MDAE5 PreSynopsis Conference Presentation 19 Feb 2025 R1.pptx

U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, AL

Missile Defense Architect-Engineering Indefinite Delivery Contract – Generation 5

(MDAE5 IDC)

Pre-Synopsis Conference Solicitation Number: W912DY-25-R-0011

19 February 2025

WELcome & disclaimer

This synopsis conference is for informational purposes only. Please put your phones on silent or mute on TEAMS.

Any remarks or explanations given during this conference (or in the conference slides) will not change the terms and conditions of the synopsis. Offerors are cautioned to carefully read the requirements of the synopsis and comply accordingly.

Oral exchanges between offerors and the Government will not be binding unless changes are incorporated by a written amendment.

ProjNet will be open for the purpose of collecting additional questions after the conference.

A copy of the presentation, recording, and attendee list will be posted to sam.gov

Safety Remarks (Presenter: Emily White)

1. Call 911 for EMS; bldg. address: 300 Secure Gateway

2. To page a first aid attendant, call the guard desk at:

256 895-1180

3. There are AEDs and first aid attendants throughout the building (AED locations on following slides)

MEDICAL EMERGENCIES

Scan this QR code to call the guard desk

AED

LOCATIONS

FIRST FLOOR

HAZARD:

RESPONSE

FIRE

Yell “Fire” Pull fire alarm Evacuate to rally point

RALLY POINTS

If the fire alarm sounds or the PA system announces an evacuation, proceed out the nearest exit and meet your supervisor at the pre-determined rally point in the back of the building.

1 – OE

2 – Contracting

3 – ED

4 - RM

5 – ISPM

6 – ZX, SO, SL, OP, PA, IR, EE,

LM, FC, EMXC, Guards Visitors should obtain rally point location from their escort or sponsor

Proceed to identified Shelter-in-Place location on the First Floor. Listen for further directions.

HAZARD:

TORNADO WARNING

RESPONSE

SHELTER-IN-

PLACE LOCATIONS

The Missile Defense Agency & U.S. Department of Defense partners, successfully conducted a live intercept of a ballistic missile target, marking the first Ballistic Missile Defense event executed from Guam. During the flight experiment, the Aegis Guam System integrated with the new AN/TPY-6 radar and Vertical Launching System, fired a Standard Missile-3 Block IIA which intercepted an air-launched Medium Range Ballistic Missile target off the coast of Andersen Air Force Base, Guam. The AN/TPY-6 radar tracked the target shortly after launch to intercept in the first end-to-end tracking use of the radar during a live ballistic missile flight test. This effort provides critical support to the overall concept, requirements validation, data-gathering and model maturation for the future Guam Defense System (GDS). The future is focused on defending Guam and protecting forces from any potential regional missile threats.

AEGIS Guam Flight experiment – AN/TPY 6 and VLS https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=OlIogEAesU4&feature=youtu.be

Flight Experiment mission (FEM) - 02 agenda

Introductions & Opening Remarks Government Representatives Huntsville Center Mission & Vision BMD-MCX Overview MDA Facilities Engineering & Construction Program Overview Acquisition Information / Selection Process Small Business Opportunities Safety Considerations Closing Remarks Points of Contacts / Questions

Government REPRESENTATIVES

Jeffery Watts – Chief, BMD-MCX Kijafa T Johnson-Cooper – CT-MIB, Supv Contracting Officer* Tamikah McWilliams – CT-MIB, Lead Contract Specialist Brandon Talbot –Branch Chief, BMD-MCX Bret Styers – Sr. Program Manager, BMD-MCX** Chad House – Project Manager, MDA Construction Mike Brooks – Branch Chief, MDA Construction** Derrick Pommerenck - Project Manager, MDA Construction**

*in place of Contracting Officer, Lashonda Smith **not presenting Chad Homelvig – Project Manager, MDA Construction** Wesley Sargent –Acquisition Liaison, AE Program** Derek Beck – Sr. Program Engineer, BMD-MCX Nicole Boone – CEHNC Small Business Representative Emily White – CEHNC Safety Specialist Clay Weisenberger – CEHNC Office of Counsel**

Huntsville center mission and vision

The U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville provides specialized technical expertise, global engineering solutions, and cutting-edge innovations through centrally managed programs in support of national interests.

A certified, professional work force with an expeditionary mindset capable of pioneering solutions to unique, complex and high-risk missions in strengthened partnership with the USACE enterprise, key DOD stakeholders and our strategic allies.

Huntsville

USACE Ballistic Missile Defense Mandatory Center of Expertise

(BMD MCX)

Presenter(s): Brandon Talbot and Derek Beck

PAST: Organizational Need The USACE formally organized Huntsville Division in October 1967 to support the Army’s Sentinel/Safeguard Ballistic Missile System. A dedicated single purpose USACE Organization was required because of the size, multiple locations across the United States and technical complexity. The Huntsville location was chosen because it was the home of the Army’s first missile defense systems.

In 1998, the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense System Program Manager, then Brig. Gen. Willie B. Nance, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Director of Military Programs, Maj. Gen. Milton Hunter, signed a charter formally linking the National Missile Defense Joint Project Office and USACE as partners.

PRESENT: ER 1110-2-8163

Huntsville Center was designated to be the Ballistic Missile Defense Systems (BMD) Mandatory Center of Expertise (MCX) for USACE, September 2016 in support of the Missile Defense Agency.

FUTURE: ER 1110-345-911

Provide worldwide technical expertise to deliver the highest quality missile defense facilities and infrastructure for the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies and foreign governments, in partnership with other USACE Commands. The Missile Defense MCX is the enterprise mandatory center of expertise and standardization for the Missile Defense System’s (MDS) operational, testing, and expeditionary projects Missile defense Past/present/Future

Missile Defense Agency AF – Nuclear Weapons Center – Sentinel

Space and Missile Defense Command

AF – Life Cycle Management Center – Over The Horizon Radar - OTHR STAKEHOLDERS & Program synergies

CURRENT PROJECT DISTRIBUTION

What to expect

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES

Sentinel – Utility Corridor and other potential facility designs

Over the Horizon Radar (OTHR)

Iron Dome America

Foreign Military Sales (Design and Construction) Worldwide

Facility Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Projects (FSRM) Nationwide

MILCON Projects

BMD MCX Portfolio [CATEGORY NAME]

[CATEGORY NAME]

[CATEGORY NAME]

Air Force Army MDA 77 1 59 Facility/infrastructure support Potential Specialized pre-planning and studies including:

Environmental Studies and Multi-State-Coverage Impact Statements Constructability and Construction Trade Studies Housing Studies Power and Utility Studies Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) and Failure Mode Effects Criticality Analysis Studies (FMECA) Economic Analysis Studies Geotechnical investigations and Topographical mapping services Site-specific ground motion studies Programmatic support services High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) Shielding Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (ATFP) Explosive safety site plans including support to DoD Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) submissions Prediction of explosive effects Protective construction to mitigate explosive effects Extreme environmental conditions TEMPEST or EMSEC design standards Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Contamination Survivability (NBCCS) Secret Compartmentalized Information Facilities Physical and electronic security systems Intrusion detection Engineering and design during construction support

RDT&E support in development and rehabilitation of tactical/non-tactical facilities and infrastructure:

Missile Control Facilities Radar Facilities and Radar Support Facilities Launch Facilities Launch Control Facilities Mission Support Facilities Industrial workshops Power plants including shielded power plants and shielded back-up power generators Missile assembly facilities Communications facilities Administration buildings New and rehab road work Utility work Building systems work

Bret Styers Acquisition Manager, Senior Program Manager Air Force/Army bret.a.styers@usace.army.mil 938-900-7451

Derek Beck Senior Program Engineer derek.a.beck@usace.army.mil 256-895-1762

Brandon Talbot Chief, BMD MCX Branch brandon.l.talbot@usace.army.mil 256-316-9292

NOTE: Discussions in reference to this procurement shall go to the Contracting Officer Missile Defense MCX Points of Contact

Facilities Engineering and Construction Program Overview To: Huntsville USACE AE Contract Potential Offerors By: Chad House Project Manager Missile Defense Agency February 19, 2025 Approved for Public Release 25-MDA-12008 (4 Feb 25)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Purpose / Agenda

Purpose: To Provide Insights of the AE Services and Design requirements of potential bidders of the USACE Huntsville AE contract

Agenda:

MDA Overview Phases of capability deployment Typical Facilities Design Requirements Project Sample – Command Center, Guam

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

MDA Overview

MDA Mission: Develop and deploy a layered Missile Defense System to defend the United States, its deployed forces, and allies from missile attacks in all phases of flight Coordinating deployment and operation of a Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense system to defend the entirety of Guam against the rapidly evolving threats Integrating various system components, including a command and control center, radars, sensors, missile launchers, missile interceptors, and support facilities, at multiple sites around Guam

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

What We Do Worldwide Construction Oversight

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

What We Do Deployment is a 4 - 7 Year Process

NAVFAC

NAVFAC

Schedule must be maintained to deliver capability ahead of advancing threat

Lead – MDA/DXOF Lead – MDA/DXOF

MDA/DXOF

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Facilities and System Capabilities Risk Category (UFC 3-301-01): Typical facility risk categories will range from RC-II (administrative) to RC-V (National strategic military assets).

RC-V requires specialized seismic design considerations Explicit analysis of vertical accelerations Seismic certification of equipment and anchorages (RC-IV and RC-V) Independent peer review

Mission Critical: Facility systems supporting mission critical facilities typically require increased reliability and availability of electrical and mechanical systems.

High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) shielding of facility and systems is typical.

Exceptional Partnering: Project success is a combination of partnership and delivery by multiple DoD components as well as both Facility and Systems contractors. Each needing to communicate and be flexible in potential changes driven by the others needs.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Typical Scope Classifications/Types Construction: Builds new or upgrades existing Real Property to provide a capability that did not exist before Erection, installation, or assembly of new facility/building (temporary or permanent); addition, expansion, extension, alteration, conversion, or complete replacement of existing facility; related site preparation, excavation, filling, landscaping, or other land improvements; foundations, site work, and utility work associated with setup of relocatable buildings Project examples: Von Braun IV, FGA Missile Field #1 MEB, Fort Drum IDT, AAMDS Romania Repair: Fixes Real Property that is broken or does not meet current code Replacement of facility components; corrections of deficiencies in failed or failing components of existing facilities or systems to meet current standards; and major work (for example, building interior gutting and replacement) required to restore a generally deteriorated facility to usable condition Project examples: FGA Missile Field #1 Utilidor Infrastructure, FGA MDC Readiness & Control Facility Chilled Water Piping Study/Analysis: Perform engineering analysis of component and/or system to meet mission requirement Examples: Power reliability, seismic analysis, feasibility, survivability, etc.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Sample Mission Critical Facility:

Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBhJTemSKaA

LRDR -

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Typical Facilities Design Requirements Typical Facilities Design Requirements

Site layout Control facility Special use spaces System equipment pad/foundations Power plants – primary and/or backup Cooling plants Support facilities – warehouse, storage, ECP, etc.

Environmentally dependent protection features if needed Control Systems Power Control & Monitoring System Power Quality Monitoring System Advanced Metering Initiative Interface with Weapon System Prime Contractors / Installation Teams

Specialty Facilities Design Requirements

Mission Critical Seismic Design to include Seismic bracing (Risk Category Iv and V) Special Use Spaces to include the Implementation of the Construction Surveillance Plan (CSP) HEMP Design and Commissioning Design of Facilities to include the wide range of Environmental Conditions (Arctic, Tropical, Desert with Blowing Sands and Highly Corrosive areas) Interface with Weapon System Prime Contractors / Installation Teams Specific for systems include redundancy, survivability, availability, and force protection.

Engineering Rigor is Crucial, Historical MDA Design Knowledge is Helpful but Not Required.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

MDA Requirements Process MDA must verify that the delivered facility meets the operational needs

Some facility requirements may require generation through a rigorous systems engineering process

MDA traces all requirements between MDS Elements, facility design, and construction projects

MDA and NAVFAC or USACE jointly oversee facility construction to verify that requirements have been met

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Operational Need

System Specification

Element Specification

Facility Requirements

Sample Project Overview Defense of Guam Command Center

Disclaimer:

The following slides are presented to provide an insight into potential aspects of MDA facility design. Presentation may not reflect the most current product, decision or design maturation.

A determination of whether to construct the facility is pending completion of the final Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense (EIAMD) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

20191101_MILCON_101-V2

Command Center Construction Project Overview The proposed Command Center is a Mission Essential facility necessary for post- disaster recovery and continuous operations after an earthquake Requires sophisticated control systems for power and cooling redundancy Power Generation Facility will provide 5 -10 MW of primary & emergency backup power Total facility space includes ~57,000 square feet for computing equipment, user interfaces, communications, and mechanical cooling equipment Project also includes security infrastructure, utilities & site improvements, cyber security measures, and demolition of housing units

Notional Representation

Command Center Key Requirements Facility must be resilient to natural and induced environments Facility is designed in accordance with ASCE 7-16 and UFC 3- 301-01 Risk Category IV Command Center is supported on a seismically isolated foundation Requires seismic certification of installed equipment Must withstand typhoon wind speeds and windborne debris Must utilize corrosion resistant materials suited for a tropical environment Induced environments include electromagnetic interference and Antiterrorism/Force Protection Select areas of facility subject to construction security requirements in accordance with ICD 705 Facility serves as a designated storm shelter subject to requirements set forth in the International Code Counsel (ICC) 500

North Side View

South Side View & Power Plant

Huntsville Missile Defense Architect-Engineering Indefinite Delivery Contract – Generation 5

(MDAE5 IDC)

ACQUISITION INFORMATION

Presenter(s): Kijafa T Johnson-Cooper

Acquisition information

Scope: Provide technical support for the design of new and existing facilities and sites in support of the deployment of mission critical and mission essential missile systems for the Government.

Place of Performance: The United States, U.S. Territories, and Possessions, and Outlying Areas (as defined in FAR 2.101), as well as foreign locations such as Germany, Denmark, Turkey, Bulgaria, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, Canada, and Czech Republic. Other foreign jurisdictions may be added after an analysis of relevant statues and regulations.

Acquisition information

Contract Information: Huntsville Center plans to award an unrestricted multiple award Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC). Firms will be selected for negotiation based on demonstrated competence and qualifications for the required work. Target number of firms is 5+ with an estimated shared capacity of $400M. Task orders will be issued, and the minimum guarantee is $2500.00

Period of Performance: One 36-month base period and two 24-month option periods for a total of 7-years. FAR 52.217-9, “Option to Extend the Term of the Contract” and FAR 52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services” applies.

North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS): 541330, Engineering Services

Product Service Code: C1BF, Missile Systems Facilities

Timeline (estimated)

Industry Day

19FEB25

Proposals Due 1QTR26 Award

3QTR26

U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville Missile Defense Architect-Engineering Indefinite Delivery Contract – Generation 5

(MDAE5 IDC)

SELECTION PROCESS

Presenter(s): Tamikah McWilliams, Brandon Talbot & Derek Beck

Selection process

The main activities that comprise the selection process for this A-E IDC suite are as follows:

1. Public Announcement

2. Receipt of Standard Form (SF) 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications

3. Conduct Pre-Selection Evaluation Board (if determined necessary)

4. Conduct Selection Evaluation Board

5. Approval of Selections by Selection Authority

6. Issuance, Evaluation, and Negotiation of Price Proposals

7. Preparation of Contract Award Documents

Selection criteria

Criteria A: 3-5 relevant and recent projects Criteria B: Certifications, Key Personnel, Work Management, Teaming, Org Chart, Quality Control Criteria C: CPARS and PPQ Criteria D: performance of 5 task orders, down ramping, and above and beyond Criteria E: diversity of project experience and capability Criteria F: Number of DoD contracts

Selection criteria & Evaluations

Criteria A: Specialized Experience & Technical Competency

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements and delivering high quality products and services based on specialized engineering experience A minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) completed key projects must be submitted Key projects must be:

Relevant (considered similar in technical complexity to the solicitation scope of work) Recent (complete within the last 10 years, and construction currently at least 50% complete) It is NOT mandatory for key projects to be in support of a missile system program Multiple projects performed under a multiple-award contract may NOT be submitted as a single key project Work performed by Key Subcontractors/Key Subcontractors must be identified

Criteria B: Professional Qualifications

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements and delivering high quality products and services based on the demonstrated experience and skills of its key personnel A resume must be submitted for each key person A key person may NOT dual-hat as another key person position Ensure selected key personnel demonstrate the credentials/registrations required by Part I – Section E of the Synopsis Present JV agreement Submit an Organization Chart and QC process

Criteria C: Past Performance

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements and delivering high quality products and services as indicated by that Offeror's record of past performance

“Offeror” refers to the proposed prime Contractor and its proposed key subcontractors

For prime contractors or key subcontractors whose firms are divided into severable segments (i.e. division, group, unit, etc.) the past performance will only be evaluated as it relates to those segments of the firm(s) that will actually perform the work

Recency is defined as work completed within 10 years from the closing date of this solicitation. Relevancy is defined as contracts similar in size, scope and magnitude of effort. Quality is defined as the overall quality of the Past Performance.

Recency, relevancy, and quality will be used to determine the Government’s confidence.

Criteria C: Past Performance

The Government will use data provided in the Offeror's proposal in addition to data obtained from other sources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance.

Criteria D: Capacity

The Government will evaluate management approach, coordination of disciplines and subcontractors, and quality control procedures to complete up to an estimated 5-task orders simultaneously, with an estimated value of $5 million each in a 1-year period of time.

More consideration will be given to firms who can effectively demonstrate a greater capacity for their proposed team to effectively handle additional work of the type demanded of this contract relative to their present workload.

Capacity is a measure of the proposed team’s ability to provide the volume of expertise

Criteria E: Knowledge of Locality

The Government will evaluate the firm’s narrative (with charts or other aids as necessary) to demonstrate their familiarity and capabilities.

Greater consideration will be given to firms with the experience and capability of performing work on projects located in diverse, extreme, remote, and targeted locations.

Criteria F: Volume of DoD Contract Awards (TIE-BREAKER)

Those requirements awarded by DoD in the last 12 months to the Prime A-E firm or approved partnerships

Contracts may include those for the Missile Defense Agency (no additional consideration given).

Greater consideration will be given to those firms who have been awarded a lesser total dollar amount of stand-alone DoD contracts and task orders in the last 12 months than those who have been awarded a greater total amount.

Capacity of unawarded options will not be considered under this criterion.

SUMMARY Information The selection process for this acquisition will be IAW EP 715-1-7, FAR 36.6, DFARS 236.6, and AFARS 5136.6, using the selection criteria listed below

Firms that demonstrate higher aggregate qualifications relevant to the primary selection criteria are considered to be the most highly qualified firms.

If two or more firms are technically equal, the secondary criteria will be used as “tie-breakers” and the final ranking of the most highly qualified firms will be decided after interviews are conducted.

At least two (2) most highly qualified firms remain “in reserve” when negotiations commence on the final contract.

Negotiations for fully burdened labor rates in each labor category will take place with the most highly qualified firms. The Request for Price Proposal (RFPP) stage

In the event there are staggered awards, later awarded contracts will have an initial PoP that will be less than the full base period in duration and will end on the same date as all other MATOC awards.

As an IDC holder if you win a task order you cannot perform on any team for construction related to that design and Support Center, Huntsville Missile Defense Architect-Engineering Indefinite Delivery Contract – Generation 5

(MDAE5 IDC)

SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES & SAFETY

Presenter(s): Nicole Boone & Emily White

Small business opportunities

NAICS: 541330, Engineering Services

Small Business standard size $25.5M

Joint ventures

Mentor/Protégé

Small Business can be key subcontractors in specialized areas

Safety

EM 385-1-1, US Army Corps of Engineers Safety & Health Requirements Manual Manual Published March 2024

Chapter 2 is most important to know and understand.

Submittals Site Visit Accident Prevention Plan (SVAPP) – HNC Form used for visual inspection/observation or office type work only. No work (ex: metering, work on equipment, etc. ) can be performed if only using SVAPP.

Accident Prevention Plan (APP) – Uses ENG Form 6293 found in EM 385-1-1. Must be completed before performing work on-site.

Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA) – AHA must be prepared for each work activity or task to ensure minimum safety requirements are met.

All submittals must go through KO/COR and received Safety Acceptance prior to work.

Site Safety Health Officer SSHO is required on-site when work is performed.

SSHO is not required for site visits with SVAPP, however there is a spot to designate someone as safety representative.

Accident Reporting All accidents, regardless of severity, and near misses must be reported within time frames in EM 385-1-1.

Use ENG Form 3394 for accident reporting.

Common Issues Noted During Reviews or Visits:

Formats not following EM 385-1-1 Generic, not site-specific, information provided in required documents Missing certificates or supporting documents AHA doesn’t contain the names & credentials of competent or qualified person No QC on the document, recurring deficiencies from project to project PHI & PII included in documents/certifications Subcontractors not aware of requirements SSHO not on-site during work or not aware of requirements in accident plan or EM

Closing remarks

Competitive acquisition; Full and Open Competition

Anticipated award date is Fiscal Year 2026 – Synopsis posted to sam.gov

Review the synopsis in its entirety, ensuring to address all “shalls” and other proposal submission requirements .

Before proposing questions determine if it is a business decision first; the Government cannot make business decisions

Do not contact the customers in reference to this effort – questions are to be directed to the Contracting Officer

Submit proposals electronically via the Procurement Integrated Environment Solicitation Module at: https://www.piee.eb.mil. Instructions are included in the solicitation & PIEE Questions shall be directed to 1-866-618-5988. The help desk cannot advise on this solicitation.

and Support Center, Huntsville Missile Defense Architect-Engineering Indefinite Delivery Contract – Generation 5

(MDAE5 IDC)

Questions

Points of contact

Contracting Officer Lashonda Smith Lashonda.C.Smith@usace.army.mil 256-895-7795 Team Lead Johnna Sebben Johnna.m.Sebben@usace.army.mil

CEHNC Small Business Office sbo-hnc@usace.army.mil

Learn more about USACE, Huntsville center www.hnc.usace.army.mil image4.png image5.png image3.png image12.jpeg image13.jpeg image14.jpeg image15.jpeg image16.png image17.jpeg image18.png image26.png image27.png image28.png image29.png image19.jpeg image20.png image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image25.png image30.jpeg image31.png image32.png image33.png image34.png image35.png image36.png image37.jpeg image38.png image39.emf image40.jpeg image41.png image42.png image43.png image44.png image45.png image46.png

Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet.xlsx Sheet1

BMD MCX Portfolio

Air Force 77

SMDC 1

Army 2

MDA 59

image10.jpeg image47.jpg image11.jpeg image48.emf image49.emf image50.png image51.png image52.png image53.png image54.jpg image55.jpg image56.jpg image57.jpg image58.jpg image59.jpg image60.png

Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet1.xlsx Sheet1

New $400M AE IDC (underway) 2025 2026 2027 - 2033

January February March April May June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August September October November December

Base

Change $48M AE IDC to $300M & execute J&A to add addtl $48M & 2 yrs Base image61.emf image62.png image63.png image64.png image65.png image1.png image9.png image2.png image6.png image7.png