PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (ATT 1).pdf
PDF 195 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CHILD CARE SPACES NEED FOR WASHINGTON DC AREA
- Solicitation number
- NAFNDW-25-R-2002
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for RFP NAFNDW-25-R-2002 related to child care spaces in the Washington DC area. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractors' previous performance across seven key factors: quality of work, personnel, subcontractor management, business relations, timeliness of performance, customer satisfaction, and cost/budget control.
The PPQ includes a six-level rating system ranging from Excellent to Unsatisfactory, with detailed definitions for each rating level. An Excellent rating requires very current and relevant performance with no problems, while an Unsatisfactory rating indicates failure to meet most contractual requirements with serious unresolved problems. The form allows for both numerical ratings and written comments for each evaluation factor. Previous PPQs may be used if Block 16's date is within one year of the RFP's original Block 9 offer end date. The questionnaire collects basic contract information including contractor details, contract type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, or Other), period of performance, dollar value, and complexity level (Difficult or Routine).
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE - RFP NAFNDW-25-R-2002 (CYP SPACES)
1. Contractor Name: 2. Contract Number:
3. Contractor Address: 4. Contract Type: __Firm Fixed Price ____Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Please Specify)
5. Agency Name: 6. Agency POC/Phone/Fax:
7. Period of Performance:
8. Dollar Amount of Award: $ Total Dollar Value with Mods:
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Complexity of Work: Difficult: ____________ Routine: ____________
NOTE: Please use adjectival ratings from below.
12. Evaluation Factor 13. Comments (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) 14. Rating
a. Quality of Work
b. Personnel
c. Subcontractor Mgmt
d. Business Relations
e. Timeliness of Performance
f. Customer Satisfaction
g. Cost/Budget Control
15. Would you select this firm again? Please explain. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.)
16. Name & Date: 17. Title:
ATTACHMENT 1
Past Performance Evaluation Levels are:
ADJECTIVAL DEFINITION
Excellent
Offeror’s performance was very current and very relevant to the requirements requested. Relevant defined as performing the same services. Performance was accomplished with no problems for which any required corrective actions taken were highly effective.
Good
Offeror’s performance was current and relevant to the requirements requested. Relevant defined as performing similar services.
Performance was accomplished with no or some minor problems for which any required corrective actions taken were effective.
Satisfactory
Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which any required corrective actions taken were satisfactory.
Unknown/Neutral
No relevant past performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful past performance risk prediction. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the Contractor or their Key Personnel. This is neither a positive or negative assessment, Marginal
Offeror’s performance did not meet all of the contractual requirements.
Performance was accomplished with serious problems for which any required corrective actions were marginally effective or not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Offeror’s performance did not meet most of the contractual requirements. Performance was accomplished with serious problems for which any required corrective actions were ineffective or non-existent.
PREVIOUS PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE USED
PROVIDED THE BLOCK 16 DATE ON THIS DOCUMENT IS NO MORE THEN
ONE (1) YEAR FROM THIS RFP’S ORIGINAL BLOCK 9 OFFER END DATE.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .