Phase 1 - Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire for Architect.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Building 40 and 1A Consolidation Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
47PJ0020R0043
Issued by
General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 8

About this file

This document contains a federal solicitation for design-build services for a Bureau of Land Management consolidation project. The General Services Administration will award a firm-fixed price design-build contract to renovate approximately 55,294 gross square feet of existing office space on the Denver Federal Center campus for the Bureau of Land Management Colorado State Office consolidation. The estimated total design/build cost is between $10-20 million, with occupancy planned for 2022. The solicitation will proceed in two phases, with Phase 1 as a request for qualifications to shortlist the top three offerors, who will then submit proposals in Phase 2. Phase 2 proposals are due by May 14, 2020. The contract will be set aside for small businesses and awarded at the conclusion of Phase 2. A stipend will be provided to offerors not selected for award who submit complete Phase 2 proposals.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaires for each Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist not later than 10:00 AM MOUNTAIN TIME, THURSDAY, MAY 14, 2020.

Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:

Rhonda Widick, Contracting Officer at rhonda.widick@gsa.gov Andrew Hunsicker, Contract Specialist at andrew.hunsicker@gsa.gov

Email subject lines should reference “Solicitation No. 47PJ0020R0043, BLM COSO Consolidation”.

A SIMILAR PROJECT is defined as follows:

· Construction was substantially completed within ten years prior to the submission deadline for Phase 1 proposals;

· Renovation of an existing building for use as an office;

· Project area (office space) was not less than 40,000 gross square feet; and

· Contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $8 million.

Additional favorable consideration may be given to the extent any of the following are demonstrated:

· The SP was contracted using the design-build delivery method.

· The proposed General Contractor and the proposed A/E worked on the same SP.

· Two or more SPs are received for the General Contractor.

· The SP of the proposed General Contractor or A/E involved LEED certifications.

· Awards were received for superior design and/or project delivery.

SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR

Name of Offeror/Firm:____________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Number: ______________________________________________________________________________________

Was the Offeror the Prime Contractor?: _____________________________________________________________________

Contract Type : ________________________________________________________________________________________

Place of Performance:____________________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance (include start and substantial completion dates):_____________________________________________

Was the delivery method Design-Build or IPD?:________________________________________________________________

Did the proposed A/E and proposed General Contractor work on this project together?:_________________________________

Gross Square Footage of Facility Construction: _______________________________________________________________

Gross Square Footage of Office Space Construction: ___________________________________________________________

Construction Value at initial award: $________________________________________________________________________

Total Construction Value (including modifications): $____________________________________________________________

Was the Building LEED Certified and, if so, what level?: ________________________________________________________

Did the project require a pre-alteration asbestos survey?: _______________________________________________________

List any awards that were received for superior project design and/or project delivery: _________________________________

Briefly describe all work performed under this contract: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Continued on next page

SECTION 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last eight (8) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Name of Respondent/Title: _____________________________________________

Firm Name: _________________________________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________________

Phone:_____________________________________________________________

Fax:_______________________________________________________________

Email:______________________________________________________________

Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.

KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.

Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.

Acceptable – A Satisfactory rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.

Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.

Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.

PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
Poor
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent
N/A

Quality of Design and Construction Documents

Achieving Project Design Goals Within the Allowable Budget

Creativity of Solutions to Design Issues

Timeliness of Required Documentation

Communicating and Interfacing with Government/Company Personnel

Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance

Continued on next page

1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________

2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________

Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary): ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .