N6945018R1750-0003.pdf

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

PWD JACKSONVILLE

BLDG 27, PO BOX 5

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0005

ACQR5138557

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N69450-18-R-1750, Base Operations Support (BOS) I Services at NAS Jacksonville, FL, BUMED Jacksonville, FL, and outlying areas supported by these commands

SEE BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Jan-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945018R1750

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Nov-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Jan-2018

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N69450

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6945018R1750

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

This amendment is issued to make the following changes:

1. The proposal due date is extended to 2:00 PM EST, Friday, 9 February 2018.

2. Section I – FAR clause 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages – Construction has been moved from clauses incorporated by reference to clauses incorporated by full text.

3. Section J – The Acquisition Table of Contents has been updated as follows:

a. Responses to Government Pre-Award Inquiries (GPIs) are provided via attachment under file name N6945018R1750_GPIs_0003.pdf.

4. Correct Section L, 5252.215-9300 CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (JAN 2003) (b)(2)g. and (b)(3)b.

5. Correct Section M, M.3 Evaluation Factors, (5) Factor 5, Past Performance, ii) Basis of Evaluation.

Note: Additional amendment(s) are forthcoming to provide responses to GPIs pending Government response.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 26-Jan-2018 02:00 PM to 09-Feb-2018 02:00 PM.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of see table below for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

Table 1: General Construction Projects

Task Order Cost

Estimated Liquidated Damages Per Calendar Day

$ 2,500 - 25,000

$ 80

25,000 - 50,000 110 50,000 - 100,000 140

100,000 - 500,000 200

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(End of clause)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the NECO website at https://www.neco.navy.mil/index.aspx with the solicitation.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table below.

Section J – Table of Contents

ACQUISITION:

JB-1 JB-1 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Spreadsheet.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_JB1FTE.xlsx.

JB-2 JB-2 Supplemental Pricing.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_JB2.xlsx.

J-0200000-02 Wage Determinations are provided as follows:

1) Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA-2014-6756, International Brotherhood of

Electrical Workers, effective 7/1/ 2017 through 6/30/ 2019.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_CBA2014-6756.pdf.

2) Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA-2015-7752, International Union of Operating Engineers, effective 10/1/2015 through 9/30/2018.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_CBA2015-7752.pdf.

3) Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA-2005-3001, between NEBA and the International Union of Elevator Constructors, effective 7/9/2017 through 7/8/2022.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_CBA2005-3001.pdf.

4) Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA-2015-7746, between GCR and the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, effective 6/1/2015 through 9/30/2018.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_CBA2015-7746.pdf.

5) Service Contract Labor Standards Wage Determination 2015-4539 (Rev.-3).

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_WD15-4539(Rev-3).pdf. Applies to all other service employees (those not performing bargaining unit work/functions) performing work on the contract. Service employees are defined in FAR 22.1001.

6) Construction Wage Rate Requirements – Building - Duval County – General Decision Number FL170246, dated 24 November 2017.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_FL170246.pdf.

JL-1 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF).

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_GPIF.xlsx.

Responses to GPIs. Provided as file name N6945018R1750_GPIs_0003.pdf JL-2 Site Visit Agenda.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750JBOSISiteVisitAgenda.pdf.

JL-3 Access Management System (AMAG) form to Obtain Visitor’s Pass.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_AMAG.xls.

JL-4 Department og the Navy Local Population ID Card/Base Access Pass Registration

(SECNAV 5512/1) form for base access.

Provided as file name N6945018R1750_SECNAV5512.pdf.

JL-5 Site Visit Brief from 29 Nov 2017 Provided as file name N6945018R1750_SiteVisitBrief.pdf.

JL-6 Site Visit Sign-In from 29 Nov 2017 Provided as file name N6945018R1750_SiteVisitSign-In.pdf.

JM-1 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Provided as file name: N6945018R1750_PPQ.doc.

The TECHNICAL documents are posted under file name N6945018R1750SectionJ.pdf or as individual files as indicated in the table below.

TECHNICAL:

J-0200000-12 Commander, Navy Region Southeast Instruction 4101.1B.

Provided as file name J-0200000-12CNRSEINST41011BenergyManagementProgram- JBOSI.pdf.

J-0200000-13 Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) spreadsheet.

Provided as file name J-0200000-13ELINs-JBOSI.xlsx.

J-1502000-03 Site Maps, NAS Jacksonville .

Provided as file name J-1502000-03SiteMaps-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1502000-04 Sample of Historical Service Orders - NAS Jacksonville.

Provided as file name J-1502000-04SampleofHistoricalServiceOrders-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1502000-04 Sample of Historical Service Orders – BUMED.

Provided as file name J-1502000-04SampleofHistoricalServiceOrders-JBOSI-BUMED.pdf.

J-1502000-05 HVAC and Refrigeration Systems – BUMED.

Provided as file name J-1502000-05HVACandRefrigerationSystems-JBOSI-BUMED.pdf.

J-1502000-23 HVAC and Refrigeration Systems.

Provided as file name J-1502000-23HVACandRefrigerationSystems-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1601000-02 Specification Attributes.

Provided as file J-1601000-02SpecificationAttributes-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1601000-03 Electrical Utility Assets.

Provided as file J-1601000-03ElectricalUtilityAssets-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1601000-04 Wastewater Utility Assets.

Provided as file J-1601000-04WastewaterUtilityAssets-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1601000-05 Steam Utility Assets.

Provided as file J-1601000-05SteamUtilityAssets-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1601000-06 Water Utility Assets.

Provided as file J-1601000-06WaterUtilityAssets-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1601000-07 Compressed Air Utility Assets.

Provided as file J-1601000-07CompressedAirUtilityAssets-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1700000-07 Weight Handling Equipment (WHE) Fleet Inventory.

Provided as file J-1700000-07WHEFleetInventory-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1700000-11 Motor Equipment Utilization Record (DD Form 1970).

Provided as file name J-1700000-11MotorEquipmentUtilizationRecordDDForm1970- JBOSI.pdf.

J-1800000-04 Stormwater Monitoring Plan.

Provided as file name J-1800000-04StormwaterMonitoringPlan-JBOSI.pdf.

J-1800000-06 Environmental Cleaning Floor Plans.

Provided as file name J-1800000-06EnvironmentalCleaningFloorPlans-JBOSI.pdf.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

5252.215-9300 CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (JAN 2003)

(a) PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. The responsibility determination, non-price proposal, and the price/cost proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The non-price proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information. The non-price proposal presented by the offeror to whom the award is made will be incorporated into the contract at time of award.

(b) The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Responsibility Determination Binder: 2 (1 original and 1 copy) hard copies of the responsibility determination information. With the responsibility determination binder, submit the following:

a. Submit completed and signed Standard Form 33 with the applicable DUNS Number and CAGE code of the offeror provided on the face of the SF-33. Ensure the SF-33 includes the appropriate name and address of any newly formed joint venture/partnership arrangement if applicable;

b. Submit acknowledgement of all amendments;

c. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and DUNS for all team members and identify their role (prime, joint venture partner, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

d. Submit individual representations and certifications if System for Award Management (SAM) representations and certifications are not complete in accordance with FAR 52.204-7;

e. Provide confirmation of most recent VETS-4212 filing or an explanation of the offeror’s exemption from this requirement;

f. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If the offeror is a new joint venture or partnership, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization;

g. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract;

h. If joint venture or partnership arrangement is being proposed, include copies of agreements and letters of commitment signed by the appropriate individuals of each firm. Agreements must include company name, DUNS number, address, point of contact, email address, phone number and fax number for the joint venture/partnership and each member of the joint venture/partnership.

The agreements shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind the firm/joint venture/team/partnership. Offerors proposing significant subcontracts (subcontracts exceeding 10% of the total contract value) shall submit signed letters of commitment from the subcontractors which define the contractual relationship and identify contribution to the planned arrangement in terms of the type and proportion of work to be performed. For Joint Venture arrangements discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies;

i. Offerors shall submit plan in accordance with DFARS 252.237-7024 NOTICE OF

CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES (OCT 2010);

j. Submit two copies of the entire Responsibility Determination information on CD-ROM filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Responsibility Determination binder;

k. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides.

Doubleside printing is permitted. Text will be black using a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier;

l. There is no page limitation on the responsibility determination submission.

(2) Price Proposal Binder: 3 (1 original and 2 copies) hard copies of the cost/price proposal. With the price proposal, submit the following:

a. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and DUNS for all team members and identify their

b. Submit all Price factor requirements;

c. Submit two copies of the entire Price Proposal on CD-ROM in readable/searchable electronic format and filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Price Proposal binder. Acceptable readable/searchable formats include MS Word, Excel, and searchable PDF.

d. Offerors shall submit pricing spreadsheet data (Section B, Section J ELINs, and JB-2 Supplemental Pricing) in hard copy and in MS EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2010 compatible) format on CD-ROM. Offerors shall utilize the MS EXCEL pricing attachments provided in Section J to submit the ELIN and JB-2 Supplemental Pricing data in the format provided. Formulas shall be traceable. Failure to do so may be cause to render the offer nonresponsive. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the Price Proposal hard copies and the Price Proposal electronic copies, the Price Proposal electronic copies will take precedence;

e. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. Text will be black using a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier. Double-side printing is permitted. For larger spreadsheets, the offeror may submit folded 11 by 17 inch sheets with printing on one side only;

f. Offerors shall put company name on every pricing page;

g. With the exception of the price narrative, as stated in the respective factor, there is no page limitation on the pricing proposal.

(3) Non-Price Proposal Binder: 6 (1 original and 5 copies) hard copies of the non-price proposal. With the non-price proposal, submit the following:

a. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and DUNS for all team members and identify their

b. Each Non-Price factor (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) must have an individual tab divider;

c. Submit two copies of the entire Non-Price Proposal on CD-ROM in readable/searchable electronic format and filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Non-Price Proposal binder. Acceptable readable/searchable formats include Word, EXCEL, and searchable PDF.

For the JB-1 Attachment, ensure data is submitted in hard copy and EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2010 compatible) in the format provided on the above mentioned CD. In the event of a discrepancy between the Non-Price Proposal hard copies and the Non-Price Proposal electronic opies, the Non-Price Proposal hard copies will take precedence;

d. State a clear acknowledgement within the beginning of the binder that nothing in the following proposal is meant to supersede or reduce any of the individual requirements to which the offer addresses. It is the Government’s intent to incorporate the offeror’s proposal into the final contract while at the same time eliminating any contradictory or conflicting requirements between the two. In the event of a conflict between any part or parts of the offer and part or parts of the requirement, the government has the right to selectively choose that part or those parts which are the more advantageous of the two;

e. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. Text (including text in all graphics, exhibits and tables) will be black using a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier, with single line spacing. Colored font may be used for headers/footers, section headings, and subheadings. Double-side printing is allowed; however each side will be counted as one page;

f. Foldouts are permitted only for the organization charts and Gantt charts for phase-in/out schedules. Foldouts are limited to 11 by 17 inch white paper that must be folded to fit within the 3-ring D-binder, printing on one side only. 11 by 17 foldouts are considered one page.

g. Offerors shall put company name on every non-price page;

h. The non-price proposal submittal shall not exceed 200 pages. Pages exceeding the 200 page limitation will not be evaluated. Blank tab dividers, Past Performance Questionnaires, and Contractor Performance Assessment Reports are excluded from the page limitation.

(4) All binder covers and spine inserts will contain the solicitation number and title, the offeror’s name, and individual point of contact, including phone number AND email address.

(5) Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Performance Work Statement Performance Objectives with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform.

(6) Offers are solicited on an “all or none” basis and FAR 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS- COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION in Section L, is hereby modified. Failure to submit offers for all line items listed shall be cause for rejection of the offer.

(End of clause)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.2 PRICING DISCREPANCIES

In the event there is a difference between the unit prices and extended total amounts, the unit price will be held to be the intended offer and total of the CLIN or ELIN/Sub-ELIN will be recomputed accordingly. The CLIN which includes the recomputed ELIN/Sub-ELIN will also be recomputed to take into account the change in the ELIN/Sub-

ELIN.

If the offeror provides a total amount for a CLIN or ELIN/Sub-ELIN but fails to enter the unit price, the total amount divided by the CLIN/ELIN/Sub-ELIN quantity will be held to be the intended unit price.

In the event there is a discrepancy between the Section J ELIN pricing and the Section B CLIN price, the Section J ELIN pricing will be held to be the intended offer.

M.3 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Management Factor 3 – Technical Approach

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment Factor 5. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

The importance of price will increase if the offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality and technical superiority. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Provide a completed Section B of the solicitation.

(ii) Provide a completed Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment. There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion.

(iii) Provide a completed JB-2 Supplemental Pricing Attachment for the base period of performance. Proposed prices for Direct Labor Hours, Direct FTEs, Direct Labor Cost, Direct Material, Direct Equipment, Overhead, General and Administrative (G&A), and Profit shall be provided in the same level of detail for all requirements, whether the work is proposed to be accomplished as the prime contractor, subcontractor, or by other means.

(iv) Submit pricing data (Section B, Section J ELINs, and JB-2 Supplemental Pricing) in hard copy and in MS EXCEL (Microsoft Office Version 2010 compatible) format on CD-ROM.

Offerors shall utilize the MS EXCEL pricing attachments provided in Section J to submit the ELIN and JB-2 Supplemental Pricing data in the format provided. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(v) Provide a narrative (limited to 15 pages) of all costs your firm classifies as direct and indirect and describe the basis and rationale for the proposed amounts. Explain how these costs are allocated to each of the cost elements identified in the JB-2 Supplemental Pricing Attachment (Direct Labor, Direct Material, Direct Equipment, Overhead, etc.).

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price and ELIN/unit pricing. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(v) Any suspected issues or concerns in the price proposal, including any inconsistent pricing submitted within Section B, the Section J ELIN attachment, and the JB-2 Supplemental Pricing.

(vi) Fair and reasonableness of proposed JB-2 Supplemental Pricing at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) and elemental (Direct Labor, Direct Material, Direct Equipment, etc.)

level, ELIN/unit pricing, and identification of unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more prices at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) level, ELIN/sub-ELIN unit prices, or contract line items is significantly overstated or understated. An offer may be rejected if the proposed price is materially unbalanced between line items or sub-line items within a pricing period, or between line items or sub-line items for the basic requirement and any option period

(vii) And/or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and consistent with FAR 15.404-1.

(3) Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unbalanced/inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide all required documentation.

(4) The analysis may consider whether prices are realistic in relation to the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal. A price that is found either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

The offeror’s response to factors that require the submission of Experience Narrative and Past Performance shall be based on the following relevancy definition:

RELEVANT PROJECT: Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $12,000,000.00 per year or greater and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last five (5) years. For purposes of this evaluation, Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) projects shall encompass at least two of the following:

a. 1502000 – Facility Investment (at minimum, including the completion of service orders, HVAC Systems maintenance and repairs, Fire Protection Systems maintenance and repairs, and two other facility investment spec items identified in the RFP).

b. At least two Utility sub-annexes that are similar to the respective requirements in the RFP (at minimum, including operations, maintenance and repairs of the sub-annex systems.)

c. 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including operations, maintenance and repair of Civil Engineering Support Equipment (CESE) and Weight Handling Equipment (WHE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).

Annexes 0100000 – General Information and 0200000 – Management and Administration will not be considered towards the minimum of one other technical annex/sub-annex requirement to demonstrate corporate experience.

Complexity will be determined based on the projects’ contract type, facilities maintained (size, quantity and type), systems maintained (quantities and capacities), and program structure (combination of Preventive Maintenance (PM) Program, service orders, Integrated Maintenance Program (IMP), other recurring services).

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) examples of relevant projects that the offeror (including joint ventures and partnerships) completed and served as the prime contractor. The offeror’s submitted projects must aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing or managing the following annexes/sub-annexes: 1502000 – Facility Investment (at minimum, including the completion of service orders, HVAC Systems maintenance and repairs, Fire Protection Systems maintenance and repairs, and two other facility investment spec items identified in the RFP); at least two Utility sub-annexes that are similar to the respective requirements in the RFP (at minimum, including operations, maintenance and repairs of the sub-annex systems); and 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including operations, maintenance and repair of Civil Engineering Support Equipment (CESE) and Weight Handling Equipment (WHE) similar to the requirements of this RFP). For each project the offeror shall provide:

a. Contract number, title, location, and original award date.

b. Type of Contract (i.e. fixed price, cost reimbursable, etc.)

c. Client points of contact with current telephone and facsimile numbers, and electronic mail addresses if available (Confidential clients are not acceptable and will result in non-consideration of the project). Failure to provide an acceptable point of contact and a correct telephone number may result in a lower rating.

d. Description of work (service) performed- similar scope, size and complexity.

e. Describe the relevance of the project to this solicitation.

f. Percentage of the work that your firm subcontracted out.

g. Provide the final/revised contract completion date.

h. Dollar value; annually and contract life.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits the following:

a. A one-page narrative clearly demonstrating that the corporate affiliates will have meaningful participation in the project by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliates that will be dedicated to the project; and

b. An organization chart that demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: For experience, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s demonstrated relevant experience and depth of relevant experience of the offeror as a prime contractor directly responsible to the owner; managing multiple subcontractors and coordinating with multiple stakeholders. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Projects completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will be considered unacceptable.

Projects completed by a proposed subcontractor will be considered unacceptable.

With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), each member of the JV must demonstrate prime contractor experience on at least one relevant project. If each member of the Joint Venture does not have at least one relevant experience project, then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, the specific relevant task order, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

Offerors shall demonstrate relevant experience in all of the following annexes/sub-annexes to be considered acceptable: 1502000 – Facility Investment (at minimum, including the completion of service orders, HVAC Systems maintenance and repairs, Fire Protection Systems maintenance and repairs, and two other facility investment spec items identified in the RFP); at least two Utility sub-annexes that are similar to the respective requirements in the RFP (at minimum, including operations, maintenance and repairs of the sub-annex systems); and 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including operations, maintenance and repair of Civil Engineering Support Equipment (CESE) and Weight Handling Equipment (WHE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).

Offerors who demonstrate experience without relying on corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) may be rated higher.

(2) Factor 2, Management

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall clearly demonstrate a feasible approach for controlling and managing the entire project, including the interface between the major functional areas and sub-annexes, and the offeror’s general management and administration structure. For organizational purposes, address the requested information in the following format.

a. Workforce Management. Provide and explain a plan to organize, manage, and supervise workforce personnel to accomplish the requirements of this contract. The plan shall include an organization chart identifying the on-site organization, on-site staff, and corporate staff that will be used to perform this contract as well as the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, sub-annex area organizations, and subcontractors. The plan shall identify the function(s) of the various groups of the organization, direct and indirect staffing and associated trade classifications with skill level (journeyman, etc.) consistent with the FTEs and labor hours provided in Section J Attachment JB1 FTE. The plan and the organization chart shall identify the function(s) of the various groups of the organization, direct and indirect staffing and associated trade classifications with skill level (journeyman, etc.) consistent with the FTEs and labor hours provided in Section J Attachment JB1 FTE.

b. Quality Control Management. Provide a summary “Quality Control Plan” (QC), i.e. the quality processes (practices, resources, and activities) and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all performance objectives and standards as described in Section C 0200000 Management and Administration. Describe the methods to be used to document, measure, and control and improve the quality processes. Describe the plan for training employees in the quality processes. Describe the processes that will be used to ensure consistent satisfactory performance of subcontractors. Limit the Quality Control Management submission to 10 pages.

c. Scheduling. Provide the methodology used to determine if/when there is a need to adjust the recurring work schedule. Describe scheduling procedures that will minimize interference with normal occurrence of Government business and the flexibility to adjust schedules to allow for access outside regular working hours and the flexibility to adjust to workload fluctuations. Describe procedures to manage foreseeable fluctuations in workload, for handling workload surges for IDIQ orders and natural disasters that could occur.

d. Phase-In and Phase-Out Plans. Provide an approach to each phase-in and phase-out plan.

The phase-in plan is limited to no more than 60 calendar days. The plans shall include: 1) a schedule for all key events; 2) personnel actions and responsibilities regarding employees at all levels; 3) acquisition, delivery, storage, inventory and disposal of equipment, working stock, and materials (to include inbound items as applicable.

e. Energy Management. Describe procedures to comply with CNRSEINST 4101.1 Energy

Management requirements. CNRSEINST 4101.1 is provided as an attachment in Section J. Proposal shall address approach for instilling a culture of conservation and use of technology and influence over operations to execute work requirements at the lowest possible energy use and cost. Include approach for complying with Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) energy efficient, water (Water Sense) conserving, and low power standby power product type selection and use.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 2 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no subfactors. The Government will evaluate the management approach considering the extent to which the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the approach to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the

RFP.

The degree to which the offeror demonstrates a management plan that demonstrates an effective and resource efficient approach to management of their workforce; labor; quality control; scheduling; phase-in and phase-out plans; and energy management will be evaluated. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s energy management approach to ensure the proposal demonstrates a culture of conservation, use of technology, and influence over operations to reduce energy consumption to include use of FEMP listed products.

(3) Factor 3, Technical Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

a. Describe staffing levels for each annex and sub-annex listed below. Provide a completed Attachment JB-1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period.

Attachment JB-1 is provided under file name N6945018R1750JB1FTE.xlsx. In summary, provide the rationale for Basis of Estimate (BOE) for each specification item listed in Section J Attachment JB-1. BOE shall include labor classification; annual hours; direct and indirect FTEs; state the estimate data source(s) (such as, RS Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, Whitestone Building and Repair Cost Reference, etc.) and methodology used to develop estimate for performing each specification item listed in JB-1.

b. The offeror shall include the methodology to be implemented to accomplish the requirements in each annex and sub-annex and detail how the proposed approach will effectively achieve each performance objective and standard across all annexes and sub-annexes. For each applicable sub-annex, the offeror’s methodology shall demonstrate an approach to perform service orders, preventative maintenance program, integrated maintenance program, other recurring services program, unscheduled services, and all other spec items in the respective sub annexes. The solicitation uses a systems approach that does not list every ancillary part/component of a system, however, the requirement is to maintain the system to include all mechanically and/or electronically interlocked parts, equipment, and components forming a functioning system (i.e. fire protection system, HVAC system, etc.). The offeror’s methodology shall clearly demonstrate an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The methodology clearly demonstrates a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The methodology clearly demonstrates understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement for each of the following annexes and sub-annexes:

Annex 15 Facilities Support 1502000 Facility Investment 1502000 Facility Investment (BUMED) 1503040 Other (Training Pools)

Annex 16 Utilities 1601000 Utilities Management 1602000 Electrical 1604000 Wastewater 1605000 Steam 1606000 Water 1609000 Compressed Air

Annex 17 Base Support Vehicles and Equipment Annex 18 Environmental

c. Risk Mitigation. The offeror shall identify and describe how the technical approach and contingency plans will ensure mitigation of risks involving material, shortages of material, equipment, licensing and certification of workers, working in secured areas, and any other risks expected to be encountered under the performance objectives and standards of this solicitation across all annexes, sub-annexes, and spec items.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 3 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no sub-factors. The Government will evaluate the degree to which the offeror’s technical approach:

a. Demonstrates adequate staffing levels for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item supported by a reasonable Basis of Estimate (BOE), a reasonable understanding of the requirements and labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform. Offerors who fail to provide a completed Attachment JB-1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period will be considered unacceptable.

b. Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve performance objectives and standards for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item that reflects the current industry and/or commercial practices, standards and procedures for each major task. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The offeror demonstrates an understanding of all limits of liability identified in each respective spec item. The approach clearly demonstrates an understanding of the systems approach described in Section J. The methodology demonstrates a state-of-the-art, reliability-centered inspection, testing, maintenance and repair program that ensures systems are maintained fully functional in accordance with design parameters and OEM specifications.

The methodology presents a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The approach demonstrates an understanding of supply chain management necessary to ensure materials, supplies, and equipment availability meet contractual delivery timelines. The approach demonstrates an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

c. Demonstrates an understanding of the potential, relevant risks to be encountered during contract performance as well as an approach/contingency plan to effectively mitigate risks across all annexes and sub-annexes.

d. Demonstrates realistic labor (direct and indirect), material, and equipment in relation to the work to be performed that reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal (i.e. Attachments JB-1, JB-2, etc.).

(4) Factor 4, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit the following information:

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

c. Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total

Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total

Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

c. Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

d. Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(5) Factor 5, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: If a completed CPARS evaluation is available for each project submitted in response to Factor 1, it shall be submitted with the proposal. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. An offeror shall not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS is available.

If a CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment N6945018R1750_PPQ.doc), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Courtney Peterson or Rebecca Jones via email at courtney.j.peterson@navy.mil or rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming…