Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CGC TAMPA DOCKSIDE AVAILABILITY
- Solicitation number
- 70Z027RFQ260000240
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the U.S. Coast Guard to evaluate contractor performance on previous federal contracts.
The questionnaire is divided into two primary sections: Contract Information (Blocks 1-4) completed by the offeror, and Reference Information (Blocks 5-8) completed by the client. In the Contract Information section, the offeror provides firm identification details (name, CAGE code, UEI number, contact information), specifies their role (prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture), and documents contract specifics including contract number, type (firm fixed price or cost reimbursement), award date, completion dates, original and final contract prices with explanations of any variances. The offeror must also describe project complexity (high, medium, or routine) and explain the project's relevance to the solicitation requirements. In the Reference Information section, the client provides their name, title, contact information, and describes their role in the project. The client then rates the contractor's overall performance using defined adjectival ratings: Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), or Not Applicable (N). Ratings are assigned for overall quality, timeliness/schedule adherence, management/staffing, and work performed. The questionnaire includes a detailed rating definitions guide explaining the criteria and notes for each adjectival rating level. The USCG requests that clients complete and submit the questionnaire directly to the offeror, who then includes the completed form with their quote submission. The government reserves the right to verify all information provided on the form.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3_SOW.pdf | ||
| Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FAR Clauses and Provisions.pdf | ||
| SF1449-21.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rev 1 20251008
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Quoter to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Offeror Information:
Firm name: _____________________________________ CAGE Code: ________________________
Address: _______________________________________ UEI Number: ________________________
Phone Number: _________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________
Point of Contact: _________________________________
Contact Phone Number: ___________________________
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Joint Venture
Other (Explain): __________________________________________________________________
Percent of Project work performed: _____________%
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name): ____________________
Phone #: _____________________________
3. Contract Information
Contract Number: _____________________________________________
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable): _________________________
Contract type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (please specify):
Contract Title: _____________________________________________________________________
Award Date (mm/dd/yy): _____________________________________________________________
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): __________________________________________________
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): ____________________________________________________
Explain Differences: _________________________________________________________________
Rev 1 20251008
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
Original Contract Price (Award Amount): _________________________________________________
Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): ________________________________
Explain Differences: _________________________________________________________________
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine
How is this project relevant to this solicitation’s requirements? (Please provide details, i.e., similar equipment, requirements, conditions, staffing etc.):
REFERENCE INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information:
Name: _________________________________
Title: __________________________________
Phone Number: _________________________
Email Address: __________________________
6. Describe the client’s role in the project: _____________________________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
See Ratings and Definitions on next page
Overall Contractor Quality: __________________________________________________________
Overall Contractor Timeliness/On Schedule: ___________________________________________
Overall Contractor Management/Staffing: ______________________________________________
Overall Rating for Work Performed: ___________________________________________________
Any additional comments regarding the contractor’s performance: _____________________________
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy): ________________________
8. Client’s Signature: ________________________________________________
NOTE: USCG REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE QUOTER SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNARIE WITH THEIR QUOTE. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS
FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
Equivalent to Neutral Adjectival Rating
No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
| USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE Form PPQ1: |
| CONTRACT INFORMATION Offeror to complete Blocks 14: |
| Firm name: |
| CAGE Code: |
| Address: |
| UEI Number: |
| Phone Number: |
| Email Address: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Contact Phone Number: |
| 2 Work Performed as: Off |
| Prime Contractor: Off |
| Subcontractor: Off |
| Joint Venture: Off |
| Other Explain: |
| Percent of Project work performed: |
| If subcontractor who was the prime Name: |
| Phone: |
| Contract Number: |
| DeliveryTask Order Number if applicable: |
| Firm Fixed Price: Off |
| Cost Reimbursement: Off |
| Other please specify: Off |
| Contract Title: |
| Award Date mmddyy: |
| Contract Completion Date mmddyy: |
| Actual Completion Date mmddyy: |
| Explain Differences 1: |
| Explain Differences 2: |
| Explain Differences 3: |
| Explain Differences 4: |
| Original Contract Price Award Amount: |
| Final contract Price to include all modifications if applicable: |
| Explain Differences 1_2: |
| Explain Differences 2_2: |
| Explain Differences 3_2: |
| Explain Differences 4_2: |
| Explain Differences 5: |
| High: Off |
| Med: Off |
| Routine: Off |
| equipment requirements conditions staffing etc 2: |
| REFERENCE INFORMATION Client to complete Blocks 58 5 Client Information Name Title Phone Number Email Address: |
| Name: |
| Title: |
| Phone Number_2: |
| Email Address_2: |
| 6 Describe the clients role in the project 1: |
| 6 Describe the clients role in the project 2: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| See Ratings and Definitions on next page: |
| Overall Contractor Quality: |
| Overall Contractor TimelinessOn Schedule: |
| Overall Contractor ManagementStaffing: |
| Overall Contractor Satisfaction: |
| Overall Rating for Work Performed: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 1: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 2: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 3: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 4: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 5: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 6: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 7: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 8: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 9: |
| 7 Date Questionnaire was completed mmddyy: |
| RATING: |
| E Exceptional: |
| VG Very Good: |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the GovernmentOwner There should have been no significant weaknesses identified: |
| S Satisfactory: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the GovernmentOwners benefit The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory: |
| M Marginal: |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the GovernmentOwner: |
| U Unsatisfactory: |
| No information or did not apply to your contract: |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .