Draft RFP N6852025R0001 QandA_Part 2.pdf
PDF 194 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6852025R0001
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) part of a Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Logistics and Engineering Support (LOGEN II) contract, solicitation number N6852025R0001. The Q&A focuses on clarifying past performance evaluation criteria for protégé and non-protégé offerors in a mentor-protégé joint venture scenario. Specifically, the questions address how the government will apply different relevance ratings (Relevant, Somewhat Relevant, Not Relevant) to protégé and mentor entities when they bid jointly as a prime contractor. The government's responses consistently indicate that they will apply the final RFP protégé applicable ratings to protégé proposal evaluations and mentor applicable ratings to mentor proposal evaluations, in accordance with 13 CFR 125.8(e).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Draft RFP N6852025R0001_QandA_5.13.2025.pdf | ||
| Attachment B-1 DRAFT Composite Rates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att L-3 Vol 3 PP-2 Con Data_DRAFT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment P6_Cost_Summary Spreadsheet_DRAFT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 DRAFT GFPattachment- TBD at TO level.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment P7_ Annual Fully Burdened Labor_DRAFT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT RFP_Question_Submittal_Form___N6852025R0001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT N6852025R0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 DRAFT DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 DRAFT SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att L-2 Vol 3 PPQ_DRAFT.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A- Exhibit A CDRLs_DRAFT.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit B- Exhibit B CDRLs_DRAFT.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att L-1 Vol 1 KA Tables_DRAFT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
# Document Reference Paragraph Question Answer
Draft RFP page
Section M, III.
Definitions, B. Other
Evaluation Definitions Table
The Draft RFP Other Evaluations Table on pages 100-101 sets out different past performance evaluation criteria for protégé offerors and for offerors who are not proposing as a protégé. Where the offeror is a mentor-protégé joint venture, both entities bid jointly as prime contractor. Under that scenario, would the Government consider applying the “Relevant,” “Somewhat Relevant,” and “Not Relevant Standards” applicable to protégé offerors to both entities comprising the “mentor-protégé offeror?”
The Government will apply the Final RFP protégé applicable ratings to the protégé proposal evaluations and apply the mentor applicable ratings to the mentor proposal evaluations. IAW 13 CFR 125.8 (e)
Draft RFP pages 94, 95 and 101
Section M, III.
Definitions, B. Past
Performance (pages 94 and 95) and Other
Evaluation Definitions Table (page 101)
The Draft RFP at pages 94-95 and in the Other Evaluation Definitions Table on pages 100-101 sets out the criteria for past performance evaluations. The criteria for “protégé offerors” differ from those “not proposing as a protégé” in that the standards for protégé offerors are somewhat less stringent. However, on pages 94-95, the Draft RFP states that “[t]he Government will assess contract references submitted by the protégé Offeror as either “Relevant” (for protégé offerors), “Somewhat Relevant” (for protégé offerors) or “Not Relevant” (for protégé offerors) as defined in Section M Part III, (B).” For offerors who are not proposing as a protégé, the criteria are “Very Relevant,” “Somewhat Relevant,” and “Not Relevant.” That provision appears to preclude protégé offerors who meet the enhanced requirements for Very Relevant Past Performance from obtaining a past performance score commensurate with that more stringent level of experience. Does the Government anticipate awarding protégé offerors a score of “Relevant Experience” that equates to a score of “Very Relevant Experience” for offerors not proposing as a protégé? Will the Government consider allowing protégé offerors with exemplary past performance contracts
The Government will apply the Final RFP protégé applicable ratings to the protégé proposal evaluations and apply the mentor applicable ratings to the mentor proposal evaluations. IAW 13 CFR 125.8 (e)
Logistics and Engineering Support (LOGEN II)
Draft_Request for Proposal_N6852025R0001_Questions & Answers_Part 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .