B08_Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Reference.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Design and Install Fire Suppression & Alarm System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- P17PS02556
About this file
3 - Past Performance Reference Form
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B08_Combined_SynSol.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_1_Scope_of_Work.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_4_Park_Map.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_2_SCA_WD.pdf | ||
| Sol_P17PS02556.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ P17PS02556
Survey / Questionnaire Completed By:
Company / Agency / Organization
Name / Title of Reference
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
Signature
Conversation Information
Date of Call
Time of Call
Offeror Information
Company Name & Address
Project Title/ Contract Number
Description of Project for Which Reference is Requested (Include type of work/trades performed)
| Complexity of Work (circle) |
| High |
| Medium |
| Low |
Location of Work
| Role on Project (circle) |
| Prime |
| Sub-contractor |
| Consultant |
Contract Amount
Date of Award
Project Status
| % Complete |
| Scheduled Completion Date |
| Actual Completion Date |
1. QUALITY OF WORK
Evaluate performance in complying with contract requirements, quality achieved and overall technical expertise demonstrated.
Excellent Quality
Above Average Quality
Average Quality
Below Average Quality
Unsuccessful or Experienced Significant Quality Problems & Issues
Remarks / Comments:
2. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
To what extent were contract performance requirements met? Consider contract performance period; were submittals provided in a timely manner; timely completion of punch-list items; submission of close out documents, i.e., “as-built drawings”. Timely / satisfactory response to warranty issues, etc.
Completed Substantially Ahead of Schedule
Completed on Schedule with no Significant Time Delays
Completed on Schedule with Minor Delays Under Extenuating Circumstances
Routinely failed to Schedule Perform Requirements
Remarks / Comments:
3. DOCUMENTATION QUALITY
To what extent were reports, submittals and other required documentation accurate, complete, comprehensive, and provided in a timely manner?
Excellent Quality
Above Average Quality
Average Quality
Below Average Quality
Unsuccessful / Extensive Quality Problems
Remarks / Comments:
4. COORDINATION
How well were sub-contractors, consultants, suppliers, and / or the labor force managed and coordinated? Or, if firm was a sub-contractor, how well did they respond to coordination efforts and work with other subs? Were there any problems and, if so, how were they handled and resolved?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
5. GENERAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
How appropriate and effective were the firm’s general management and business practices? Consider such things as; did they provide quality, experienced managers and supervisors, technical and administrative personnel for the duration of the project; were appropriate personnel promptly available when needed, and responded in a prompt and acceptable manner to resolve problems, did they provide comprehensive, accurate price proposals, etc.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
6. OVERALL SAFETY PROGRAM
How well did the contractor manage the construction project as it relates to general safety? Discuss any safety issues that arose during the course of the project.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
7. BUDGET MANAGEMENT
How well did the contractor conform to the project budget? Did the contractor initiate unwarranted, unverifiable, change orders or change order requests, etc.?
Excellent
Above Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
8. CLAIMS / LITIGATION
Was the contractor involved in any claims or litigation involving the project?
Yes (If “Yes”, please explain in remarks area below)
No
Remarks / Comments:
9. OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
To what extent were the end users satisfied with: Quality? Cost? Schedule?
| Quality |
| Cost |
| Schedule |
Exceptionally Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Somewhat Dissatisfied (please explain)
Dissatisfied (please explain)
Remarks / Comments:
10. YOUR RECCOMENDATION
If given the opportunity and the choice, would you work with this contractor again?
Yes
No
Not Sure
Remarks / Comments:
11. OTHER REMARKS / COMMENTS
Use the space below to provide other information related to the contractor's performance. This may include selection of sub-contractors / consultants, flexibility in dealing with contract challenges, payment issues, their overall concern for the client's interest (if applicable), project awards received, etc.
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .