Past_Performance_forms.docx

17 KB Posted

Attached to
Main Rotor Blade Transportation Carts
Solicitation number
N68335-15-R-0210
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N68335-15-R-0210_Amendment_03.docx DOCX document
N68335-15-R-0210_Questions_and_Answers_11-18-2015.docx DOCX document
N68335-15-R-0210_Amendment_02.docx DOCX document
SS9090.pdf PDF
SS9016.pdf PDF
N68335-15-R-0210_Questions_and_Answers_11-4-2015.docx DOCX document
N68335-15-R-0210_Questions_and_Answers_10-30-2015.docx DOCX document
Amendment_01_released_10-30-2015.docx DOCX document
N68335-15-R-0210_MRB_Carts_Solicitation.docx DOCX document
65720-15009_(2).pdf PDF
65700-70033_(2).pdf PDF
65700-70018_(2).pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

SECTION L ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DATA

Customer:

Contract Number/Period of Performance:

Contract Type:

Total Contract Value:

Point of Contact:

Contract Work Description:

Remarks:

SECTION L ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE INTERVIEW FORM

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number: Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type:Negotiated|_|Sealed Bid|_|
Fixed Price|_|Cost Reimbursement|_|
IDIQ|_|Other|_|

5.Complexity of Work: Difficult: |_| Routine: |_|

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)

Customer Satisfaction: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service and product)

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

Interviewee Name:Signature:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
Date:
Interviewer Name:Signature:
Phone Number:Fax Number:
Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .