RFQ Amendment 01.pdf

PDF 571 KB Posted

Attached to
Harbor Pilot Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N6883623Q0362
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command

About this file

This document is an amendment to a solicitation for harbor pilot support services issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command. The amendment updates contact information and provides instructions to offerors. Offerors must submit responses in four volumes by October 11th, 2023, to be considered for award of a firm fixed price requirements contract for harbor pilot services. Volume I requires pricing information. Volume II is limited to four pages demonstrating technical capability. Volume III allows up to three past performance evaluations. Volume IV requires representations and certifications. The response will be evaluated on technical capability, past performance, and price, with technical capability and past performance combined being equal to price. The contract will be awarded to the responsible offeror providing the best value based on these factors.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Harbor Pilot Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 4 Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ Amendment 04.pdf PDF
RFQ Amendment 03.pdf PDF
RFQ Amendment 02.pdf PDF
N6883623Q0362 RFQ.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N62841NOTUOPS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1) Update addednum FAR 52.212-1(b)(7) to add remit to contact information.

2) Update addendum FAR 52.212-1(b) Volume III to add Ms. Rhonda Davis, rhonda.r.davis4.civ@us.navy.mil, and Mr. Gary Hall, gary.b.hall.civ@us.navy.mil as addition contacts.

See summary of changes below .

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Oct-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6883623Q0362

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Oct-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Oct-2023

CODE

NAVSUP FLC JACKSONVILLE CONTRACTS DIV

CHELSEA MCNEELY

110 YORKTOWN AVE 3RD FLOOR

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212

N68836 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6883623Q0362

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM 52.212-1

ADDENDUM 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

The following provisions are incorporated into 52.212-1 as an addendum to this solicitation:

The Government intends to post solicitation N6883623Q0362 and all amendments to the Government Point of Entry via SAM.gov.

QUESTIONS

All questions and clarifications regarding this solicitation must be submitted via email to Chelsea McNeely at Chelsea.n.mcneely.civ@us.navy.mil and Laura Donson at laura.j.donson.civ@us.navy.mil; subject line to read:

Questions/Clarifications for N6883623Q0362.Each question or comment should reference the applicable document, page number, and paragraph number. Offerors shall not include any proprietary information in a question, because the Government will provide the question and answer to all potential offerors. All questions must be submitted no later than Wednesday, 11 October 2023 at 12:00 PM ET.

The Government reserves the right not to respond to any questions received concerning this solicitation after the questions receipt date above. Accordingly, offerors are encouraged to carefully review all solicitation requirements and submit questions to the Government early in the proposal timeframe.

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. This procurement is being solicited in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 19.5 - Small Business programs. See block 10 of the SF1449 for the type of Small Business Set Aside, the North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS), and the Small Business Size Standard.

(b) Submission of offers. Offerors shall submit offers in PDF format by volume as described below. Each volume shall contain a cover sheet with #1 and #3 below.

The offer shall contain the following information:

1. Solicitation number as indicated on page one (1) of the SF1449, Block 5 and the Title of the procurement.

2. Time specified for receipt of offers: Offerors shall ensure that offers are received by the Government point of contact no later than the date and time indicated on page one (1) of the SF1449, Block 8.

3. Name, title, e-mail address, and telephone number of the individual(s) with authority to bind the company.

Offeror’s POC information for contractual questions/discussions. CAGE Code, Unique Entity ID (UEI), Business Size, and GSA Contract Number if applicable.

4. Technical Description: See volumes below.

5. Terms of any express warranty: Not modified.

6. Provide Price and any discount terms as described in Price Volume.

7. “Remit to” address: The Offeror shall submit all volumes of its offer electronically via email to:

a. Chelsea McNeely at Chelsea.n.mcneely.civ@us.navy.mil

b. Laura Donson at laura.j.donson.civ@us.navy.mil

c. Rhonda Davis at rhonda.r.davis4.civ@us.navy.mil

d. Gary Hall at gary.b.hall.civ@us.navy.mil

8. Representations and certifications: See Contractor Responsibility Volume.

9. Acknowledgment solicitation amendments: All amendments issued with signatures to acknowledge terms and conditions of amendments. Acknowledgement of all amendments issued to the solicitation shall be signed, and dated.

10. Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information ).

11. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

Offers shall be submitted in volumes as follows:

Volume I – Price ___________________________________________

Offerors shall submit the following:

1. Standard Form (SF) 1449. Blocks 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c of page one (1) of SF 1449 shall be completed and signed to show the Offeror has read and agrees to comply with all terms, conditions, and instructions provided in the solicitation document.

2. Price Offer. The Offeror shall fill in the price schedule and include unit prices. The unit price should be evenly incremented so that it adds up to the total price without rounding past the second digit right of the decimal point for total prices for all contract line items (CLINs). Pricing shall be structured in accordance with the contract line items identified in the SF 1449 bid schedule.

Note: The Harbor Pilot Service Rates of Compensation is located within attachment 03 of the RFQ.

Volume II – Technical Capability Volume II is limited to 4 pages (Resumes not inlcuded in page count)

Offerors shall demonstrate an understanding of the solicitation requirements by providing the following:

1. A narrative demonstrating the offeror understands the requirement of PWS 3.0.

2. Resumes, refer to sections 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 of the PWS for skills and knowledge, qualifications, and experience required.

Volume III – Past Performance ____________________________

The Offeror shall provide a maximum of three (3) relevant past performance evaluations of similar size, scope and complexity to services set forth in the PWS and completed within the past three (3) years prior to the solicitation closing date (See Block 8 of the SF1449). If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available which meets the requirements identified above, it shall be submitted with the offer.

If a CPARS is not available, then the Offeror shall submit a completed Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 1) for each reference submitted. At the PPQ customer/client’s request, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Chelsea McNeely at Chelsea.n.mcneely.civ@us.navy.mil, Laura Donson at laura.j.donson.civ@us.navy.mil, Rhonda Davis at rhonda.r.davis4.civ@us.navy.mil, and Gary Hall at gary.b.hall.civ@us.navy.mil by the date and time offers are due. Offers shall not incorporate by reference PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Offeror is responsible for providing the Past Performance Questionnaire to their references for completion.

Offerors may submit a combination of delivery orders (DOs), task orders (TOs), technical direction letters (TDLs), and/or technical area tasks (TATs) placed under an Indefinite Delivery type contract or BPA as one of the examples of past performance, however, no more than five (5) total will be reviewed. Each individual example in the combination must meet the requirements listed above.

If no recent (within the past three years prior to solicitation closing date), relevant past performance is available the Offeror shall affirmatively state that it possesses no recent or relevant past performance.

Note: An incomplete PPQ may not be evaluated.

Volume IV Contractor Responsibility ___________________________________________

1. Representation and Certifications. Offerors shall either complete the following provisions contained in the solicitation OR provide a statement that certification in System for Award Management (SAM) is current, complete, and accurate as of the date of the Offeror’s signature, or list any changes as they relate to the following provisions:

FAR 52.212-3

FAR 52.209-5

FAR 52.209-11

DFARS 252.204-7016

2. No Exception. Include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

3. Limitations on Subcontracting. Offeror shall affirmatively state that they intend to meet the requirements outlined in FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Sep 2021) (Deviation 2021-O0008).

4. Financial Letter. A letter from the Offeror’s financial institution that indicates that the Offerr has adequate financial resources to perform the contract;

5. Organization. A description of the Offeror organization, accounting, and operational controls to meet the requirement.

Note: After the solicitation closing date, the Contracting Officer may require an Offeror to promptly submit additional information to demonstrate the Offeror is responsible.

AWARD NOTICE TO SUCCESSFUL OFFEROR

A written notice of award or acceptance of an Offer will be emailed to the successful Offeror. Before the Offeror’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Failure to submit all required documentation may render an offer non-responsive and the offer will not be considered for award.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. Offeror agrees to hold their prices firm for a period of 120 calendar days from date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an amendment to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. Not modified.

(e) Multiple offers. The Government IS NOT accepting multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions, including alternative line items, or alternative commercial products or commercial services for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers. Not modified.

(g) Contract award. Not modified.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government WILL NOT accept any item or group of items of an offer. The Government WILL NOT accept quantities less than those specified in the schedule. The Government WILL NOT make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation. Not modified.

(j) Unique entity identifier. Not modified.

(k) Reserved.

(l) Debriefing. Not modified.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

In accordance with FAR 13.106-2, the Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible quoter whose quote, conforming to the solicitation, will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The evaluation factors are: 1) Technical Capability; 2) Past Performance; 3) Price.

Technical Capability, when combined with Past Performance, is approximately equal to Price, for evaluation purposes. The Government reserves the right to make award solely on initial offer received.

EVALUATION PROCESS

Technical Capability will be evaluated and appropriate adjectival ratings will be assessed for all quoters.

Once all quotes have been technically evaluated, a past performance evaluation will be performed on all technically “acceptable” quotes. Quotes deemed technically “unacceptable” will not be evaluated for past performance nor will be considered for award.

Once all technically “acceptable” quotes have been evaluated for past performance, price evaluation will be performed in accordance with FACTOR 3: PRICE.

Once evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer shall make an integrated assessment best-value trade-off award decision.

EVALUATION FACTORS

FACTOR 1 - TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements. For a quote to be found technically acceptable, the quoter must clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Adjectival Rating Definition Acceptable (A) The technical capability meets the governments’ requirements and indicates an adequate understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Unacceptable (U) The technical capability does not meet requirements of the solicitation and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Quote is un-awardable.

Note: If the quoter is found to be “Unacceptable”, then the quoter will be removed from further consideration of the award.

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE: The Government will evaluate a quoter’s past performance by utilizing assessments from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), PPQ, and/or any other past performance information available. The past performance evaluation will result in an assessment of the quoter’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each quoter’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying services that meet the task order’s requirements. The recency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in Contractor’s performance shall be considered. These are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each quoter. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

Relevancy and for the purpose of this evaluation is described as past or current contracts (including Federal, State, and local government and private) with at least one year of evaluated performance completed. Past Performance relevancy will be rated as either “relevant” or “not relevant”.

Rating Definition Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

A review of all past performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information will be incorporated into an overall performance confidence assessment rating. The past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the quoter overall record of recency, relevancy and quality of performance and will be rated as stated below.

Performance Confidence Assessment

Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the quoters recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the quoters recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoters performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the quoter recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the quoters recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of quoters for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance is not available, the quoters may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance. In this case, the quoters past performance is unknown and assigned a confidence rating of “neutral.” Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence and “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

FACTOR 3 – PRICE: The Government will evaluate price in accordance with FAR 13.106-3(a), Award and Documentation. The Government may evaluate any and all information submitted by the quoter to support the reasonableness of the prices quoted. The method of evaluation used by the Contracting Officer is solely within the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

Price will be evaluated by multiplying the estimated quantities provided to the Government by the quoted unit price for each line item provided by the quoter and then adding the totals together thereby identifying the quoter’s total estimated price for each line item.

All options, including option FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, will be evaluated pursuant to solicitation provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options.

For award purposes, the Government will evaluate quotes based on total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and any option(s) identified. Evaluation of the option(s) shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option.

Note: Quotes that do not offer all items (including options) or which offer only partial CLIN pricing will be considered non-responsive. Failure to furnish the price quote IAW the instructions above shall render the quote unacceptable.

ATTACHMENTS: The following documents are provided as attachments and are considered part of this solicitation:

Attachment 1: Past Performance Reference Questionnaire Attachment 2: Wage Determination

BASIS OF AWARD: NAVSUP FLC Jacksonville intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price Requirements Contract resulting from this solicitation to responsible Quoter(s) whose quote(s) meets the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .