Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 152 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FBI- Quantico Lead Cleaning
- Solicitation number
- FBIQLC1755
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for the Quantico Lead Cleaning Services contract. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate potential contractors' past performance across six key criteria: quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of key personnel, and utilization of small business. The rating scale ranges from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with references asked to provide detailed assessments and comments for each performance area.
The questionnaire is specifically related to the FBI Quantico Complex Lead Cleaning Services, which covers lead cleaning services for gun firing ranges, classrooms, physical training areas, bathrooms, and other training support areas across the 547-acre complex with 130+ buildings. The document instructs past performance references to complete the form and email it directly to Contracting Officer Maureen Murdock and Contract Specialist Aaron Awai, with the subject line "{FBI- Quantico Lead Cleaning/PPQ}" followed by the company's name. The final section of the questionnaire also requests an overall assessment of the contractor's future potential and any reservations about soliciting their services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Interchange Form-Quantico Lead Cleaning Government Responses.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Request for Quote (RFQ) Lead Cleaning.pdf | ||
| Statement of Work Lead Cleaning- Quantico .pdf | ||
| Quantico Lead Cleaning SF1449.pdf | ||
| Pricing Spreadsheet Quantico Lead Cleaning.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Interchange Form-Quantico Lead Cleaning.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ FBI Quantico Lead Cleaning.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FINANCE AND FACILITIES DIVISION | PROCUREMENT SECTION
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
To Whom It May Concern:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation intends to acquire services for Quantico Lead Cleaning.
In order to accurately evaluate an Offerors past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying relevant past performance history on the attached Past Performance Rating Form.
Upon completion of this form, please e-mail it directly to the Contracting Officer, Maureen Murdock, at mmurdock@fbi.gov and Contract Specialist, Aaron Awai, at aoawai@fbi.com.
Please make the subject line of the e-mail read “{FBI- Quantico Lead Cleaning/PPQ}”
– Past Performance Questionnaire – Insert Company’s Name.”
The following standards will be used in arriving at the rating:
| Outstanding | The Contractor’s performance exceeded customer expectations and was technically acceptable, providing significant features or benefits. |
| Satisfactory | The Contractor met customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the requirements. |
Unsatisfactory The Contractor’s performance was either marginal or did not meet customer expectations or contract requirements.
Other If the element is not applicable, indicate with “N/A.” If no data has been obtained or additional comments are provided, please note in this column.
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
DESCRIPTION OF SERIVICES PROVIDED:
Click here to enter text.
For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
Overall Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Why or why not?
Click here to enter text.
| Past Performance Questionnaire |
| Version 1 |
October 18, 2023 image1.jpeg image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .