N69450-17-R-0117_SYNOPSIS.pdf

N69450-17-R-0117 Architect and Engineering Services

N69450-17-R-0117 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER DESIGN AND RELATED SERVICES AT VARIOUS

LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

DESCRIPTION: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO

SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS

CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD.

ALL RFIs MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING IN ORDER TO BE ANSWERED. RFIs

WILL BE ANSWERED VIA NECO AND FEDBIZOPS. NO PHONE CALLS WILL BE

RESPONDED TO DURING OPEN PROCUREMENTS. RFIs MUST BE SUBMITTED BY 10

JANUARY 2018 AT 3PM ET TO DONNA.YON1@NAVY.MIL.

This procurement will result in up to three (3) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for: Professional engineering

Services for preparation of Design-Bid-Build documents and Design-Build Request for

Proposals for various project types at DoD and Non-DoD activities in the Naval Facilities

Engineering Command Southeast Area of Responsibility. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers as implemented by

FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a period of five (5) years. The total fee for each contract shall not exceed $30M (Thirty Million Dollars). The guaranteed minimum for the contract term is $20K (Twenty Thousand Dollars) for each contract. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is expected to be September 2018.

This proposed contract is being solicited as a SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE. The Small

Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System

(NAICS) Code 541330, Architectural-Engineering Services, size standard: $15M. The

Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The type of Architectural-Engineering services expected to be performed under this contract may include, but are not limited to, the preparation of Design-Bid-Build documents (100% plans and specifications) and Design-Build Requests for Proposals (RFPs). The A/E may be required to assist in evaluating Design-Build proposals and reviewing Design-Build contractor’s design and construction submittals to ensure they meet the performance requirements of the RFP. Services may also include field investigation and facility damage assessments after hurricanes or other storm events. Specific duties include architectural programming, geotechnical investigation, surveying, cost estimating and DD 1391 preparation, and other preliminary project documentation. The projects associated with this contract shall involve any combination of the architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, fire protection, environmental and electrical engineering disciplines. If needed, studies and collateral equipment lists shall also be included.

All new projects in this contract will include either initiatives to seek certification under the US

Green Building Council’s Leadership in Environmental Engineering and Design (LEED™) with a goal of achieving LEED Silver certification or Green Building Initiative (GBI) “Guiding

Principles Compliance” (DoD versions only). NOTE: NAVFAC now requires all new general building construction projects to follow the UFC 1-200-02 “High Performance and Sustainable

Building Requirements” (HPSB), Revision 01, 01 December 2016. All work shall be done in

English units, as directed by the Government. Selected firms will not be able to propose on

Design-Build task orders for which the firm or any of the firms’ subcontractors have assisted the

Government in the preparation of the Design-Build technical statement of work or plans and specifications.

All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site: https://www.sam.gov.

All subcontractors or teaming partners shall also be registered in SAM by location of the office provided in the SF330.

In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) the AE firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award. Provide proof that the firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, (e.g., state registration number, or a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in jurisdictions that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

FIRMS WHO ARE OFFERING AS A JOINT VENTURE OR MENTOR PROTÉGÉ SHOULD

INCLUDE WITH THEIR SUBMISSION A COPY OF THE AGREEMENT. FAILURE TO

INCLUDE THE JOINT VENTURE OR MENTOR PROTÉGÉ AGREEMENT WILL RESULT

IN THE FIRM’S ELIMINATION FROM FURTHER EVALUATION.

JOINT VENTURE, TEAMING OR SUBCONTRACTOR UTILIZATION: Firms formally organized as Joint Ventures that have associated specifically for performance of this contract, consortia of firms, or any other interested parties may submit proposals, however must meet requirements as stated in FAR 52.219-18 and must be approved by the Small Business

Administration prior to award. Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime firm; or (2) a potential prime firm agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of firm team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. The firm shall identify the major or critical aspects of the requirement to be performed by those identified in the Firm Team Arrangement. The submission must contain a narrative that clearly explains the relevance to a particular factor of information concerning a company that is part of a Firm Team Arrangement. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance of the information to this procurement.

Notwithstanding the specific requirements of any other area of this synopsis, information submitted about any company other than the firm, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries) that will not perform major or critical aspects of this requirement, or other associated business, WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor unless the proposal contains a detailed narrative explaining why this submitted information is relevant to this acquisition. The Government will consider the adequacy of this https://www.sam.gov/ explanation in deciding the relevance and weight, if any, of the information to this procurement.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflicts of

Interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Slate, Interview and Selection Procedures

The firm shall demonstrate its capability to perform planning work as required under this contract using the Standard Form 330 (SF330). The firm is required to complete ALL sections of Part I and Part II of the SF330. The Government will evaluate the completed SF330. This section describes the tasks required for completion of a fair, comprehensive, and impartial slate-selection process.

1. Evaluations. The evaluation for this project will be conducted using a Slate/Selection (one board) procedure and will be held in Jacksonville, FL. The Slate-Selection Board Chairman

(SSBC) will make arrangements for the evaluation upon completion of the screening of the

SF330 by Acquisition Division. Each SF330 submitted will be evaluated individually and independently.

2. Familiarization. All members of the architect-engineer evaluation board will be composed of members who, collectively, have experience in different areas of architecture and engineering and Government and related acquisitions matters. Other non-voting members may be included to provide advice on specific matters. Members will be appointed from among highly qualified professional employees from NAVFAC SE. The members are required to be familiar with the contents of the synopsis before evaluation begins. The Chairman will bring the evaluation team members and advisory staff together prior to the evaluation of proposals to discuss the synopsis, the rating methodology, and each member’s responsibilities.

3. Communication. All members of the evaluation organization are to communicate via e-mail and/or verbally whenever possible and prudent to the Government. All e-mail communication among the evaluation organization is to be protected as sensitive to source selection.

4. Receipt and Preparation of SF330. The Contract Specialist will screen all SF330s to ensure that each is properly completed, executed and submitted in accordance with the synopsis requirements. After this initial screening, the Contract Specialist will forward the SF330s to the

SSBC for evaluation.

5. Slate Evaluation. Each member of the evaluation organization will independently evaluate each SF330 submitted to identify compliance with the synopsis, strengths and weaknesses, potential clarifications and possible deficiencies. The evaluation will be documented on Slating

Rationale worksheets and conducted in accordance with the guidelines established in this synopsis.

6. Narrative assessments. The evaluators’ narrative assessment of each SF330 is the cornerstone of the evaluation process. The narratives form the basis for the award decision.

Narrative comments must be clear, detailed and self-explanatory. Narratives will be prepared in ink or computer generated. Evaluators must indicate, at a minimum, (1) where the SF330 meets or fails to meet minimum requirements; (2) strengths/advantages and the benefit to the government should the firm receive award; (3) weaknesses/disadvantages/deficiencies and the impact each would have on the capability to perform.

7. The rating given under each of the evaluation criterion reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the requirement through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of an offer. The methodology used to evaluate the

SF330 and related risk will be based on a Met or Not Met determination for each evaluation criterion. An overall rating will not be given.

8. Consensus. Upon completion of individual evaluations, the evaluation team and Chairman shall meet and establish a final rating for each firm on each evaluation factor. Ratings will not be averaged, but will represent the consensus opinion of the evaluators. The Chairman will record these consensus results and document the basis for each. The Chairman will present the consensus results to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) and legal counsel for review and/or concurrence.

9. Discussions/ Interviews: After PCO review of the consensus results, up to nine (9) of the most highly qualified firms will be short listed and invited to participate face-to-face discussions/interviews. Interviews are conducted for the purpose of obtaining any additional information that will help the board in ranking the firms in order of preference and distinguish between the most highly qualified firms. It provides the board an opportunity to gain a better understanding of the firm’s qualifications, to clarify questions regarding the SF330 and to assess their understanding of the work. The firms are given an opportunity to provide their presentation followed by a question and answer period led by the SSBC. The questions may be provided to the firms for preparation; however additional questions may arise based on the information presented during the interview. Any information received during the interview process may be used as justification for the ranking of the firms based on the published selection criteria. During the interviews, the firms are invited to present their approach discuss the concepts and the relative utility of alternative methods of furnishing the required services.

10. Interviewed firms must be prepared to provide a listing of present business commitments with their required completion schedules; financial and credit references (include name and telephone numbers of officers at their financial institutions) and performance references other than NAVFAC Southeast (include three (3) or more with names and telephone numbers of the contract administrators).

11. Selection: Following the interviews, the Evaluation Board shall reach a consensus on the order of preference of the short listed firms and provide the Selection Board Report recommending to the selection authority, in order of preference, at least three firms that are considered to be the most highly qualified. The Selection Board Report will include clear justification for the basis of selecting the most highly qualified firm and will be based solely on the evaluation criteria identified publicized synopsis. When only one board is used, the

Slate/Selection report will include documentation supporting the decision to include and exclude firms from the slate. If two boards are used, an approved Pre-Selection/Slate Board Report must be included must be included as an enclosure to the Selection Report. Final selection decision shall be made by the agency head or a designated selection authority.

12. After Selection: After the Selection Report has been approve, the PCO may release information identifying only the AE firms selected as the most highly qualified with which negotiations will be conducted. Because of the Selection of Architects and Engineers procedures, if a fair and reasonable price cannot be negotiated with the selected firms, the next most highly qualified firm may be contacted and requested to provide a fee proposal. At that time the name of the firm may be released.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF330 package. The SF330 shall be typed, one sided, at least

11 point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 45 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, small business information on the extent to which small businesses commit to subcontracting to large business, (LB), SB, SDB. WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI, if applicable in the performance of this contract, nor does the page limit include cover sheets or dividers, provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Introductions shall be included in Sections E and F. Please include your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in

Block 30 of the SF330. Interested firms shall submit one (1) original plus three (3) paper hard copies of the SF330 and one (1) CD to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast, Code

N69450, Attn: AE/CE (Donna Yon), Building 903 Yorktown Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida

32212-0030. Responses are due no later than 2:00pm ET, 31 January 2018. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The primary point of contact is Donna Yon, Contract Specialist, at donna.yon1@navy.mil. If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Provide evidence of professional registration for all registered personnel, such as planners, architects, engineers, and geologists (i.e., State registration numbers).

It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the installation procedures and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge.

Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached

LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to donna.yon1@navy.mil.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration.

The following seven (7) Selection Criteria will be used to evaluate and award this contract.

Criteria 1, 2 and 3 will all be considered of equal and highest importance while Criteria 4, 5, 6, and 7 are listed in descending order of importance for the evaluation process.

Specific selection criteria include:

1. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence

2. Specialized Experience

3. Past Performance

4. Quality Control Program Management

5. Program Management and Capacity and Location

6. Sustainable Design

7. Volume of Work

Criterion 1 — Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G): The proposed team’s Key Personnel will be required to demonstrate substantial knowledge, acquired through recent design experience, of technical criteria for programming, designing, constructing, sustaining, restoring, and modernizing facilities similar in scope, size and cost to those typically found on DoD installations. A proposed team’s Key

Personnel shall include:

a. Management: Licensed Professionals who are principal points of contact to the government and Project Managers who are responsible for managing the deliverables provided to the government.

b. Primary Disciplines: Professional licensure and a minimum of five (5) years continuous experience in the specific role of Project Architect of Record or Project Engineer of Record for each of the following disciplines:

1. Architecture *

2. Civil Engineering

3. Structural Engineering

4. Mechanical Engineering *

5. Electrical Engineering *

* Primary disciplines marked with an asterisk, (a minimum of three (3) licensed professionals required), should have at least one person on the proposed team who was a Project Architect or

Engineer on a project that received LEED Silver Certification per USGBC.

c. Specialists (resume’ required):

1. Fire Protection Engineering: Licensed professional Fire Protection Engineer demonstrating a minimum of 5 years continuous experience in Fire Protection design.

2. LEED AP-Project Administrator: A licensed professional Architect or Engineer who is a

LEED Accredited Professional, with experience as a LEED Project Administrator in the administration, implementation, and integration of the LEED design process for a minimum of one (1) completed project that has received a LEED Silver Certification (or better).

3. Roofing Specialist: Licensed professional Architect, Engineer, or a Registered Roof

Consultant (RRC) by the Roof Consultants Institute (RCI), demonstrating a minimum of 10 years continuous specialized experience in design, investigation, testing, and consulting services related to roofing, waterproofing, and building envelope systems for new and existing structures.

4. Waterfront Engineer: Licensed Civil or Structural Engineer, with a minimum of 10 years of experience in the design of waterfront structures as are typically required at Navy bases where ships are berthed.

5. Seismic Specialist: Licensed Civil or Structural Engineer who can demonstrate the ability to provide seismic evaluations of existing facilities per ASCE/SEI 31-03 and to provide Seismic

Rehabilitation per ASCE/SEI 41-06.

6. Airfield Pavement Specialist: Licensed Civil or Structural Engineer, with a minimum of 10 years of experience in the design of airfield pavements for DoD installations and/or major commercial airports.

7. Energy Specialist: Licensed Mechanical Engineer who is a LEED Accredited Professional with experience providing facility energy assessments and Whole Building Energy Simulations as part of the integrated design process beginning with the project’s initial conceptual design.

The energy specialist should have documented experience on at least two (2) large, (30,000 sf minimum), and complex projects. Attainment of a CEM certification through American Energy

Engineers or an ASHRAE certified BEMP would be an advantage in considering the total submittal package.

d. Specialists (resume’ not required)

1. Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD): Designers certified by and registered with BICSI as a RCDD®.

2. Interior Designer: Interior Designer licensed in the practice of Interior Design, qualified by the National Council of Interior Design Qualifications (NCIDQ), demonstrating a minimum of 5 years continuous experience in the interior design of facilities and able to demonstrate an understanding of the government procurement process.

The “Professional Qualifications of Key Personnel” Evaluation Criterion shall be demonstrated by submitting the following information:

• Organizational Chart: In Section D of the SF 330, submit an organizational chart of the proposed team’s Key Personnel (as defined above). The organizational chart shall include (as a minimum) the following personnel: Principal Point of Contact (for the government), at least two

(2) project managers, at least three (3) licensed professionals in each Primary Discipline

(indicated in 1b. above), and at least one (1) person for each of the Specialists (indicated in 1c.

and 1d. above). A single person may fill the role of a Specialist and a Licensed Professional in a

Primary Discipline if they have the necessary qualifications. Indicate the professional registration held (PE, RA, NCIDQ, etc.) for each person on the organizational chart and the name of the company they work for.

• Resumes: In Section E of the SF330, include resumes of the following selected Key

Personnel proposed for this contract: Principal Point of Contact (1), Project Managers(2), one

(1) person for each of the Specialist (7 total) listed in 1c. above). Resumes’ for other Key

Personnel indicated on the Organizational Chart in Section D, are not required to be provided at this time. A total of 10 resumes’ should be included in Section E of the SF330 as delineated.

• Experience Summary Form for other Key Personnel: In Section H, Block 30, submit attached Table H-1 with requested qualifications and experience data provided for Key Personnel designated by Paragraph 1b. (Primary Disciplines) and by Paragraph 1d. (Specialists – No resume’ required).

Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to two (2) pages and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite a minimum of two (2) recent (within the past five (5) years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the

SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 2—Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

The proposed design team shall demonstrate project experience in the following design deliverables through the submission of a maximum of ten (10) example projects in Sections F and G of the SF 330:

a. Multi-Discipline Design-Bid-Build (100% Plans and Specifications) documents for vertical construction projects that obtained a USGBC Silver (or higher) Certification level with an emphasis on energy efficiency (1, minimum);

b. Multi-Discipline Design-Bid-Build (100% Plans and Specifications) documents for vertical construction projects requiring use of Unified Facilities Criteria and Unified Facilities Guide

Specifications (2, minimum);

c. Multi-Discipline Design-Bid-Build (100% Plans and Specifications) documents for vertical construction projects where Building Information Modeling (BIM) design services (including 3-

D parametric models) were provided (2, minimum);

d. Multi-Discipline Design-Build Request for Proposal (RFP) documents for vertical construction projects requiring use of Unified Facilities Criteria, Unified Facilities Guide

Specifications, and Design-Build RFP format from the Whole Building Design Guide ( 1, minimum; 2, maximum);

e. Airfield Pavement Design-Bid-Build documents (1, minimum; 2, maximum);

f. Waterfront Design-Bid-Build documents (1, minimum; 2, maximum).

At least five (5) of the example projects must be construction complete, and the remaining projects must be at least design complete (or RFP complete for Item 2c). All of the example projects shall have met their design completion or construction completion milestone within the last seven (7) years. Example projects may meet single or multiple requirements identified above. Do not exceed one sheet per project.

Example projects that are a task order from an IDIQ contract shall be considered one project for the purpose of demonstrating “Project Experience.” Experience in providing 100% Plans and

Specifications for a Design-Build contract will be considered equivalent to providing these documents for a Design-Bid-Build contract.

Criterion 3—Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in

Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS/ACASS for Criterion 2 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the

Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 2 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 2. IF A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE,

the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion

2, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED

CPARS/ACASS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the

Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast, Code N69450, Attn: Donna Yon via email at donna.yon1@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 2 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed four single-sided pages in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4—Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. The specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract will require the selected firm to demonstrate that an internal Quality Control Program is consistently utilized to ensure the technical accuracy and the inter-disciplinary coordination of work products. The selected firm will also be required to demonstrate how “quality assurance” and “quality control” on work products prepared by multiple offices (branch and/or sub-consulting) is achieved.

Demonstration of this Evaluation Criteria shall be accomplished by providing an Executive

Summary only, not to exceed one page, of the Quality Control Program utilized by your firm and the proposed design team.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 5— Program Management and Capacity and Location (SF330, Part I, Section

H):

Firms will be evaluated on the their ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and on the location of their office(s) that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which projects could be located.

Submission Requirements:

Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners and mentor protégé where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

3. Provide the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the primary geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily in Alabama, Andros Island Bahamas, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Guantanamo Bay

Cuba, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and

Texas. It is anticipated that most work will be in the Southeast AOR; however, the contract may also be used at other DoD or non-DoD facilities in the geographic area for which NAVFAC

Southeast performs work. These actions will be decided on a case-by-case basis approved by the contracting officer.

Criterion 6— Sustainable Design (SF330, Part I, Section H):

NAVFAC now requires all new general building construction projects to follow UFC 1-200-02

“High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements” (HPSB), Revision 01, 01 December

2016.

Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integral design approach and designing in accordance with recognized sustainability rating systems such as Green Globe, LEED, etc.

Submission Requirements:

Identify examples indicating design team (including consultants) experience and concepts employed, certification awarded, and accredited professionals proposed for this contract. For projects certified, submit a copy of the certificate (certificates are not included toward the overall page count).

Criterion 7—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the

Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

ATTACHMENT H-1

TABLE H-1 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY - SELECTED KEY TEAM MEMBERS

Key Personnel Team

Member Name

R eg is te re d

A rc h it ec t o r

P ro fe ss io n a l E n g in ee r

(Y es o r

N o

C er t.

L

E E

D A

P

Y es o r

N o

D es ig n

E x p er ie n ce

D o D

P ro je ct s

N

A V

F A

C P ro je ct

L

E E

D S il v er

P ro je ct

E x a m p le

P ro je ct

Architects

Civil Engineers

Structural Engineers

Mechanical Engineers

Electrical Engineers

RCDD

BICSI

REGISTERED

Interior Designer

NCIDQ

Licensed

Table Notes:

1. Number of years of design experience after becoming a Professional Engineer, Registered Architect, RCDD, or NCIDQ Interior Designer.

2. Number of DoD projects on which the team member was designated as the

Architect or Engineer of Record (AOR/EOR).

3. Number of NAVFAC projects on which the team member was designated as the

AOR/EOR for the applicable discipline.

4. Number of LEED Silver Certified Projects on which the team member was designated as the

AOR/EOR.

5. Number of projects where the team member was AOR/EOR of an Example Project included in

Section F of SF 330.