N6945020R0097.pdf

ACQR5753634

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND SOUTHEAST AREA OF OPERATIONS

Work w ill be for the Department of Defense (DOD) activities to include (but not limited to) the states of Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. Work may be required in other areas managed by NAVFAC SE if deemed necessary and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Off ice.

This procurement is being solicited in accordance w ith Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.1 on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS) is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

SHEILA I. BORGES 904-542-6207

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

11-Sep-2020

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1825 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________13 Oct 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

CORE CONSTRUCTION

BLDG 903 YORKTOWN

PO BOX 0030

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

03:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6945020R0097 65

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6945020R0097

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

NOT-TO-EXCEED (NTE)

The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) amount is for the total of all Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts awarded under the solicitation.

A task order for the minimum guarantee will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract. Once the value of task orders placed exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the minimum guarantee task order will be modified to de-obligate the funds from the task order.

The minimum guarantee of $1,000 will be fulfilled by the issuance of the first Task Order.

PERFORMANCE PERIOD

General Construction Projects for a period not-to-exceed (NTE) five (5) years.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 900,000,000 Each

GENERAL CONSTRUCTIO PROJECTS NTE 5 YEARS

FFP

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) INDEFINITE

DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR SOUTHEAST AREA OF

OPERATIONS (AO)

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: ACQR5753634

PSC CD: Y1JZ

MAX

NET AMT

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$20,000,000.00 $900,000,000.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

$20,000,000.00 $100,000,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 5 yrs. ADC 900,000,000 NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

INSPECTOR OF RECORD

CORE CONSTRUCTION

BLDG 903 YORKTOWN

PO BOX 0030

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

904-542-6315 FOB: Destination

N69450

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.216-32 Task-Order and Delivery-Order Ombudsman SEP 2019 52.236-15 Schedules for Construction Contracts APR 1984 52.242-14 Suspension of Work APR 1984 52.246-12 Inspection of Construction AUG 1996 52.246-13 Inspection--Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of

Improvements

AUG 1996

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

(To be completed on individual task orders as applicable)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within (Contracting Officer insert number) calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than . * The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

*The Contracting Officer shall specify either a number of days after the date the contractor receives the notice to proceed, or a calendar date.

(End of clause)

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984) -

ALTERNATE I (APR 1984)

(To be completed on individual task orders as applicable)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within (Contracting Officer insert number) calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than . * The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

*The Contracting Officer shall specify either a number of days after the date the contractor receives the notice to proceed, or a calendar date.

The completion date is based on the assumption that the successful offeror will receive the notice to proceed by (Contracting Officer insert dater) . The completion date will be extended by the number of calendar days after the above date that the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, except to the extent that the delay in issuance of the notice to proceed results from the failure of the Contractor to execute the contract and give the required performance and payment bonds within the time specified in the offer.

(End of clause)

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00100 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

This procurement is being solicited in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.1 on an unrestricted basis with full and open competition. The North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS) is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

EXHIBITS: The following documents are provided and considered part of the solicitation.

Exhibit A – Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet Exhibit B – Safety Data Sheet Exhibit C – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) Exhibit D – Historical Small Business Utilization Exhibit E – Small Business Participation Commitment Document Exhibit F – Small Business Subcontracting Plan Exhibit G – ProjNet How-to Guide Exhibit H – AMAG Form Exhibit I – Base Access Pass Registration Form

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) must be submitted in writing via the “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet. The bidder inquiry key for this solicitation is 4Z5YB5-EK8EW6. Be sure to select “NAVFAC” as the agency in the dropdown menu. All questions shall be submitted at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. Answers will be made via ProjNet; however, answers do not amend the solicitation. Any changes to the solicitation will be made via a formal amendment to the RFP and will be posted on Beta.SAM.Gov (www.beta.sam.gov).

All offerors are encouraged to register on ProjNet for alerts and to stay abreast of bidder inquiries and Government responses that are posted in reference to this solicitation. Only self-registered users on ProjNet can submit and review inquiries. A “how to” guide has been provided via Exhibit G. Those submitting inquiries will receive a system generated e-mail notification when their inquiry has been processed and responded to. Notifications are not made to registered users when a new inquiry is posted. It is the offeror's responsibility to monitor for inquiries and responses.

Beta.Sam.Gov

In Phase One, the posting of all amendments and attachments, etc. will be posted directly to www.beta.sam.gov. It is the offerors responsibility to check Beta.Sam.Gov for all postings. In Phase Two, amendments and attachments, etc. will be e-mailed directly to those offerors selected to participate in Phase Two.

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

The Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit information will be provided in Phase Two of the solicitation.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Phase One

In response to this request for proposal, the completed Phase One proposal shall include both the Submission Requirements Proposal and the Non-Price Proposal. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures.

Submission Requirements Proposal

The Submission Requirements Proposal shall be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail), shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Submission Requirements”. It shall be organized as follows:

Section 1 – Executed SF1442 and Acknowledgment of all amendments

(DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number) Section 2 – Original Bonding Capacity Letter (original shall be mailed to the address in block 7) Section 3 – Representations & Certifications required by Section 00600 of the RFP Section 4 – FAPIIS Certification Section 5 – VETS-4212 registration (or statement that offeror is not required to submit a report)

Non-Price Proposal

The Non-Price proposals shall be submitted by electronic mail (email) as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Non-Price Proposal”. All pages shall be numbered. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to.

Submissions related to the Factors shall be labeled, and organized as follows:

Section 1– Factor 1, Technical Approach (Narrative; Organizational Chart; JV Agreement, etc.)

Section 2 – Factor 2, Experience (EXH. A - Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheets) Section 3 – Factor 3, Safety (EXH. B - Safety Data Sheet) Section 4 – Factor 4, Past Performance (EXH. C or CPARS evaluations; Explanations, if applicable)

Hard copies of the Submission Requirements and Non-Price Proposal will not be accepted.

Phase Two

Only offerors invited to participate in Phase Two will need to submit a Phase Two proposal. Those offerors will receive a formal notification of the invitation to proceed into Phase Two. The completed Phase Two proposal shall include the Price Proposal, Non-Price Proposal and Small Business Proposal. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures.

Price Proposal

The Price Proposal shall be submitted by electronic mail (email) as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Price Proposal,”. It shall be organized as follows:

Section 1 – Executed DD1155 (Acknowledgment of all amendments) Section 2 – Original Bid Bond (SF-24) Section 3 – Representations & Certifications (If not included in Phase One proposal) Section 4 – FAPIIS Certification (If not included in Phase One proposal) Section 5 – VETS-4212 registration (or statement that offeror is not required to submit a report) (If not included in Phase One proposal) Section 6 – Responsibility Determination Documents

Non-Price Proposal

The Non-Price proposals shall be submitted by electronic mail (email) as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Non-Price Proposal”. All pages shall be numbered. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to.

Submissions related to the Factors shall be labeled, and organized as follows:

Section 1 – Factor 5, Technical Solution (Narrative) Section 2 – Factor 6, Energy Design Reducation (Narrative, Drawings, Simulation)

Small Business Proposal

Section 1 – Factor 7, Small Business Utilization Section 2 – Small Business Subcontracting Plan

The Submission Requirements Proposal, Price Proposal, Non-Price Proposal and Small Business Proposal shall be submitted in accordance with the solicitation. The above list is provided for the offerors’ convenience and is not exhaustive. Offerors shall refer to Section 00150 of the solicitation (“Evaluation Factors for Award”) for details regarding each submittal requirement.

The first page of each Proposal should clearly state:

Type of Proposal (Submission Proposal, Price Proposal, Non-Price Proposal, Small Business Proposal) RFP Number and Title of Project Offeror’s Name

Offerors shall include the following information with their proposals:

Authorized negotiator’s Point of Contact (POC) POC telephone number POC email address DUNS Number (offeror and any team members) CAGE Code TIN (Federal Tax ID Number) Indicate Small Business Type *It is recommended to also include an additional POC including contact information.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required by the solicitation and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for nonconformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

All proposal submissions shall be electronic, shall be emailed to sheila.borges@navy.mil with a copy to rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil and contain “RFP N69450-20-R-0097 IDIQ DB/DBB SOUTHEAST AREA OF OPERATION MACC” in the subject line. In Phase One the Submission Requirements and Non-Price Proposal shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled accordingly. In Phase Two, the Price Proposal, Non-Price Proposal and Small Business Proposal shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled accordingly. All files shall be Adobe PDF formatted and be under 10MB.

Offerors shall ensure that proposals are received electronically no later than the date and time stated in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Ultimately, it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission. An offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of a proposal where it delays submitting its proposal until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of proposals. Hard copy submissions will not be accepted.

TIMELY RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED NO

LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN BLOCK 13A OF THE SF1442. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected. You are highly advised to submit at least one day prior to avoid late submission. (See FAR 15.208(b)(1)(i))

DEFINITIONS

The following definitions apply to the evaluation of each non-price factor.

Strength: An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATING METHOD

Adjectival Rating and Descriptions: The following adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical factor.

Outstanding: Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good: Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

SMALL BUSINESS RATING METHOD

The following rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to the small business factor and sub- factor.

Outstanding: Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Good: Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Marginal: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements of the small business objectives.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Past Performance relevancy will be rated as either “relevant” or “not relevant”.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance confidence assessments will be evaluated utilizing the following adjectival ratings:

Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence: No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

SECTION 00150

SECTION 00150 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Intentionally left blank

B. DESCRIPTION OF ACQUISITION

1. This acquisition will result in the award of a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Design-Build (DB) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast (NAVFAC SE) Area of Responsibility (AOR) to include (but not limited to) the states of Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.

2. Projects to be performed may include Design-Build construction and/or 100% Plans and Specifications construction contracts for general construction. Construction will primarily consist of general building type projects (new construction or renovation and any necessary design) including: Administrative Facilities, Training Facilities, Hangars, BEQs, Dormitories, Maintenance Facilities, Commissaries/Retail and other similar types of facilities for the areas managed by NAVFAC SE. Work may be required in other areas in the area of responsibility of NAVFAC if deemed necessary and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracts.

The best value continuum source selection process to be used for this acquisition is the tradeoff process as described in FAR 15.101-1 and utilizes the Two-Phase Design-Build selection procedures of FAR Subpart 36.3 under one (1) solicitation for both phases. There is currently no seed project identified for this solicitation. A seed project will be identified and included in Phase-Two of the process.

Phase-One of the procurement process is a narrowing phase of offerors up to ten (10) offerors (design-build teams) who offer the best technical value to the government, unless the Government determines that a number greater or less than ten (10) is in the Government's best interest. Only those offerors selected in Phase-One will be allowed to proceed into Phase-Two.

In Phase-Two, the successful Phase-One offerors will be required to submit technical and price proposals for a seed project. Offerors who fail to submit technical and price proposals for the seed project will not be considered for a MACC award.

3. The description of the basic contract award Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) is as follows:

CLIN 0001 – General Construction Projects for a period not-to-exceed (NTE) five (5) years

4. Each contract under the MACC will be for a period of five (5) years or an aggregate maximum value of $900,000,000, whichever comes first.

5. The Government’s cost estimate for this work and total aggregate for all years is not-to-exceed $900,000,000 combined for all MACCs awarded. Each MACC will include a minimum guarantee of $1,000 with a five (5) year ordering period. There is no yearly or per contractor limit except for the total five (5) year maximum of $900,000,000. Task orders will be firm-fixed-priced, normally in the range of $20,000,000 to $100,000,000 per order. However, task orders under or over these amounts may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

6. The Government intends to award approximately five (5) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offerors whose proposals represent the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors and subfactors and their relative importance in the solicitation.

7. This acquisition will be solicited on an unrestricted basis with full and open competition.

II. Intentionally left blank

III. EVALUATION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value—the proposals most advantageous to the Government, cost/price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

6. The Contractor’s technical proposal, including revisions and amendments, made prior to contract award and a copy of which is in the possession of both parties, will be incorporated into this contract upon award by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full text.

B. Intentionally left blank C. Intentionally left blank D. Intentionally left blank E. Intentionally left blank

F. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors and subfactors:

Phase-One Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 - Safety

Phase-Two Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

All ratings from Phase-One will be carried over into Phase-Two.

Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design Factor 7 – Small Business Utilization and Participation

In accordance with FAR 36.3, this procurement will use Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures. For the two-phase design-build procurement, Factors 1 through 4 will be evaluated in Phase-One, and Factors 5 through 7 (and their respective subfactors) will be evaluated in Phase-Two. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase-Two. In making the best value award decision after Phase-Two, the government will consider Factors 2 through 7 (and their respective subfactors) and price.

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors and subfactors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and their respective subfactors) are of equal importance to each other respectively and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Submission Requirements (Phase-One):

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide one (1) electronic copy in Adobe PDF format of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

(i) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, offeror shall provide its DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal. If proposing as a joint venture, offerors shall provide the DUNS Number and Cage code for the members of the joint venture.

(ii) Bonding Letter. Offeror shall submit a letter from its Bonding Company indicating the offeror’s bonding limit for a single project and aggregate bonding capacity. Offerors must have a single award bonding capacity of $50,000,000 and the ability to bond multiple projects.

(iii) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the System for Award Management (SAM) website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications, are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.

(iv) FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(v) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report (previously VETS-100 and/or VETS-100A report) has been submitted to the Department of Labor website, https://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement stating that the offeror is not required to submit a report and state the reason. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

Note: The bid bond letter, SAM, FAPIIS and VETS-4212 registrations must be in the name/CAGE/DUNS of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: Offerors will be evaluated on the information required to be submitted in the solicitation submittal requirements identified above.

(b) Non-Price Factors (Phase-One):

Provide one (1) electronic in Adobe PDF format of the solicitation submittal requirements for Factors 1 through 4 identified below. Title page, table of contents, dividers, and any pages specifically excluded under each factor do not count towards the total page count and should not be numbered. Any pages beyond the first 50 pages submitted will not be evaluated. Documentation for Joint Venture (JV) Agreements, partnerships, subcontractors or teaming arrangements does not count towards the page count.

(1) Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. Offerors that are rated Unacceptable will be found ineligible to proceed to Phase-Two.

(2) Factor 2, Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1). Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) relevant multidiscipline construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. At least one (1) relevant new construction and one (1) relevant major renovation project is required.

Experience in multiple project types may be considered a benefit to the government and may be considered more favorably.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP with a value of $20 Million or greater.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as new construction or major renovation project performed as the Prime Construction Contractor, including, but not limited to: Administrative Facilities, Training Facilities, Hangars, BEQs, Dormitories, Maintenance Facilities, Commissaries/Retail and other similar types of facilities.

A major renovation is further defined as a project which includes complete replacement/repair of mechanical, electrical and/or fire protection systems. Indicate replacement of interior finish systems in accordance with project scope.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two(2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror MAY NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor.

(2). Design Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) relevant multidiscipline design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. At least one (1) relevant new construction and one (1) relevant major renovation project is required.

Experience in multiple project types may be considered a benefit to the government and may be considered more favorably.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP with a value of $20 Million or greater.

For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as new construction or major renovation of a variety of projects including, but not limited to: Administrative Facilities, Training Facilities, Hangars, BEQs, Dormitories, Maintenance Facilities, Commissaries/Retail and other similar types of facilities.

A major renovation is further defined as a project which includes complete replacement/repair of mechanical, electrical and/or fire protection systems. Indicate replacement of interior finish systems in accordance with project scope.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two

(2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design.

Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

(3) Factor 3, Past Performance:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL FOR EACH PROJECT INCLUDED IN FACTOR 2 FOR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE. IF A

COMPLETED AE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS)

EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH PROJECT

INCLUDED IN FACTOR 2 FOR DESIGN EXPERIENCE.

IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit C) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the

Government’s point of contact Sheila Borges, via email at sheila.borges@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date.

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE. PPQs and CPARS/ACASS evaluation forms do not count towards the overall page limitation.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Exhibit C.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating. Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

(4) Factor 4, Safety

The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include three previous calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; submit three previous calendar years’ worth of data. If the OSHA DART and TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why.