Past_Performance_Questionnaire Attachment 7.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Serology and PCR Assay Testing Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
75N98020Q00032
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health Office of Logisitics and Acquisition Operations

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Serology and PCR Assay Testing Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
AmendmentOneSF 30.pdf PDF
STATEMENT OF WORK-2020.docx DOCX document
Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
52_212_3-October 2018 REPS.docx DOCX document
1449.docx DOCX document
Guidance - Invoice Submission via Email to NIH OFM - as of 6-8-2020.pdf PDF
IT_Security_Clauses_508 Appendix A.docx DOCX document
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items.docx DOCX document
PROPOSAL INTENT RESPONSE FORM.docx DOCX document
52_212_2_Evaluation.docx DOCX document
52_212_1-October 2018.docx DOCX document
52_212_4-OCT 2018_508.docx DOCX document
DisclosureofLobbyingActivities.pdf PDF
fixed price invoice instructions.pdf PDF
SerologySolicitation93020.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

NIH RFQ 75N98020Q00032

Attachment 7

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contract Information

Name of Contractor Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Period of Performance:

Contract Value:

Brief Description of Requirement:

To be completed by person providing review:

Name:

Phone/Email Agency/Organization:

Position/Title:

Relationship to Contract (Contracting Officer, Project Officer, Etc.)

SCORING CRITERIA

3-Exceptional- Performance met or exceeded all requirements with no or few minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

2-Acceptable- Performance met all requirements with major and minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

1-Unacceptable- Performance failed to meet all or most requirements with serious or persistent problems, for which corrective actions were either not taken or were ineffective and recovery was unsuccessful in a timely manner.

Survey Questions

1. Contractor’s compliance with the contract requirements?

Rating: 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

2. Contractor's adherence to contract schedules, timelines, and deadlines?

Rating: 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

3. Contractor’s commitment to customer satisfaction?

Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

4. Contractor’s ability to recruit and retain qualified and reliable personnel?

Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

5. Contractor’s Onsite Manager’s effectiveness?

Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

6. Was contractor ever issued a cure notice /show cause letter, or terminated for any reason?

YES NO If yes, explain:

Comments:

7. Contractor’s ability to consistently deliver invoices and reports timely and accurately?

Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

8. Were discrepancies ever discovered between negotiated costs and actual costs submitted?

YES NO If yes, explain:

Comments:

9. Contractor’s ability to communicate and respond to constructive feedback from PM/COR?

Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:

10. Contractor's OVERALL performance? Would you award another contract to this contractor?

Rating 3 2 1 N/A YES NO Comments:

Thank you for completing this survey! Please email your completed questionnaire to: stevenst@od.nih.gov by 2 pm. On October 30, 2020.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .