NP_SER_PMS FY20(5)_BIP_STR 5230-007P.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Cumberland Gap National Historical Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-21-B-000009
About this file
This solicitation is seeking sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns for pavement preservation treatment, asphalt patching, pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work on identified paved roads and parking areas at Cumberland Gap National Historical Park. The project will be split into two schedules, with the total cost expected to fall between $1,000,000 to $5,000,000. Bids are due by the date specified on the SF1442 form included in the solicitation documents, which are available for download on beta.SAM.gov under opportunity number 693C73-21-B-000009. Bidders must complete representations and certifications at beta.SAM.gov and Form Vets-4212 at dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. Questions should be directed to eflhd.contracts@dot.gov. Bidders must be registered in SAM.gov for payment purposes. Visitors to the bid opening location must present ID and be escorted.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
LITTLE YELLOW CREEK CULVERT #2 INSPECTION DATE: 5/15/18
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 322 FT (98 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 42.0 FT (12.8 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 13.5 FT (4.1 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 25E7 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2017-REPAIRS TO WEST HEADWALL; NW END TREATMENT REPLACED.
LOCATION
CUMBERLAND GAP NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT:
STATE: .................................. KENTUCKY LOCATION: 0.5 MILES FROM VISITOR CENTER
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. U.S. ROUTE 25E
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... LITTLE YELLOW CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This triple barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the vertical joints at the wingwalls, with protrusion of the filler material and vegetation growth present; collision damage to the southeast guardrail end treatment for the southbound lanes; rusting of the guardrails at the south end treatments for the southbound lanes, with the steel completely rusted through in places; and exposed rebar on the underside of the top slab in all barrels. In addition, drift is beginning to accumulate at the upstream end of the culvert.
Since the previous inspection, the northwest guardrail end treatment has been replaced; repairs have been made to the west headwall over the south barrel; and the capstones along the southwest wingwall have been replaced.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: A. IMMEL, P. SWANN (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
AARON IMMEL, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/28/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
61.4 REMOVE DRIFT FROM UPSTREAM END OF CULVERT. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
222.3, 36.D REPLACE SOUTH GUARDRAIL END TREATMENTS FOR
SOUTHBOUND LANES.
1 LS
62.4 CLEAN AND RESEAL VERTICAL JOINTS BETWEEN CULVERT AND
WINGWALLS WITH APPROVED SEALANT.
1 LS
62.1 REPAIR CONCRETE AT LOCATIONS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON
SLAB UNDERSIDE IN ALL BARRELS.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY
70% TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 5
F G G F
10 FT.
MED
SUFF
N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62. CULVERT 6
1. BARREL(S)
2. FOOTINGS
3. HEADWALLS
4. WINGWALLS
5. DEBRIS AND/OR SILT
6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION
8. ADEQUACY OF COVER
9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
10. ROADWAY SURFACE
11. RIDEABILITY
12. OTHER (STORM DRAIN)
F G G G F G G G G F G G
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N F G G G G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N
SAND, GRAVEL
61.1,2,3 SOME RIPRAP HAS WASHED FROM SOUTH BANK INTO CHANNEL
UPSTREAM OF CULVERT DUE TO SOUTHWARD CHANNEL
MIGRATION; REMAINING RIPRAP APPEARS ADEQUATE. RIPRAP
ALSO PRESENT ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL.
61.2, 62.6 MINOR SCOUR, UP TO 7" D X 30' L, HAS EXPOSED FLOOR SLAB AT
UPSTREAM END OF CENTER AND SOUTH BARRELS; MINOR SCOUR,
UP TO 5" D X 5' L, HAS EXPOSED TOEWALL AT DOWNSTREAM END
OF CENTER BARREL. MINOR EROSION BEHIND NORTHWEST
WINGWALL AND AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL END.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 DRIFT BEGINNING TO ACCUMULATE ALONG UPSTREAM END OF
CULVERT.
61.4, 62.5 APPROXIMATELY 36" OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION IN NORTH
BARREL AND 6" IN CENTER BARREL. SMALL SANDBAR
DOWNSTREAM OF NORTH AND CENTER BARRELS. MINOR DEBRIS
AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION THROUGHOUT BARRELS. SEVERAL
RIPRAP STONES FROM UPSTREAM EMBANKMENT PROTECTION
HAVE BEEN WASHED INTO BARRELS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 25
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62.1 EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVERAGE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE OF SOUTH AND CENTER
BARRELS; MODERATE SECTION LOSS FROM SOME REBAR. MINOR CRACKING WITH MODERATE
EFFLORESCENCE AT ALL VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS; RUST STAINING PRESENT AT SEVERAL JOINTS.
EFFLORESCENCE FROM HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
MINOR MAP AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING ALONG SLAB UNDERSIDE OF NORTH AND SOUTH BARRELS, ESPECIALLY TOWARD CENTER OF SOUTH BARREL; REBAR CHAIRS EXPOSED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING ON BARREL WALLS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS; MINOR LEAKAGE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING AT EAST END OF NORTH AND SOUTH BARREL WALLS; SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR SPALLING AT WEST END OF CENTER BARREL WALLS.
MINOR SPALLING AND DELAMINATION OF SOUTH BARREL WALL BETWEEN CENTER AND SOUTH BARREL, EAST
END. MINOR SCALING OF FLOORS AND WALLS IN NORMAL WATER ZONE.
62.3 MODERATE DELAMINATION WITH LEACHING OF EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON HEADWALLS; MINOR SPALLING OF FINISH COAT. MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS IN WEST HEADWALL OVER CENTER BARREL. SMALL TREES GROWING ABOVE BOTH HEADWALLS. MINOR TO MODERATE AMOUNT OF
VEGETATION OVERHANGING WEST HEADWALL.
STONES IN WEST HEADWALL OVER SOUTH BARREL HAVE BEEN REPLACED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
62.4 JOINT FILLER MATERIAL BETWEEN NORTHWEST WINGWALL AND CULVERT PROTRUDES OUT FROM JOINT APPROXIMATELY 3/4". LOSS OF GROUT IN VERTICAL JOINT BETWEEN CULVERT AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINT BETWEEN CULVERT AND WINGWALL AT NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST, AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS. TREE GROWING AGAINST NORTHWEST WINGWALL. DISPLACED CAPSTONE AT
NORTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS.
CAPSTONES ALONG SOUTHWEST WINGWALL HAVE BEEN REPLACED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
62.10 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT ON NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND LANES OVER
CULVERT, MAINLY ALONG STRIPING.
62.12 STORM DRAIN ENTERS CULVERT ON SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BARREL; MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
AND RUST STAINING.
222.3, 36.D MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHEAST GUARDRAIL END TREATMENT FOR SOUTHBOUND LANES.
MODERATE RUSTING WITH AREAS OF 100% SECTION LOSS FROM SOUTH END TREATMENTS FOR SOUTHBOUND LANES. SPLITTING OF RAIL POST AT SOUTHWEST END TREATMENT OF SOUTHBOUND GUARDRAIL.
NORTHWEST END TREATMENT HAS BEEN REPLACED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
222.7 USGS SURVEY MARKER ON TOP OF SOUTH SIDEWALL AT EAST END.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 36 33 60 55
TYPE 3 32 29 53 48
TYPE 3S2 51 46 85 77
TYPE 3-3 62 56 104 94
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR THIS STRUCTURE ARE NOT AVAILABLE. RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE).
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: CUMBERLAND GAP NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LITTLE YELLOW CREEK CULVERT #2
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 2 - CULVERT
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5230-007P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 007P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 25E7
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
214 - KENTUCKY (KY)
013 - BELL
120000250
LITTLE YELLOW CREEK
U.S. ROUTE 25E
5230007P0000000
0.5 MILES FROM VISITOR CE
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
19 - CULVERT
13.5 FT (4.1 M)
42.0 FT (12.8 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°36'18.80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°41'24.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 1 MI (2 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 38.0 FT (11.6 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 04 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 10.0 FT (3.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 3 - CLOSED MEDIAN (non-mou
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 300 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 30 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2014 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... YES
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 330 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 39.0 FT (11.9 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2034 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.25 FT (0.69 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: ......... N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: .............. N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1N10
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2017-REPAIRS TO WEST HEADWALL; NW END TREATMENT REPLACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5230-007P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD MIDDLESBORO, KY
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW OF SOUTHBOUND LANES
LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW OF NORTHBOUND LANES
LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER BARREL LOOKING
EAST
PHOTO #6 - DRAINAGE INLET IN MEDIAN OVER CULVERT
PHOTO #7 - SPLITTING OF RAIL POST AT
SOUTHWEST END TREATMENT OF
SOUTHBOUND GUARDRAIL
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH SECTION
LOSS FROM SOUTH END TREATMENTS OF
SOUTHBOUND GUARDRAILS, SOUTHEAST END
TREATMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHEAST END TREATMENT FOR
SOUTHBOUND LANES
PHOTO #10 - NORTHWEST END TREATMENT FOR SOUTHBOUND LANES
HAS BEEN REPLACED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION
PHOTO #11 - DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END
PHOTO #12 - SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION IN NORTH BARREL
PHOTO #13 - EXPOSED TOEWALL AT UPSTREAM END
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL TREES GROWING ABOVE HEADWALLS, WEST
HEADWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - REPAIRS TO DISPLACED WEST HEADWALL STONES
ABOVE SOUTH BARREL
PHOTO #16 - DETERIORATION OF WEST HEADWALL MORTAR JOINTS
ABOVE CENTER BARREL
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING ALONG
HEADWALLS, WEST HEADWALL ABOVE CENTER BARREL SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE
HEADWALL AND WINGWALL STONES HAVE BEEN REPLACED
PHOTO #19 - DETERIORATION OF GROUT IN
JOINT BETWEEN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
AND SOUTH ENDWALL
PHOTO #20 - REPLACED CAPSTONES ALONG
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SPALLING AT WEST END
OF INTERMEDIATE WALLS, SOUTH
INTERMEDIATE WALL SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - PROTRUSION OF VERTICAL
JOINT MATERIAL BETWEEN NORTHWEST
WINGWALL AND NORTH ENDWALL
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE
VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #24 - DISPLACED CAPSTONE AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL END
PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL SCALING ALONG BASE
OF WALLS, SOUTH INTERMEDIATE WALL AT
WEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL LEAKAGE,
EFFLORESCENCE, AND RUST STAINING
ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, NORTH
BARREL NEAR WEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #27 - MAP CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN
NORTH BARREL NEAR MIDSPAN
PHOTO #28 - CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE, LEAKAGE, AND RUST
STAINING ON NORTH BARREL SLAB
UNDERSIDE EXTENDING INTO NORTH
INTERMEDIATE WALL 50' FROM WEST END
PHOTO #29 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH BARREL
SLAB UNDERSIDE AT EAST END
PHOTO #30 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH BARREL
SLAB UNDERSIDE AT EAST END
PHOTO #31 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, LEAKAGE,
AND RUST STAINING ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, SOUTH BARREL SHOWN
PHOTO #32 - SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AT DOWNSTREAM END OF
NORTH BARREL
PHOTO #33 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #34 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .