performance-risk-assessment-questionaire.pdf

PDF 213 KB Posted

Attached to
MSCOE G6 IT/AV Service Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911S7-20-R-0009
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

About this file

This document contains a performance risk assessment questionnaire for a federal contract. The questionnaire requests information from offerors regarding past performance on a contract to provide network administration and audio visual direct support services for 684 training classrooms across Fort Leonard Wood. Services include support of computers, monitors, printers, network switches, servers, and audiovisual equipment used for training delivered by the Army Training Support Center and Battle Command Arts and Science Program. Offerors are asked to provide candid responses on compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness including use of subcontractors, timeliness of performance, cost controls if applicable, and commitment to customer satisfaction. Respondents then evaluate the offeror's past performance in these areas using an adjectival rating system and provide any other relevant performance information. Completed questionnaires must be returned within 3 days via email to the contracting specialist listed in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MSCOE G6 IT/AV Service Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation W911S7-20-R-0009 Amendment 01 REV 6-12-20.pdf PDF
Exhibit C (REV) Hardware Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit D(REV) Software Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 01 to Solicitation W911S7-20-R-0009.pdf PDF
Final W911S7-20-R-0009 Solicitation Questions and Answers.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PAST PERFORMANCEQUESTIONNAIRE ATTACHMENT 1.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A (REV) - Facility List_FY 20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit D _NIPR_MCASP Software List.pdf PDF
Exhibit B - Equipment Checklist.xls XLS spreadsheet
W911S7-20-R-0009 G6 IT AV SPT FINAL Solicitation 8 May 20.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - Facility List_FY20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit C _Hardware Inventory.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within 3 days.

Adjectival Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Acceptable

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Acceptable

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Acceptable

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Acceptable

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Specialist identified in Section L of the solicitation “ Instruction to Offers”

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .