Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 187 KB Posted

Attached to
REPLACE ROOFS AND PAINT EXTERIORS OF BUILDINGS IN
Solicitation number
140P5426R0002
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for National Park Service Solicitation Number 140P5426R0002 concerning replacement of roofs and exterior painting of buildings in the Pine Island Maintenance Yard of Everglades National Park. The questionnaire is to be completed by references who have worked with the bidding contractor on similar projects and submitted to Contracting Officer William Vazquez at william_vazquez@nps.gov no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on April 09, 2026. Responses must be submitted directly from a corporate or government email account.

The questionnaire requests information about the referenced contract including contract number, value, period of performance, and description of items provided, along with the name and contact information of the person completing the form. Respondents are required to rate contractor performance across multiple categories using a five-point scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable. The evaluation criteria include overall performance ability, timeliness and ability to resolve issues, quality of work, and an overall rating of contractor performance regarding requirements, schedule, and price. Detailed explanatory narratives are requested for as many responses as possible to support the ratings provided.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Revised_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0002_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0002_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Specifications.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0002.pdf PDF
Drawings.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation# 140P5426R0002

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov

Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, ConOps East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5426R0002 for Replacement of Roofs and Exterior Painting of Buildings in the Pine Island Maintenance Yard of Everglades National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov

Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on April 09, 2026. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

NAME OF CONTRACTOR:

Phone:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________

3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________

4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Company: __________________________________________________________

Title: __________________________________ Phone: _________________________________

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation:

Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Timeliness and Ability to Resolve Issues

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Issues

Quality of Work

The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.

Quality of Shipments

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
N/A
N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .