Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 300 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IFMCS22725
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template issued by the FBI Finance and Facilities Division's Procurement Section for evaluating contractor performance on the FBI Indoor Firearms Range Maintenance and Lead Cleaning Services opportunity (Solicitation #15F067-25-Q-0000062).
The questionnaire contains six evaluation criteria sections: Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management of Key Personnel, and an additional comments section. For each criterion, evaluators must select one of five ratings (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) and provide supporting comments. The PPQ requires basic contract information including contractor name, contract number, project title, period of performance, and reference contact details. Completed questionnaires are to be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer Javia S. Warner and Contract Specialist Charles E. Julian via email.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Master Interchange Form w Gov Answers.pdf | ||
| Indoor Firearms Range Photos.pdf | ||
| Master Interchange Form w Gov Answers.pdf | ||
| Firing Range SF1449.pdf | ||
| Interchange Form .xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Firing Range SOW 2.20.25.pdf | ||
| RFQ FBI Indoor Firearms Maintenance and Cleaning Services 2.27.25.pdf | ||
| Pricing Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FINANCE AND FACILITIES DIVISION | PROCUREMENT SECTION
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Past Performance Questionnaire Version 1 October 18, 2023
To Whom It May Concern:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation intends to acquire FBI Indoor Firearms Range Maintenance and Lead Cleaning Services
In order to accurately evaluate an Offerors past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying its relevant past performance history on the attached Past Performance Rating Form. Please note that the Offeror was directed to submit to you a copy of the Experience Narrative for your contract that it submitted as part of its proposal.
Upon completion of this form, please e-mail it directly to the Contracting Officer, Javia S.
Warner, at JSWARNER@fbi.gov; and Contract Specialist, Charles E. Julian at CEJULIAN@fbi.gov
Please make the subject line of the e-mail read FBI Indoor Firearms Range Maintenance and Lead Cleaning Services 15F067-25-Q-0000062.
– Past Performance Questionnaire – Insert Evaluated Company’s Name.”
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT or ORDER
NUMBER:
PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE,
INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION
NAME: Click here to enter text.
TITLE: Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.
PHONE: Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL Click here to enter text.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES PROVIDED:
For each of the six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose one (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
2. SCHEDULE
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
3. COST CONTROL
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .