registration Applicants must register with the System for Award Management (SAM) before submitting an application. Instructions for registering with SAM can be found at https://www.sam.gov.

A recipient must maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active federal award or an application under consideration. To remain registered in the SAM database after the initial registration, the applicant is required to review and update the registration at least every 12 months from the date of initial registration or from the date of subsequent updates to ensure it is current, accurate, and complete. If applicant entities do not renew their SAM registration, it will expire. An expired registration can delay or prevent application submission in Grants.gov. Registration and renewal can take up to ten business days to complete. For clarification, the applicant is the entity that meets the eligibility criteria and has the legal authority to apply and to receive the award. If an applicant has not fully complied with these requirements by the time the Grant Officer is ready to make a federal award, the Grant Officer may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant.

b. Requirement for Unique Entity Identifier (UEI Number) All applicants for federal grant and funding opportunities must have a UEI and must supply their UEI on the SF-424. The UEI is a 12-character alphanumeric code that uniquely identifies all entities. Any entity registering to do business with the government is required to have one. UEIs are issued by SAM.gov and are a part of an entity’s record in the Entity Information section of SAM.gov. If your organization does not have a UEI, one can be obtained for free at https://sam.gov.

https://www.sam.gov/SAM/ https://sam.gov/

Grant recipients authorized to make subawards must meet these requirements related to UEIs:

• Grant recipients must notify potential sub-recipients that no entity may receive a subaward unless the entity has provided its UEI.

• Grant recipients may not make a subaward to an entity unless the entity has provided its UEI.

See Appendix A to 2 CFR Part 25.

c. SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance Applicants must complete the SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance, available for review at SF-424 Family | Grants.gov. The SF-424 instructions are also available at the same link. (Please note that the PDF forms available at this link are for sample purposes only and cannot be submitted with your application package. If you are applying for a grant, please complete and submit your application using Grants.gov Workspace.)

The SF-424 must clearly identify the applicant and must be signed by an individual with authority to enter into an award agreement. Upon confirmation of an award, the individual signing the SF-424 on behalf of the applicant is considered the Authorized Representative of the applicant. As stated in block 21 of the SF-424 form, signature of the Authorized Representative on the SF-424 certifies that the organization is in compliance with the Assurances and Certifications form SF-424B, also available at SF-424 Family | Grants.gov.

The SF-424B is not required to be submitted with the application.

Box 8b should include the applicant's Employer Identification Number (EIN) as applicable.

Domestic entities should have an EIN whereas international entities may or may not have an EIN. For international entities without an EIN, this box should be marked 44-4444444.

Further information on the EIN is available at https://www.irs.gov.

IMPORTANT NOTE for applicants with non-U.S. addresses: On the SF-424, page 1, Section 8d, please enter “DC” into the State field and "20210" into the Zip/Postal Code field.

This is extremely important for ensuring your application is received by USDOL.

d. SF-424A Budget Information (Non-Construction Programs) Applicants must complete the SF-424A Budget Information Form, available for review at SF-424 Family | Grants.gov. (Please note that the PDF forms available at this link are for sample purposes only and cannot be submitted with your application package. If you are applying for a grant, please complete and submit your application using Grants.gov Workspace.) Applicants must use the columns in Section B of the SF-424A to provide line-item costs for each year of the cooperative agreement’s period of performance.

e. SF-424A Budget Narrative and the Country-Specific Budget Narratives (20 points)

The Budget Narratives will be evaluated on the following:

1. the extent to which it supports the overall project strategy and reflects proposed project activities (5 points);

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1.

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1.

https://www.grants.gov/applicants/workspace-overview/ https://www.grants.gov/applicants/workspace-overview/ https://www.grants.gov/forms/forms-repository/sf-424-family%22%EF%B7%9FHYPERLINK%20%22https:/www.grants.gov/forms/forms-repository/sf-424-family https://www.irs.gov/ https://www.grants.gov/forms/forms-repository/sf-424-family%22%EF%B7%9FHYPERLINK%20%22https:/www.grants.gov/forms/forms-repository/sf-424-family https://www.grants.gov/applicants/workspace-overview/ https://www.grants.gov/applicants/workspace-overview/ https://www.grants.gov/applicants/workspace-overview/

2. the extent to which it is reasonable and proportionate relative to the expected outcomes and impact (5 points); and,

3. The extent to which it follows the instructions outlined…