Past Performance Data.docx

OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA

Solicitation N00244-26-R-3106

Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:

NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Jennifer Stevens Email: jennifer.k.stevens7.civ@us.navy.mil On behalf of:

Company's Name: _________________________________

POC/Title/Position: _________________________________

Email Address: _________________________________

Contract/Purchase Order No.: _________________________________

Contract Amount: _________________________________

Contract Type: |_| Firm-Fixed-Price |_| Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity |_| Cost-Reimbursement Period of Performance: _________________________________

NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST

The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

II. Performance Information: Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate rating using the scale provided. For unacceptable ratings, please comment on how the contractor failed to meet your requirement. If the contractor had problems in a specific area, but you determined them to have no impact on the mission, please specify this in your narrative remarks. If the statement is not applicable, check “unknown”.

When responding to this questionnaire please use the following definitions as a guide:

A- ACCEPTABLE (SATISFACTORY) - Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see Note below).

U- UNACCEPTABLE (UNSATISFACTORY) – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

QUALITY

With respect to past performance, the evaluators will be assessing quality of performance. Therefore, it is extremely important that personnel contacted for past-performance information provide comprehensive information supporting assessments of quality, timeliness, customer satisfaction and cost control. It shall be insufficient on its face to just mark a block in support of a grade or score for past performance. Again, please be specific.

The contractor completed or complied with all aspects of the contract for the following items:

Contractor provided adequately trained and professional personnel

Comments:

Did contractor have an effective quality control program to ensure contract compliance?

Comments:

Did contractor demonstrate the ability to correct discrepancies in contract performance. Did the contractor self identify discrepancies and correct them in accordance with their Quality Control Procedures?

Comments:

TIMELINESS

Did the contractor provide timely, effective response to problems without excessive government involvement?

Comments:

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Did the contractor provide experienced/qualified management personnel to meet contract requirements?

Comments:

Did the contractor demonstrate the ability to identify and correct weaknesses in management (relative to contract, personnel - ie. quantity and/or quality), planning/scheduling, and quality of service?

Comments:

Did the contractor identify problems in advance—and once identified, take positive and effective corrective action?

Comments:

Did the contractor suggest solutions and showed initiative to implement solutions?

Comments:

Administrative reports/documents were received in accordance with contract requirements

Comments:

Contractor demonstrated ability to hire, maintain and replace, if necessary, personnel during the contract period

Comments:

Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, contractually or otherwise, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution

Comments:

Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied? |_| Yes (please explain) |_| No

Comments:

Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another Government contract? |_| Yes |_| No (please explain)

Comments:

Please rate the overall consistency and reliability of the contractor’s performance.

Narrative:

Please rate overall customer satisfaction with the contractor's performance.

Narrative:

COST CONTROL:

Has the contractor performed within the estimated contract costs? |_| Yes |_| No (please explain)

Comments:

Please rate the overall ability of contractor’s efforts to notify of unforeseen costs.

Narrative:

III. Evaluator Information: The following information will help us track the responses received, as well as resolve whatever differences may arise between your perception of the contractor’s performance and the contractor’s perception of their performance information revealing the individual completing the form will NOT be released to the contractor by the Government.

a. Evaluator’s Name:

b. Title:

c. Telephone Number: DSN: Commercial:

d. Organization, Office Symbol, and Address:

e. Length of involvement in the contract:

f. Date of questionnaire completion: