Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Radiosonde Frequency Migration Project (RFMP) Upper Air Inflation Buildings (UAIB) Feasibility Study
- Solicitation number
- 1305M222QNWWG0480
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractor performance on a previous federal contract, as well as a solicitation for a feasibility study related to radio frequency migration projects and upper air inflation buildings. The past performance questionnaire includes ratings and comments for quality of service, schedule, cost control, and management for a contractor under contract number provided. It requests the completed questionnaire be returned by December 6, 2019. The solicitation seeks quotations for a feasibility study on radio frequency migration projects and upper air inflation buildings under solicitation number 1305M222QNWWG0480. The associated NAICS code is 541330 and FSC code is B513. The solicitation is not set aside for small businesses and is being issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 0001 Final.doc | DOC document | |
| Feasibility Study Combined Synopsis-Sol_v.1.pdf | ||
| PWS_UAIB_DomeRemoval_Feasibility_Study_V1.1.pdf | ||
| PWS_UAIB_DomeRemoval_Feasibility_Study_V1.0.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_UAIB_DomeRemoval_Feasiblity Appendix A v1.0.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS_UAIB_DomeRemoval_Feasiblity Appendix D v1.0.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Feasibility Study Combined Synopsis-Sol.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Information Form.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M220QNWWG0002
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Nicole Frie, no later than December 6, 2019 5:00pm Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________
Source Selection Information
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .