Responses_to_Questions_N68335-15-R-0115.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N68335-15-R-0115
About this file
Responses to Questions 22 October 2015
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Responses_to_Questions_N68335-15-R-0115.docx | DOCX document | |
| Responses_to_Questions_N68335-15-R-0115.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_P1_Workforce_Qualifications.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_P2_Workforce_Hour_Matrix.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_P4_CLIN_Breakout_N68335-15-R-0115.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| QASP.doc | DOC document | |
| N68335-15-R-0115_DD254_signed.pdf | ||
| N68335-15-R-0115_Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRLs.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_P3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Responses to Questions N68335-15-R-0115
Question #1 received 1 October 2015
Does the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation under solicitation number N6833515R0115 contain requirements similar to a current contract?
If possible, please provide the current contract number.
Or, is this a new requirement for the government?
Answer #1
Yes, the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation under solicitation number N68335-15-R-0115 does contain requirements similar to the current contract, N00178-04-D-4089-4Y06.
Question #2 received 3 October 2015
Could you tell me who the incumbent is for this effort.
Answer #2
The incumbent for this effort is NDI Engineering Co.
Question #3 received 5 October 2015
Are you contemplating to have the award to one contractor, as a SBSA?
Answer #3
Yes
Question #4 received 6 October 2015
The solicitation N68335-15-R-0115 instructs Offerors, if required, to send Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment P3) to the ACO, PCO, and “Program Manager.” For a contract with no “Program Manager” but with a designated Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), would it be appropriate to send the Attachment P3 to the ACO, PCO, and COR?
Answer #4
Yes it would be appropriate to send to the COR.
Question #5 received 6 October 2015
The solicitation N68335-15-R-0115 in Section C says that IA Officer functions require a Top Secret clearance OR EQUIVALENT.
"In accordance with Navy policy, personnel performing the Information Assurance Officer function shall be United States citizens and shall be required to possess a TOP SECRET clearance or equivalent for specific labor categories (see Section L)."
In Section L, the Senior Information Assurance Software Engineer SHALL possess a Top Secret clearance.
"D. Clearance requirements:
In accordance with Navy policy, personnel performing the Information Assurance Officer function shall be United States citizens and shall possess a Top Secret clearance."
The Solicitation's DD254 specifies a SECRET level facility clearance.
Please clarify if the Senior Information Assurance Software Engineer must have a Top Secret clearance or may have TOP SECRET clearance equivalent?
Answer #5
The current IA requirement is that the person must have an SSBI security investigation which is the same investigation required for a Top Secret clearance. The Individual must have the equivalent of a Top Secret clearance wherein "equivalent" means he has successfully completed the Top Secret background investigation. A Top Secret clearance will not/would not be issued since the individual does not have an immediate need to access Top Secret information.
Question #6 received 14 October 2015
The solicitation N68335-15-R-0115 in Section L says:
The narrative shall include, but is not limited to, the elements of Section C, Statement of Work Paragraph 4.0, titled “Requirements” as follows: . . .
I believe that this is referring to:
Section C, Statement of Work, Paragraph 1.4 titled "Scope."
Please confirm that Work, Paragraph 4.0, Requirements, refers to Statement of Work, Paragraph 1.4, Scope?
Answer #6 Yes, the solicitation will be amended to reflect this change.
Question #7 received 8 October 2015
Does the government require resumes for all personnel who are proposed for the Technical Support Engineer/Technician Labor Category to cover 35,000 hours/yr i.e. some 18 resumes? Or would a lesser number of resumes e.g. 10 of the 18 demonstrate proposed capability?
Answer #7
The Government will accept six (6) resumes equivalent to 11,520 hours for the Technical Support Engineer/Technician Labor Category.
Question #8 received 8 October 2015
Given the Technical Support Engineer/Technician is a mix of talent, does the government have a minimum number of Engineers or a minimum number of Technicians expected in the proposal to be considered sufficient?
Answer #8
No.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .