P-2025-000058 Addendum TWO.pdf

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DIVISION

Project Name: West County Senior Center Sidewalk Repair

Project Number: P-2025-000058

ADDENDUM NUMBER: TWO

DATE OF ISSUANCE: August 31, 2026

TO: Prospective Bidders

This addendum forms a part of the contract documents, modifies the original bid documents and shall be as binding as if contained therein. Acknowledge receipt of this addendum in the space provided on the "Bid Proposal Form." Failure to do so may subject the bidder to disqualification.

This Addendum consists of three (3) pages and four (4) attachments.

1. RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION:

WYNN & SONS

Question 1: Is a certified arborist required on this project as there are many areas with root intrusion of large caliber?

Response: An arborist/landscape architect will be required to be hired by the contractor to approve of the replacement of any trees or shrubs and coordinate with PBC for review.

Question 2: Southwest entrance, there is a rather large handrail in place, can this area of concrete be shored up and not replaced?

Response: This area can remain as existing; however, it will be required to fill under the exposed concrete landing and ramps. Proposed fill to be brought up to exposed concrete and grade out at 4:1 to match existing. See revised addendum plans, Attachment Four (4).

Question 3: Northeast corner has a retaining wall that will be destroyed if we follow the plan, can this be eliminated as the concrete is in good shape?

Response: This area can remain; however, it will be required to fill under the exposed concrete and edge of concrete so there is no fall-off hazard (4:1 to match existing). See revised addendum plans, Attachment Four (4).

Question 4: Who is responsible for survey and grade stakes for the excavation & fill process?

As-builts?

Response: The contractor is responsible for hiring a surveyor for grade stakes, etc. As-builts are required for close-out documentation of this project. Please read the general notes for full information on requirements.

Question 5: There is drainage on the site that appears to be defective, how will this be handled as there is no provision in the plans

Response: The pipe in question was videoed by PBC. It was determined that the top of pipe has not failed as originally assumed due to the sinking of pavement above the pipe. The pipe will not be proposed for replacement.

Question 6: Are there any as-builts that will show the depth of existing lighting poles?

and the path of power to them?

Response: Please see Attachment Three (3) for Site Lighting As-Builts.

Question 7: How will the replanting of the trees and landscape be governed as there is no callout in the plan.

Response: An arborist/landscape architect will be required to be hired by the contractor to approve any replacement tree or shrubs and coordinate with Palm Beach County (PBC)

Facilities Systems Project Manager (FSPM) for review/acceptance.

Question 8: Does the existing irrigation function? There is massive root intrusion throughout the project, has it been tested?

Response: The sprinkler system has been tested and is functional. Please see Attachment One

(1) for the historical irrigation plan.

Question 9: Who is responsible for the geotechnical testing?

Response: The County will retain the Geotech engineer for testing during construction.

Question 10: What is the engineers estimate of construction for both phases?

Response: No estimate is available.

Question 11: The picture in the bid package does not match the plans, please clarify.

Response: Please see Attachment Two (2) for the revised boundary.

FLORIDA BLACK TOP INC.

Question 1: Can you provide a diagram showing the exact limits of the additional north side drive work to be done (as) discussed at the pre-bid?

Response: Please see the revised Attachment Two (2) plans showing:

- the revised limits that include the north side drive.

Question 2: Will the existing wall on the north side have to be removed and rebuilt in order to over excavate 2 ft beyond the resurface?

Can we omit this portion of the over excavation?

Response: Please see the revised Attachment Two (2) plans showing:

- The revised sidewalk area abutting the north side wall to remain.

Question 3: Are two phases enough for the alternate work? If not, please provide the number of phases required.

Response: The awarded contractor will be required to submit a work schedule. The schedule will include any phasing and tasks needed to complete the project and will be subject to Facilities’ approval.

ANDREA CONSTRUCTION INC.

Question 1: Has this project already been submitted to the building department for permit and is the county paying the permit fees.

Response: The project has not been submitted for permitting. All permit applications and fees are the responsibility of the awarded contractor. Please reference the Scope of Work, under the heading “General”, point a.

2. EXHIBIT(s): Delete Exhibits 1 and 3 and insert Attachments 1 - 4 as follows:

a. Attachment “4” replaces Exhibit “1”

b. Attachment “2” replaces Exhibit “3”

c. Insert Attachments “1” and “3”

PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM NO. TWO (2), AND ANY

PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ADDENDA, BY SIGNING BELOW AND ATTACHING THIS

ADDENDUM TO YOUR BID FORM. THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE SIGNED BY AN

AUTHORIZED AGENT AND ATTACHED TO YOUR BID FORM, AND RECEIPT OF THIS

ADDENDUM MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED ON THE “BID PROPOSAL FORM”. FAILURE

TO DO THIS MAY RESULT IN BIDDER’S DISQUALIFICATION.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT: _____________________________________

END OF ADDENDUM - 2