OASIS Plus Unrestricted RFP 47QRCA23R0006 SF30 and Continuation Pages (Amd 0008).pdf

(x)

47QRCA23R0006

x x

0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

WASHINGTON DC 20405

47QRCA

ROOM 428 - PSHCROOM 4

1800 F ST NW

PSHC/SERVICESIDIQ

GSA/FAS

01/12/20260008

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

06/15/2023

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The following changes have been made to the solicitation as a result of Amendment 0008:

The solicitation has been amended to re-open the OASIS+ RFP continuously and incorporate changes, including the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. Offerors will be required to acknowledge the current amendment as part of their offer submission in the OASIS+ Submission Portal

(OSP).

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Shelba D. Young

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

GSA OASIS+ MAC Program Unrestricted IDIQ

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

SF30 Block 14 Continuation Sheet

The following changes have been made to the solicitation as a result of Amendment 0008:

1. Incorporated Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) References throughout the RFP, as well as various minor language clarifications. For details on the GSA deviations, visit: https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul.

2. Revised language throughout the RFP to replace the requirements that contractors update their information via OSP with a FedConnect notification.

3. Incorporated minor language clarification to Section B.1 to change the number of Domains from seven to thirteen and to remove outdated language.

4. Provided additional clarification in Section B.4 regarding the Minimum Contract Guarantee, to include under which circumstances the Minimum Guaranteed Award amount will and will not be paid.

5. Revised language at Section B.6 to state “incorporate FAR 16.507-2(c)(3), Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), (GSA Class Deviation RFO-2025-16) FAR subpart 17.1, Multiyear Contracting, (GSA Class Deviation RFO-2025-17) and FAR subpart 17.2, Options (GSA Class Deviation RFO-2025-17). OASIS+ supports both commercial and non-commercial requirements. OASIS+ does not allow agreements identified in FAR subpart 16.7 (GSA Class Deviation

RFO-2025-16).”

6. As part of initial proposal submission, GSA is requiring all Offerors, including any proposed team members, to represent their size status for each NAICS Code within all of their proposed Domain(s), including NAICS Code exceptions where applicable, to ensure fair opportunity within each CLIN.

7. Added five Domains as follows to Section C.2: Business Administration, Marketing and Public Relations, Human Capital, Financial Services, and Social Services.

8. Made minor adjustments to the already-existing scope tables included in sections C.2.1 to C.2.8.

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

9. Added Sections C.2.9, C.2.9.1, C.2.10, C.2.10.1, C.2.11, C.2.11.1, C.2.12, C.2.12.1, C.2.13, and C.2.13.1 for additional domains.

10.Made changes to Section C.5 to add more detail regarding services not in scope.

11.Made minor revisions to the Deliverables and Compliances tables at Sections F.4.1 and F.4.2.

12.Removed language from Section F.5.3 indicating that performance reports will be made available via the OSP.

13.Added language at Section G.2.2.1 to state “If needed and as determined by the customer agency acquisition team, a contract specialist (CS) who has completed the OASIS+ DPA training may post solicitation(s) in GSA eBuy under the authority and direction of an OASIS+ DPA certified OCO” as well as clarifying language regarding Contractor employees’ permitted use of Government supply sources.

14.Added requirement at Section G.3.1.1.2 that states Corporate OASIS+ Contract Managers (COCMs) are responsible for “Reviewing and executing (signing) any bilateral modifications.”

15.Added Section G.3.1.1.3 Corporate OASIS+ Authorized Negotiator.

16.Revised language at Section G.3.1.2 to state “Additionally, the Contractor must include in the CSA demonstrated evidence of task order proposal submission for all responsive unsuccessful offers submitted in response to task order solicitations issued under the Master Contract (e.g., record of response correspondence). The OASIS+ CO will provide a standardized template for the Contractor to complete the CSA. The COCM shall submit the CSA to the OASIS+ CO annually as specified by the OASIS+ CO.”

17.Revised language at Section G.3.1.6 to state “Subject to FAR 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jun 2020) (Deviation Aug 2025), the Contractor shall report executive compensation and first-tier subcontract awards in SAM.gov, unless an exception applies.

18.Updated CFR citation and added clarification that size is inclusive of all team members in Sections G.3.1.7.2 and G.3.1.7.3.

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

19.Added additional certifications at Sections G.3.1.9.3.7, G.3.1.9.3.8, G.3.1.9.3.9, G.3.1.9.3.10, and G.3.1.9.3.11.

20.Revised language at Section G.3.1.13 to state “Contractors shall submit the C-SCRM Plan within Attachment J-3, within 90 days AFTER the OASIS+ UR Notice to Proceed, and then annually beginning on August 30th of each year thereafter.”

21.Revised language at Section G.3.2.1 to state “Zero Invoice ((applicable only to active/awarded task orders when there are no invoices paid for the active order month; if there have been zero task orders awarded under the master contract, or all awarded task orders have been closed out, then "Zero Invoice" reporting is not required.)” and add “Note: Contractors shall report zero sales on any awarded task orders beginning after the first initial task order in SRP. This is not to be confused with reporting of no awarded task order IAW Section G.3.1.2 Contractor Self-Assessment demonstrating evidence of task order proposal submission for all responsive unsuccessful offers submitted in response to task order solicitations issued under the Master Contract (e.g., record of response correspondence).”

22.Changed Section G.3.3 to “Reserved.”

23.Revised language at Section G.3.4 to state “For transparency at the order level regarding Contractor Teaming Arrangements (CTAs), the Contractor must notify the OASIS+ CO of any changes to the Contractor Teaming Agreement documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, subcontractor letter of commitment) and Attachment J.P-7, Joint Venture Work & Qualifications Template (if applicable), submitted with the initial proposal. This includes any changes in a team member’s size that require rerepresentation in accordance with Sections G.3.1.7.1 and G.3.1.7.2. The Contractor must notify the OASIS+ CO of any changes or updates to the CTA within 30 calendar days, and upload the updated documentation through FedConnect as specified in Section F.4.1.”

24.Changed Section H.6 to “Reserved.”

25.Added Section H.8.3.1 Duplicative Contracts Under the Same Contract Family.

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

26.Replaced “Domain Enhancement” with “Add Domain Modification” throughout the RFP.

27.Made substantial changes to Section H.11.3 to add more detail regarding the addition of Domains.

28.Added language to Section H.13 to state that off-ramping may result from “Failure to cooperate with GSA during contract administration reviews, including providing requested records in accordance with 52.215-2 Audit and Records-Negotiation (Jun 2020) (Deviation Sep 2025).” and/or “Taking any other action which is not permitted under the Master Contract’s terms and conditions.”

29.Revised title of Section H.18 to “Adjustment Of Scope Or Certain Terms And Conditions Under The OASIS+ Master Contract.”

30.Added language to Section H.18 to state “The Government reserves the right to unilaterally modify the contract to implement Executive Orders as long as the changes do not conflict with current statutes. The Government reserves the unilateral right to issue a modification to update terms and conditions to reflect regulations or statutory changes.”

31.Added language to Section H.22 to state “For OASIS+ Contractors with a CTA submitted and retained in the contract file, it is the Contractor’s responsibility to notify the OASIS+ CO of any changes to the CTA (e.g., joint venture agreement, subcontractor letter of commitment) and Attachment J.P-7 (if applicable) submitted with the initial proposal, as well as provide transparency at the order level regarding teaming arrangements to OCOs.”

32.Updates to the clauses and provisions listed in the table located in Section I.2.1.

33.Significant changes have been made to sections I.2.4.1 to I.2.4.12 to incorporate Revolutionary FAR Overhaul clauses and provisions.

34.Minor corrections made to Attachment J-1 to ensure the most current information is referenced.

35.Determined the OASIS+ Reporting CLINs on Attachment J-2 for Travel and Indirect Costs.

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

36.Updated various provisions and clauses in Attachment J-4 and J-5 to ensure the most current information is referenced.

37.Made significant revisions to Attachment J.P-1 to:

a. Add scorecards for new domains

b. Update certifications

c. Change the number of attainable points for various qualifications

38.Updated Attachment J.P-2 with a more current sample.

39.Revised Attachment J.P-3 to:

a. Clarify that the Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the customer is informed of the solicitation requirements pertaining to the claimed qualifications so that the customer can accurately assess and confirm the project elements.

b. Added additional qualifications as a result of the new domains

40.Updated attachment J.P-4 with new Domain Auto-Relevant NAICS Codes.

41.Edited Attachment J.P-5 to add and remove functional areas and subareas.

42.Significant changes made to Attachment J.P-7 that apply to all Contractor Teaming Arrangements and Offerors submitting a proposal that includes a MRCL entity.

43.Updated Attachments J.P-8 and J.P-9 with more current Direct Labor Rate Ranges.

44.Added new Attachments J.P-12 Subcontractor Letter of Commitment Template, J.P-13 Financial Data Input Template.

45.Minor renumbering in Section K, as well as added language to state “System updates may lag policy updates. The System for Award Management (SAM) may continue to require entities to complete representations based on provisions that are not included in this solicitation. Contracting officers will rely on representations from offers based on provisions in the solicitation. Entities are not required to, nor are they able to, update their entity registration to remove these representations in SAM.”

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

46.Added NAICS codes as a result of newly added Domains and revised language in the footnotes in Section K.1.

47.Edited language in Section L.1 to account for Provision updates.

48.Revised language in Section L.3.4 for Continuous Open.

49.Removed Questions and Helpdesk language in Section L.3.5.

50.Changed Section L.3.6 to “Reserved”.

51.Revised the Proposal Format Table at Section L.4.1.

52.Updated Section L.5.1.3.1 to clarify that QP sources must be from the joint venture, an individual member of the joint venture, a proposed subcontractor to the joint venture, or an entity being used by way of a MRCL. Also clarified the MPJV provision by stating that the required minimum QP must be attributable to the protégé or the offering MPJV, and may not be satisfied via a MRCL entity.

Finally, aligned MPJV submissions with Section L.5.2.2 by confirming that MPJV offerors remain subject to the minimum socioeconomic set-aside QP requirements, including that at least one of the required set-aside QPs must be from the protégé or the offering MPJV, with the remaining set-aside QP(s) permitted from an eligible set-aside JV member, the JV, a set-aside subcontractor, or a MRCL entity.

53.Revised language in Section L.5.1.3.1 to state “IAW 13 CFR 125.9(b)(4) A mentor cannot be a contract holder through joint ventures with two protégé small business concerns on the same small business multiple award contract or small business reserve on a multiple award contract at the same time. Therefore, submission of more than one offer from the same mentor as part of a Mentor-Protégé joint venture within the same solicitation will result in the rejection of all offers from that mentor. If a mentor is already an OASIS+ contract holder, any additional offers submitted will be rejected.”

54.Revised language in Section L.5.1.3.1 to state “Note: Joint Venture Offerors submitting a proposal with proposed small business subcontractors in accordance with Section L.5.1.3.2 must comply with the requirements of this section as well.”

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

55.Revised language throughout Section L.5.1.3.2 to include RFO and attachment references.

56.Revised Section L.5.1.3.2 to state “An Offeror’s size will be determined at the master contract level, including all team members and across all Domain submissions.”

57.Revised Section L.5.1.3.2 to state “Offerors with proposed subcontractors must complete and submit Attachment J.P-7, CTA Qualifications & MRCL List Template, Section B, listing all proposed subcontractors and their representation of size at the time of offer submission. Attachment J.P-7 will become part of the contract file to maintain CTA transparency IAW Section G.3.4.”

58.Revised language in Section L.5.1.4 Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letters, if applicable to state “Credit will not be awarded for any scored evaluation element performed by MRCL entities identified by Offerors for which there is not a conforming Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter.”

59.Revised Sections L.5.1.7.1 to L.5.1.7.3 to require a copy of the contract award form being claimed, at a minimum.

60.Added to Section L.5.2.1: “Note: IAW Section L.5.1.3.1, QP submissions may be from the joint venture, an individual member of the joint venture, or a proposed subcontractor to the joint venture itself. Additionally, for offers from SBA Mentor-Protégé joint ventures, a minimum of one Relevant Qualifying Project must be from the protégé or the offering Mentor-Protégé joint venture for each proposed Domain. QPs may be submitted by MRCL entities and evaluated for scoring credit as provided in Section L.5.1.4; however, MRCL projects will not count toward satisfying the requirement for one relevant QP from the protégé.”

61.Emphasized language in Section L.5.2.3.1.2 to state “Additionally, the Offeror must tag those specific written passages in the contract documentation that support a relevance determination in the proposed Domain(s) in accordance with the scope of each Domain outlined in Section C.2.”

62.Added Section L.5.2.3.3.2.

63.Made significant changes to Section L.5.2.3.4 Qualifying Project Experience - Management & Staffing that added credit explanations for Licensed/Certified Professionals, Certified Financial Professionals, and their verification.

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

64.Revised language in Section L.5.4.8 to state “Note: Facility clearances are not to be confused with individual security clearances. Refer to section L.5.2.3.4 for details on how to claim credit for individual security clearances.”

65.Changed Section L.5.5.2 to “International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 27001:2022 (Information Security)”.

66.Changed Section L.5.5.7 to “Reserved.”

67.Added Sections L.5.5.9, L.5.5.10, L.5.5.11, L.5.5.12, and L.5.5.13.

68.Revised language in Section L.5.6.1 to state “If there is no final CPARS rating available, an “Incomplete-Rated” CPARS is acceptable if it has the Assessing Official’s name, title, and date signed.”

69.Revised language in Section L.5.7 to state “Accepted costs/prices, based on Attachment J.P-9 submitted with the offer, or the latest submitted revision, will be included in the awarded Master Contract as Attachment J-6 Awarded Sole Source T&M/L-H Ceiling Rates.”

70.Revised language in Section L.5.7.1 to state “The Cost/Price Template consists of 15 years of pricing. These 15 years constitute the five-year base period and option period of the OASIS+ MA-IDIQ, plus an option to extend services up to six months, and an additional five years to cover the full period of performance of any task order that has a term beyond the base term plus the option. Contracts resulting from an on-ramp/open solicitation period will only incorporate any remaining performance period pricing based on the most recent J.P-9 template.”

71.Revised language in Section L.5.7.1.2 to state “If an Offeror does not have DCAA, DCMA, and/or CFA approved FPRAs, FPRRs, Provisional Billing Rates, or other approved rates, Offerors shall propose indirect rate percentages generated from their accounting system, and submit a copy of the indirect rates generated by the Offeror’s accounting system, including reports generated directly from the Offeror’s accounting system required to validate the claimed indirect pool expenses and allocation base costs.”

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

72.Revised language in Section L.5.7.1.2 to state “GSA will compare these rates to the contractor’s proposed rates for sole-source T&M or LH type task orders, at the request of an OCO who holds a Delegation of Procurement Authority (DPA).”

73.Revised language in Section L.5.7.2 to state “Sole-source T&M/LH ceiling rates for years one through 15 will automatically be calculated for each labor category by applying an escalation factor of 4.41 percent.”

74.Revised language in Section L.5.7.3 to state “If an Offeror does not have DCAA, DCMA, and/or CFA approved FPRAs, FPRRs, Provisional Billing Rates, or other approved rates, Offerors shall submit a copy of the indirect rates generated by the Offeror’s accounting system, including reports generated directly from the Offeror’s accounting system required to validate the claimed indirect pool expenses and allocation base costs.”

75.Revised language in Section L.5.7.3.2 to state “Offerors are required to submit an Indirect Cost Rates Basis of Estimate in support of Attachment J.P-9” and “Additionally, if an Offeror does not have DCAA, DCMA, and/or CFA approved FPRAs, FPRRs, Provisional Billing Rates, or other approved rates, Offerors shall submit a copy of the indirect rates generated by the Offeror’s accounting system.”

76.Added language to Section L.5.8.3 to state “The Offeror must also submit a completed Attachment J.P-13 Financial Data Input Template based on the submitted annual financial statements for the previous three years.”

77.Added language to Section L.5.8.4 that states “Note: If submitting an offer as a Joint Venture, and all members of the Joint Venture’s policies are aligned, or if one member of the Joint Venture’s policies will be followed when performing work on OASIS+, then the Offeror is only required to submit one policy. If the various Joint Venture members plan to follow different policies when performing task orders under OASIS+, then the Offeror is required to submit one Attachment J-3 for each member and attach the applicable policy for each, as well as describe when conflicting policies exist, what the Government can expect in the execution of a task order.”

78.Added Section L.5.8.5. Subcontracting Plan Submissions Required for OTSBs Only.

RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006 Amendment 0008

79.Added Section L.5.9 Rejection of Previous Offer.

80.Clarified language in Section M.3.

81.Made significant changes to Section M.5 Acceptability Review to clarify team member requirements.

82.Revised language in Section M.9 to state “Attachment J.P-7, CTA Qualifications & MRCL List Template, will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis regarding whether the requested proposal submission information meets all the conditions for the information requested in Section L.”

83.”Corrected minor grammatical and formatting changes throughout RFP.

These changes are highlighted for awareness in the Amendment 0008 Conformed Copy.

Proposal submission capability will go live in the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) on January 12, 2026.

The Revolutionary FAR Overhaul updates currently apply to the FAR. Some GSAR/M provisions and clauses may still reference outdated FAR clauses until conforming updates are issued. In the event of a conflict between the FAR (including RFO deviations) and GSAR/M text, the FAR presides.

System updates may lag policy updates. The System for Award Management (SAM) may continue to require entities to complete representations based on provisions that are not included in this solicitation. Contracting officers will rely on representations from offers based on provisions in the solicitation. Entities are not required to, nor are they able to, update their entity registration to remove these representations in SAM.