Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf
PDF 384 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-25-R-00076
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) form designed to evaluate contractor performance for a source selection process for the FAA's Oakland ARTCC emergency lighting system project. The questionnaire is to be submitted to Contracting Officer Raymond Lena and consists of two main sections: contractor information to be completed by the offeror (including contract details, value, and type) and an evaluation section to be completed by the evaluating organization representative.
The evaluation portion uses a six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Observed) to assess seven key performance areas: Quality of Products/Services, Overall Performance, Technical Requirements, Schedule adherence, Cost Control, Customer Satisfaction, and Overall Assessment. Each area includes specific evaluation criteria focused on the contractor's conformance to requirements, technical capabilities, budget management, and responsiveness to customer needs. The form provides space for evaluator information and comments to support the ratings provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_6973GH-25-R-00076_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Alameda County Wage Determination - SAM.gov.pdf | ||
| 6973GH-25-R-00076.pdf | ||
| (SOW) ZOA CPC Emergency Lighting.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection
Please complete this Questionnaire and email Contracting Officer at:
raymond.a.lena@faa.gov
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT: (Fixed
Price, GMP, FPI, etc.)
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional S = Satisfactory US = Unsatisfactory VG = Very Good MG = Marginal N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
EX VG S MG US N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
EX VG S MG US N/O
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
EX VG S MG US N/O
D. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
EX VG S MG US N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”
EX VG S MG US N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .