Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Contractor Vetting and Vehicle Escort Service
- Solicitation number
- M6700123Q0005
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluating contractor performance on a federal contract. The contract is for contractor vetting and vehicle escort services at gates on Camp Lejeune, NC and Marine Corps Air Station New River, NC. The base period of performance is 12 months with an option for an additional 12-month period. The requirement is set aside 100% for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses. The solicitation number is M6700123Q0005 and proposals are due by the United States Marine Corps for a firm fixed price contract awarded based on price and other factors. The NAICS code is 561612 for guards and patrol services and the size standard for small businesses is $29 million.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002 of M6700123Q0005.pdf | ||
| M6700123Q0005_P0001.pdf | ||
| Executive Order 14055 dated 18 Nov 2021.pdf | ||
| M6700123Q0005.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M6700123Q0005 M6700123Q0005
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
This is a survey to evaluate Contractor’s performance indicated on page two of the survey.
The survey contains a series of evaluation elements and questions asking you, as the evaluator, to provide an evaluation of the contractor’s performance. Using the rating level definitions below, please provide a rating level for each element that best describes the contractor’s performance.
Please respond to each question by answering yes or no and providing explanations as appropriate.
Please provide frank and concise comments in your evaluation and assessment of contractor performance. In addition to responding to the given statements and questions for the contract listed, please provide other information or knowledge of contractor performance for similar contracts performed by the contractor for your organization.
Rater Information. After completing the survey, please provide the requested rater information and sign/date the survey.
| Rating Level |
| Descriptive Definition |
Satisfactory
The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
The contractor’s performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
Not observed under this contract.
CONTRACTORS SHALL ONLY COMPLETE THIS PAGE
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
A. CONTRACTOR NAME (being evaluated): ___________________________
PO Box/Street Address: ____________________________________________
City, State, & Zip: ________________________________________________
B. CONTRACT NUMBER:
Contract Award Date: _________________________________________________
Contract Completion Date :____________________________
Total Contract Amount: __________________________
| Contract Method | [ ] Request for Quote [ ] Negotiated [ ] Sealed Bid | |
| Competitive | [ ] Yes | [ ] No |
| Type of Contract | [ ] Fixed Price | [ ] Cost Reimbursement |
| Other (Specify): | __________________________ |
C. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT
D. RELEVANCE OF WORK
II. IDENTIFICATION (Name of agency completing the evaluation form):
A. AGENCY NAME _ _______________________________________________________
PO Box/Street Address _______________________________________________________
City, State, & Zip _______________________________________________________
Point of Contact : _________________________________________________________
III. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:
A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE. Compliance with contract requirements, technical excellence of proposed supply items and service(s), furnished documents and reports in an accurate and timely manner.
[ ] Satisfactory [ ] Neutral [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comment:______________________________________________________________._______________
Was consideration or a monetary with held for non-conforming supplies/services or late deliveries against this contract? Yes ___ No ___
If yes explain ___________________________________________________________________________
Was any part if the contract terminated or in litigation? Yes _____ No _____
If yes explain ___________________________________________________________________________
Did the contractor receive any quality awards in performance of the contract? Yes _____ No ___
List awards, if applicable:_________________________________________________________________
Did the contract have option periods for performance. Yes ___ No _____
If yes, were all options exercised? Yes ___ No _____ If not, please explain_____________________________________________________________________
Did the firm comply with all environmental aspects of the contract? Yes ___ No ____ Additional Explanation ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE. Met service(s) performance times and did not receive any cure and/or show cause notices or have numerous complaints.
[ ] Satisfactory [ ] Neutral [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comment:_____________________________________________________________________________
Were all items (including products, services, reports, etc) delivered within original contract schedule?
Yes __ No ____
If no explain: ___________________________________________________________________________
Describe any corrective actions initiated to solve any of the above problems.
C. COST CONTROL. Pricing was considered Satisfactory and reasonable, no excessive or unreasonable claims and submits proper invoices.
[ ] Satisfactory [ ] Neutral [ ] Unsatisfactory Comment:___________________________________________________________________________
Did the contractor perform this contract at the original contract price? Yes __ No ____
Did the contractor request any kind of equitable adjustment in performance of this contract?
Yes ____ No __ If yes explain ___________________________________________________________________________
D. CUSTOMER (end user) SATISFACTION. Customer (end-user) satisfaction of overall performance for contract service(s).
[ ] Satisfactory [ ] Neutral [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comment:__________________________________________________________________________ E. BUSINESS RELATIONS. Effective Management, reasonable and cooperative behavior and overall business-like concern for the interests of the customer, effective Contractor recommended solutions to problems.
[ ] Satisfactory [ ] Neutral [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comment:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
IV. SUMMARY OPINION. PLEASE “X” THE STATEMENT THAT BEST DESCRIBES YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH THE FIRM
a. ____ They were a SATISFACTORY firm. The contractor’s performance met contractual requirements.
b. ____ They were a NEUTRAL firm who were not observed during a contract’s period of performance.
c. ____ They were a UNSATISFACTORY firm who did not meet the requirements of the contract.
e. ____ None of the above statements describes the firm. The following statement best describes our experience with them:
EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
| ___________________________________________ | ________________________________ | |
| SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR | PRINTED NAME OF EVALUATOR |
| ___________________________ | ______________________________ | |
| TITLE OF EVALUATOR | DATE |
| 1 OF 1 |
| 4 of 5 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .