Nahunta USDA RFP Score Sheet _ Architect Sele.pdf
PDF 289 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-66562-NONST-2026-000000004
- Issued by
- Brantley County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Qualification Evaluation Form for the selection of an architect for the City of Nahunta USDA project. The form is designed to assess architectural firms or individual architects competing for this design services contract through a standardized scoring methodology.
The evaluation criteria establish six key performance areas against which competing firms will be assessed: the architect's ability to provide all major disciplines necessary for project completion, relevant experience with the type of construction involved, knowledge of the local community, staff expertise qualifications, prior experience with Federal Grants or Loan Projects, and cost competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 1 representing Poor performance, 2 representing Fair, 3 representing Good, and 4 representing Excellent. The form also includes a verification requirement regarding Errors and Omissions insurance coverage, with a checkbox to confirm whether the firm carries this professional liability insurance. The evaluation form provides spaces for the reviewer's name, date of review, and additional comments to support the scoring decisions.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALIFICATION EVALUATION FORM
SELECTION OF ARCHITECT
FOR THE CITY OF NAHUNTA USDA
OWNER:___________________________________________________________
NAME OF FIRM:____________________________________________________
FIRM ADDRESS:__________________________________________________________________________
Evaluate the Architect and/or Architectural Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion. Scoring of RFP’s will be as follows:
POINTS
CRITERION ASSIGNED
1. Architect and/or Architectural Firms ability to supply all major disciplines necessary to perform the work.
2. Architect and/or Architectural Firms experience with this type construction.
3. Architect and/or Architectural Firms knowledge of community.
4. Architect and/or Architectural Firms Staff Expertise.
5. Has Architect and/or Architectural Firm had experience with Federal Grants or Loan Projects?
6. Is cost competitive?
TOTAL SCORE: __________
____ No Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes
COMMENTS:
NAME OF REVIEWER: _____________________________ DATE OF REVIEW: _______________
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .