P617 Industry Day Brief_02.24.2026.pdf

P617 Transit Protection Program Facility

Industry Day

24 February 2026

• 0830-0900 – Registration and networking

• 0900-0915 – Kick off and Introductions

• 0915-0930 – SUBASE Kings Bay Command Brief

• 0930-0945 – SWLANT Command Brief

• 0945-1000 – Kings Bay PWD Command Brief

• 1000-1020 – Acquisition Brief

• 1020-1030 – Small Business Brief

• 1030-1040 – Security Brief

• 1040-1100 – Networking Break

• 1100-1110 – NAVFAC SE PM Brief

• 1110-1200 – AE Project Presentation

• 1200-1330 – Lunch Break & Networking

• 1330-1445 – Q&A

• 1445-1500 – Close Out Remarks 2

Agenda

Introductions

• CAPT Bill M. Dull SUBASE KB Commanding Officer

• Derrick Yarbrough SWLANT Security Program Manager

• Stephanie Neidig SWLANT Facilities Eng Manager

• CDR Eldred/LCDR Nurthen NSB KB PWD

• Kirk Drost NAVFAC SE PM

• David Walter NAVFAC SE DM

• Lindsay Betteridge NAVFAC SE ACQ

• Deborah Torrence NAVFAC SE ACQ

• Dawn Brown NAVFAC SE Sm Bus.

• Hitch Stankiewicz NAVFAC SE Security

• Chris LaPlatney MN BMcD SE JV PM

• Isaac Canner MN BMcD SE JV DM

• Brandyn Turley MN BMcD SE JV DOR

• Lee Cook MN BMcD SE JV EV

Project Location

P617 Transit Protection Program Facility

SUBASE Kings Bay Command Brief

• CAPT Bill M. Dull, Commanding Officer

SWFLANT Command Brief

• Derrick Yarbrough, SWFLANT Security Program Manager

• Stephanie Neidig, SWFLANT Facilities Engineering Manager

Kings Bay PWD Command Brief

• Role of PWD During Construction

• Work Restriction – Highlights

• Active SWLANT and TRF missions adjacent to site

• The Kings Bay Channel will remain in operation

• Shore access to and through the site will remain in operation

• Access to site requires installation access and lower base access.

• Work Hours

• Regular working hours: 12-hour period, between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Government holidays.

• Work outside regular working hours requires Contracting Officer approval.

• Adequate laydown space near site

• Environmental compliance including Marine Mammal and wildlife monitoring required

NAVFAC SE ACQUISITION

PROCESS INFORMATION

24 February 2026

Industry Day

Ground Rules

• THESE DISCUSSIONS ARE INFORMATIONAL AND FOR

PLANNING / INTEREST GENERATION PURPOSES ONLY.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. NOTHING

DISCUSSED TODAY WILL BE EVALUATED IN RESPONSE TO

ANY FUTURE REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS.

• DO NOT PROVIDE THE GOVERNMENT WITH ANY

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION, TRADE SECRETS, OR ANY

OTHER INFORMATION DEEMED SOURCE SELECTION

SENSITIVE, OR ANY INFORMATION THAT YOU DO NOT

WANT DISSEMINATED TO THE PUBLIC.

• A RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS WILL BE MADE. IF YOU HAVE

NOT ALREADY DONE SO, PLEASE SIGN THE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / SIGN IN SHEET, INDICATING YOUR

UNDERSTANDING AND CONSENT TO THE GOVERNMENT

MAKING PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE A SUMMARY OF

TODAY’S DISCUSSION, WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION TO

PARTIES.

NAVFAC SE ACQUISITION PROCESS

• Sources Sought posted to SAM.gov Opportunities 27 Jan 2026

• Anticipated Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price

• SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS: BEST VALUE TRADE-OFF, FULL & OPEN

COMPETITION:

• The tradeoff methodology allows an award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or the highest technically rated Offeror. The Government can pay a higher price to receive certain perceived benefits (e.g., better past performance record providing a lower risk of performance issues in executing our requirements).

• DESIGN BID BUILD (DBB) PROJECT WILL UTILIZE THE ONE PHASE DBB

PROCUREMENT PROCESS

• PROPOSED SCHEDULE:

• Request for Proposals (RFP) Issue Date: April 2026

• Planned Award: July 2027

• CONSTRUCTION:

• Period of Performance Estimate: 2,100 calendar days from date of award.

ACQUISITION LOGISTICS – POTENTIAL FACTORS

• Experience:

• Focuses on the experience an Offeror has on relevant projects. A relevant project will be one that is similar in nature to the RFP based on a comparison of the size, scope, and complexity.

• Past Performance:

• Focuses on how well the Offeror performed on relevant projects. Contractor

Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) specific to the relevant projects submitted at minimum. Other performance statements and CPARS in the system will be considered.

• Safety:

• Focuses on the safety record of the Offeror and how they will manage safety on this project.

• Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and

Total Case Rate (TCR) Evaluated (Typically 5 calendar years of data)

• Technical Approach to Safety (Narrative)

ACQUISITION LOGISTICS – POTENTIAL FACTORS

• Project Specific Requirement:

• Focuses on describing the approach to successfully completing the project in accordance with the RFP requirements.

• Small Business Utilization

• Additional documents to be submitted with Cost/Price:

• Financial Responsibility Documents

SOURCE SELECTION ADJECTIVAL RATINGS

A combined technical/risk evaluation includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings:

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Rating Description Outstanding Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

Past Performance: Three aspects: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

SOURCE SELECTION – SUBJECTIVE DISCRIMINATORS

• SIGNIFICANT STRENGTH: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

• STRENGTH: An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

• WEAKNESS: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

• SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESS: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

• UNCERTAINTY: Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offer is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

• DEFICIENCY: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Proposed Basis of Award

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. All technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-price factors and/or sub-factors will result in an overall rating of “Unacceptable” for the non-price factors, unless corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

IMPORTANT WEB SITES

• SAM.gov Contract Opportunities

• https://sam.gov/content/opportunities

• Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module

• https://piee.eb.mil/

• NAVFAC web page

• www.navfac.navy.mil

GENERAL: RFP Response Helpful Hints

• RFP Responses:

- Limit marketing “fluff”

- Number your pages

- Adhere to font size and page number requirements.

- Non-price Factors separate from Price

• NO Price information in Non-Price Factors

• Evaluation criteria responses:

- Address ALL aspects of EACH factor.

- Identify aspects of your proposal that EXCEED the minimum RFP requirements.

- Explain why this is a VALUE to the government.

- Check all completion dates in project examples submitted to ensure they fall within the dates specified in the RFP.

GENERAL: RFP Response Helpful Hints

• OTHER:

- Adhere to Proposal Due Date & Time

- Ensure any required bonds are filled out correctly and meet or exceed the required minimum stated in the RFP.

- All proposals must be submitted electronically through the PIEE website. Hard copies and email copies will NOT be accepted.

- If you have questions about the solicitation, specifications, drawings, etc. be sure to utilize PROJNET.

Note: This list is not all inclusive, these are the most common observations.

• NAVFAC SE App

QUESTIONS?

NAVFAC SE

Small Business Brief

NAVFAC SE Security Brief

• NAVFAC SE Activity Security Manager

• Richard “Hitch” Stankiewicz

• Theresa “Terry” Jones

• National Crime Information Center (NCIC) Checks

• SECNAV 5512 forms (backgrounds good for 1 year at a time)

• VISITOR REQUEST FORM – ONLY require a ‘12’ access for Site 6

Networking Break

NAVFAC SE PM Brief

• Solicitation & Construction Milestone Schedule

• Issue RFP April 2026

• Award Contract July 2027

• Project BOD February 2033

• Project Complete April 2033

• P617 Industry Day Survey

AE Project Presentation

Project Scope Overview

• Demolition of Existing Facilities

• Temporary Small Craft Berthing

• Transit Protection Program (TPP)

Berthing Pier & Trestle

• Permanent Small Craft Berthing

Docks w/ Wave Protection

• Utilities

• Potable Water / Fire Water System

• Compressed Air

• Diesel Fuel Marine & Motor Gasoline

• Electrical Power & Comms

• Oily Waste & Lift Station

• Sanitary Sewer & Lift Station

• Stormwater Collection & Lift Station

• Operational Storage Facility (OSF)

• Compressed Air and Storage Building

• Access Control Point (ACP) – Guard Booth

• Phased Construction

• Maintain TPP Operations

• Maintain Layberth Pier Operations

• Performance Specifications for Floating Docks

• Delegated Design of Floating Docks and Guide Piles

• Testing and Commissioning

• Test Pile Program

• Facility Evaluation Tests (FET)

Project Site

Construction Phasing – Phase 1 Construct Temporary Small Craft Berthing

1. Temporary Small Craft Berthing w/ Utilities

2. Pile supported gangway platform

1. Electrical Interim Service

2. Complete all work to allow Phase

2 Demolition

Demolition

• Remove Floating Docks

• Demo TPP Pier & Trestle

• Option: Construct Temporary

Trestle over Wetlands,

• May use salvaged concrete floating docks

• TPP Pier & Trestle have damage and a limited live load capacity

• Pull &/or Cut-off Piles

Construction Phasing – Phase 2

TPP Pier, Trestle, Floating Docks

1. Trestle: 886’ L x 41’ W

2. Pier: 700’ L x 65’ W

3. Wave Screen: 1200’

4. Utility Area: 66’ L x 36’ W

5. Concrete Floating Docks for

23 Vessels

6. Floating Wave Attenuator:

410’ L x 20’ W

7. Walkway to Attenuator:

345’ L x 10’ W

8. Wave Break Wall: 227’ Long

Construction Phasing – Phase 3

Demolition

1. Remove Temporary

Floating Docks

2. Demolish Remaining TPP

Pier & Spud Dolphin

3. Install H-Pile Fender

System

4. Remove Temporary Trestle

& Floating Dock

Construction Phasing – Phase 4

Waterfront Structural - Piles

• Test Pile Program

• Establish Pile Driving Criteria and Pile Lengths

• TPP Pier

• 299 - 30” Sq P/S Concrete Piles up to 118’ long w/ HP Stinger

• TPP Trestle

• 244 - 30” Sq P/S Concrete Piles up to 94’ long w/ HP Stinger

• Walkway, Abutment, Phase 1 Platform

• 49 - 24” Sq Prestressed Concrete Piles w/ HP Stinger

• Wave Attenuator Wall

• 22 - 60”x0.875” Steel Pipe Piles up to 112’ long

• Floating Docks & Guide Piles

• Performance Specification:

• Concrete Docks – Permanent

• Aluminum Docks – Temporary (~5 years)

• Pile Size and Quantity per Floating Dock Manufacturer & Engineer

• Estimated 30 to 36” diameter at Small Craft Berthing Facility

• Estimated 36 to 42” diameter at Floating Wave Attenuator

Waterfront Structural - Trestle

Waterfront Structural - Trestle Construction Sequence

1. Drive Piles

2. Set Lower Pile Cap and Concrete

Pile Tops

3. Set Utility Trench

4. Closure Pour for Upper Cap

5. Set Upper Pile Cap and Concrete

Pile Tops and Edge Beam

6. Set Deck Panels and Conduit Duct Bank

7. Install Wave Screen Brackets and Panels

8. Place Concrete Topping Slab

9. Place Concrete Barrier

10. Install Concrete and FRP Trench

Covers

Waterfront Structural – TPP Pier

Waterfront Structural – TPP Pier

Civil Site

• Operational Storage Facility

• Relocation of Conex boxes

• Exterior hazardous materials canopy

• Infiltration basin

• Motor Gasoline (MOGAS) Storage Facility

• Offloading drive aisle

• MOGAS storage tank

• Diesel fuel marine (DFM) pump pad and canopy

• Remote containment basin

• Infiltration basin

• Guard Booth

• Vehicle inspection

• K12 active vehicle barrier and bollards

• Perimeter anti-climb fence

• Trestle Parking

• Walkway to gangway

Concrete Batch Plant Laydown Opportunity

Civil Site Utilities

• Operational Storage Facility

• Potable water laterals

• Stormwater management and drainage

• Compressed air

• Sanitary sewer package lift station, force main, and gravity piping

• MOGAS Storage Facility

• Fuel distribution piping

• Eye wash stations

• Stormwater management and drainage

• Guard Booth Area

• Oily waste force main and lift station

• Sanitary sewer lift station, force main, and gravity piping

• Storm drainage

• Potable water and domestic water meter

• Low pressure compressed air

• Fuel distribution piping

Concrete Batch Plant Laydown Opportunity

Architectural Access Control Point - Guard Booth

• Approx 350 SF

• Concrete masonry unit with brick veneer

• Standing seam metal roof

• High durability interior finishes

Architectural Operational Storage Facility

• Approx 8,100 SF

• Concrete masonry unit w/ insulated metal panels

• Standing seam metal roof

• High durability interior finishes

Hazmat Canopy

• Approx 750 SF

• Standing seam metal roof

Structural Access Control Point - Guard Booth

• Seismic Design Category C

• Reinforced CMU Structure approx. 18’ x 17’ x 12’ tall

• Fully grouted 8” CMU shear walls

• Metal deck over wide flange steel framing

• Shallow foundations with 6” slab on grade

• UL 752 Level III Ballistic Rating

Operational Storage Facility

• Seismic Design Category C

• Reinforced CMU structure

• Approx 122’ x 82’ x 14’ tall

• 8” CMU shear walls

• Metal deck over wide flange framing

• 10” concrete grade beam and pile supported slab

• (75) 18” square precast concrete piles

• Estimated tip depth = 65’ below grade

Misc Foundations

• HAZMAT Canopy

• 12” thick mat foundation

• DFM Canopy

• 12” thick (minimum) mat foundation, slope to drain

• 8” curb all around

• MOGAS Fuel Storage Tank

• 12” thick (minimum) mat foundation, slope to drain

• 8” curb all around

Pier and Site Fire Protection

• Pier

• Stand-alone manual pull stations and transceivers

• Operational Storage Facility

• Addressable Fire Alarm System

• Horns and strobes

• Automatic Wet-Pipe Sprinkler System

• Light hazard and ordinary hazard protection

• Nonencapsulated Class IV commodity rack storage

• Guard Booth and Hazmat Canopy

• No fire alarm or sprinkler system

Pier and Site Plumbing/Mechanical Pier and Site

• Fueling Systems

• DFM (Diesel Fuel Marine)

• MOGAS (Motor Gasoline)

• Sanitary System

• Vacuum – Floating Docks

• Lift station

• Oily Waste

• Vacuum – Floating Docks

• Lift station

• Compressed Air

Pier and Site Plumbing/Mechanical Buildings (OSF, Guard Booth)

• Compressed Air

• 1400 CFM Plant

• 1200 CFM to Layberth Pier

• 200 CFM to TPP Pier

• HVAC

• Operational Storage Facility

• CAV DX AHU

• Guard Booth

• DX Mini Split

• Dehumidifier

Pier Plumbing/Mechanical - Phasing

• Phase 1 - Construct

Temporary Small Craft Berthing Facility

• Protect existing blocking vessel utilities (SS, OWWO, DW) & maintain lift stations

• Provide temporary air compressors on the Layberth

• Provide new utility piping and equipment at the floating dock

• Phase 2 – Demo Existing TPP Pier and Floating Docks

• Demolish compressed air building

• Demolish all existing pier utilities

Pier Plumbing/Mechanical - Phasing

• Phase 3 - Construct TPP Pier and Permanent Berthing Facility

• Construct new TPP Pier and permanent utilities (DW, CA, SS, Storm, OWWO, DFM, MOGAS)

• Phase 4 – Demo Existing Laydown Pier and Temp.

Floating Docks

• Demo all remaining blocking vessel utilities on the pier

• Demolish all utilities on the

TSCB (OWWO, SS, CA)

• Remove temporary compressors and cap piping

Pier & Landside Electrical Medium Voltage (MV) Circuits

• MV Circuit 3L5

• MV power is distributed at 12.47kV for the TPP Pier (incl Laydown Pier) and landside facilities via existing distribution circuit (CKT) 3L5 routed from existing pad-mounted 4-way MV switch S39 to existing pad-mounted 500kvA transformer T- 5102.

• MV Circuits 3L7 & 3K7

• MV power is distributed at 12.47kV for the Layberth Pier and shore power via existing distribution circuits 3L7 & 3K7.

• 3K7 feeder cables are routed along the existing Layberth Trestle to the existing Layberth Pier 15KV switchgear.

• 3L7 is installed in a loop fashion though manhole (MH) W31S along the TPP Trestle to a slice point in the ADRM Slice Box and then continues across the Laydown Pier and Layberth North Trestle to the Layberth Pier 15KV switchgear.

Pier Electrical - Phasing Phase I – Construct Interim

Electrical Infrastructure

• Install new pad-mounted 6-way MV switches.

• Utilize spare conduit to re-route MV circuit 3L7 to existing Layberth Pier 15KV switchgear.

• Re-route existing conductor 3L5 along outside of Layberth Trestle to new interim pad-mounted transformer

T-LB.

• Provide interim switchboard, small craft berth shore power ties, & associated distribution equipment.

• Back feed Laydown Pier vessel shore power ties and lighting (CKT 3L5).

Phase II – Demolition of Existing TPP Pier, Trestle, & Floating Docks Electrical Infrastructure

• Demolish 3L7 conductor between

Layberth Pier substation & ARDM splice box & between MH W31S & ARDM splice box.

• Demolish 3L5 conductor between MH W31S & Transformer T-5102.

• Demolish Transformer T-5102 & Laydown Pier electrical equipment.

• Demolish Floating Docks electrical equipment & exposed conduit.

Pier Electrical - Phasing Phase III – Construct

Permanent TPP Pier & Small Craft Berthing Electrical Infrastructure

• Route 3L5 conductor underground between 6-way pad mounted switch and TPP Trestle.

• Route MV conductors in TPP deck concrete.

• Install TPP Pier service transformer T-P1 and switchboard. Install area lighting, shore power ties, & associated electrical infrastructure.

Phase IV – Demolition of Existing Laydown Pier & Temporary Small Craft Berthing Electrical Infrastructure

• Demolish 3L5 conductor between interim Layberth Transformer T-LB and landside 6-way pad mounted transformer.

• Demolish interim tie pedestal, substations, panelboards and all associated appurtenances including conductors and conduit.

• Demolish existing Laydown Pier shore power ties and lighting.

Landside Electrical

• Facilities

• Sanitary Sewer Lift Station

• MV Transformer TR-11 (75kVA, 12.47 Pri, 480/277V Sec, dual source selector)

• Low voltage power and grounding

• ACP Guard Booth

• MV Transformer T-L1 (45kVA, 12.47 Pri, 480/277V Sec, dual source selector)

• Low voltage power, lighting, grounding, lightning protection

• Operational Storage Facility

• MV Transformer T-L2 (750kVA, 12.47 Pri, 480/277V Sec, dual source selector)

• Low voltage power, lighting, grounding, lightning protection

• Explosive fixtures at covered hazmat canopy

• Low voltage feeder to containers at nearby Conex Box Yard.

• DFM Canopy / MOGAS Tank

• MV Transformer T-L3 (112.5kVA, 12.47 Pri, 480/277V Sec, dual source selector)

• Low voltage power, lighting, grounding, mast style lightning protection

• Explosive fixtures at canopy and tank

Telecommunications OSP Diagram

Telecommunications SCADA Diagram

Security

Environmental Permitting Joint Agency Pre-Application Meeting held July 14, 2022

Standard Permit Required

• Incidental Take Authorization from NOAA

• Sediment Testing

• Internal Section 408 Review

• Demolition debris may be donated for artificial reef construction areas

Coastal Marshlands Protection Act (CMPA) Permit Required

• Revocable License issued concurrently

• 401 Water Quality Certification will be required from the Environmental Protection Division (EPD)

• Project Presentation in front of the Coastal Marshlands Protection Committee which meets every two months

A JOINT APPLICATION is required FOR A DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT, STATE OF GEORGIA MARSHLAND PROTECTION PERMIT, REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR WATER QUALITY

CERTIFICATION AS APPLICABLE

Lunch Break

Networking

QUESTIONS?

Close Out Remarks

• P617 Industry Day Survey