P200 Industry Engagement Brief_13Nov2025.pdf

FY 26 P-200

NUCLEAR POWER TRAINING

FACILITY SIMULATION EXPANSION

Joint Base Charleston Charleston, South Carolina

Industry Engagement Briefing

13 November 2025

2 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Conference Call Info

858-980-0000

Phone conference ID: 207 346 741# tel:+18589800000,,207346741 tel:+18589800000,,207346741 tel:+18589800000,,207346741 tel:+18589800000,,207346741 tel:+18589800000,,207346741

3 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ 08:00 – 08:15 Introductions and Opening Remarks

❑ 08:15 – 08:40 Project Overview

❑ 08:40 – 09:05 Project Constraints

❑ 09:05 – 10:15 Project Scope Details

❑ 10:15 – 10:30 Break

❑ 10:30 – 10:45 Construction Sequencing (proposed)

❑ 10:45 – 11:15 Acquisition Plan

❑ 11:15 – 11:30 Small Business Engagement

❑ 11:30 – 12:00 Question and Answer Period

❑ 12:00 - Wrap up

Agenda

4 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Welcome and Introductions

5 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ William Moreno

▪ Senior Project Manager – NAVFAC

❑ Alison Tulloss

▪ Design Manager – NAVFAC

❑ Chuck Brindley

▪ Project Sponsor - NPTU

❑ Tim Quarrick

▪ Project Manager – NPTU

❑ LCDR Luke Keiser

▪ Resident Officer in Charge of Construction - NAVFAC (ROICC CHAS/SHAW)

❑ Rett Fowler

▪ Resident Engineer in Charge of Construction - NAVFAC (ROICC CHAS/SHAW)

❑ Jonnathan Vargas

▪ Project Manager JB Charleston

❑ Burns & McDonnell – Design Team DORs

6 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Notify Industry of the upcoming solicitation for the P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility

Simulation Expansion at Joint Base (JB) Charleston, SC.

❑ Inform industry as to the scope, timeline, and possible construction challenges.

*** NOTE: Everything presented today is subject to change. If you spot an error or confusing item, please mention it either immediately or as a separate response.

Industry Engagement Goals

7 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ These discussions are informational and for planning purposes only. This is not a request for proposal. Nothing discussed as part of this event will be evaluated in response to any future requests for proposals.

❑ In this meeting, do not provide the Government with any proprietary information, trade secrets, or any other information deemed source selection sensitive, or any information that you do not want disseminated to the public.

❑ Please hold questions until the Q&A session at the end of this presentation

❑ Registering for and joining this meeting indicates your understanding and consent to the government making a summary of this meeting publicly available, including the question and answer period.

*** All Questions and Comments should be addressed to:

Dennis Bourgault, Contract Specialist, dennis.p.bourgault.civ@us.navy.mil

Lindsay Betteridge, Contracting Officer, lindsay.e.betteridge.civ@us.navy.mil

Ground Rules

8 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Project Background:

▪ Nuclear Power Training Unit (NPTU) – Charleston (NPTU-C) is a technical school operated by the Navy and located on the Naval Weapons Station within Joint Base Charleston in Goose Creek, South Carolina.

▪ NPTU-C provides hands-on training for enlisted sailors, officers, and Naval Nuclear Laboratory (NNL)

❑ Project Scope (Three Separate Buildings and Site Work)

▪ Two Story Training Support Building (TSB)

▪ Multi-story High Bay to house two Propulsion Plant Team Trainers (PPTTs). (Training simulators under separate MILCOM procurement)

▪ Mechanical Building (MB)

▪ Causeway widening, utility upgrades, and raising road elevation

▪ Improvements to electrical, water, sanitary, storm water, and telecom utility distribution

▪ Construction of an electrical power substation

Project Overview

9 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Solicitation:

▪ Design-Bid-Build

▪ Pre-Proposal Conference - TBD

▪ Anticipated Advertisement – Jan 2026

▪ Anticipated Award – Sept 2026

❑ Construction Schedule:

▪ Construction Start

▪ Access after award subject to completed pre-requisites

• See NAVFAC “Green Zone” specifications in solicitation

• Pre-construction conference, contract requirements, submittals, plans, etc.

▪ Construction Complete

• Site Work: Oct 2029

• High Bay (HB): Oct 2029

• Mechanical Building (MB): Oct 2029

• Training Support Building (TSB): June 2030

• Causeway: June 2030

• Substation: June 2030

Project Overview

10 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Proposed Site

11 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Tree Clearing Bid Option

❑ Separate Tree Clearing Package issued to

NAVFAC for Contracting

❑ Bid Option Tree Demolition (~23ac)

▪ Drwgs 2-CD200 thru 2-CD204

❑ NMC access procedures (Substation)

❑ Clearing moratoriums for tri-colored bat -

Annually: 12/15-2/15 and 4/15-7/30

❑ MBTA requirements – nest surveys

12 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑Physical Security:

▪ All access must be coordinated with Joint Base Charleston (JBC).

▪ Project is primarily located northwest of the intersection of Old Tom Road and Red Bank Road

▪ The substation portion of the project is located northwest of the main site off Missile Haul Road.

▪ The primary construction haul route will be from the Remount Entry Gate (South Gate) and CVI via Wilkinson

Way and Red Bank Road to the new north entrance road off the campus.

▪ Security Badges:

▪ Security badges are required for entry into the base or while working within the Navy fenced property. However, this does not preclude the selected contractor from the need to apply for DBIDS (Defense

Biometric Identification System) for all employees working on the project. Each individual will need to provide a

Real ID and proof of US citizenship. Information pertaining to the DBIDS requirements can be found at https://dbids-global.dmdc.mil/home/.

❑Photographic Equipment:

▪ Use of any photographic or video equipment within the NPTU site requires prior approval. A camera pass will be required. Outside of the NPTU site, there are no restrictions.

Joint Base Security/Access Requirements https://dbids-global.dmdc.mil/home/ https://dbids-global.dmdc.mil/home/ https://dbids-global.dmdc.mil/home/

13 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

▪ Compliance

▪ All offerors should be able to handle CUI

▪ This can be expensive, intrusive, and time-consuming – start early to avoid difficulties or delays

▪ Prime, Joint Venture, JV members, subcontractors, and some suppliers (fabrication)

❑CUI Guidance

▪ DOD Instruction 5200.48

▪ DFARS Section 252.204-7012 and others

▪ NIST SP 800-171 (check current version); https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/171/r3/final

▪ General DOD policy; https://www.dodcui.mil/

General Security Requirements - Data

14 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Construction Haul Route(s)

❑ Remount Entry Gate & CVI

❑ Wharf Alpa Operational impacts – Alternate Red

Bank Entry Gate after CVI – time limit

❑ Grace Hopper Bridge Load Rating

❑ Construction Access for Substation Tree Clearing &

Initial Site work

▪ Gate 2 & 29

▪ NMC Access and Restrictions

❑ Drawing 2-G-102

15 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Construction Laydown & Parking

❑ROICC and Contractor Construction Trailers

▪ ROICC Parking spaces

▪ Elec Pole & transformer

❑Contractor Trailers GC

▪ Subcontractor trailers w/in project work limits

▪ Worker parking w/in project work limits

▪ Staging w/in project work limits

❑Existing NPTU Overflow Parking, East

Parking, Bid Option South Parking

❑Quiet Hours 6 PM to 8 AM, Monday to

Friday, and all Weekends and holidays

❑Drawing 2-G-103

16 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Early Clearing Package – Permits Provided:

▪ CSWPPP developed and will be approved prior to construction to transfer to Contractor.

❑ MILCON Package – Permits Provided:

▪ USACE Nationwide Permit Number 18 for Minor Discharges and USACE Nationwide Permit Number

14 for Linear Transportation Projects

▪ SCDES Individual Water Quality Certification

▪ SCDES General Construction Permit for Wastewater and Water Lines

▪ SCDEC BCM Coastal Zone Consistency Certification

▪ SCDES Air Permit Exemption

Contractor shall review all JB CHS provided permits and adhere to the conditions and special conditions of those permits. Contractor shall note permit expiration dates and notify JB CHS contracting officer of impending expiration dates as soon as possible and not less than 6-months prior to the expiration date such that JB CHS can coordinate permit extensions and/or coordinate with federal and state agencies.

Environmental Considerations (GOVT)

17 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ The following permits will be obtained by the Contractor:

▪ SCDES Demolition Permit (MILCON)

▪ JB CHS Dig Permit (MILCON)

▪ SCDOT Special Hauling Permit (MILCON)

▪ FAA Structure Height Notification (Temporary) FAA Form 7460-2 (MILCON)

▪ SCDES Well Construction Permit (D-3736) (MILCON)

▪ SCDES CGP Transfer of Ownership (Early Clearing and MILCON)

Environmental Considerations (Contractor)

18 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) required for each construction phase.

❑ Education and Notification requirements for Migratory Birds, each construction phase.

❑ Qualified Biologist required, each construction phase.

❑ Known HAZMAT requiring notification and/or management/disposal during construction

▪ Identified Tetrachloroethylene Plume (SWMU 36/37)

▪ AOC B2 and AOC B3 (petroleum constituents)

▪ Potential for asbestos/lead containing pipe

❑ Stormwater Management and SCDES Construction General Permit (SCR10000) coverage

▪ Early Clearing CSWPPP will be provided to Contractor. Contractor to contact JB CHS, submit Transfer of Ownership Form and NOI to SCDES and JB CHS (MS4). Contractor to transfer OSWPPP to

MILCON contractor once selected.

▪ MILCON CSWPPP will be provided as draft to Contractor, for submittal to SCDES/ JB CHS. Contractor to submit Transfer of Ownership Form and NOI to SCDES and JB CHS to authorize MILCON construction. MILCON Contractor to obtain Early Clearing OSWPPP and maintain with Compliance

Notebook.

Environmental Considerations (Contractor, cont.)

19 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

SE View of Training Support Building and High Bay Buildings

20 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Training Support Building Main Entrance

21 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Training Support Building Covered Outdoor Area

22 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Main Lobby and Entry Control

23 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Second Floor Study Area

24 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

High Bay

25 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

High Bay Mid-Level

26 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑Construction of new Simulator Training Facility

▪ Two-story Training Support Building (TSB)

▪ Multi-story High Bay (HB) housing simulators and ancillary support space

▪ Mechanical Building (MB)

▪ Improvements to electrical, water, sanitary, storm water, and telecom utility distribution infrastructure to support the new facilities.

▪ Causeway widening, utility upgrades, and raising road elevation.

▪ Building deep foundation construction.

▪ Roadway and pedestrian capital improvements.

▪ Construction of an electrical power substation and associated electrical feeds to the site.

▪ Reconstruction of existing parking spaces planned for demolition and constructing additional parking spaces as part of MILCON.

Project Scope Summary

27 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Proposed Site

28 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Primary Work Area

❑Base Bid Main Site

▪ Existing Parking

▪ East Parking

▪ North Access Drive

▪ Electrical Equipment Yard Relocation

❑Bid Option Causeway

❑Bid Option Substation

❑Bid Option Road Improvements

❑Bid Option South Parking

❑Wetlands

❑Future High Bay infrastructure

29 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Demolition

❑Asphalt Parking Lot and access drives

❑Hockey Rink

❑Clearing & Grubbing of treed areas

❑Utility Demolition

▪ Water

▪ Sanitary sewer

• 30” WWTP discharge FM

▪ Natural gas

▪ Stormwater

▪ Electrical overhead and UG

▪ Communication overhead and UG

• AT&T, Comcast, privatized systems

30 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Layout

❑Asphalt Parking Lot

❑Heavy Duty Asphalt Assess Roads

❑Site Concrete around Buildings

❑Sidewalks

❑Gravel laydown for PPTT Contractor

❑Dumpster Enclosure

❑Hardscape/landscape

31 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Layout – Bid Option Substation

❑NMC Security drive and fence relocation

▪ Access

❑JB CHS side

▪ Site Preparation

▪ Grading

▪ Erosion Control

▪ Gravel surface

▪ Fencing and all work

❑Dominion Energy Side

▪ Site Preparation

▪ Grading

▪ Erosion Control BMPs

32 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Layout – Bid Option Road Improvements

❑Mill/Overlay portions of Old Tom Rd and Red Bank Road

❑Addition of turn lanes

❑5’ asphalt shoulders

❑Removal of diagonal access along Cote Bas and add Cul-de-sac

❑Removal of diagonal access along Cote Bas and update to

Cross/perpendicular intersection access

33 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Layout – Bid Option South Parking

❑Asphalt Parking

❑Sidewalks

❑Bus Shelter

❑Abandon 5 monitoring wells, replace 3

▪ Coordinate w/JB CHS ENV

❑Existing wetland – do not disturb

34 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Layout - Bid Option Causeway

❑Widen Existing 20ft width to 28ft

❑Raise Elevation 1.5-2ft

❑ Install water main, elec ductbank, comm ductbank

❑Signage, striping, guard rail, curb/gutter

❑Construction sequence/duration

❑Cross Sections

❑Drwg 2-G-120 thru 2-G-137

35 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Site Layout - Bid Option Causeway X- Section

❑Embankment/Widening Sequences

▪ Wetland impacts - BMPs/Turbidity

Curtains

▪ Temporary Sheet Piles

▪ Material for embankment layers

▪ Geogrids

▪ Settlement periods

▪ Surcharge

▪ Maintaining Traffic

• Temp traffic signals

▪ SD Box Culvert

▪ Existing Utility locates

• Temporary Comm

• Water main, Elec Ductbank, Comm ductbank

▪ Drwg 2-G-120 thru 2-G-137

36 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Grading Layout

❑Wetland – avoid impacts except as noted

❑Erosion Control & BMPs

❑Excavation for stormwater basins

❑Re-use of satisfactory materials for fill

▪ 24” Lime/cement modified soil layers under pavements

❑Cut/Fill for lane widenings

37 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Civil Utility Layout

❑Water – 12” Main, 10” loop, service lines

❑Sanitary – Lift Station, service lines

▪ Demo/Capping existing 10” SSFM

▪ Relocate 30”FM WWTP Discharge line

❑Storm Drain – Curb inlets, Drop inlets, RCP &

HDPE, Roof drains

❑Natural Gas – Relocations, No Bldg service

❑Utility Trench – CHWS/R & HWS/R

❑ Irrigation – temporary underground system

❑Electrical Overhead and UG

❑Communication Overhead and UG

▪ Existing direct bury – Conduit/Concrete

Encasement

▪ Private Utility coordination

❑Future expansion/connections/infrastructure

38 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Landscape Architecture

❑Landscaping focused at building main entrance, parking lots, and screening/vegetative natural buffers.

▪ Low-maintenance, drought tolerant and adaptive species selection.

▪ BMP's with native grass seeding and plug plantings.

▪ Underground temp irrigation pipe/controls

❑Hardscape elements include specialty decorative pavement provided at building entry and quarterdeck plaza space.

▪ Atomic symbol, rating symbols, compass symbol, decorative concrete, and integral color concrete.

39 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Architecture

❑3 facilities with total ground floor area of ~100K SF

❑Exterior Arch features -

▪ Low water table split face masonry throughout, to 3'-4"

▪ TSB higher water table of brick, to 22' AFF

▪ Metal panel – TSB Composite, HB Insulated, Mech Single Skin

▪ Roof – 2 ply mod bit, mostly internal drainage

▪ TSB specialties;

Entrance – painted cast in place revealed concrete

2 clerestories ('pop-ups') at roof, translucent FRP sandwich panels thru-out

Multiple 2 story curtainwall windows, storefront at entrance/dining/stairs/etc

Insulated, low-E laminated glazing (STC systems at secure boundaries)

Sunshades and precast accents at curtainwall

❑ Interior Arch features -

▪ Elevators – Hydraulic; TSB passenger type, HB freight type

▪ On-Crew Trellis (2) - support secure cabling

❑Additional structures –

▪ Shade Structure, Dumpster Enclosure, Mechanical Screenwall, Shuttle Queue

40 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Overall Building Layout

First Floor Overall Second Floor Overall

ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW

41 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Building 2725 Layout – First Floor

42 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Building 2725 Layout – Second Floor

43 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Building 2726 Layout – First Floor

44 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Building 2727 Layout

45 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Structural – Building 2725

❑Foundations (3-SB100 through 3-SB114)

▪ 12” Square Precast Prestressed Concrete driven piles

▪ Reinforced concrete pile caps and pile-supported grade beams

▪ 10” thick reinforced concrete ground floor slab

❑Superstructure (3-SF115 through 3-SF129)

▪ Structural steel frame

▪ 2nd Floor - Composite concrete on metal deck. Wide flange framing

▪ Roof – Metal roof deck. Wide flange framing and open web steel joists

▪ Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames and Special Moment frames

• Seismic detailing

❑Other

▪ Special reinforced concrete shear walls at the entryway (3-SB113, 3-SF210)

▪ Separation joints at the entryway-2725, 2725-Connector, Connector-2726 (3-A-530s)

▪ Secondary steel framing to support various elements (curtainwall, storefront, parapet, operable partitions, etc)

(see 3-SF200s, 3-S-300s, 3-S-400s 1-S-500s)

46 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Structural – Building 2726

❑Foundations (4-SB100 through 4-SB608)

▪ 12” Square Precast Prestressed Concrete driven piles

▪ Reinforced concrete pile caps and pile-supported grade beams

▪ 14” and 16” Reinforced concrete ground floor mat slab

❑Superstructure (4-SF115 through 4-SF580)

▪ Steel frame 80-ft high bay structure

▪ Misc perimeter floors of composite concrete deck and grating

▪ 94-ft built-up roof truss system of angles and wide flange framing

▪ Steel special concentric braced frames

▪ Special reinforced concrete shear walls

▪ Independent masonry elevator shaft

▪ Steel framed lean-to structure supported by high bay

▪ Steel and concrete roof decking

❑Other (4-SB700s and 4-SF750s)

▪ Coordination of future PPTT trainer and support structure anchorage

▪ 40-ton bridge crane with 77-ft span and 60-ft hook height

▪ Separation joints at the Connector

▪ Vertical steel windposts to support metal wall panels

▪ Misc. cold formed steel framing for exterior walls on second floor

47 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Structural – Building 2727

❑Foundations (5-SB190 and 5-SB191)

▪ 12” Square Precast Prestressed Concrete driven piles

▪ 24”-30” thick pile-supported reinforced concrete slab (step and slope at exterior)

❑Superstructure (5-SF192)

▪ 12” Reinforced CMU load-bearing walls

▪ Metal roof deck with wide flange framing

❑Other (5-S-300s)

▪ Utility trenches from Bldg 2727 to HB1 (Bldg 2726) and future HB2

• Pile-supported reinforced concrete trenches for mechanical piping

• First portion of trench to HB2 is constructed with this contract; remainder under HB2 construction

▪ 8” CMU screenwall

▪ Generator and Mech/Elec equipment on exterior portion of pad

48 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Interior Design Slide

❑ Interior finish durability is the primary consideration due to the 24/7/365 environment

▪ Poured Terrazzo in Quarterdeck/Dining – 3 color pattern

▪ Rigid Sheet Wall Protection Wainscot throughout facility

▪ Solid vinyl tile in primary circulation spaces

❑Digitally Printed FRP Wall Graphic at two-story main stair

❑FF&E Package is not in contract.

▪ Planned Modification for Procurement and Installation coordination

❑The Base Price Proposal must include time for FF&E Procurement and Installation in the Construction Schedule, Coordination of all trades with the furniture.

▪ FF&E Installation Schedule, Construction Coordination Schedule and Mock-Up Coordination of all trades

49 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Fire Protection Slide

❑Fire Suppression System Overview

❑ Redundant Fire Pumps in the MB that serve TSB, HB, and MB

▪ Single Jockey Pump and Remote Free-standing FDC (only FDC for the three buildings)

❑ Wet-Pipe Fire Suppression in TSB, HB, and MB

▪ TSB – Mostly Light Hazard with some Ordinary Hazard rooms. Two small rooms are Extra Hazard.

▪ HB – Mostly Ordinary Hazard with a couple Light Hazard rooms.

▪ MB – Ordinary Hazard only

❑ HB – Manual Wet Class 1 Standpipe System (Located in each of the four exit stairs)

❑ HB – Route Piping for Connection during Future MILCON.

❑Fire Alarm System Overview

▪ Separate Monaco MAAP-X Fire Alarm Panels and Transmitters for TSB, HB, and MB

• TSB and HB include Mass Notification, MB does not

▪ TSB – Monaco D-21 Incident and Emergency Management System

▪ HB – Beam Detection to initiate Smoke Control System

▪ HB and TSB – Spot Smoke Detectors in Server Rooms

▪ HB and TSB – Route Conductors/Conduit to Areas for Connection during Future MILCON. Ensure spare capacity for

Future MILCON.

50 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Mechanical/Plumbing Slide

❑Mechanical System Overview

❑ Cooling & heating systems are as follows:

▪ Air-cooled chillers with primary/secondary chilled water pumps. ~580 tons cooling,

▪ Electrical Resistance Heating

❑ Central Airside Systems are as follows:

▪ TSB: VAV AHUs with electric reheat VAVs/ ERV for OA pre-treat

▪ HB: VAV AHUs with electric reheat in AHU/ERV for OA pre-treat

▪ MB: Single zone FCUs with CHW coil and electric heat

❑ Single Zone Systems

▪ Comm rooms: DX single zone split systems.

▪ MEP rooms, stairs: Single zone FCU with CHW coil and electric heat

▪ TSB Network Server room: DX CRACs (N+1); on emergency power. Cabinet chimney exhaust.

▪ TSB SMATT Server room: CHW CRAHs; NOT on emergency power

▪ HB PPTT Server room: CHW CRAHs; on emergency power. Cabinet chimney exhaust.

▪ Tertiary loop for loss of power event

❑ Security

▪ Duct penetrations greater than 96 sq. in. will have security bars

❑ Future utility preparation

▪ Coordination between disciplines to show future footprint of DI/ALP pipe routed thru HB and TSB shown on design drawings.

▪ Pipe hangers for future piping are to be installed under MILCON contract per the design drawings.

51 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Mechanical/Plumbing Slide

❑Plumbing System Overview

❑ Domestic Water

▪ BFP and metering (AMRS network monitoring) at service entrance.

▪ Domestic hot water is provided by electric storage type water heaters. Remote fixtures (sinks, etc.) utilize POU water heaters .

❑ Sanitary Sewer

▪ SSWV serving each building connects back to base-wide sanitary sewer

▪ No industrial waste

❑ Storm Drainage

▪ Roof drains and overflow drains for all buildings except MB

❑ Natural Gas not required for MILCON facilities

❑ Building Plumbing Fixtures

▪ Toilets and urinals will be wall mounted, low-flow type.

▪ Single and double-compartment stainless steel sinks

▪ ADA approved electric water coolers with bottle fill

▪ Lavatories will be under-counter mounted with hard wired sensor faucet and will have integral hand dryers. See plumbing fixture schedules

▪ Floor drains/sinks with trap primer connections

▪ Emergency eyewash/shower provided in TSB Mixing room

52 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Electrical Slide

❑Campus Distribution (480V & Below) Overview

❑ Four Pad-Mount Transformers distributing to three buildings 2725 (TSB), (2) at 2726 (HB1), and 2727 (MB).

❑900kW Emergency Generator – Cummins.

▪ Level 1 (Emergency) and Level 2 distribution to 2725 & 2726 via 2727.

• ATSs for each level within both 2725 & 2726.

❑Grounding ring around each building with interconnections between each individual ring.

❑LED Lighting throughout.

▪ Low-Voltage controls using networked local room controllers with a central hub for connectivity back to DDCs.

▪ Central Emergency Lighting Inverters.

53 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Electrical Slide

❑2725 – TSB

▪ 3,000A Switchboard.

▪ Controlled receptacles.

▪ EV Charging Stations.

❑2726 – HB1

▪ Two 3,000A Switchgears in a Main-Tie-Tie-Main configuration.

▪ Infrastructure in place for future PPTT fitout.

▪ High bay lighting utilizing very high lumen fixtures mounted using a unique hoist for each fixture for ease of maintenance.

❑2727 – MB

▪ 2,000A Normal Power Switchboard.

▪ 1,600A Generator Distribution Switchboard.

54 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Telecommunications Slide

❑Outside Plant (OSP) System Overview (2-TS100 – 2-TS701)

❑ Demolition

▪ Existing direct buried base owned fiber optic cables. Replace before demolition.

▪ Coordination with AT&T and Comcast for relocation of existing telephone and fiber optic lines and structures.

❑ New

▪ Connections from Building 13 (NMCI) to Building 2725 (TSB) and Building 206

(NNPTC)

• New fiber optic cables in existing pathways

▪ Connections from Building 2711 (NPTU-C) to Building 2725 (TSB)

• New air-blown fiber optic cables in a new directional bore duct bank

▪ Connection from Building 2400 (NNPTC) to Building 2725 (TSB)

• New fiber optic cables in existing pathways

▪ Connections from Building 2727 (TSB) to Building 2727 (MB)

• New fiber optic cables in a new duct bank

❑ Bid Option Causeway (2-TS126)

▪ Temporary poles and aerial relocation of existing cables from the base, AT&T, and

Comcast.

▪ New duct bank across the causeway and relocation of existing cables into new duct bank.

❑ Bid Option Road Improvements (2-TS152 & 2-TS154)

▪ Coordination with AT&T and Comcast for relocation of existing telephone and fiber optic lines and structures.

55 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Telecommunications Slide

❑ Inside Plant (ISP) System Overview (TN Series)

❑ Main Telecom Room (3-TN213, 3-TN413, 3-TN601, & 3-TN604)

▪ Fiber and copper connections to Unclassified Comm Rooms to support Voice, NMCI, and Public Address systems

❑ Network Server Room (3-TN210, 3-TN410, 3-TN601, & 3-TN602)

▪ Fiber connections to Unclassified and Classified Comm Rooms to support PrimeNet, Wireless, and NNPP systems

▪ Cabinets with vertical exhaust ducts

❑ PPTT Server Room (4-TN201, 4-TN202, 4-TN401, 4-TN601)

▪ Fiber connections to Classified Comm Rooms to support NAVSIM system

❑ Cable Tray (1-TN501, 1-TN503, and 3-TN110 thru 3-TN129)

▪ Unclassified tray above the ceiling

▪ Classified tray exposed, flush to the ceiling for cable inspectability

❑ Horizontal (1-TN502, 1-TN503, and 3-TN140 thru 3-TN149)

▪ CAT-6 and CAT-6A cables

▪ Surface-mount outlets and raceway for classified networks

▪ Zone cabinets for classrooms, tablet cabinets, and PPTT interface

❑ Public Address System (3-TN150 thru 3-TN159 & 3-TN603)

▪ Includes conduits, backboxes, head-end, cabling, speakers, and ancillary equipment

❑ Wireless System (3-TN150 thru 3-TN159 & 3-TN604)

▪ Comm outlets, cables, and patch panels

▪ Does not include access points or active equipment

❑ First Responder Distributed Antenna System (DAS)

▪ NFPA 1221

▪ Active, fiber-based system

56 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Electronic Security Slide

❑Secure Boundaries

▪ Limited Access Area

▪ Controlled Access Area with Entry Control Point

▪ Open Storage Area

❑Access Control System

▪ Full system install

▪ Badging Station

❑Video Surveillance System

▪ Full system install

❑Intrusion Detection System

▪ Rough-in only

❑RFID Tracking

▪ Rough-in only

57 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Cybersecurity Slide

❑Facility-Related Control System (FRCS) Cybersecurity Overview

▪ Design followed UFC 4-010-06, Cybersecurity of Facility-Related Control Systems

▪ General Contractor's (GC) responsibility in construction is to ensure installed FRCS are appropriately hardened using the applicable UFGS 25 05 11

• GC Cybersecurity SME must coordinate with the Government Cybersecurity organizations (AFCEC

Cybersecurity Team and NAVFAC SE CIO) o Will be the interface to the contractors/vendors o Provides the required submittals during construction o Coordinates any potential changes to control systems with the government

• Not responsible for the Cybersecurity Authority to Operate (ATO), but will assist the government in obtaining the information needed from each contractor/vendor to create the required cybersecurity artifacts

▪ List of FRCS identified during design: HVAC DDC, Fire Protection, Building Lighting, Electronic Security, Utility

Metering, Electrical Distribution, EV Charging Station, Elevator Control, and Bridge Crane.

58 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Propulsion Plant Team Trainers (PPTT) Interface

59 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

PPTT Interface Slide

❑PPTT Mech Room Validation

❑ Future mechanical systems for PPTT

▪ Right-sized the PPTT mechanical room based on hybrid dimensions of major equipment based on worst case dimensions from multiple manufacturers

▪ Floor drains and Potable Water service with BFP installed in PPTT mechanical room under MILCON contract per design drawings

▪ Future PPTTs served by dedicated AHUs located on mezz above trainers

▪ Future AHUs served by dedicated chilled water system

▪ Future PPTT chillers to be installed at MB in chiller yard. Concrete pad for future equipment installed under MILCON contract per design drawings

▪ Penetrations for future utility piping is to be coordinated and drilled under this contract for ease of future utility installation.

▪ PPTT mechanical room floor drains to be located/installed under MILCON contract. Coordination with PPTT design team to finalize locations will be required.

60 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Substation and Distribution Slide

❑Substation System:

▪ Consist of 115kV Substation designed, built and owned by Dominion

Energy South Carolina (DESC). Coordination & Subcontract DESC

▪ Consist of 13.8kV Substation maintained by Joint Base. This station will be connected to the DESC 115 kV substation.

▪ The 13.8kV Joint Base Substation will have voltage regulators for voltage regulation.

▪ A single 13.8kV overhead distribution feeder will be extended outside the substation for distribution feed.

▪ Packaged circuit breakers with internal relays will be utilized at the Joint base Substation.

▪ AC Power will be provided via station service transformer.

▪ DC will be incorporated into each breaker through uninterruptible power supply.

▪ No control enclosure and protection relay included internal to the packaged circuit breakers.

61 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Substation and Distribution Slide

❑Primary Feeder:

▪ 13.8kV Duct Bank from New DESC Substation north of proposed facility.

▪ Dedicated feed from DESC Substation to Facility.

▪ DESC Substation is designated as bid-option. Should Bid Option not be adopted under initial Bid, alternate feeder would serve as primary feeder until Substation is built.

❑Alternate Feeder:

▪ 13.8kV Overhead Feeder from existing Waterfront Express Circuit.

• Waterfront Express Feeder fed by Waterfront Substation

▪ New Circuit built following existing pole line to location south of the proposed facility.

▪ Dips Underground south of the facility and runs to facility switchgears west of the campus.

❑Campus Distribution:

▪ Fed from Facility Switchgears throughout campus to designated transformers.

▪ Key Interlocks installed at switchgears to prevent paralleling of Primary & Alternate Feeders.

62 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Break

63 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Construction sequencing of main site

▪ Existing NPTU Overflow Parking lot replacement & access – East Parking or Bid Option South Parking (Drwg 2-G-110)

• Access to Bldg 1670/27 parking & maintenance equipment complex

• Electrical Yard relocation

▪ Utility relocations – maintain services - Overhead Elec, Overhead/Underground Comm, 12” Water main, 30” WWTP discharge

▪ Fiber Optic Cable to Building 206 Relocation

▪ Communication along Old Tom Rd/ Causeway into P99/P100 campus

(NPTU Escort Access)

▪ Lime/cement treatment of satisfactory soils 24” layer below site pavements

❑Bid Option Substation - coordination with DESC scope &

Access thru NMC – Previous slides (2-CS140

❑Bid Option Road Improvements (Drwgs 2-G-135 thru 2-G-137)

▪ Maintain Red Bank Road and Old Tom Road traffic

• New Lane additions – 1 or 2 sequences, signage, barriers, etc

• Mill/Overlay – Lane Closures daytime, signage, barriers

Construction Sequencing

64 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑Bid Option Causeway Construction

Sequence/Duration

▪ Embankment construction in the wet, tidal impacts

▪ Maintaining traffic - 1 lane and/or 2 lanes

• Dwrgs 2-G-120 thru 2-G-122

• One limited duration complete shutdown

• Wharf Alpha Operations coordination

▪ Embankment construction in layers/various materials

• Settlement monitoring/pauses between layers

• Drwgs 2-G-123 thru 2-G-131

• Cross Sections 2-CG301 thru 2-

CG304

▪ Culvert Installation in two parts

▪ Surcharge Settlement monitoring – 12 to 16 month estimation

▪ Maintain Communications – temp poles/lines

▪ OH Elec to UG Elec ductbank

▪ Water main

Construction Sequencing

❑ ROICC is your partner in construction excellence so expect enhanced coordination efforts. We strive to provide exceptional

Construction Management to expertly manage and execute Navy construction projects ensuring the delivery of high quality facilities.

65 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Draft Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) SCHEDULE

PLEASE have JOHN M UPDATE

CLIN Summary Description Quantity Unit

0001 Total Base Price for the entire work for the completion of the High Bay (Bldg. 2726) and

Mechanical Building (Bldg. 2727)

1 Project

0002 Total Base Price for the entire work for the completion of the Training Support Building (TSB, Bldg. 2725)

1 Project

0003 Total Base Price for all sitework outside the 5-foot line from the exterior perimeter of the High

Bay, Mechanical, and Training Support Buildings

1 Project

0004 Incentive Award Fee 1 Project

0005 Option 1: Price for providing all work in connection with tree clearing 1 Project

0006 Option 2: Price for providing all work in connection with the JBC/DESC new substation, including the portion to be constructed by DESC

1 Project

0007 Option 3: Price for providing all work in connection with the Causeway 1 Project

0008 Option 4: Price for providing all work in connection with the South Parking 1 Project

0009 Option 5: Price for providing all work in connection with the Road Improvements 1 Project

0010 Option 6: Unit Price for stockpiling, TCLP testing, and classification of potentially contaminated soils

1 EA

66 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

PLEASE have JOHN M UPDATE

CLIN Summary Description Quantity Unit

0011 Option 7: Unit price for all costs associated with transporting and disposing of contaminated soils at an approved disposal site plus the replacement of the contaminated soil that had been scheduled for reuse

1 CY

0012 Option 8: Unit Price for collection, temporary storage, and testing of potentially contaminated water assuming 1 test per 55-gallon drum

1 EA

0013 Option 9: Unit Price for all costs associated with transporting and disposing of contaminated water

1 GAL

0014 Option 10: Unit Price for testing, transporting, and disposing of asbestos containing material (ACM) underground piping

1 LB

0015 Option 11: Unit Price for testing, transporting, and disposing of lead containing underground piping

1 LB

0016 Option 12: Unit Price for providing a change in total length of Precast Prestressed

Concrete Piles from length indicated in contract documents

1 Project

0017 Option 13: Price for providing work in connection with labor, material, equipment, transportation and supervision required for the Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E)

Government

Estimated

Price

HAR

Percent

(NTE 5%)

67 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

PLEASE have JOHN M UPDATE

CLIN Summary Description Quantity Unit

0018 Option 14: Price for providing Electronic Security System (ESS) equipment, testing, and associated training

Government

Estimated

Price

HAR

Percent

(NTE 5%)

0019 Option 15: Price for providing the Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Government

Estimated

Price

HAR

Percent

(NTE 5%)

*Note: CLIN scheduled as shown is a draft.

It is subject to change.

68 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Procurement Strategy

Lindsay Betteridge - Contracting Officer

Dennis Bourgault - Speaker

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Southeast

Construction Acquisition

69 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Procurement Strategy

Construction Contract

P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion

Firm-Fixed-Price with Award Fee Incentive

Project Budget

DFARS 236.204 Magnitude of Construction:

Between $250,000,000 and $500,000,000

Project will be incrementally funded

Overall Contract Duration

Approximately 1,343 calendar days (approximately 3.7 years)

Funding

FY26 MILCON, FY29 O&MN

70 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

Procurement Process

Request for Proposals (Single Solicitation Package)

• Sources Sought Notice posted to SAM.gov Opportunities 21 JUL 2025

• Special Notice – Project Labor Agreement (PLA) 21 JUL 2025

• RFP Issue Date (Proposed) JAN 2026

• Contract Award (Proposed) SEP 2026

Source Selection Process

• Best Value Source Selection (BVSS) – Trade-off

• Full & Open Competition

• Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Project will utilize one-phase DBB procurement process

71 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ FAR 15.1 Competitive acquisitions

▪ Proposals will be evaluated in an impartial and comprehensive manner, ultimately leading to the selection of the proposal that represents the best value to the Government.

▪ Best value - the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government's estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement.

❑ FAR 15.101-1 – Tradeoff process

▪ Used when it may be in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. The Government can pay a higher price to receive certain perceived benefits (e.g., better past performance record providing a lower risk of performance issues in executing our requirements).

▪ All evaluation factors that will affect contract award and their relative importance shall be clearly stated in the solicitation.

▪ Past performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305.

Best Value – Tradeoffs

72 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ FAR 15.101-1 – Tradeoff process

▪ Potential Evaluation Factors:

• Price

• Non-Price:

– Factor 1 – Experience: Focuses on the experience an Offeror has on relevant projects. A relevant project will be one that is similar in nature to the RFP based on a comparison of the size, scope, and complexity.

– Factor 2 – Past Performance: Focuses on how well the Offeror performed on relevant projects.

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings and Past Performance

Questionnaires (PPQs) specific to the relevant projects submitted at minimum. Other performance statements and CPARS in the system will be considered.

– Factor 3 – Safety: Focuses on the safety record of the Offeror and how they will manage safety on this project.

» Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate

(TCR) Evaluated (Typically 5 calendar years of data)

» Technical Approach to Safety (Narrative)

Draft Evaluation Factors

73 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ FAR 15.101-1 – Tradeoff process

• Non-Price:

– Factor 4 – Technical Approach: Focuses on the technical solution tailored to the unique project requirements within the limits outlined in the standard factors.

– Factor 5 – Small Business Utilization

– Possible Additional Factors

▪ Additional documents to be submitted with Cost/Price:

• Financial Responsibility Documents

• Project Labor Agreement NOT required

Draft Evaluation Factors

74 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ A combined technical/risk evaluation includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties and deficiencies in determining technical ratings:

Source Selection Adjectival Ratings

Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding (O)

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good (G) Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable (A) Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (M) Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable (U) Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

75 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Past Performance: Three aspects: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality

(including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

Source Selection Adjectival Ratings

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

76 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Past Performance:

Source Selection Adjectival Ratings

Performance Confidence Assessments

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

77 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ Significant Strength: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal with appreciable merit or will exceeds specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

❑ Strength: An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

❑ Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

❑ Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

❑ Uncertainty: Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offer is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

❑ Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Source Selection Subjective Discriminators

78 P-200 Nuclear Power Training Facility Simulation Expansion, Joint Base Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina

❑ The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

❑ The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

❑ The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

❑ All technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

❑ Any proposal found…