Attachment 4_Past Performance Questionnaire V1.2.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Mission Engineering Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N65236-16-R-0026
Issued by
Department of the Navy Information Warfare Systems Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Mission Engineering, newest first.
File Type Posted
N65236-16-R-0026-0004.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026 CONFORM COPY.pdf PDF
Attachment 5_Amend 03 PRICING MODELV3.0.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Enclosure 1 Small Business Reserve Implementation for Task Orders.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026-0003.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026-0002.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 2_CAPABILITYMATRIX Amendment 1 V1.1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
28 NOV QAs_16R0026__ECC Posting 1st 40 questions 28Nov17 JS v1.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 6_SUBCONTRACTING PLAN MATRIX V1.1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1B_Ref Info Sheet - Summary Data.docx DOCX document
QAs_16R0026_12Oct17_ECC Posting 17Oct17.pdf PDF
Attachment 4_Past Performance Questionnaire V1.2.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 7 WAGE DETERMINATION.pdf PDF
QAs_16R0026_08Nov17_ECC Posting dtd 08 Nov 2017.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 5_PRICING MODELv1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1A_TS SCI Access Contract Ref Verification Form.docx DOCX document
QAs_16R0026_12Oct17_ECC Posting 17Oct17.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRLS.pdf PDF
Attachment 6_Subcontracting Plan Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2_CapabilityMatrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1D_Team Summary.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3_Small Business Participation.docx DOCX document
QAs_16R0026_29Sep17_ECC Posting.pdf PDF
Attachment 3_Small Business Participation_29 Sept 2017.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4_Past Performance Questionnaire_29 Sept 2017.docx DOCX document
N65236-16-R-0026_RFP draft_dtd 29 Sept 2017_clean sc_ECC Posting.pdf PDF
Attachment 1B_Ref Info Sheet - Summary Data_29 Sept 2017.docx DOCX document
N65236-16-R-0026_RFP draft_COMPARE version_dtd 11 MAY 2017 and 29 Sept 2017.pdf PDF
Attachment 1D_Team Summary_29 Sept 2017.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1C_Ref Info Sheet - Contract Specific Data_29 Sept 2017.docx DOCX document
N65236-16-R-0026-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - MEC PWS DRAFT V2.pdf PDF
Attachment 3_Small Business Participation V1.1.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026-0001.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 Small Business Reserve Implementation for Task Orders.pdf PDF
Market Research QA.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 6_SUBCONTRACTING PLAN MATRIX V1.1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CME QAs 41-115 as of 8 Dec 17 pdf.pdf PDF
Attachment 5_Amend 04 PRICING MODELV4.0.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1A, 1B, and 1C_draft_dated 06 June 2017.docx DOCX document
Market Research QA 2-22-17.pdf PDF
Market Research QA_1-18-17.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026 CYBER MISSION ENGINEERING DRAFT RFP DTD 11 MAY 2017.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0026 CYBER MISSION ENGINEERING DRAFT RFP DTD 1 MAY 2017.pdf PDF
RFI (SB Reserves) - 16-R-0026.pdf PDF
Sections L&M_draft_dated 06 June 2017.doc DOC document
Industry Day Attendees.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Market Survey - Mission Engineering Contract r3.docx DOCX document
Show all 50

Mission Engineering has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N65236-16-R-0026

ATTACHMENT 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
[N65236-16-R-0026]

Competition Sensitive

For Official Use Only
Page 1 of 4
SPAWAR Systems Center – Atlantic
[Lacey Flint], CODE22410

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT,

P.O. BOX 190022, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29419-9022

TO: AGENCY:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

PAST PERFORMANCE

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

b.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

c.) Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;

d.) Management or Business Relations - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;

e.) Management of Key Personnel - How long key personnel stayed on the contract, how well they managed their portion of the contract, the quality and relevancy of the products/services generated by key personnel.

f.) Small Business Subcontracting - Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, along with any other pertinent information, NOT LATER THAN 12 Dec 2017 to lacey.flint@navy.mil or elizabeth.norris@navy.mil . Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Respectfully,
Lacey C. Flint
Contract Negotiator
ATTACHMENT 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
N65236-16-R-0026
Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 2 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print)

Code

Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(d) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N65236-16-R-0026

4-1

ATTACHMENT 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

[N65236-16-R-0026]

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 3 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

4. MANAGEMENT OR BUSINESS RELATIONS:

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) The Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.

6. SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING: Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

4-3

ATTACHMENT 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

[N65236-16-R-0026]

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 4 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

4-4

File details come from the government source that posted it.