Attachment_6_Asbestos_Survey_Report_excerpts.pdf

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

SURVEY REPORT

FOR

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MINIDOKA INTERNMENT NATIONAL MONUMENT

JEROME COUNTY, IDAHO

Prepared For:

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

1201 Eye Street NW, 10th Floor

Washington, DC 20006

Prepared By:

MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.

396 Plasters Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30324

December 6, 2010

MACTEC Project Number 6141-10-0016

National Park Service; MINN, Jerome County, Idaho Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Report MACTEC Project 6141-10-0016 December 6, 2010

Page i

TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... i

1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Background Information

2.1 Facility Description

3.0 Summary of Review of Existing Data and Interview of On-Site Personnel

3.1 Interview of Onsite Personnel

3.2 Review of Previous Asbestos-Related Information

4.0 Survey of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Scope

4.1 Visual Survey

4.2 Methodology

4.3 Existing Data

4.4 Supplemental Sample Collection and Analysis

5.0 Findings

5.1 Located ACM

6.0 Opinion of Abatement Costs of Located ACM

6.1 Previous Asbestos-Related Costs

6.2 Current Asbestos-Containing Material Cleanup and Management

6.3 Future Asbestos-Containing Material Cleanup Costs

7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

Attachments:

Tables: 1. Summary of Suspect ACM Observed

2. Summary of ACM Located

Appendices: A. Photographs of Buildings included in this Survey B. Photographs and Supplemental Information for Non-ACM C. Photographs and Supplemental Information for Located ACM D. Laboratory Results of Bulk Samples E. Inspector and Laboratory Accreditations

11..00 EEXXEECCUUTTIIVVEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY

The National Park Service (NPS) contracted MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) to provide asbestos assessment services at select Parks to assist NPS with establishing an Asbestos Assessment

Program (AAP). The intent of the AAP is to evaluate and supplement existing asbestos related data to assist

NPS with complying with existing applicable Federal, State and local regulations related to asbestos. The

AAP will provide objective data related to the impact of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) for the planning and execution of future maintenance, renovation, construction, and demolition efforts related to

Park facilities. Additionally, information obtained through the asbestos assessment and survey effort will be used by the NPS Washington Support Office to compile the necessary data to respond to the Federal

Accounting Standards Advisory Board Technical Bulletin 2006-1, Recognition and Measurement of

Asbestos-Related Cleanup Costs.

The site specific asbestos survey assessment of Minidoka Internment National Monument, in Jerome

County, Idaho was performed on March 9, 2010. The asbestos survey and sampling was performed by accredited asbestos inspectors from MACTEC. Asbestos surveys were performed on 14 buildings/structures at the Park.

During the interview with the NPS representative, it was learned that the building list provided to MACTEC by NPS included two buildings that are no longer at the site. These two buildings were not surveyed. Eight buildings not on the building list provided to MACTEC by NPS were also included in the survey.

Additionally, it was learned during the interview that no previous or existing asbestos related information or data is available for the Park.

During the survey efforts, 95 bulk samples were collected of suspect asbestos-containing materials. These samples were analyzed by a laboratory accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program. The samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy and reported as percent asbestos in each sample.

The survey located asbestos-containing materials in seven buildings. Asbestos-containing window glazing on the exterior of the Motor Repair & Tire Shop, wallboard joint compound throughout the Hx Barrack

Administrative building, and floor tile and mastic located in the Restroom of the Hx Barrack Administrative building were noted to be damaged. The remaining asbestos-containing materials were assessed as being undamaged at the time of the survey. MACTEC recommends that the damaged materials be removed.

Additionally, it is recommended that due to the likely significant mobilization costs to the site the other asbestos-containing materials be removed at that time.

Due to the lack of existing data/information, no previous asbestos related expenses were identified. The current asbestos related expenses are $10,670. The opinion of cost for asbestos cleanup is estimated to be

$48,659.

22..00 BBAACCKKGGRROOUUNNDD IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONN

The National Park Service (NPS) contracted MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) to provide asbestos assessment services at select Parks to assist NPS with establishing an Asbestos Assessment

Program (AAP). The intent of the AAP is to evaluate and supplement existing asbestos related data to assist

NPS with complying with existing applicable Federal, State, and local regulations related to asbestos. The

AAP will provide objective data related to the impact of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) for the planning and execution of future maintenance, renovation, construction, and demolition efforts related to

Park facilities. Additionally, information obtained through the asbestos assessment and survey effort will be used by the NPS Washington Support Office to compile the necessary data to respond to the Federal

Accounting Standards Advisory Board Technical Bulletin 2006-1, Recognition and Measurement of

Asbestos-Related Cleanup Costs.

The scope of work for this project included asbestos related survey and assessment efforts to evaluate existing survey information and perform supplemental sampling as necessary to comply with established sampling guidance and protocols. The asbestos survey process included a review of existing asbestos survey information (if provided), an interview of appropriate Park site personnel, visual surveys of readily accessible interior and exterior areas of the various structures to locate suspect ACM, and the collection and laboratory analyses of bulk samples of located suspect ACM.

Following identification, delineation, and quantification of ACM within structures at the Park, an opinion of abatement cost was prepared for each structure where ACM was located and summarized for the Park as a whole. To the extent possible, the opinion of costs included asbestos-related costs incurred by the Park to date when documentation of the expenditure of funds was provided for review. However, when documentation of actual costs was not provided, these expenditures were not reported.

2.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Minidoka Internment National Monument (MINN) is located in Hagerman, Idaho. NPS initially reported to MACTEC that 8 structures were present at the Park. During the interview with the head of

Maintenance, Ray Vader, it was learned that two structures were no longer at the site. Assessments and surveys were not performed for these two structures. Eight buildings not on the building list provided to

MACTEC by NPS were also included in the survey. Therefore, 14 structures were surveyed for ACM;

however only one-half of the Hx Barrack Administrative buildings (109044) was accessible for inspection.

Appendix A provides a summary of the buildings included in the survey.

33..00 SSUUMMMMAARRYY OOFF RREEVVIIEEWW OOFF EEXXIISSTTIINNGG DDAATTAA AANNDD IINNTTEERRVVIIEEWW OOFF

OONN--SSIITTEE PPEERRSSOONNNNEELL

MACTEC requested and, when provided by NPS, reviewed general types of asbestos information as follows:

1. Information related to the construction of facilities and structures at the site. The intent of this review was to gain an understanding if asbestos was specified and/or installed during construction.

2. Existing asbestos survey data, asbestos Operations and Maintenance Programs, and other asbestos related information. The intent of the review was to gain an understanding of the scope and extent of previous survey efforts including locations, quantities and condition of previously located ACM and non-ACM. The purpose of reviewing this information would be to assess the need for supplemental sampling and analyses.

3. Previous asbestos abatement actions or monitoring. The purpose of reviewing previous asbestos abatement efforts and evaluation of replacement materials was to assess the need for supplemental sampling and analyses.

4. Information related to any previous expenditure of funds related to asbestos for the above referenced information. The purpose of reviewing this information was to provide NPS with a summary of past asbestos-related costs.

5. Information obtained from interviews of onsite personnel familiar with the history of the Park’s construction and operation. The purpose of the interviews was to obtain pertinent information related to building construction/materials, previous and current uses, and previous or planned renovations/modifications to the facilities.

3.1 INTERVIEW OF ONSITE PERSONNEL

MACTEC interviewed Ray Vader, while onsite. Mr. Vader stated that he had been employed at the Park for approximately one-year. During the interview, Mr. Vader stated that there were no immediate plans for renovation or demolition at the MINN Park.

3.2 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS ASBESTOS-RELATED INFORMATION

No asbestos related documents were provided. MACTEC was informed by NPS personnel that no previous asbestos related data or information for the Park exists.

44..00 SSUURRVVEEYY OOFF SSUUSSPPEECCTT AASSBBEESSTTOOSS--CCOONNTTAAIINNIINNGG MMAATTEERRIIAALLSS

SSCCOOPPEE

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) have published regulations, guidelines, and recommendations regarding inspection and sampling for installed ACM. These regulations, guidelines, and recommendations were adhered to as appropriate within the scope of this survey. The State of Idaho does not have any specific Asbestos inspector licensing or survey requirements beyond those of the Federal Government.

Current EPA and OSHA guidelines allow accredited asbestos Inspectors to categorize certain materials as non-suspect asbestos-containing materials based on visual evaluation. Examples of these non-suspect ACM include fiberglass, rubber, Styrofoam©, cork, foam glass, wood, concrete, glass, and metal. MACTEC did not inventory, sample, or otherwise assess these non-suspect materials when encountered.

Current EPA and OSHA guidelines allow accredited asbestos Inspectors to assume suspect materials contain asbestos. MACTEC’s survey protocol relative to NPS facilities included sampling and analyses of composite shingled roof materials, where safe access could be obtained. However, in order to preserve the integrity of roofing systems, when roofing materials other than composite shingled materials were observed, these suspect materials were assumed to be ACM.

4.1 Visual Survey

The visual survey consisted of a walk-through of each structure included to be surveyed at the Park to locate, inventory, quantify and document the condition of suspect ACM. The survey efforts included reasonably accessible interior and exterior areas of each structure at the Park. Destructive evaluation was not performed to evaluate for concealed suspect ACM located beneath multiple layers of flooring, within wall/ceiling cavities and/or chases, or other locations that were not readily accessible. Suspect materials observed during the survey were grouped into “homogeneous materials”. A homogeneous material is one that appears to be uniform in color and texture and appears to have been applied or installed during the same general time period. Homogeneous materials can be friable or nonfriable. Friable materials are those that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Nonfriable materials are those which when dry cannot be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Nonfriable materials can become friable when they are disturbed, become deteriorated, or are aggressively contacted.

For reference, MACTEC developed room designations during our visual survey. Each room, area, or groups of rooms were assigned a unique (arbitrary) number. For the purposes of this survey effort, a room is a discrete area within the surveyed structure that may correspond to physical rooms (e.g., doors and walls), a discrete space (e.g., mezzanine or roof), or other identifiable space such as a department, suite, or group of rooms. When drawings for a building/structure were not provided by NPS, MACTEC may have designated an entire building as a single room and referenced areas/rooms within that building/structure based on the physical lay-out of the structure (i.e., northwest office, entrance, storage, kitchen, restroom, etc.).

4.2 Methodology

When supplemental sampling and analyses were performed, representative bulk samples (some with multiple layers) were collected of homogeneous suspect asbestos-containing materials located during the visual survey. The sampling was performed in general accordance with the sampling requirements of the

Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulation [40 CFR 763.86] for each homogeneous material. The bulk samples were sealed in airtight containers, labeled, and delivered to MACTEC’s

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory in Atlanta, Georgia.

Samples were analyzed for asbestos content by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in general accordance with EPA method 600/R-93/116.

4.3 Existing Data

There was no existing data or information related to asbestos provided to MACTEC for this Park.

4.4 Supplemental Sample Collection and Analysis

Sampling and analyses of suspect asbestos-containing materials were performed. The asbestos survey and sample collection were performed by R. Greg Henley and Tod A. Dawson of MACTEC. Mr. Henley and

Mr. Dawson are accredited asbestos Inspectors; evidence of accreditation is provided in Appendix E. The site evaluation services were performed on March 9, 2010.

A total of 95 samples were collected from structures at the Park. All samples were analyzed by PLM with no additional analytical evaluation.

55..00 FFIINNDDIINNGGSS

The detailed findings of the survey are provided in the tables, appendices, and attachments following the body of this report. Each of these sections is presented by building name and NPS building identification number and is described below. Refer to these sections for detailed information associated with the materials located during the survey efforts.

Table 1.0 - Summary of Suspect ACM Observed includes the following for each material observed during our survey:

Homogeneous material identification number;

A physical description of each suspect ACM observed;

The associated substrate or component and associated building system;

The AHERA category (material type), and;

Suspect Material Classification (previously sampled, sampled, assumed).

Table 2.0 - Summary of Identified ACM includes the following for each ACM material:

Homogeneous material identification number;

A physical description of the ACM located;

The associated substrate or component and associated building system;

The AHERA category (material type);

Documentation of friability, and;

Material classification.

Appendix A – Building Summary:

Presents a picture of the building/structure (if available);

Building number and name (as defined by NPS);

Building use;

Building size;

Construction date;

Reference to ACM;

Asbestos related costs.

Appendix B – Non-ACM Detail and Photographs:

Building/structure identification number;

A representative photograph of the non-ACM homogeneous material;

The information summarized in Table 1, and;

Bulk sample information including sample location and sample results.

Appendix C - ACM Detail and Photographs:

Building/structure identification number;

A representative photograph of the ACM homogeneous material;

The information summarized in Table 2, and;

Bulk sample information including sample location, sample results, homogeneous material locations, quantity and condition.

Laboratory results of bulk samples are included in Appendix D. Inspector and Laboratory Accreditations and

Certifications are included in Appendix E.

5.1 LOCATED ACM

Asbestos-containing materials were located in the following buildings: Administrative Office/Visitor Center

(108342), Motor Repair & Tire Shop (108343), Hx Barrack Administrative (109044), Herman North Barn

(Unk54), Herman House (Unk55), Firestation (Unk56), and Bathroom (Unk61). Asbestos-containing window glazing on the exterior of the Motor Repair & Tire Shop, wallboard joint compound throughout the

Hx Barrack Administrative, and floor tile and mastic located in the Restroom of the Hx Barrack

Administrative were assessed to be damaged. The window glazing and joint compound were observed to be friable. The Herman North Barn contains vermiculite insulation within the walls which contains asbestos.

66..00 OOPPIINNIIOONN OOFF AABBAATTEEMMEENNTT CCOOSSTTSS OOFF LLOOCCAATTEEDD AACCMM

6.1 PREVIOUS ASBESTOS-RELATED COSTS

Previous asbestos related data was not located or provided for the Park.

6.2 CURRENT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL CLEANUP AND MANAGEMENT

The cost to perform this survey at this Park, including analytical efforts, reporting, expenses, and management, is $10,670. This expense is provided in Appendix A and has been allocated proportionally by square feet per building/structure area.

6.3 FUTURE ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL CLEANUP COSTS

The total estimated cost for the removal of ACM identified at this Park is $48,659. These expenses are provided by building in Appendix A. This total cleanup cost includes asbestos removal and disposal. The cost does not include management of the ACM prior to removal.

77..00 CCOONNCCLLUUSSIIOONNSS AANNDD RREECCOOMMMMEENNDDAATTIIOONNSS

Based on findings presented in this report, MACTEC offers the following conclusions and recommendations:

1. MACTEC recommends that the damaged materials be removed. Due to location of the Park and likely significant mobilization cost, it is recommended that the other ACM be removed at the same time. The identified ACM should not be disturbed until removal is complete.

2. Avoid disturbance of ACM presented in this report. Inadvertent or improper disturbance of ACM can create exposures to asbestos at or above the permissible exposure limits established by OSHA.

MACTEC has recommended that the ACM at the site be removed. In the event that these materials are not removed, they should be included in an Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Program (O&M), which provides policies and work practices for the performance of work on or around asbestos-containing materials presented in Table 2. The O&M Program should contain the necessary elements to comply with and document compliance with the OSHA Asbestos General Industry Standard [29 CFR 1910.1001] and the OSHA Construction Asbestos Standard [29 CFR 1926.1101].

3. Prior to disturbing materials assumed to be ACM, MACTEC recommends that an accredited asbestos Inspector evaluate the materials and collect representative bulk samples if applicable to be appropriately analyzed to evaluate for asbestos content.

4. If any suspect materials are discovered that have not been addressed in this report, MACTEC recommends that work activities that may disturb the materials be halted and the materials be assumed to be asbestos-containing until an appropriate evaluation (which may include sampling and analysis) of the materials is performed by an accredited asbestos Inspector to confirm or rebut the presence of asbestos.

5. Due to the non-destructive nature of the survey performed by MACTEC, it may be necessary to perform additional destructive evaluations of areas of the facility prior to renovation and/or demolition activities. The additional evaluations should focus on locating materials that were concealed and not accessible during these survey activities.

Minidoka Internment National Monument Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010

Table 1.0 - Page 3 of 5

TABLE 1.0 - SUMMARY OF SUSPECT ACM

Building Unk54 - Herman North Barn (Field Assigned By MACTEC)

Homogeneous Material ID

Suspect Material Description

Substrate/Component

Associated Facility System

Material Category

Suspect Material Classification

MIIN-Unk54-001a Wallboard, White Wall Studs Wall/Ceiling Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk54-002a Window Glazing, Gray Windows Windows Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk54-003a Felt Paper, Black Wood Building Exterior Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk54-004a Wall Insulation, Behind Existing Finishes Wall Studs Perimeter Wall Misc. Sampled

Building Unk55 - Herman House (Field Assigned By MACTEC)

Homogeneous Material ID

Suspect Material Description

Substrate/Component

Associated Facility System

Material Category

Suspect Material Classification

MIIN-Unk55-001a Resilient Sheet Flooring, Tan, Square Pattern Floor Tile Floor Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-001b Sheet Flooring Adhesive, Yellow Floor Tile Floor Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-002a 9" x 9" Floor Tile, Green, Under Existing Finishes Wood Floor Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-002b Floor Tile Mastic, Black Wood Floor Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-003a Resilient Sheet Flooring, Green/White, Square Pattern Wood Floor Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-003b Sheet Flooring Adhesive, Yellow Wood Floor Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-004a Wallboard, White Walls/Ceilings Wall/Ceiling Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-004b Wallboard Joint Compound, White Walls/Ceilings Wall/Ceiling Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-005a Mastic/Adhesive, Tan Wallboard Wall Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-006a Roof Shingles, Brown Wood Roof Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-007a Window Glazing, White Windows Windows Misc. Sampled

MIIN-Unk55-008a Roof Shingles, Gray Wood Roof Misc. Sampled

APPENDIX A - BUILDING SUMMARY

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Building Summary Page 5 of 8

Building Size: 495 SF

ACM Identified

Building Use: Herman North Barn (Field Assigned By MACTEC)

Building Unk54 - Herman North Barn (Field Assigned By

MACTEC)

Previous Expense:

Current Expense:

Future Asbestos Clean-up Costs:

$0

$249

$10,000

Building Size: 925 SF

ACM Identified

Building Use: Herman House (Field Assigned By MACTEC)

Building Unk55 - Herman House (Field Assigned By MACTEC)

Previous Expense:

Current Expense:

Future Asbestos Clean-up Costs:

$0

$465

$11,089

APPENDIX B - NON-ACM DETAIL AND PHOTOGRAPHS

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 20 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-001

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (001a) Resilient Sheet Flooring, Tan, Square

Pattern Floor Tile Floor SampledMIIN-Unk55-001a

(001b) Sheet Flooring Adhesive, Yellow Floor Tile Floor SampledMIIN-Unk55-001b

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - Northeast None Detected 001aBUnk55.001

Level 1 - Northeast None Detected 001bBUnk55.001

Level 1 - North Center Entry None Detected 001aBUnk55.002

Level 1 - North Center Entry None Detected 001bBUnk55.002

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 21 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-002

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (002a) 9" x 9" Floor Tile, Green, Under Existing

Finishes Wood Floor SampledMIIN-Unk55-002a

(002b) Floor Tile Mastic, Black Wood Floor SampledMIIN-Unk55-002b

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - Northeast None Detected 002aBUnk55.003

Level 1 - Northeast None Detected 002bBUnk55.003

Level 1 - North Center Entry None Detected 002aBUnk55.004

Level 1 - North Center Entry None Detected 002bBUnk55.004

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 22 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-003

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (003a) Resilient Sheet Flooring, Green/White, Square Pattern Wood Floor SampledMIIN-Unk55-003a

(003b) Sheet Flooring Adhesive, Yellow Wood Floor SampledMIIN-Unk55-003b

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - West Center None Detected 003aBUnk55.007

Level 1 - West Center None Detected 003bBUnk55.007

Level 1 - West Center None Detected 003aBUnk55.008

Level 1 - West Center None Detected 003bBUnk55.008

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 23 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-004

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (004a) Wallboard, White Walls/Ceilings Wall/Ceiling SampledMIIN-Unk55-004a

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - North Center Entry None Detected 004aBUnk55.005

Level 1 - Southwest None Detected 004aBUnk55.006

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 24 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-005

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (005a) Mastic/Adhesive, Tan Wallboard Wall SampledMIIN-Unk55-005a

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - West Center None Detected 005aBUnk55.009

Level 1 - West Center None Detected 005aBUnk55.010

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 25 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-006

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (006a) Roof Shingles, Brown Wood Roof SampledMIIN-Unk55-006a

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Roof None Detected 006aBUnk55.011

Roof None Detected 006aBUnk55.012

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 26 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-007

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (007a) Window Glazing, White Windows Windows SampledMIIN-Unk55-007a

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - Exterior None Detected 007aBUnk55.015

Level 1 - Exterior None Detected 007aBUnk55.016

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 Non-ACM Detail Page 27 of 44

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-008

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (008a) Roof Shingles, Gray Wood Roof SampledMIIN-Unk55-008a

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Roof None Detected 008aBUnk55.013

Roof None Detected 008aBUnk55.014

APPENDIX C - ACM DETAIL AND PHOTOGRAPHS

Jerome County, Idaho

December 6, 2010 ACM Detail Page 9 of 11

Building Unk55 - Homogeneous Material MIIN-Unk55-004

Material Description Associated System Sampled/Assumed

Material Information

HM ID

Substrate/

Component (004b) Wallboard Joint Compound, White Walls/Ceilings Wall/Ceiling SampledMIIN-Unk55-004b

HM # Sample Location Lab Results

Bulk Sample Data

Sample ID Level 1 - North Center Entry 2% Chrysotile004bBUnk55.005

Level 1 - Southwest 2% Chrysotile004bBUnk55.006

Material Locations and Condition

Material Location Quantity ConditionHM Level 1 - North Center Entry Good233 S.F.004b

Level 1 - Northeast Good472 S.F.004b

Level 1 - Southeast Good780 S.F.004b

Level 1 - Southwest Good556 S.F.004b

Level 1 - West Center Good204 S.F.004b

Level 1 - Northwest Good472 S.F.004b

Level 1 - North Center Good112 S.F.004b

Level 1 - North Center Good112 S.F.004b

Level 1 - South Center Good112 S.F.004b

Level 1 - South Center Good227 S.F.004b