amend_0001.pdf
PDF 268 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6945019R0508
About this file
This document provides details on a solicitation for the Kings Bay Dry Dock Recapitalization project at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay in Georgia. The solicitation seeks firm fixed price proposals for repair and replacement work on the dry dock concrete structure, cover, mechanical and electrical systems. The project scope is divided into three phases for work estimated between $400-600 million. Phase A establishes a secure work zone and procures long-lead items. Phase B performs work while the dry dock is empty, including cover repairs and preservation, crane and pump replacements. Phase C completes miscellaneous repairs after Phase B. The performance period is 1,090 days total, with 365 days for Phases A and C and 360 days for Phase B. The solicitation will be issued on May 24th with proposals due on July 24th and evaluations based on technical approach, experience, past performance, safety, technical solution and small business factors. The NAICS code is 237990 and size standard is $36.5 million.
amend_0001.pdf
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
N69450-19-R-0508, KINGS BAY DRY DOCK RECAPITALIZATION, SUBASE KINGS BAY, GA
SEE PAGE TWO FOR CONTINUATION
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 19
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 09-Jul-2019
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945019R0508
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
24-May-2019
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
03-Jul-2019
CODE
NAVFAC SOUTHEAST
GULFCST
BLDG 903, PO BOX 30
NAS JACKSONVILLE
JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030
N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N6945019R0508
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following items are applicable to this modification:
REVISED SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0001
Start Amendment 0001
a. The purpose of this amendment is to: (1) provide a secondary POC for questions, (2) provide revisions to the Non-cost/price (technical) evlauation factors, (3) add CLINs 0005 and 0006, (4) changes the period of performance (overall and Phase B), (5) reduce liquidated damages, (6) delete FAC 5252.209-9300 Organization Conflict of Interest, (7) delete FAR Clause 52.244-2 Subcontracts, (8) provide sign-in sheets and slides form the 1st site visit held on 18 and 19 June 2019, (10) provide updated proposal forms and (11) provide AMAG form for NAS Jacksonville for offerrs that are hand delivering their proposal.
b. Proposal due date remains unchanged at Wednesday, 24 July 2019 at 3 pm Eastern Time.
Offerors are required to submit a proposal on 07-24-2019 in order to be considered for the 2nd proposal submission.
c. Add secondary POC for questions:
Stephen Sparks Phone: 904-542-6915 Email: Stephen.Sparks@navy.mil
This change is identified in the instructions to offerors and identfied by a blue vertical line in the right hand margin.
d. Non-cost/price (technical) evaluation factors 1 and 5 have been changed. These changes are identified in the instructions to offerors and identfied by a blue vertical line in the right hand margin.
e. CLINs 0005 and 0006 have been added; in addition CLIN 0004 title has been revised.
These changes are separate the Award fee for each phase into a separate CLIN for each Phase.
f. The overall period of performance has been revised 1,090 calendar days to 1,180 calendar days. This additional 90 calendar days are added to Phase B, for an overall Phase B period of performance of 450 calendar days.
g. Liqudated Damages have been reduced. See FAR Clause 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages
- Construction
h. The following clauses have been deleted: FAC 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflict of Interest and FAR Clause 52.244-2, Subcontracts
i. The following documents are provide with this amendment:
1) Updated: Attachment 1 Proposal forms
2) AMAG form NAS JAX
j. AMAG From NAS JAX for base access to hand deliver proposals, must be completed and returned by 5 pm Eastern Time on Wednesday 17 July 2019. These forms must submitted via email to both Barbara Czinder at Barbara.Czinder@navy.mil and Stephen Sparks at Stephen.Sparks@navy.mil.
On the proposal due date (24 July 2019 by 3 PM Eastern Time) you must bring this completed form and the approprioate documentation (drivers lincense, etc.) to pass and id office. You must allow your firm’s delivery person self sufficient time at the base security office for the processing of the application. Please expect delays for standing in line. The Base Security Office opens at 7 a.m. and promptly closes at 3 p.m. You MUST go inside the Base Secure Office to obtain your temporary pass.
k. The following documents are provided in NECO for this solicitation under Documents:
Click here for Additional Documents:
• 1st site visit signin
• 1st site visit NAVFAC Dry Dock Slides – Deterrent Removed
• 1st site visit DD Tech Slides B and M 1of 2
• 1st site visit DD Tech Slides B and M 2of2
• 1st site visit day 2 site visit data
l. OFFERORS MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AMENDMENT WITH THEIR
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION.
m. All other and conditions of this solicitation remian unchanged.
END AMENDMENT 0001
SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM
The contractor period of performance end date has increased by 90 days from 1090 days to 1180 days.
The required performance has changed from N69450-19-R-0508, KINGS BAY DRY
DOCK RECAPITALIZATION, SUBASE KINGS BAY, GA
This acquisition will be solicited on a unrestricted basis with full and open competition.
This solicitation will result in a Firm Fixed Price Award Fee, Design-Bid-Build Construction contract.
The Project Magnitude is between $400,000,000 to $600,000,000
NAICS Code: 237990, Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
All correspondence regarding this solicitation shall be directed via email to Barbara Czinder at Barbara.Czinder@navy.mil
NOTE: SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS AND ALL AMENEMENDS WILL BE POSTED
ON WWW.NECO.MIL IT IS THE RESPONSIBILTIY OF ALL POTENTIAL OFFERORS TO
CHECK NECO PERIODICALLY.
To
N69450-19-R-0508, KINGS BAY DRY DOCK RECAPITALIZATION, SUBASE KINGS
BAY, GA
This acquisition will be solicited on a unrestricted basis with full and open competition.
This solicitation will result in a Firm Fixed Price Award Fee, Design-Bid-Build Construction contract.
The Project Magnitude is between $400,000,000 to $600,000,000
NAICS Code: 237990, Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
All correspondence regarding this solicitation shall be directed via email to Barbara Czinder at Barbara.Czinder@navy.mil and Stephen Sparks at Stephen.Sparks@navy.mil
NOTE: SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS AND ALL AMENDMENTS WILL BE POSTED ON
WWW.NECO.NAVY.MIL. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILTIY OF ALL POTENTIAL
OFFERORS TO CHECK NECO PERIODICALLY.
CLIN 0004
The CLIN description has changed from Award Fee to Award Fee Phase A.
CLIN 0005 is added as follows:
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Award Fee Phase B
FFP
FOB: Destination
NET AMT
CLIN 0006 is added as follows:
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Award Fee Phase C
FFP
NET AMT
DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE
The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:
DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
360 dys. ANP PWD KINGS BAY
INSPECTOR OF RECORD
910 USS HUNLEY
NSB KINGS BAY
KINGS BAY GA 31547-2613
912-573-4610
N68248
To:
DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
450 dys. ANP 0 PWD KINGS BAY
INSPECTOR OF RECORD
910 USS HUNLEY
NSB KINGS BAY
KINGS BAY GA 31547-2613
912-573-4610
N68248
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
The following Acceptance/Inspection Schedule was added for CLIN 0005:
INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
N/A N/A N/A Government
The following Acceptance/Inspection Schedule was added for CLIN 0006:
INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
N/A N/A N/A Government
SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
EVALUATION FACTORS
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:
Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance
Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 - Small Business Utilization
The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.
2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.
The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.
3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.
(a) Price:
(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
Price will be submitted with the Second Proposal Submittal:
Provide one (1) original, one (1) copy, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements with the second proposal submission pricing identified below.
i. Cover letter with the following information:
Authorized negotiator’s (POC) name POC telephone number POC email address CAGE code DUNS number TIN (taxpayer ID number)
ii. SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20c completed iii Bid Bond (SF24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price or $3M, whichever amount is less
iv. Proof of the Offeror’s current representations and Certifications from the System for Award Management (SAM)
v. Copy of annual Vet’s 4212 Report or confirmation notification email from VETS – 4212 (demonstrating proof of registration and current status)
(vi) Firm Fixed Price. The Offeror shall also submit a firm fixed price for the complete and total contract requirement (CLIN 0001-0004).
(vii) Small Business Sub-Contracting Plan (Attachment C) NOTE: Offerors representing as other than small businesses must submit acceptable small business subcontracting plans using the SBSP (template) in order to be eligible for award (FAR 19.702(a)(1)).
(viii) Certifications under section 00600 of this solicitation.
(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for CLINs 0001-0004. Total price consists of the basic requirement. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:
(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.
(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.
(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.
(iv) Comparison of market survey results.
(b) Non-cost/price Factors:
Entire proposal (submissions one and two combined) shall not exceed 100 pages in length single-sided (50 pages double-sided).
First Non-Cost/Price (Technical) Factor Submittal:
Provide one (1) original, five (5) copies, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements with the first proposal submission identified below.
Factor 1- Technical Approach
(i) Submittal requirement:
(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and potential first tier subcontractors for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the prime contractor and the various subcontractors. At a minimum, the potential subcontractors performing the structural coating, electrical and mechanical trades shall be identified and addressed.
The narrative shall also include an organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the construction firm entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the narrative and organizational chart.
(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). (Note: This does not include subcontractors.) This requested information does not count against the page limit for this factor and does not count towards the overall page count limitation of 100 pages.
The technical approach narrative shall be limited to two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 is not included in this page limitation.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure, teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror and ability to staff logistically challenging projects. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.
Factor 2 – Experience
(i) Submittal Requirements:
For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as a new construction or repair project completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP that is similar in size and complexity to the RFP with a construction value of approximately $200M or greater.
Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant projects completed by the Prime Contractor.
Projects submitted must contain two (2) or more of the critical elements of work listed below:
CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF WORK:
• Coating of large elevated space frame steel structure
• Constrained construction site
• Compressed construction schedule utilizing 24/7 construction activities
• Providing and maintaining large skilled labor force for duration of construction project
• Construction site security restricted access challenges
• Waterfront/Marine repair and/or construction
• Federal or State projects
The combination of projects submitted under Factor 2 must demonstrate Prime Contractor experience on two (2) or more relevant projects that include two (2) or more of the critical elements of work. Projects that contain more than two (2) of the critical elements of work may be considered more favorably than those that contain only two (2) of the critical elements of work. At least one (1) of the submitted projects must be a relevant multi-discipline construction project.
A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;
rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a single task order as a project.
The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment D) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).
For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, scope, construction methods).
If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.
Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) relevant projects combined.
If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.
Relevant projects that demonstrate experience that include more than two (2) of the critical elements may be considered more favorably than those that demonstrate experience with only two (2) of the critical elements of work required.
Factor 3 – Past Performance
If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 - Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment E) for each project included in Factor 2 - Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal.
Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s points of contact, Barbara Czinder at Barbara.Czinder@navy.mil and Stephen Sparks at Stephen.Sparks@navy.mil.
Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.
Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.
The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.
Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.
This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.
The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.
Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.
Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.
Factor 4 – Safety
The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating and selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. Submit Attachment F - Safety Data Sheet for this Factor. The narrative shall include:
The Offeror shall submit the following information:
(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include three previous calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.
(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; submit three previous calendar years’ worth of data. If the OSHA DART and TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element.
(3) Technical Approach for Safety; describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.
Note: The narrative shall be limited to two pages. For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements (items 1 and 2 above) are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four pages in length.
The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to:
OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.
Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:
Risk EMR Rate Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1
Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:
Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0
Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0
Second Non-Cost/Price (Technical) Factor Submittal:
Provide one (1) original, five (5) copies, for Factor 5 – Technical Solution and Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization of the solicitation submittal requirements for the second proposal submission identified below.
In addition provide two electronic copies (CDs): one (1) for Factor 5 Technical Solution and one (1) for Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization.
Factor 5 – Technical Solution
(i)Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
(1) Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP and that demonstrates the Offeror's ability to successfully perform this Dry Dock Repair project in NSB Kings Bay, GA.
Include the following:
1. Overall management and coordination of simultaneous construction activities
2. Labor force access to Waterfront Restricted Area during Phase A and C
3. Maintaining operations of the Waterfront Restricted Area (WRA) during construction and minimizing construction impacts to the ongoing mission (required for phases A & C)
4. Approach to successfully completing the project within the requirements of specification section 01 14
00.00 25 during Phase B of the project
5. Approach to establishing and maintaining a secure perimeter of the WRA during construction for each project phase.
6. Approach to delivering materials and equipment to the project site for each project phase
(2) Provide a narrative describing how the needed skilled labor forces will be provided and maintained throughout the duration of this construction contract at Kings Bay, GA. The narrative shall address at a minimum:
• Securing the needed workforce/skilled work force
• Logistical issues such as housing, transportation to the work site
• Maintaining the workforce as needed
• Management of this workforce
• Major subcontractors (structural coating, mechanical and electrical) ability to provide skilled labor
Narrative shall not exceed four (4) double-sided pages (or eight (8) single-sided pages). Independently, up to four
(4) drawings on 11”x17” paper can be provided to supplement the narrative.
(3) Provide a Critical Path Method (CMP) time scaled logic diagram and schedule reports showing longest path activities using project planning software such as Primavera (P6) Project Planner Software. Native files (.xer) shall be provided on a CD along with the schedule reports. This schedule should include key milestones and activities, including submittals, procurement, major construction items, Quality Control and Testing, Dry Dock Operational testing, labor resource loading (no costs) and work requirements as specified in section 01 14 00.00 25. The project schedule shall be broken into 3 defined project phases (Phase A, Phase B and Phase C). The schedule shall consider potential work stoppage and possible delays as described in Section 01 14 00.00 25 along with work requirements as specified sheets G-003, G-101, G-111 thru G-114. The awardees proposed schedule will become the basis for initial schedule submission as outlined in Section 01 32 17.00 25. Along with the schedule provide a narrative that outlines significant schedule risk(s) and propose mitigation(s) to meet the contractual dates for each project phase.
Schedule narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages). No page restrictions on the project schedule reports but they must be printed on 11”x17” paper.
(iii) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.
The Government will evaluate the narrative and schedule considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP.
Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization
This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies.
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
1. Achievements: All offerors shall provide a narrative (limited to two pages) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance. In support of narrative submissions:
a. All offerors shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor in the format provided in Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Record.
b. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current individual subcontracting reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract.
If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract.
For cited projects with state and local government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts. When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, offerors shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans.
Notes:
The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources.
Offerors utilizing achievements information of team members or key subcontractors shall clearly demonstrate how these companies will have meaningful involvement in the management of the subcontracting program for this acquisition. If not, such achievement information will not be considered under this factor. If the offeror is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.
Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.
2. Small Business Participation and Commitment: All offerors shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment H, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.
a. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the offeror will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).
b. Include supplemental narratives (limited to five pages) to address other elements of the offeror’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.
c. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition
(i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment H consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.
Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which their proposals and other performance information available to the Government demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning utilization of small business concerns as subcontractors including, when applicable, achievements against established small business subcontracting plan goals. Offerors will also be evaluated on the levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources. The anticipated benefits of proposed initiatives and tools to enhance small business participation and capabilities will be considered. The Government will assess proposal realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.
Attachment G – Small Business Subcontracting Record Attachment H – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Additional Information for Offerors
1. Contractor’s performance will be evaluated using the respective contractor performance evaluation report entry system located on the website http://www.cpars.gov/. Prior to commencement of work the contractor is required to provide the government with the name, phone number and e-mail address of the “Contractor’s Representative” that will be responsible for receipt and review of draft performance evaluations prepared by the government in the appropriate system. It is the contractor’s responsibility to keep this contact information current. NFAS 42.1503-100
Information to Offerors:
This procurement is solicited on an unrestricted basis with full and open competition. This acquisition will result in a FIRM-FIXED PRICE (FFP) AWARD FEE, Design-Bid-Build construction contract for KINGS BAY DRY
DOCK RECAPATIALIZATION, SUBASE KINGS BAY.
Project magnitude: $400,000,000 - $600,000,000
1. Questions/Inquiries
1a. Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs)
All pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) must be submitted in writing via the “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet <http://www.projnet.org/projnet>. The bidder inquiry key for this solicitation is U284F6- 2FTZ59. All questions shall be submitted at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. Answers will be made via ProjNet, however, answers do not change the solicitation, any changes to the solicitation will be made via an amendment to the RFP and will be posted on FBO (www.fbo.gov <http://www.fbo.gov>).
All Offerors are encouraged to register on ProjNet for alerts and to stay abreast of bidder inquiries and Government responses that are posted in reference to this solicitation. Only self-registered users on ProjNet can submit and review inquiries. A “how to” guide has been provided via Attachment 2 and provided under additional documents in NECO. Those submitting inquiries will receive a system generated e-mail notification when their inquiry has been processed and responded to. It is the Offeror's responsibility to monitor for inquiries and responses.
1b. Questions
The Point of Contact (POC) for other questions/inquiries is as follows:
Questions/Inquiries Primary POC: :
Barbara Czinder Phone: (904) 542-6668 Email: Barbara.czinder@navy.mil
And
Secondary POC:
Stephen Sparks Phone: (904) 542-6915 Email: Stephen.Sparks@navy.mil
The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date.
2. Proposal Delivery Information:
Proposal Acceptance Period: 120 calendar days from receipt of final offers.
FIRST Proposal Submission Due Date/Time: 24 July 2019; 3:00 PM (Eastern Time)
Proposal Delivery Information:
(i) Hand Delivery:
Offerors submitting their proposal by hand shall submit the proposal to the following address located at the corner of Yorktown and Langley (the main entrance faces the parking lot):
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast ACQ Core, Construction Support Branch Attention: Barbara Czinder BLDG 903 Yorktown Jacksonville, FL 32212
Proposal(s) package must be clearly marked on the outside with the solicitation number, Government POC name and “Do Not Open In Mail Room”.
Offerors must submit the Attached AMAG form (NAS Jacksonville base access form) for hand delivery. This form must be submitted at least seven (7) business days in advance of the proposal receipt date. Submit your form to barbara.czinder@navy.mil.
On the day of proposal delivery you must bring the following with you to the NAS Jacksonville Base Security Office in order to obtain a temporary base pass:
• Copy of the AMAG form that was previously submitted seven (7) business days in advance.
• You will be required to have 2 forms of photo ID's on the day you are to pick-up your temporary base pass.
If the occupants in the vehicle do not have the proper documents when filling out the picking up their temporary Base Access Pass, base security will not be able to issue them a pass.
You must allow your firm’s delivery person sufficient time at the base security office for the processing of the application. Please expect delays for standing in line. The Base Security Office opens at 7 a.m.
and promptly closes at 3 p.m. You MUST go inside the Base Secure Office to obtain your temporary pass.
Note: On the day of proposal delivery the vehicle driver must have a valid driver’s license, current vehicle registration and/or rental car contract, current proof of insurance. The level of security at the Naval Air Station Jacksonville may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Naval Air Station also increases.
(ii) Courier Delivery:
Offerors submitting their proposal via courier delivery shall submit their proposal to the following address located at the corner of Yorktown and Langley (the main entrance faces the parking lot):
ACQ Core, Construction Support Branch Attention: Barbara Czinder BLDG 903 Yorktown
Proposal(s) package must be clearly marked on the outside with the solicitation number, Government POC name and “Do Not Open In Mail Room”
(iii) U.S. Mail
ACQ Core, Construction Support Branch Attention: Barbara Czinder P.O. Box 30
Proposal(s) package must be clearly marked on the outside with the solicitation number, Government POC name and “Do Not Open In Mail Room”.
LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.
3. Pre-Proposal Conference See FAR clause 52.236-27 Alt I.
4. Reserved N/A
5. Subcontracting Information
SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN
(Reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS 252.219-7003)
NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition.
Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals that are consistent with their small business participation and commitment strategies submitted for evaluation under the small business utilization source selection factor in this solicitation and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.
Small Business 45% Historically Underutilized Business Zone 3% Small Disadvantaged Business 5% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business 5% Woman-Owned Small Business 15%
Small businesses identified by name in offerors’ proposals/participation and commitment strategies and considered in the evaluation shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with 252.219-7003(e).
6. System for Award Management (SAM)
The System for Award Management (SAM) is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities in Central Contractor Registry (CCR),/Federal Registration(FedReg), Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA), and Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).
Contractors must be registered in SAM prior to award of a Department of Defense (DoD) contract. For more information and to complete the electronic representations and certifications, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that is not registered in SAM. Remember to review the NAICS codes listed in your SAM record and make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement:
NAICS 237990 (Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction)
7. Federal Contractor Program In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $150,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified targeted veterans which includes, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam-era, recently separated veterans, and any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized. Companies MUST file an annual VETS-4212 report, which shows the number of targeted veterans in their work force by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including targeted veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report. Instructions, information and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-4212 Internet site athttps://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm or employers may contact the VETS- 4212 Processing Center at (866) 237-0275 or e-mail at VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov.
8. Women Owned Small Business Program Repository In accordance with the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) WOSB Federal Contract program regulations, EDWOSBs are required to upload and categorize all required documents in the SBA’s General Login System (GLS) at https://eweb.sba.gov/gls.
9. Incurred Expenses The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.
10. No Alternate or Multiple Proposals Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.
11. Intent to Incorporate Contractor’s Non-Cost/Price (Technical) Proposal
(a) All or part of the successful offeror's Non-cost/price (technical) proposal may be incorporated in any contract resulting from this solicitation. The successful offeror's technical proposal may be incorporated by reference.
Nothing contained in the successful offeror's technical proposal shall constitute a waiver to any other requirement of the contract. In the event of any conflict between the successful offeror's technical proposal and any other requirement of the contract, the conflict shall be resolved in accordance with the Order of Precedence clause.
(b) The successful offeror will provide an updated technical proposal which reflects the results/responses to all exchanges and/or Evaluation Notices (ENs) issued during the negotiation process for incorporation in the contract.
If, after contract award, it is discovered that changes made during negotiations were not incorporated in the SOW and/or technical proposal, such changes to the Contractor's documents shall be considered administrative in nature and shall be made by unilateral modification to the contract, at no change in contract cost or price or other terms and conditions.
12. Navy Electronic Commerce On-line (NECO) NECO website: HTTPS://www.neco.gov. Amendments will be posted directly to NECO. The posting of amendments generates an automated message to the contractor’s point of contact listed in NECO, alerting them to the posting. The drawings and specifications are available on NECO under the Additional Documents section of this RFP. Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO, such as the pre-proposal inquires (PPI) log, revised drawings, etc., under the Additional Documents section of the RFP. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DOES NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is the Contractors responsibility to check NECO for any amendments and Additional Documents section for updates to the RFP.
SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES
The following have been modified:
52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)
The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 10 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed*, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 1,180* calendar days after date of contact award.** The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.
(End of clause)
* Phase A: 365 days from date of contract award Phase B: 366 days to 815 days Phase C: 816 days to 1,180 days
**NOTE: Contract award is notice to proceed for Phase A. Phases B and C the contractor will be provided written notice to proceed.
52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)
(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of
Phase A: $11,625 Phase B: $83,500 Phase C: $10,400
.for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.
(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.
(End of clause)
The following have been deleted:
52.244-2 Subcontracts OCT 2010
5252.209-9300 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST JUN 1994
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .