AmendmentFourPast_Performance_Questionnaire_Attachment_2.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Sign Language Interpreting Services
- Solicitation number
- NIHOD201800037
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AmendmentFour_QuestionsAndAnswers50319.docx | DOCX document | |
| AmendmentFour_Price_Sheet_-_SignLang_2019_05032019.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AmendmentFourSF_30.pdf | ||
| AmendmentFourInterpretingServicesPWS_v5.4_05032019.pdf | ||
| AmendmentThreeSF_30.pdf | ||
| AmendmentTwoSF_30.pdf | ||
| AmendmentOneRFP_NIHOD201800037.pdf | ||
| AmendmentOneInterpreting_Services_PWS_4.23.2019.pdf | ||
| AmendmentOneQuestionsAnswers.pdf | ||
| AmendmentOneSF_30.pdf | ||
| AmendmentOneAttachment_1.pdf | ||
| AmendmentOnePage_45.pdf | ||
| AttachmentsRFPsign.pdf | ||
| RFPSign.pdf | ||
| Attachment_11_Price_Sheet_-_SignLang_2019_04042019.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NIH RFP NIHOD201800037 Attachment 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contract Information
Name of Contractor Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value:
Brief Description of Requirement:
To be completed by person providing review:
Name:
Phone/Email Agency/Organization:
Position/Title:
Relationship to Contract (Contracting Officer, Project Officer, Etc.)
SCORING CRITERIA
3-Exceptional- Performance met or exceeded all requirements with no or few minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
2-Acceptable- Performance met all requirements with major and minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
1-Unacceptable- Performance failed to meet all or most requirements with serious or persistent problems, for which corrective actions were either not taken or were ineffective and recovery was unsuccessful in a timely manner.
Survey Questions
1. Contractor’s compliance with the contract requirements?
Rating: 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
2. Contractor's adherence to contract schedules, timelines, and deadlines?
Rating: 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
3. Contractor’s commitment to customer satisfaction?
Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
4. Contractor’s ability to recruit and retain qualified and reliable personnel?
Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
5. Contractor’s Onsite Manager’s effectiveness?
Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
6. Was contractor ever issued a cure notice /show cause letter, or terminated for any reason?
YES NO If yes, explain:
Comments:
7. Contractor’s ability to consistently deliver invoices and reports timely and accurately?
Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
8. Were discrepancies ever discovered between negotiated costs and actual costs submitted?
YES NO If yes, explain:
Comments:
9. Contractor’s ability to communicate and respond to constructive feedback from PM/COR?
Rating 3 2 1 N/A Comments:
10. Contractor's OVERALL performance? Would you award another contract to this contractor?
Rating 3 2 1 N/A YES NO Comments:
Thank you for completing this survey! Please email your completed questionnaire to: stevenst@od.nih.gov by 2 pm. On May 24, 2019
File details come from the government source that posted it.