Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 213 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1DA--Project # 596A4-19-106 - Construction to Upgrade Parking Garage Lighting/Replace Parking Garage Gates
- Solicitation number
- 36C24924R0079
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity with Solicitation Number 36C24924R0079. The contract is for Project 596A4-19-106, Construction to Upgrade Parking Garage Lighting/Replace Parking Garage Gates, for the Lexington VA Healthcare System.
The questionnaire collects past performance information from assessors on the prospective contractor's quality of service, schedule performance, cost control, business relations, and overall performance. Assessors rate the contractor as either "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" across various criteria and provide rationale for the ratings. The questionnaire also asks assessors if they would award another contract to the contractor. The overall performance rating is provided at the end. The assessor is asked to identify their role and period of involvement in the contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Site Visit Sign in.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 36C24924R0079 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Project Specifications.pdf | ||
| 36C24924R0079_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| DBA Wage Determination KY20240090 7-26-2024.pdf | ||
| Final Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Project Drawings.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Procurement Sensitive Do Not Disclose --- See FAR Subparts 2.101 and 3.104-4 FOR
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24924R0079 Project/Requirement Project 596A4-19-106 Customer/Agency Lexington VA Healthcare System
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s __________________________________________________
Name and Address __________________________________________________
2. Contractor Point of Contact: __________________________________________________
3. Phone Number (with area code): __________________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award Number: __________________________________________________
5. Description of Services: __________________________________________________
6. Contract Award Date: _______________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________ Final___________
7. Period of Performance: __________________________________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to
NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Signature
Name and Title of Authorizing Official Date
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
RATING SCALE Definitions
Past performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror's performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror's performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
UNACCEPTABLE
Based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor's compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
4. Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor's business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor's management, and your company (i.e. contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
8. Rate the contractor's responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
9. Overall rating of contractor's business relations.
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
__________ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
__________ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
__________ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.
__________ Do not wish to award another contact to this contractor.
__________ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
Overall rating of contractor's performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
ROLE
PERIOD OF INVOLVEMENT
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .