NP SER PMS FY24(1) FY24(2) FY24(3) Pavement Memo.pdf

Page 1 of 15 Pages

Form FHWA-201 (Rev. 11-67)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message comment is to be retained as file material. Do not prepare carbons. Not to be used in lieu of Form FHWA-121 for informal correspondence. MINUTE-MEMO

SUBJECT: Projects NP SER PMS FY24(1), NP SER PMS FY24(2) and NP SER PMS FY24(3) – Pavement Recommendations

TO MESSAGE/COMMENT FROM/DATE

R. Satasiya Project Manager

A.

Feleke Highway Design Manager

This memorandum serves to support the PS&E development for three projects. The projects consist of pavement preservation for several roadways and parking areas as follows:

NP SER PMS FY24(1)

Canaveral National Seashore (CANA) in Florida

NP SER PMS FY24(2)

Castillo de San Marcos National Monument (CASA) in Florida

Fort Matanzas National Monument (FOMA) in Florida

Fort Caroline National Memorial (FOCA) in Florida

Timucuan Ecological & Historic Preserve (TIMU) in Florida

NP SER PMS FY24(3)

Fort Frederica National Monument (FOFR) in Georgia

Fort Pulaski National Monument (FOPU) in Georgia

Fort Sumter National Historical Park (FOSU) in South Carolina)

The recommendations are based on findings from the field assessment performed by Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD) Pavements Team and the most recent Road Inventory Program (RIP) data and Pavement Management System (PMS) data at the time of developing this memorandum.

BACKGROUND

The EFLHD RIP last collected the pavement condition data in CANA, CASA, FOMA, FOCA, TIMU, FOFR, FOPU, and FOSU as part of their Cycle 6 (C6) using the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) for the majority of the roadways while condition data for parking areas and some roadways were manually collected. Location Maps for the routes collected in C6 are included in Appendix A. Based on C6 RIP data collected between 2019 and 2021 and the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA) data, the 2023 predicted Pavement Condition Ratings (PCRs) for roadways and parking areas were determined as follows:

Canaveral National Seashore (CANA) o A total of 42 routes consisting of roads and parking areas were scoped.

o Pavement conditions for roadways typically ranged from fair (PCR of

75.5) to good (PCR of 85.8).

o PCRs for parking areas showed fair condition (PCR from 63.6 to 77.4).

Two parking areas were determined to be in poor condition with a predicted PCR of 47.2.

K. Nguyen Pavement Engineer

Through:

A.

Maloche Acting Pavement Team Leader

7/5/2024

Page 2 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

Castillo de San Marcos National Monument (CASA) and Fort Matanzas National Monument (FOMA) o A total of 11 routes consisting of roads and parking areas were scoped.

o PCRs for roadways showed fair to good conditions (PCR from 84.1 to

87.0). One roadway was rated as poor with a PCR of 50.5.

o PCRs for parking areas typically was in fair condition (PCR from 84.1 to

77.4). One parking area was rated as poor with a PCR of 47.2.

Fort Caroline National Memorial (FOCA) and Timucuan Ecological and

Historical Preserve (TIMU) o A total of 5 parking areas were scoped.

o PCRs for parking areas were rated in fair condition, with a predicted PCR of 83.5.

Fort Frederica National Monument (FOFR) o A total of 4 routes consisting of roads and parking areas were scoped.

o PCRs for roads were between fair (PCR of 77.9) to good (PCR of 93.3) condition. Parking areas were rated in fair condition, with a predicted PCR of 83.5.

Fort Pulaski National Monument (FOPU) o A total of 10 routes consisting of roads and parking areas were scoped.

o PCRs for roads were rated in fair to good conditions (PCR from 83.1 to

89.6). Parking areas were rated mostly in fair condition (PCR from 68.1 to 83.5), with one parking area rated good (PCR of 90.8).

Fort Sumter National Monument (FOSU) o Only one route that is a parking area was scoped.

o PCR for the parking area was rated in fair condition, with a predicted PCR of 83.5.

Appendix B includes the C6 RIP Road Condition Summary Report and HPMA Predicted Values for 2023 for the roadways and parking areas within the Parks visited.

The Pavements Team conducted a condition survey based on visual inspection from July 10th to July 13th, 2023, of all roadways and parking areas within the project scope to assess the existing pavement conditions and determine the feasibility of pavement preservation treatments. Multiple roadways and parking areas were confirmed to be in fair to excellent conditions, however there were pavements in poor condition with distresses higher in severity and frequency. Below is a summary describing the typical pavement conditions for each park within the project along with respective photographs.

Page 3 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

CANA

A total of 42 routes consisting of roads and parking areas were scoped by the Pavements Team. 40 out of the 42 routes were confirmed to be in good to fair condition exhibiting edge cracking (Figure 1), transverse cracking (Figure 2), block cracking (Figure 3 and Figure 4), longitudinal cracking, and rutting. Two parking areas, AD Parking # 7 (CANA- 0937) and AD Parking # 9 (CANA-0939) were observed to be in poor condition with block cracking present on most of the surface and edge cracking. It’s our understanding that a portion of Playalinda Access Road (CANA-0300) is planned to have a mill and overlay in FY24, about 50 feet east of the railroad to the east corner of the fee booth due to shoving (Figure 5).

A total of eight locations, including the two parking areas mentioned above, were observed to be beyond preservation. Due to the severity of the distresses, a heavier pavement preservation treatment is warranted to extend the pavement life but won’t increase the structural capacity to address pavement condition needs. In agreement with NPS, the table below shows the locations that will need heavier preservation treatments with additional remarks.

Route 2023

PCR

Pavement Comments

AD Apollo Beach Road (CANA-0013)

81.7 Transverse cracking, longitudinal cracking, block

cracking, and rutting present. Low severity shoving at the beginning of the road.

AD Eldora Loop Road

(CANA-0205)

80.8 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Excessive block cracking, and patching present along the road.

AD Parking #1

(CANA-0931)

77.4 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface, bleeding present on isolated areas, reflective cracking from gutter, and transverse cracking.

AD Parking #2

(CANA-0932)

77.4 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface, along with raveling.

AD Parking #3

(CANA-0933)

77.4 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface.

AD Parking #4

(CANA-0934)

77.4 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface.

AD Parking #7

(CANA-0937)

47.2 Pavement condition matches the predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface, along with edge and longitudinal cracking.

AD Parking #8

(CANA-0938)

77.4 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface, along with edge cracking.

AD Parking #9

(CANA-0939)

47.2 Pavement condition matches the predicted PCR.

Block cracking present on most of the surface, along with edge cracking.

Page 4 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

Figure 1. Edge Cracking – CANA-0010

Figure 2. Transverse Cracking –

CANA-0013

Figure 3. Block Cracking – CANA-0205 Figure 4. Block Cracking – CANA-0934

Figure 5. Shoving present near entrance booth area – CANA-0300

Page 5 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

CASA and FOMA

9 out of the 11 roads and parking areas within CASA and FOMA were observed to be in good to fair condition. Block cracking (Figure 6), raveling (Figure 7), transverse cracking (Figure 8), longitudinal cracking (Figure 9), and patching (Figure 10) were observed during the field view. Beach Access Road (FOMA-0100) and Maintenance Area Parking (FOMA-0901) were observed to be in poor condition, with extensive block cracking present.

A total of three locations, including the road and parking area mentioned above, were observed to be beyond preservation. Due to the severity of the distresses, a heavier pavement preservation treatment is warranted to extend the pavement life but won’t increase the structural capacity to address pavement condition needs. In agreement with NPS, the table shows the locations that will need heavier preservation treatments with additional remarks.

Pavement Comments

Visitor Parking

(CASA-0902)

77.4 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Previous work was done in 2017, as part of SER PMS FY16(2) project. Raveling, possible gutter longitudinal cracking reflected, and longitudinal cracking along cold joint present.

Visitor Center Access Road (FOMA-0010)

87.0 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Longitudinal cracking along cold joint, transverse cracking, and areas with block cracking present.

Maintenance Area Parking (FOMA-0901)

47.2 Pavement condition matches the predicted PCR.

Block cracking and raveling present on most of the surface.

Figure 6. Block Cracking – FOMA-

Figure 7. Raveling – FOMA-0100

Page 6 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

Figure 8. Transverse Cracking –

FOMA-0901

Figure 9. Longitudinal Cracking –

FOMA-0010

Figure 10. Patching – CASA-0902

Page 7 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

FOCA and TIMU

Five parking areas across FOCA and TIMU were observed to be in good condition.

Longitudinal and transverse cracking (Figure 11), and edge cracking (Figure 12) were observed during the field view. The Park has expressed concerns about the existing height/thickness of the pavement due the water infiltrating the building and maintenance shop area (Figure 13) for FOCA-0903.

Figure 11. Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking – FOCA-0900

Figure 12. Edge Cracking – TIMU-

Figure 13. Parking Area with Concerns from Park – FOCA-0903

Page 8 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

FOFR

2 of the 4 routes within FOFR were observed to be in good condition. Block cracking (Figure 14), longitudinal cracking (Figure 15), transverse cracking, edge cracking, and areas with alligator cracking were observed during the field view. HQFA Entrance Road (Old Monument Road) (FOFR-0400) and Bloody Marsh Parking (FOFR-0903) were observed to be in poor condition, lower than the predicted PCR values. These routes were showing extensive cracking including longitudinal, block, edge, and alligator cracking.

The table below shows locations that were observed to be beyond preservation. Due to the severity of distresses, a heavier pavement preservation treatment is warranted to extend the pavement life but won’t increase the structural capacity to address pavement condition needs. In agreement with NPS, the table shows the locations that will need heavier preservation treatments with additional remarks.

Pavement Comments

HQFA Entrance Road (Old Monument Road)

(FOFR-0400)

77.9 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Edge cracking, thermal and longitudinal cracking present, patch along the edge will be needed.

Towards the end of the road the condition gets worse.

Bloody Marsh Parking

(FOFR-0903)

83.5 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Entrance apron has block cracking. Edge cracking present, extensive low severity alligator cracking, patch needed in some areas.

Figure 14. Block cracking – FOFR-

Figure 15. Longitudinal Cracking –

FOFR-0900

Page 9 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

FOPU

10 of the 11 routes within FOPU were observed to be in good to fair condition.

Longitudinal cracking, raveling and block cracking (Figure 16), transverse cracking, thermal cracking, and edge cracking were observed during the field view.

The table below shows locations with additional remarks for the routes observed to be beyond preservation. Due to the severity of the distresses, a heavier pavement preservation treatment is warranted to extend the pavement life but won’t increase the structural capacity to address pavement condition needs. In agreement with NPS, the table shows the locations that will need heavier preservation treatments with additional remarks.

Pavement Comments

Visitor Center Parking

(FOPU-0900)

83.5 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking and longitudinal cracking along the cold joint.

Maintenance Parking

(FOPU-0903)

68.1 Pavement condition is worse than predicted PCR.

Block cracking, severe raveling, and areas with transverse cracking present.

Pilot Parking (FOPU- 0904)

68.1 NPS mentioned to not include the parking area, is

beyond preservation.

Figure 16. Raveling and Block Cracking – FOPU-0903

Page 10 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

FOSU

One parking area was observed to be in good condition, with thermal cracking and rutting (Figure 17) visible in the pavement due to rain.

Figure 17. Thermal Cracking and Rutting – FOSU-0900

PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

The Pavements Team evaluated all routes within CANA, CASA, FOMA, FOCA, TIMU, FOFR, FOPU, and FOSU based on the visual assessment of the existing pavement conditions, predicted data using HPMA, the pavement management system, and C6 RIP for validation, to determine routes that are candidates for preservations.

Most of the assessed routes will benefit from pavement preservation treatments. However, approximately 22% of the total number of roadways and parking areas within the parks scoped are exhibiting conditions that might not benefit much from applying pavement preservation treatment. These routes have either received a pavement treatment recently or exhibit moderate to high severity distresses that deem them beyond preservation and warrant rehabilitation treatments.

In agreement with NPS, routes that were deemed beyond preservation but requested to be considered will require a heavier preservation treatment. For park units in GA and SC, we recommend for these routes (roads and parking areas) to receive a SAMI (Stress Absorbing Membrane Interlayer, consisting of chip seal followed by a thin overlay). For the park units in FL, the roads that are identified for a heavier treatment should receive a Cape Seal (consisting of chip seal followed by microsurfacing) while the parking areas should receive SAMI consisting of chip seal followed by 1.125-inches of the 9.5 mm mixture. These treatments are expected to extend the pavement life but won’t increase the structural capacity to address pavement condition needs. Spot reconstruction (i.e., patching) and crack sealing/filling are recommended prior to placing the preservation treatments.

Page 11 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

Florida Sites (CANA, CASA, FOMA, FOCA, and TIMU)

In the case of the Florida sites, per FDOT’s State Materials Engineer, FDOT has developmental specifications for 4.75mm mixtures that are not commonly used thus the mixtures are not common in Florida. Therefore, most asphalt producers may not have mix designs readily available. Also, FDOT specifications allow 9.5mm mixtures to be placed at a compacted thickness of 1.0 to 1.5 inches that have performed well at this thickness range. FDOT 9.5mm mixtures consist primarily of fine aggregates and are all design as fine-graded mixtures meaning the job mix formula (gradation) will run above the primary control sieve.

Provided this information, the following treatment alternatives are recommended for the park units in FL:

For roads in good or better conditions, microsurfacing will still be recommended.

For roads that are beyond pavement preservation, cape seal (chip seal followed by microsurfacing) or a SAMI (chip seal followed by 1.125-inch overlay with a 9.5mm mix) can be used.

For parking areas that are in good or better conditions, we propose either 9.5 mm mixture for all parking areas or microsurfacing for large parking areas accessible by equipment and 9.5 mm mix on small parking areas. It is important to mention that it was assumed that large parking areas are sites with more than 10,000 sq ft.

Taking that into consideration, about a third of the Florida parking lots are considered large. We identified that placing the 9.5mm mixture (placed at 1.125-inches) as opposed to the 4.75mm (placed at 0.75-inch) that we typically recommend for parking areas will result in an additional approximately 1,400 tons of asphalt concrete. This number reflects a difference of 33% in added costs incurred if we consider using a 9.5mm mix on all parking areas. In the case of using microsurfacing for large parking areas, the cost difference is approximately 10% less in comparison of the original 4.75mm. However, it is important to mention that using a 9.5mm mix will extend the pavement life for up to 10 years, in comparison to microsurfacing which is expected to extend it for 5 to 7 years.

For parking areas or roads that are beyond preservation, a SAMI can be used.

Roads that are connected to parking areas with no barriers should receive the same treatment as parking areas to ensure a feasible and smoother transition in grade.

Page 12 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

The following pavement preservation strategies are recommended as per the FP-24 Specifications, “Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects”:

AC Overlay (1.125 inches) – an AC overlay (9.5 mm NMSA) for parking lots is recommended. For parking areas where a curb exists, taper milling will be needed to maintain the existing curb reveal. Tack coat must be applied to the surface prior to placement of the overlay. Crack sealing and filling, if required, should be applied as described below.

Microsurfacing Type 2 – Micro-surfacing is the recommended option for roads and large parking lots, if the NPS agrees. In this case, 1.125-inch-thick overlay of

9.5 mm mixture will be used only for small parking lots and adjacent roads connected to these parking areas with no barriers.

Cape Seal - Apply a Chip Seal (Type 1C) on the existing pavement surface prior to placing a Microsurfacing treatment for roads that were identified as beyond preservation.

SAMI – Apply a Chip Seal (Type 1C) on the existing pavement surface prior to placing an AC Overlay (9.5 mm NMSA at 1.125-inch depth) treatment for parking areas that will need a heavier preservation treatment. Adjust emulsion application rates to fill any necessary cracks prior placing the overlay.

Page 13 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

Georgia and South Carolina Sites (FOFR, FOPU, FOSU)

Based on the existing pavement conditions of roads and parking areas, micro-surfacing, and thin-lift asphalt concrete (AC) overlay (¾ inch) are feasible preservation treatments for the routes and parking lots within the scope of work for the sites in the states of Georgia and South Carolina. The following pavement preservation strategies are recommended as per the FP-24 Specifications, “Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects”:

Microsurfacing Type 2 – Microsurfacing is recommended for roads and large parking lots, or parking lots adjacent to roadways without a median/barrier.

Thin-lift AC Overlay (¾ inch) – a Thin-lift AC overlay (4.75 mm NMSA) placed at ¾ inch depth for small parking lots and short roads with tight curves is recommended. For roads and parking areas where a curb exists, taper milling will be needed to maintain the existing curb reveal. Tack coat must be applied to the surface prior to placement of the overlay. Crack sealing and filling, if required, should be applied as described below.

SAMI – Apply a Chip Seal (Type 1C) on the existing pavement surface prior to placing a Thin-lift AC Overlay (3/4” depth, 4.75 mm NMSA) treatment for routes and parking areas that will need a heavier preservation treatment. Adjust emulsion application rates to fill any necessary cracks prior placing the thin-lift overlay.

In general, for the park units in FL, GA and SC, existing pavements may require the following repairs prior to placing the proposed preservation treatments:

Perform a Full Depth Patch (FDP Type 2) as necessary, in areas exhibiting fatigue cracking, settlement, and/or potholes. Such areas should be identified by the CO. Patch areas should be performed in accordance with Section 418.

Perform Crack Sealing and Filling at least a week prior to placing the Thin-lift overlay preservation treatment. Crack sealing (crack width ¼-inch to less than -inch) and filling (crack width greater than 1-inch) should be performed in accordance with Section 414. It is recommended to have as much time as possible, typically 6 to 12 months or one season per industry practice, between the crack sealing operation and a hot surface treatment application. That time will allow for the crack sealant to set into the cracks and cure under vehicular traffic. This will also prevent too much sealant under the surface treatment resulting in better performance. If crack sealing occurs prior to 6 months from the preservation treatment application, it is recommended to use a recessed configuration by applying the sealant so that it sets below the surface. This reduces the risk of the sealant melting and potentially bubbling back through the subsequent hot surface treatment applications.

Page 14 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

Table 1 provides the approximate quantities for patching and crack sealing/filling for the parks specified.

Table 1 – Patching and Sealing Quantities

Park ID Full Depth

Patch Type 2 (Square Yards)

Crack Sealing and Filling for Roads

(Miles)

Crack Sealing and Filing for Parking

Areas (Miles)

CANA 443 0.07 0.13

CASA 245 0 0

FOCA 200 0 0.09

FOFR 375 0 0.02

FOMA 30 0 0.04

FOPU 58 0.12 0.01

FOSU 20 0 0.03

TIMU 30 0 0.01

Removal of pavement markings and wheel stops will be necessary prior to placement of the surface treatment on some routes/parking areas.

A list of routes with the respective proposed preservation treatment and estimated patching and crack cleaning/sealing quantities is included in Appendix C for all Parks.

Page 15 of 15 Pages

Use this form in lieu of transmittal slips within Dept. of Trans. When message

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Project Location Maps Appendix B: C6 RIP Route Condition Summary Report Appendix C: Preservation Treatments Summary – All Parks cc: Highway Design BC, TS BC w/ attachments

Appendix A: Project Location Map

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Key Map

Canaveral National Seashore

±0 10 20

Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

NPS Collected Routes

4-1

Area Map 1

Canaveral National Seashore

±0 2 4

Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Rte. 0931

Rte. 0205 Rte. 0936

Rte. 0940

Rte. 0013

Rte. 0933

Rte. 0941 Rte. 0945

Rte. 0937 Rte. 0938

Rte. 0939

Rte. 0932

Rte. 0942

Rte. 0934

Rte. 0935AZ Rte. 0935CZ

Rte. 0935BZ

4-2

Area Map 2

Canaveral National Seashore

±0 2 4

Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Rte. 0913

Rte. 0910 Rte. 0909

Rte. 0912

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0947

Rte. 0911

Rte. 0908

Rte. 0904

Rte. 0907 Rte. 0906

Rte. 0905

Rte. 0903 Rte. 0902

Rte. 0901Rte. 0923

Rte. 0922

Rte. 0921

Rte. 0920Rte. 0919

Rte. 0918 Rte. 0917 Rte. 0300

Rte. 0916

Rte. 0914

Rte. 0915

Rte. 0900

Rte. 0200

Rte. 0924

4-3

Castillo de San Marcos National Monument

±0 0.2 0.4 Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Non-NPS Collected Routes

NPS Collected Routes

MAP 1

Castillo de San Marcos National Monument

±0 0.1 0.2 Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads Non-NPS Collected Routes

Rte. 5000

Rte. 0901

Rte. 0900ZZ

Rte. 0902

Rte. 0904

Rte. 0400

Rte. 0200

Fort Matanzas National Monument

±0 0.5 1 Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Non-NPS Collected Routes

NPS Collected Routes

Rte. 5001

Fort Matanzas National Monument

±0 0.2 0.4 Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Non-NPS Collected RoutesNote: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0902ZZ Rte. 0100

Rte. 0200

Rte. 5001

Rte. 0400ZZ

Rte. 0900A

Rte. 0900B

Rte. 0909

Rte. 0901

Rte. 0905

Rte. 0906

Rte. 0903

Rte. 0908 Rte. 0907

Fort Caroline National Memorial

Key Map

±0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Non-NPS Collected Routes

NPS Collected Routes

Rte.

Rte. 0900

Rte. 0903

Rte. 0901

Rte. 0902

Fort Caroline National Memorial

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Area Map 1

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Non-NPS Collected Routes

Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve

Key Map

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 2.5 5 Non-NPS Collected Routes

Miles

Rte. 5002

Rte. 0905

Rte. 5001

Rte. 0904

Rte. 0902

Rte. 0900

Rt e.

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.95 1.9 Miles

Non-NPS Collected RoutesNote: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Rte. 0100

Rte. 0903

Rte. 5000

Rte. 0901

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.3 0.6 Miles

Non-NPS Collected RoutesNote: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Area Map 2

KEY MAP

Fort Frederica National Monument

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 1 2 Miles

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Rte. 0900

Rte. 0902BZ

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0400Rte. 0901

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

MAP 1

Fort Frederica National Monument

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.15 0.3 Miles

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Rte. 0902AZ

MAP 2

Fort Frederica National Monument

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.09 0.18 Miles

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

KEY MAP

Fort Pulaski National Monument

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 1.5 3 Miles

Non-NPS Collected RoutesNote: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Rte. 0901SZZ

Rte. 0904Rte. 0906

Rte. 0901NZZ

Rte. 0900

Rte. 0101

Rte. 0102

Rte. 0100

Rt e.

Rte. 0905ZZ

Rte. 0902

Rte. 0907ZZ

Rte. 0201

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

MAP 1

Fort Pulaski National Monument

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Non-NPS Collected RoutesNote: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie National Historical Park

±0 1 2 Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

NPS Collected Routes

Rte. 0900

Rte. 0902 Rte. 0901 Rte. 0100Rte. 0101

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Area Map 1

Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie National Historical Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.2 0.4 Miles

Rte. 0400

Rte. 0200

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Area Map 2

Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie National Historical Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

0 0.05 0.1 Miles

Appendix B: C6 RIP Route Condition Summary Report

Cycle 6 - Road Inventory Program Road Condition Summary Report for

Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rated Roads

Canaveral National Seashore

Notes:

• This condition summary report contains only the roads rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).

• Condition on roads that were manually rated and parking areas are shown in separate reports.

• Route-level scores shown on this page may not represent scores at smaller intervals (due to rollup calculations).

• Additional details on individual road ratings at 0.10-mile and 1-mile intervals can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR (0 - 60)

FAIR (61 - 84)

GOOD (85 - 94)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (95 - 100)

NR = NOT RATED

Route No. FMSS No.

Functional

Class Surf.

Type

Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R u tt in g I n d ex

P a tc h

P o th o le

I n d ex

Lo n g it u d in a l C ra ck in g

In d ex

St ru ct u ra l C ra ck

I n d ex

Su rf a ce

C o n d it io n

R a ti n g

SC

R

R o u g h n es s C o n d it ex

R

C I)

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck

I n d ex

Tr a n sv er se

C ra ck ex

Route-Level Condition for Roads Rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)

CANA-0010 60814 PD PLAYALINDA BEACH ROAD 1 AS 4.30 100 98 99 100 99 98 100 9999

CANA-0013 60780 AD APOLLO BEACH ROAD 1 AS 6.60 100 89 89 100 89 91 100 9793

CANA-0200 60836 PD BEACH OFFICE COMPLEX 6 AS 0.67 100 72 80 100 80 72 100 9983

CANA-0205 60781 AD ELDORA LOOP ROAD 2 AS 1.21 100 85 85 100 85 92 100 9691

CANA-0300 60798 PD PLAYALINDA ACCESS ROAD 1 AS 4.22 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 9999

Data Collection Date: 04/2019 3-3

Parking Area Condition Summary Report

Canaveral National Seashore

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in

B le ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck

Jo t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o

P o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

PD PLAYALINDA ENTRANCE PULL OFFCANA-0900 60799 3,810 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

PD PARKING #1CANA-0901 60815 28,772 AS 97PUBLIC 9073 90 97 97 73

PD PARKING #2CANA-0902 60817 36,304 AS 73PUBLIC 9073 90 97 97 73

PD PARKING #3CANA-0903 60818 31,067 AS 97PUBLIC 9073 90 97 97 73

PD PARKING #4CANA-0904 60819 39,969 AS 90PUBLIC 9073 90 97 97 73

PD PARKING #5CANA-0905 60820 33,407 AS 97PUBLIC 9073 97 97 97 73

PD PARKING #6CANA-0906 60827 38,741 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

PD PARKING #7CANA-0907 60826 34,681 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 90 97 97 90

PD PARKING #8CANA-0908 60829 43,430 AS 90PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

PD PARKING #9CANA-0909 60831 29,732 AS 97PUBLIC 9773 90 97 97 73

PD PARKING #10CANA-0910 60832 30,054 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

PD PARKING #11CANA-0911 60833 13,174 AS 90PUBLIC 9773 90 97 97 73

PD PARKING #12CANA-0912 60834 16,057 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

PD PARKING #13CANA-0913 60835 12,742 AS 97PUBLIC 9073 97 97 97 73

PD RANGER STATION PARKINGCANA-0914 60801 13,201 AS 97NONPUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

PD CONTACT STATION RV PULLOUTCANA-0915 60802 2,816 AS 90PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

PD VISTA #1CANA-0916 60803 7,412 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

PD VISTA #2CANA-0917 60804 12,278 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

PD VISTA #3CANA-0918 60806 6,586 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

PD VISTA #4CANA-0919 60808 6,363 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

PD VISTA #5CANA-0920 60809 9,647 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

PD VISTA #6CANA-0921 60810 4,592 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

PD VISTA #7CANA-0922 60812 5,264 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

PD VISTA #8CANA-0923 60813 5,284 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

PD BEACH OFFICE COMPLEX PARKINGCANA-0924 60837 5,419 AS 30NONPUBLIC 9030 90 90 97 73

AD PARKING #1CANA-0931 60786 49,482 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 90 97 97 90

Data Collection Date: 03/2019 3-4

Canaveral National Seashore

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

AD PARKING #2CANA-0932 60789 12,839 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

AD PARKING #3CANA-0933 60790 12,984 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

AD PARKING #4CANA-0934 60791 12,667 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

AD PARKING #5 ACANA-0935AZ 60792 2,997 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

AD PARKING #5 BCANA-0935BZ 60792 1,494 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90

AD PARKING #5 CCANA-0935CZ 60792 2,939 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

AD PARKING #6CANA-0936 60793 9,336 AS 97PUBLIC 5353 97 97 97 90

AD PARKING #7CANA-0937 60794 10,660 AS 97PUBLIC 5353 97 97 97 90

AD PARKING #8CANA-0938 60795 13,557 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 90 97 97 90

AD PARKING #9CANA-0939 60796 8,874 AS 97PUBLIC 5353 97 97 97 90

AD BOAT RAMP PARKINGCANA-0940 60787 32,553 AS 97PUBLIC 9790 90 97 97 90

AD TURTLE MOUND PARKINGCANA-0941 60797 6,359 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

97SR SEMINOLE REST MAIN PARKINGCANA-0942 73396 15,089 COPUBLIC 73 97 73 90 97

AD VISITOR CENTER PARKINGCANA-0945 242094 18,936 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 90 97 97 90

PD EDDY CREEK PARKINGCANA-0947 60828 29,197 AS 90PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

Data Collection Date: 03/2019 3-5

Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rated Roads

Castillo de San Marcos National Monument

Notes:

• This condition summary report contains only the roads rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).

• Condition on roads that were manually rated and parking areas are shown in separate reports.

• Route-level scores shown on this page may not represent scores at smaller intervals (due to rollup calculations).

• Additional details on individual road ratings at 0.10-mile and 1-mile intervals can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR (0 - 60)

FAIR (61 - 84)

GOOD (85 - 94)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (95 - 100)

NR = NOT RATED

Route No. FMSS No.

Functional

Class Surf.

Type

Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R u tt in g I n d ex

P a tc h

P o th o le

I n d ex

Lo n g it u d in a l C ra ck ex

St ru ct u ra l C ra ck

I n d ex

Su rf a ce

C o n d it ti n g

SC

R

R o u g h n es s C o n d it ex

R

C I)

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck

I n d ex

Tr a n sv er se

C ra ck ex

Route-Level Condition for Roads Rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)

CASA-0400 254088 SERVICE ACCESS ROAD 5 AS 0.11 NR 47 49 100 49 47 100 9347

Data Collection Date: 04/2019 3-3

Castillo de San Marcos National Monument

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

ADMINISTRATIVE AREA ACASA-0900AZ 37033 919 AS 90NONPUBLIC 9073 73 73 97 73

ADMINISTRATIVE AREA BCASA-0900BZ 37033 362 AS 97NONPUBLIC 9073 73 90 97 73

ADMINISTRATIVE AREA CCASA-0900CZ 37033 407 AS 97NONPUBLIC 9073 90 90 90 73

ADMINISTRATIVE AREA DCASA-0900DZ 37033 3,468 AS 90NONPUBLIC 9073 97 90 97 73

MAINTENANCE AREACASA-0901 37034 6,257 AS 53NONPUBLIC 9053 90 73 73 73

VISITOR PARKINGCASA-0902 37031 54,440 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 90 97 97 97

EMPLOYEE PARKINGCASA-0904 37032 6,162 AS 73NONPUBLIC 9073 90 97 97 90

3-4Data Collection Date: 04/2019

Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rated Roads

Fort Matanzas National Monument

Notes:

• This condition summary report contains only the roads rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).

• Condition on roads that were manually rated and parking areas are shown in separate reports.

• Route-level scores shown on this page may not represent scores at smaller intervals (due to rollup calculations).

• Additional details on individual road ratings at 0.10-mile and 1-mile intervals can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR (0 - 60)

FAIR (61 - 84)

GOOD (85 - 94)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (95 - 100)

NR = NOT RATED

Route No. FMSS No.

Functional

Class Surf.

Type

Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R u tt in g I n d ex

P a tc h

P o th o le

I n d ex

Lo n g it u d in a l C ra ck ex

St ru ct u ra l C ra ck

I n d ex

Su rf a ce

C o n d it ti n g

SC

R

R o u g h n es s C o n d it ex

R

C I)

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck

I n d ex

Tr a n sv er se

C ra ck ex

Route-Level Condition for Roads Rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)

FOMA-0010 37037 VISITOR CENTER ACCESS ROAD 1 AS 0.24 NR 91 96 100 96 91 100 9991

FOMA-0100 242156 BEACH ACCESS ROAD 2 AS 0.11 NR 51 92 100 92 51 100 9951

3-3 Data Collection Date: 04/2019

Manually Rated Roads

Fort Matanzas National Monument Notes:

• This condition summary report contains only the roads that were manually rated.

o MRL: Manually Rated Line (a linear road) o MRP: Manually Rated Polygon (a non-linear road)

• Condition on roads that were rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) are shown in a separate report.

• A road is manually rated when it is determined to be unsuitable for the DCV to drive.

• Additional details on individual road ratings at 0.10-mile and 1-mile intervals can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR (0 - 60)

FAIR (61 - 84)

GOOD (85 - 94)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (95 - 100)

NR = NOT RATED

Route No. FMSS No.

Functional

Class Surf.

Type

Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R u tt in g I n d ex

P a tc h

P o th o le

I n d ex

Lo n g it u d in a l C ra ck ex

St ru ct u ra l C ra ck

I n d ex

Su rf a ce

C o n d it ti n g

SC

R

R o u g h n es s C o n d it ex

R

C I)

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck

I n d ex

Tr a n sv er se

C ra ck ex

Route-Level Condition for Manually Rated Line (MRL) Roads

FOMA-0400BZ 37047 FOMA MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROAD B 6 AS 0.02

3-4

97 NR 97 NR 97 97 97 97 97

Fort Matanzas National Monument

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

VISITOR CENTER PARKING AFOMA-0900A 104762 4,461 AS 97PUBLIC 9797 97 97 97 97

VISITOR CENTER PARKING BFOMA-0900B 104768 4,161 AS 97PUBLIC 9797 97 97 97 97

MAINTENANCE AREA PARKINGFOMA-0901 37039 5,865 AS 73NONPUBLIC 5353 73 97 97 73

BEACH ACCESS PARKING AREA AFOMA-0902AZ 37040 4,681 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

BEACH ACCESS PARKING AREA BFOMA-0902BZ 37040 3,026 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

DUNES PARKINGFOMA-0905 37041 23,122 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

RIVER PARKINGFOMA-0906 37042 16,011 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

FOMA MAINTENANCE PARKING AREAFOMA-0907 254112 4,898 AS 90PUBLIC 9090 90 97 97 90

3-5

Fort Caroline National Memorial

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

VISITOR CENTER PARKINGFOCA-0900 11925 29,277 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

SPANISH POND PARKINGFOCA-0901 11930 16,494 AS 90PUBLIC 9090 90 90 97 97

RIBAULT MONUMENT PARKINGFOCA-0902 11920 15,553 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

MAINTENANCE AREA PARKINGFOCA-0903 16776 9,931 AS 97NONPUBLIC 9090 97 90 97 97

Data Collection Date: 02/2021 3-3

Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

HEADQUARTERS ENTRANCE PARKINGTIMU-0903 11902 22,261 AS 90PUBLIC 9090 97 90 97 90

CEDAR POINT TRAIL PARKINGTIMU-0905 7,367 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 90 97 90

Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rated Roads

Fort Frederica National Monument

Notes:

• This condition summary report contains only the roads rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).

• Condition on roads that were manually rated and parking areas are shown in separate reports.

• Route-level scores shown on this page may not represent scores at smaller intervals (due to rollup calculations).

• Additional details on individual road ratings at 0.10-mile and 1-mile intervals can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR (0 - 60)

FAIR (61 - 84)

GOOD (85 - 94)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (95 - 100)

NR = NOT RATED

Route No. FMSS No.

Functional

Class Surf.

Type

Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R u tt in g I n d ex

P a tc h

P o th o le

I n d ex

Lo n g it u d in a l C ra ck ex

St ru ct u ra l C ra ck

I n d ex

Su rf a ce

C o n d it ti n g

SC

R

R o u g h n es s C o n d it ex

R

C I)

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck

I n d ex

Tr a n sv er se

C ra ck ex

Route-Level Condition for Roads Rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)

FOFR-0010 94500 HQVCC ENTRANCE ROAD 1 AS 0.09 NR 100 100 100 100 100 100 100100

FOFR-0400 74025 HQFA ENTRANCE ROAD (OLD MONUMENT ROAD) 6 AS 0.12 NR 78 93 100 93 78 100 10078

Fort Frederica National Monument

Notes:

• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.

• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR* (0, 30, 53)

FAIR (73)

GOOD (90)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (97)

NR = NOT RATED

Asphalt Surface Distresses

FMSS No. Route Name Area

(Sq. Ft.)Route No.

Surf.

Type

User Access

Concrete Surface Distresses

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck in g

Lo n g it u d in a l

Tr a n v er se C ra ck in g

R u tt in g

D is to rt io n s

P o th o le s

P a tc h in g

H M

A P a tc h in g

Su rf a ce

R a v el in ed in g

Jo in t Fa u lt in g

Sl a b C ra ck t D is tr es se s

D el a m in a ti o p -O u ts

P o th o le s

P a tc h in gCondition Rating Details for Paved Parking Areas

VISITOR CENTER PARKINGFOFR-0900 66907 39,740 AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97

MAINTENANCE AREA HANDICAP PARKING AFOFR-0902AZ 74030 867 AS 73NONPUBLIC 9073 97 97 97 90

97MAINTENANCE AREA HANDICAP PARKING BFOFR-0902BZ 74030 239 CONONPUBLIC 90 90 97 97 97

BLOODY MARSH PARKINGFOFR-0903 66910 15,385 AS 90PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90

3-4Data Collection Date: 02/2021

Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rated Roads

Fort Pulaski National Monument

Notes:

• This condition summary report contains only the roads rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).

• Condition on roads that were manually rated and parking areas are shown in separate reports.

• Route-level scores shown on this page may not represent scores at smaller intervals (due to rollup calculations).

• Additional details on individual road ratings at 0.10-mile and 1-mile intervals can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.

• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.

POOR (0 - 60)

FAIR (61 - 84)

GOOD (85 - 94)

Condition (Rating / Index) Legend

EXCELLENT (95 - 100)

NR = NOT RATED

Route No. FMSS No.

Functional

Class Surf.

Type

Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R u tt in g I n d ex

P a tc h

P o th o le

I n d ex

Lo n g it u d in a l C ra ck ex

St ru ct u ra l C ra ck

I n d ex

Su rf a ce

C o n d it ti n g

SC

R

R o u g h n es s C o n d it ex

R

C I)

P a v em en t C o n d it ti n g

P C

R

A ll ig a to r C ra ck

I n d ex

Tr a n sv er se

C ra ck ex

Route-Level Condition for Roads Rated…