Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 32 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P5420R0007
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on solicitation number 140P5420R0007 to rehabilitate the Flamingo Waste Water Treatment Plant at Everglades National Park for the Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region. The questionnaire requests ratings on a contractor's past performance in the areas of meeting requirements, timeliness, quality of work, and overall performance on a previous contract. It must be completed and returned to William Vazquez by May 14, 2020 to be considered as part of the proposal. Respondents are asked to provide contract details and evaluations using defined rating criteria of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. General comments are also solicited.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5420R0007_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5420R0007_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Revised (Site Visit) Construction Solicitation Clauses_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5420R0007.pdf | ||
| Drawings.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Statement of Work.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5420R0007
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Contracting Office; Solicitation Number: 140P5420R0007 for Rehabilitation of the Flamingo Waste Water Treatment Plant at Everglades National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 PM EST on May 14, 2020. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
If you will not be available on May 14, 2020 for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Quality of Work
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .