Past Performance Worksheet.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
S201--534-21-3-5036-0080 Janitorial Services (VA-21-00028719)
Solicitation number
36C24722Q0001
Issued by

About this file

This document is a combined synopsis and solicitation for janitorial services at the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center in Charleston, South Carolina. The solicitation seeks quotes for janitorial services in three major areas totaling approximately 50,000 square feet, including kitchens, general areas, and non-patient care spaces. Services are required seven days per week across various shifts. The base period of performance is one year with four optional one-year extensions. Quotes are due by September 10, 2021 and must include pricing for the base year and all option years. The solicitation is set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and will be awarded on a best value determination considering price, past performance, and technical factors. The performance work statement details required cleaning tasks and frequencies for the various areas as well as quality assurance and personnel requirements.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24722Q0001 0002.docx DOCX document
36C24722Q0001 0001_1.docx DOCX document
P11-Site Visit sign in sheet.pdf PDF
P09-PWS Janitorial Contract FY22-Final.pdf PDF
36C24722Q0001.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE

(To be completed by References)

Request for Proposal Number: 36C24722Q0001 closing date: September 10, 2021

Submit completed Cover Sheet and Survey via email to:

Thomas Nicholls, Contract Specialist Network Contracting Office (NCO) 7 Phone: 843-789-6379 Email: Thomas.Nicholls@va.gov

Department of Veterans Affairs, RHJ VA Medical Center 109 Bee Street Charleston, SC 29401

*Do not return this form to the contractor being evaluated. It is desired that this form be submitted to the person identified above, no later than 5 days before RFQ closing date.

1. Handwritten responses are acceptable. If a response is handwritten, please print legibly.

2. If more space is needed for narrative comments, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.

3. Your time and effort in providing this vitally important information is greatly appreciated.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Please provide the following information:

Your Company Name:_____________________
Person Filling Out Survey Form:_____________________
Phone Number:_____________________
Fax Number:_____________________
Email Address:______________________

Name of Company for which you are filling out this survey:

Contract Number(s): __________________________________ Period of Performance: _________________________________ General Description of Contract Services: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Dollar Value: ______________ Type of Contract (firm fixed price, cost plus fixed fee, etc.): ______________

REMARKS: (Add on separate sheet.)

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET

RATING SCALE

Please use the following rating to answer the questions. If you are unable to rate any item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “N/A”.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Rating
Description
Substantial Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Limited Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

NOTE: For statements indicating “No Confidence” or “Substantial Confidence”, please provide and explanation in the Comments section of the survey.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET

FOR CONTRACT: ___________________________

Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel who were appropriate to the effort performed.

B. COST CONTROL

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

C. SCHEDULE

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

D. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise and businesslike manner

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

E. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or TPOC.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

F. Key Personnel

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance

(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

G. OTHER:

(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered “no”, provide an explanation.

(2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( ) Yes ( ) No

Page 1 of

Page 1 of

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .