Past Performance Questionnaire S-280.DOC
DOC document 110 KB Posted
- Attached to
- S-280C/G Shelters Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV20R0024
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W56HZV20R0024-0005.pdf | ||
| Federal Register 2020-15293.pdf | ||
| W56HZV20R0024-0004.pdf | ||
| W56HZV20R0024-0003.pdf | ||
| REVISED Questions and Answers S280 Shelter 11 June 2020.pdf | ||
| W56HZV20R0024-0002.pdf | ||
| W56HZV20R0024-0001.pdf | ||
| S-280 W56HZV-20-R-0024 Q and As 11 JUNE 2020.pdf | ||
| TM 10-5411-207-13P S-280C 15 APR 16.pdf | ||
| T20191353 S-280C TDP Revision List.pdf | ||
| TDPL20191353.zip | ZIP file | |
| 17-1-3274_(rev_B).pdf | ||
| SBP-Workbook Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| SBP-Workbook Attachment 0005.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SM-D-947080.zip | ZIP file | |
| W56HZV20R0024.pdf | ||
| Pricing Attachment 0004 S-280CG SheltersLOCKED.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-DETROIT ARSENAL
6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD
WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000
18 May 2020 Dear Sir or Madam:
The Army Contracting Command is acquiring S-280C/G Shelters to fulfill its mission. Requirements include the purchase of various quantities over a five year ordering period along with delivery of associated Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) items.
The U.S. Army is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award. An Offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the Offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the Offeror in the area of past performance. The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the Offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire within 15 days of receipt via e-mail to the Government at Keri.L.Skrobot.civ@mail.mil. If you have any questions relative to the enclosed Questionnaire, please contact me.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, CLETUS O. NWALOZIE
Contracting Officer
ATTACHMENT 0003
Past Performance Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire via email to the Government at Keri.L.Skrobot.civ@mail.mil within 15 days after receipt. Thank you.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
1. Contract Number (and delivery/task order number if applicable);
2. Contract Type;
3. Total Value of the Contract (beginning & ending value);
4. Delivery or Performance Schedule;
5. Government or private industry contracting activity address, telephone number and e-mail;
6. Procuring Contracting Officers (PCO) and/or Contract Specialist's name, or point of contact for private industry entity responsible for signing or administering the contract, telephone number and e-mail;
7. Government (DCMA) or commercial administrative contracting officer (ACO), contracting officers representative (COR), performance certifier, and/or quality assurance representative (QAR), name, telephone number and email;
8. Specify the Government or Contractor Point of Contact(s) for which the Questionnaire sent, and provide the date(s) it was sent.
9. A description of past contract scope of work requirements and a discussion of the similarities between the cited contract scope to each of the statement of work requirements identified above in L.6.2.1 (b) that the Offeror believes is relevant. In its description, the Offeror should specify the location in the proposal (to include filename or document reference with page and paragraph of the past contract information) that substantiates the relevance;
10. Contract period of performance;
11. A description of work performed by the Offeror
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS
Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.
Table 1
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Too Soon To Tell |
| No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| Not Applicable |
| Does not apply to this contract. |
To what extent was the contractor compliant relating to contract deliverables on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.
· Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Very Good
· Satisfactory
· Marginal
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Too soon to tell
· Not Applicable Comments:
To what extent was the contractor effective in managing the project, including its employees and subcontractors, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.
· Very Good
· Satisfactory
· Marginal
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Too soon to tell
To what extent did the contractor adhere to the delivery schedules, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.
· Very Good
· Satisfactory
· Marginal
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Too soon to tell
To what extent did the contractor exhibit the ability, knowledge, and skill to provide customer satisfaction? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.
· Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Very Good
· Satisfactory
· Marginal
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Too soon to tell
F. Overall Satisfaction
To what extent did the contractor demonstrate knowledge and ability to perform all requirements to meet the form, fit, and function of the contract? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.
· Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Very Good
· Satisfactory
· Marginal
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Too soon to tell
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
Address:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the point of contact identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
A. Compliance of Products, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship.
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Product Deliverables, including the Administrative Aspects of Performance.
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.
E. Overall Satisfaction.
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
PAGE
Source Selection Information --See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .