N6945018R0700-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide changes to the solicitation submittal requirements for Factor 2, Experience, and Factor 3, Past Performance; to provide a change to the basis of evaluation for Factor 4, Safety; and provide an updated PPI log.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N69450-18-R-0700

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Mar-2018

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

IPT SOUTH ATLANTIC

BLDG 135, PO BOX 30

NAS JACKSONVILLE

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N69450-18-R-0700

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The following revisions have been made to the solicitation:

(1) Section 00150.F.3.b.(2) FACTOR 2, EXPERIENCE, (i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements is changed as follows (changes in bold):

Remove:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as new construction or major renovation of a variety of projects including, but not limited to: Administrative Facilities, Training Facilities, Hangars, BEQs, Dormitories, Maintenance Facilities, Commissaries/Retail and other similar types of facilities. A major renovation is further defined as a project which includes complete replacement/repair of mechanical, electrical and fire protection systems and complete replacement of interior finishes. At least one (1) relevant new construction and one (1) relevant major renovation project is required. Experience considered a benefit to the government and may be considered more favorably.

Add:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For the purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a new construction or major renovation project performed as the Prime Construction Contractor, including but not limited to: Administrative Facilities, Training Facilities, Hangars, BEQs, Dormitories, Maintenance Facilities, Commissaries/Retail and other similar types of facilities. A major renovation is further defined as a project which includes complete replacement/repair of mechanical, electrical and fire protection systems and complete replacement of interior finishes. At least one (1) relevant new construction and one (1) relevant major renovation project is required.

Experience considered a benefit to the government and may be considered more favorably.

(2) Section 00150.F.3.b.(3) FACTOR 3 , PAST PERFORMANCE, (i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements is changed as follows (changes in bold):

Remove:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH

THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH PROJECT INCLUDED IN FACTOR 2 FOR CONSTRUCTION

EXPERIENCE. IF A COMPLETED AE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS) EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

WITH THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH PROJECT INCLUDED IN FACTOR 2 FOR DESIGN

EXPERIENCE.

IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit B) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact Yaritza Acton, via e-mail at yaritza.acton@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT

SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

Add:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH

THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH PROJECT INCLUDED IN FACTOR 2 FOR CONSTRUCTION

EXPERIENCE. IF A COMPLETED AE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS) EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

WITH THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH PROJECT INCLUDED IN FACTOR 2 FOR DESIGN

EXPERIENCE.

IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit C) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact Yaritza Acton, via e-mail at yaritza.acton@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE. PPQs and CPARs evaluation forms do not count towards the overall page limitation.

(3) Section 00150.F.3.b.(4) FACTOR 4 , SAFETY, (ii) Basis of Evaluation is changed as follows:

Add (items in bold):

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk EMR Rate Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Greater than 1.1

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

A copy of the Safety Data Sheet to be used for submission of safety information is included as Exhibit B.

(4) An updated PPI log has been provided as an attachment.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

(End of Summary of Changes)