Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 192 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PERL THEATERS RENOVATION Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P8221Q0022
About this file
This is a past performance questionnaire for contractors bidding on the Pearl Harbor National Monument Theater Seating and Flooring Replacement project. The questionnaire collects information about a contractor's past work including the nature, location, value, and period of performance for prior projects as well as ratings for timeliness, communications, quality of work, and any post-award issues or changes requested. References are also asked to recommend whether they would hire the contractor again.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service for the Pearl Harbor National Memorial Theater Seating and Flooring Replacement project. Bidders should refer to the full combined synopsis/solicitation for details on requirements. No further specifics are provided in the file beyond the project name and issuing agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P8221Q0022_Amd_0004.pdf | ||
| Amendment_No_4_0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P8221Q0022_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Floor_Plans_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P8221Q0022_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Existing_Theater_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P8221Q0022_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P8221Q0022.pdf | ||
| A04_Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| SCA_Wage_Determination.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Pearl Harbor National Monument Theater Seating and Floor Replacement Past Performance Questionnaire Contractor Name:_______________________________________
1. What was the nature of the work they performed? Where was the work performed? What was the dollar value and period of performance?
2. Timeliness and communications. Did the Contractor complete contract requirements on time? Were there communications prompt, responsible, clear, professional?
3. Quality of work. What was the contractor's quality of work?
4. Post-award problems? Did the contractor request modifications after award to extend time of performance or cost of contract, or were they able to meet all requirements as quoted with no changes? If changes were requested, were they reasonable?
5. Would this reference recommend hiring this contractor again (highly recommend, recommend, not recommend)?
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .