Attachment_III_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Lodging for the Crew of NOAA Ship FAIRWEATHER
Solicitation number
NMAN72002000024
Issued by

About this file

Attachment III

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_I_SOW_Revised.pdf PDF
Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment_II_Past_Performance_Information_Form.pdf PDF
RFQ_NMAN72002000024.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: NMAN72002000024 Attachment: III

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: (Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Bridget Cofo no later than October 31, 2019 at 11:00 am Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name:

Rater’s Signature:

Date:

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Bridget Cofo, no later than October 31, 2019 at 11:00 am Eastern Time:

bridget.cofo@noaa.gov mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Bridget Cofo no later than October 31, 2019 at 11:00 am Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
2. SCHEDULE
3. MANAGEMENT
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

File details come from the government source that posted it.