PdD SAWS-INDUSTRY-DAY_PAO-412-20_01JUN20.pptx

Product Director Special Ammunition and Weapon System (PdD SAWS) Industry Day 2020 ACC-RI IDIQ

2 JUN 2020

Frank Altamura, Product Director Project Manager, Maneuver Ammunition Systems US Army, JPEO-AA Bldg. 354 Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806 frank.altamura.civ@mail.mil

Stacy Poto, Deputy Product Director Project Manager, Maneuver Ammunition Systems US Army, JPEO-AA Bldg. 354 Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806 Stacy.f.poto.civ@mail.mil

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: (PAO#:412-20) – Dated: 27 MAY 2020 Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:

Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited

Agenda

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:

Mission:

Procure and deliver safe, reliable, and lethal Non Standard Ammunition and armaments to fully equip the U.S. allies’ and Joint Forces’ warfighter to support the U.S National Security Strategy (NSS) and U.S. Agencies for the purpose of training and familiarization

Vision:

Enable our coalition partners to fight the fight and Create a stable situation around the world PdD SAWS Mission Over 400 Munitions and Weapon types managed Over $1.7B placed on contract Over 1B Rounds Delivered

ATGMS & Launchers

105/122/152mm Artillery 40mm 60/82/120mm Mortar Ammo and Systems S8 80mm AVN Rocket

RPG & SPG-9

Recoilless 7.62mm x 39&54R 23mmx115 & 152

90/125mm Tank

120MM

(KEW A1 / IM HET

120MM

KEW A4

Qualification

PdD SAWS Short List of Products Small Caliber AK-74: 5.45x39 (Blank, Ball, Tracer) Makarov: 9x18mm AK-47: 7.62x39mm (Blank, Ball, Tracer, Armor Piercing (AP)) Sniper & PKM: 7.62x54mm (Blank, Ball, Tracer, AP) DsHK: 12.7x108mm (Blank, Ball, Tracer, AP)

Medium Caliber 14.5mm (Ball, Tracer, AP, Armor Piercing Incendiary (API)) 23mm (High Explosive (HE), High Explosive Incendiary (HEI), API, Armor Piercing Incendiary-Trace (API-T) 30mm (HE, HEI, API, API-T)

Large Caliber 120mm IM HE-T 120mm KE-W 125mm (HEAT, APFSDS-T, Practice) 90mm (HESH-T, APFSDS-T, Practice) 100mm Hollow Charge

Recoilless Rifle Ammunition 40mm HE Frag ((Rocket Propelled Grenade) (RPG)) 40x70.5 to 106mm High Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) Thermobaric (RPG) 73mm ((Tripod stand mounted Rocket Propelled Grenade) (SPG-9))

Under Barrel Grenade (VOG-25) 40mm HE FRAG 40mm HE Bounding 40mm Ground Smoke & Illum

Mortar Weapons and Spare Parts 60mm: M57, M6-211Long Range 82mm: M37, M41, M69 120mm: NEMO, M43, M75

Mortar Ammunition 60mm HE, Illum, Smoke 82mm HE, Illum, Smoke 120mm HE, Illum, Smoke 120mm Breach Loaded, HE Practice, HE, Illum, Smoke

Artillery 122mm HE Part & Full 122mm Smoke & Illum 130mm HE Part & Full 152mm HE Part & Full

Other Anti Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) and launchers 57mm, 80mm, 107mm, 122mm Rockets Fire Suppression: PP3, PP9 YAK B WPN Cycle: PPL Counter Measure: PPI-26 Links, Belts, Linking Machines

SAWS Acquisition Strategy Full & Open Competition

5 Year (FY22-FY26) - Best Value Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contracts Multiple contract(s) will be awarded for five (5) one-year ordering periods and will contain FFP NTE unit prices to cover SAWS requirements

Minimum guarantee for each contract awarded is $20,000 Award(s) will be made to best overall proposal(s) that are determined to be most beneficial to the Government

As future needs are identified during the 5 years of the contract(s), FFP Delivery Orders will be competed among Offerors who have been awarded IDIQ base contracts

Awardees will have ability to propose lower unit prices than negotiated FFP NTE prices on contract for each of the Delivery Orders

The Government reserves the right to split delivery order awards, if determined to be in the best interest of the Government Offerors will be notified of the possibility of a split award at the time the delivery order RFP is issued

Pricing for each DO is FFP- transportation costs will be proposed and evaluated on DO basis USG will be requesting support for transportation costs through commitment letters from freight forwarders and purchase orders

Basis of Evaluation Factor 1: Management

Subfactor 1 is more important than Subfactor 2 / Subfactor 2 is more important than Subfactor 3

Factor 2: Technical

Subfactor 1 is more important than Subfactor 2

Factor 3: Price:

FFP NTE Prices proposed in the pricing matrix of solicitation will be utilized to compute total evaluated price. Price will be evaluated, but will not be rated with a color or adjectival rating

Factor 4: Past Performance:

Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine relevancy & confidence assessment

Factor 5: Small Business Participation:

The extent of Small Business Participation will be evaluated

Relative Order of Importance of Factors For evaluation purposes - Management is more important than Technical

Technical is more important than Price

Price is significantly more important than Past Performance

Past Performance is significantly more important than Small Business Participation

All non-price factors, when combined, are significantly more important than Price

Government reserves right to make an award to other than the lowest priced Offeror, or to other than the Offeror with the highest technical rating if the Government determines that to do so would result in the best value to the Government

Offerors that receive a final rating of Red / Unacceptable at any Factor / Subfactor level - are ineligible for contract award

Discussions In accordance with FAR 15.306(d), discussion offeror(s) may be held

If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will conduct discussions in writing

The Government’s discussions will address deficiencies, significant weaknesses, and adverse past performance information for which the offeror has not yet had the opportunity to respond to

MAY 20

Draft RFP Issued

JUN 20

Q&A on Draft RFP Received from Industry

JUN 20

Q&A Responses Provided to Industry

JUL 20

Final RFP Issued

MAR 21

CONTRACT

AWARD

NOV 20

Discussions (if necessary)

JAN 21

FPRs Due Tentative Timeline of Events

Technical Requirements General Specifications for SAWS used as benchmark for determining contractor TDP compliance including visual inspections, performance and Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT)

TDPs must be submitted in accordance with the requirements specified in each general specification and when submitted for review may be approved for all delivery orders under the contract, if specified by the Government. ECPs will address changes to configuration.

PdD SAWS reserves the right to witness all LATs and must be notified in accordance with appropriate timeline stated within Section C of RFP

DCMA has been delegated the authority to conduct Government Source Inspections with or without PdD SAWS personnel being present

Updated Specifications were posted along with Draft:

General Specification JAN 2019 Small Caliber JAN 2019 Mortar Ammunition JAN 2019 RPGs and Grenades JAN 2019 Mortar Weapon Systems JAN 2019

2019 Gen Specs Five (5) PdD SAWS Specifications cover the list of ammunition

General Specification for Non-Standard Ammunition - 01 JAN 19

General Specification for Non-Standard Small Caliber Ammunition - 01 JAN 19

General Specification for Non-Standard Mortar Ammunition - 01 JAN 19

General Specification for Non-Standard Rocket Propelled & Spin Stabilized Grenade Ammunition - 01 JAN 19

General Specification for Non-Standard Mortar Systems - 01 JAN 19

Any request received from a customer that includes an item(s) that does not fall within PdD SAWS General Specifications will be annotated on an order by order basis and may include additional technical requirements and/or additional specifications which will be provided when Delivery Order Request for Proposal (RFP) is issued

CDRL’s End User Certificate (EUC) Submission Ten (10) days after delivery order award

Contract Status Report Submission Ten (10) Business days after delivery order award Weekly submission thereafter Template Attached to RFP

Delivery Status Report Submission Ten (10) Business days after delivery order award Weekly submission thereafter Template Attached to RFP

Technical Data Package (TDP) Submission Thirty (30) days after delivery order award Re-Submission twenty one (21) days after disposition is received from USG

Lot Acceptance Test Report Submission seven (7) calendar days from completion of the testing Explosive Site Safety Plan (ESSP) Submission Thirty (30) days after delivery order award Re-Submission thirty (30) days after disposition is received from USG

Item Information and Certification Statement (IICS) Submission forty eight (48) hour prior to arrival at final destination

Department of Transpiration (DOT) Hazard Classification – EX Number Submission thirty (30) days prior to delivery to final location

Interim Hazard Classification (IHC) Submission thirty (30) days prior to delivery to final location

Program Review Program Review minutes fifteen (15) day after each review

Integrated Product Team (IPT) IPT meeting minutes three (3) days after each IPT meeting

Lot History Folder Available at time of lot presentation and submitted electronically

Quality Assurance Require prime contractor to be ISO 9001 certified or equivalent and flow down quality requirements to producers

LAT reports shall provide at a minimum: (1) Shot to Shot Data, (2) Measured values conducted during visual inspections, (3) Notation of any anomalies during visual inspections and live fire testing, (4) Notation of any skip lot testing for temperature extremes

PdD SAWS provides concurrence on all LAT Reports for all lots to be provided to USG

LAT Report Concurrence required prior to conducting Government Source Inspection (GSI) DCMA requires PdD SAWS concurrence on LAT reports before scheduling or conducting GSI

Approved Explosive Site Safety Plans (ESSP) are required before scheduling and conducting GSI

DCMA functions as the Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) for GSI for all PdD SAWS items

Sampling size in Gen Specs will be used for visual inspections prior to LAT Gen Spec will not be used to determine sampling size for GSI DCMA QAR will follow Zero Based Acceptance Sampling chart

Challenges Limited Sources of Supply

EUCs take approximately 60-90 days after submission of draft to USG

Delivery Verification Certificate (DVC) return may take longer than 30 days after receipt of material at final delivery location

Some European countries have delayed release of transit permits for ammunition traveling through their country to final delivery location

No set requirements year to year and cannot predict when orders will be placed

Geopolitical events can occur any time Previously acceptable suppliers may no longer be allowed (may be sanctioned) Need to be flexible/adaptable to adjust shipping, deliveries, etc.

Summary/Wrap Up Acquisition Strategy was presented and discussed

New General Specifications will be used for this contract

Known challenges were addressed

Industry Day questions/briefing will be collected and posted online

A list of registered participants at today’s event will be provided to all attendees

Request your continued review of draft RFP and provide all questions/concerns to Contracting within timeframe posted on beta.sam.gov

Changes that are made from time the draft RFP was issued and final RFP is released will be tracked and provided when final RFP is officially released

Questions ?

image3.png image4.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.jpeg image20.png image7.tiff image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.gif image12.png image13.png image6.jpg image1.png image2.png