Past Performance Worksheet.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24722Q0001
About this file
This document is a combined synopsis and solicitation for janitorial services at the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center in Charleston, South Carolina. The solicitation seeks quotes for janitorial services in three major areas totaling approximately 50,000 square feet, including kitchens, general areas, and non-patient care spaces. Services are required seven days per week across various shifts. The base period of performance is one year with four optional one-year extensions. Quotes are due by September 10, 2021 and must include pricing for the base year and all option years. The solicitation is set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and will be awarded on a best value determination considering price, past performance, and technical factors. The performance work statement details required cleaning tasks and frequencies for the various areas as well as quality assurance and personnel requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24722Q0001 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24722Q0001 0001_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| P11-Site Visit sign in sheet.pdf | ||
| P09-PWS Janitorial Contract FY22-Final.pdf | ||
| 36C24722Q0001.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE
(To be completed by References)
Request for Proposal Number: 36C24722Q0001 closing date: September 10, 2021
Submit completed Cover Sheet and Survey via email to:
Thomas Nicholls, Contract Specialist Network Contracting Office (NCO) 7 Phone: 843-789-6379 Email: Thomas.Nicholls@va.gov
Department of Veterans Affairs, RHJ VA Medical Center 109 Bee Street Charleston, SC 29401
*Do not return this form to the contractor being evaluated. It is desired that this form be submitted to the person identified above, no later than 5 days before RFQ closing date.
1. Handwritten responses are acceptable. If a response is handwritten, please print legibly.
2. If more space is needed for narrative comments, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.
3. Your time and effort in providing this vitally important information is greatly appreciated.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Please provide the following information:
| Your Company Name: | _____________________ | |||
| Person Filling Out Survey Form: | _____________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _____________________ | |||
| Fax Number: | _____________________ | |||
| Email Address: | ______________________ |
Name of Company for which you are filling out this survey:
Contract Number(s): __________________________________ Period of Performance: _________________________________ General Description of Contract Services: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Dollar Value: ______________ Type of Contract (firm fixed price, cost plus fixed fee, etc.): ______________
REMARKS: (Add on separate sheet.)
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET
RATING SCALE
Please use the following rating to answer the questions. If you are unable to rate any item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “N/A”.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
| Rating |
| Description |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Limited Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown Confidence (Neutral) |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
NOTE: For statements indicating “No Confidence” or “Substantial Confidence”, please provide and explanation in the Comments section of the survey.
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET
FOR CONTRACT: ___________________________
| Substantial Confidence |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Limited Confidence |
| No Confidence |
| Unknown Confidence (Neutral) |
A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(3) The Contractor utilized personnel who were appropriate to the effort performed.
B. COST CONTROL
(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
C. SCHEDULE
(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
D. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS
(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost and schedule issues.
(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise and businesslike manner
(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.
E. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program.
(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or TPOC.
(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.
F. Key Personnel
(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance
(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
G. OTHER:
(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered “no”, provide an explanation.
(2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Page 1 of
Page 1 of
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .