QASP_N68335-15-R-0147_Attachment_1.doc

N68335-15-R-0147 Attachment 1

N68335-15-R-0147

Attachment 1

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

For Engineering and Technical Support Services for the Support Equipment Engineering Division (SEED), Code 4.8.6

1.

Purpose

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the performance based service order. The intent is to ensure that the contractor performs in accordance with the performance metrics and the Government receives the quality of services called for in the order.

The contractor shall provide engineering and technical support services to the NAVAIR Lakehurst aircraft support mission including domestic Navy platforms and Naval Aviation requirements, FMS customers, other Department of Defense (DOD) activities and non-DOD activities. This order will provide for support services in the following areas:

· Fighter and Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing and Special Missions Aircraft

· Avionics Program Support

· Aircraft Servicing, Tool Control and Pollution Prevention

· Reliability Maintainability and Integrated Diagnostics

· Six Sigma Support

· Peculiar Support Equipment (PSE) / Common Support Equipment (CSE) Hardware and Software Development and In-Service Engineering Support

· Support Equipment (SE) Installations Engineering

· Propulsion

· Aircraft and Armament Handling

· Aircraft Servicing

· Module Test and Repair

· Miscellaneous Engineering Efforts

The service support contract will have cost-plus-fixed-fee labor CLINs, and cost-reimbursable CLINS for travel and material. The contract will be for a five (5) 12 month ordering years. A properly executed QASP will assist the Government in achieving the objectives of this procurement.

2.

Authority

Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Contract Section E – Inspection and Acceptance, which provides for inspections and acceptance of the services and documentation called for in each ordering year, to be executed by the Contracting Officer or a duly authorized representative.

3.

Scope

To fully understand the roles and responsibilities of the parties, it is important to first define the distinction in terminology between Quality Control Plan (QCP) and the QASP. The contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions necessary to meet the quality standards set forth by the order.

The QASP will provide Government surveillance oversight of the contractor’s efforts to assure that they are timely, effective and are delivering the results specified in the order.

4.

Government Resources

The following definitions for Government resources are applicable to this plan:

Contracting Officer - A person duly appointed with the authority to enter into (Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)) contracts and make related determination and findings on behalf of the Government. The PCO for this contract is *To be completed at time of award. Contracting Officers are designated via a written warrant, which sets forth limitations of authority.

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) - An individual appointed in writing by the PCO to act as their authorized representative to assist in administering the contract. The COR will be appointed in the resulting task order. The limitations of authority are contained in a written letter of appointment.

5.

Responsibilities

The following Government resources shall have responsibility for the implementation of this QASP:

PCO – The PCO ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the PCO that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair and equitable treatment under the contract. The PCO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance

COR – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and assures proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the contractor deems may affect contract price, terms or conditions shall be referred to the PCO for action.

6.

Methods of QA Surveillance a.

Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) – The market place for information technology, engineering, and management support services is very competitive. As such, the successful offeror has a vested interest in the Government generated CPARS rating under this contract. Additionally, an evaluation using the CPARS format will be performed at the midpoint of each period of performance. This evaluation will be one determinant in exercising an option. The Government for this procurement will address the quality of product or service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management, and other important areas. As this information may affect future source selections throughout DoD, and the continuation of the order, the annual Government assessment will be used appropriately as an additional performance oversight and communication tool with the QASP.

b.

QASP - The below listed methods of surveillance shall be used by the COR in the technical administration of this QASP. In addition to the below instructions, the form to be used for documentation of quality assurance surveillance is the Surveillance Activity Checklist (SAC) provided herein.

7.

Surveillance

Enclosures (1), (2), and (3) sets forth the performance standards, incentives, and surveillance methods for the contractor and COR while enclosure (4) provides the checklist and means for the COR to document on a monthly basis the results of the surveillance and shall be provided to the Contracting Officer on a quarterly basis. Enclosure (5) provides the annual surveillance checklist for the COR’s annual assessment of overall contract performance utilizing CPARS.

8.

Documentation

In addition to providing quarterly reports to the PCO, the COR will maintain a complete Quality Assurance file. The file will contain copies of all reports, evaluations, recommendations, and any actions related to the Government’s performance of the quality assurance function, including the originals of the Quality Assurance Checklists (QAC). All such records will be maintained for the life of the TO. The COR shall forward these records to the PCO at termination or completion of the order.

9.

Enclosures

Enclosure (1) – Performance Based Quality Standards for Engineering and Technical Services Enclosure (2) - Data Performance Standards

Enclosure (3) - Incentives

Enclosure (4) - SAC Enclosure (5)- Annual Surveillance

ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES STANDARDS

SOW Task Description

- Attend /participate in meetings per the standard at least 95 percent of the time

DATA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Method/

Measure

INCENTIVES

The following incentives shall apply to performance under this order.

Incentives

See below.

(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for all ordering years

Ordering Year II

Not more than 2 of the measurement areas rated below “Satisfactory”. None of the measurement areas are rated below “Marginal”.

See below.

(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for all ordering years

See below.

(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for exercise of award term A.*

See below.

(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for exercise of award term B.*

See below.

(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for exercise of award term B.*

* The Government will not exercise option unless all regulatory requirements are met and the contractor meets the acceptable performance definition.

All SOW/CDRL tasks, including SOW/CDRL sub-tasks, will be assessed focusing on the following:

Quality of Product or Service – Assess the contractor’s effort to transform operational needs and requirements into an integrated solution. Areas of focus may include the planning and management of program tasks, the quality of support provided throughout all phases of contract execution, the integration of program management specialties, management of interfaces, and the management of a totally integrated effort of all program management concerns to meet cost, performance, and schedule objectives. Assess how successfully the contractor meets program quality.

Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to the required delivery schedule by assessing the contractor’s efforts during the assessment period that contribute to or effect the schedule variance. Also address significance of scheduled events discuss causes, and assess the effectiveness of contractor corrective actions.

Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost. Is the contractor experiencing cost growth or underrun? If so, discuss the causes and contractor-proposed solutions for the cost overruns. For contracts where task or contract sizing is based upon contractor provided person-hour estimates, the relationship of these estimates to ultimate cost should be assessed. In addition, the extent to which the contractor demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility, through the efficient use of resources in each work effort should be assessed.

Business Relations – Assess the timelines, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction.

Management – Assess the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met small/small disadvantage and women-owned business participation goals. Discuss the extent to which the contractor discharges its responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identifies and applies resources required to meet schedule requirements; assigns responsibility for tasks/actions required by contract; communicates appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner. Assess the contractor’s risk mitigation plans. If applicable, identify any other management areas that are unique to the contract.

Other areas – Assess additional evaluation areas unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere.

The evaluation ratings are as follows:

Exceptional – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task contain some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed reflect a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s actions appear or were ineffective.

SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY CHECKLIST

Monthly Surveillance:

The COR will perform a monthly assessment of Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management, and Other Areas as applicable utilizing the CPARS evaluation rating definitions listed in enclosure 3.

Measure

Other

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Monthly Summary of Ratings:

Quality

Schedule

Number of Exceptional

Number of Very Good

Number of Satisfactory

Number of Marginal

Number of Unsatisfactory

Cost Control

Business Relations

Management

Other Areas

Number of Unsatisfactory

Annual Surveillance:

The COR will perform an annual assessment of overall contract performance utilizing the CPARS evaluation rating definitions listed in enclosure 3 and the monthly summary of ratings. This annual assessment will occur at the midpoint of each period and cover the previous 12 months, except for the base period which will cover only the previous 6 months.

Measure

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY